Comparative efficacy and tolerance study of azlocillin and carbenicillin in patients with cystic fibrosis: a double blind study

Intravenous antibiotics for pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is a multi-system disease characterised by the production of thick secretions causing recurrent pulmonary infection, often with unusual bacteria. Intravenous antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of acute deteriorations in symptoms (pulmonary exacerbations); however, recently the assumption that exacerbations are due to increases in bacterial burden has been questioned.

OBJECTIVES

To establish if intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis improve short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and ongoing trials registers.Date of last search of Cochrane trials register: 27 July 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials and the first treatment cycle of cross-over studies comparing intravenous antibiotics (given alone or in an antibiotic combination) with placebo, inhaled or oral antibiotics for people with cystic fibrosis experiencing a pulmonary exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors assessed studies for eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 40 studies involving 1717 participants. The quality of the included studies was largely poor and, with a few exceptions, these comprised of mainly small, inadequately reported studies.When comparing treatment with a single antibiotic to a combined antibiotic regimen, those participants receiving a combination of antibiotics experienced a greater improvement in lung function when considered as a whole group across a number of different measurements of lung function, but with very low quality evidence. When limited to the four placebo-controlled studies (n = 214), no difference was observed, again with very low quality evidence. With regard to the review's remaining primary outcomes, there was no effect upon time to next exacerbation and no studies in any comparison reported on quality of life. There were no effects on the secondary outcomes weight or adverse effects. When comparing specific antibiotic combinations there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. In the comparisons between intravenous and nebulised antibiotic or oral antibiotic (low quality evidence), there were no significant differences between groups on any measure. No studies in any comparison reported on quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of evidence comparing intravenous antibiotics with placebo is poor. No specific antibiotic combination can be considered to be superior to any other, and neither is there evidence showing that the intravenous route is superior to the inhaled or oral routes. There remains a need to understand host-bacteria interactions and in particular to understand why many people fail to fully respond to treatment.

Clinical features, survival rate, and prognostic factors in young adults with cystic fibrosis

The medical records of 142 patients with cystic fibrosis were reviewed. The patient group included 78 males and 64 females; three patients were black. Periods of observation ranged from two to 25 years (mean, 14.5 years). The analysis focused on clinical evaluation at age 18 years and included information gained at an earlier age. Evaluation at age 18 years was based on Shwachman and Kulczycki's (S-K) scoring system, Brasfield chest roentgenographic scoring system, pulmonary function measurements, height-adjusted weight percentile, sputum bacteriologic results, number of hospitalizations for treatment of pulmonary infections prior to the age of 18 years, time of onset of clubbing, and frequency of complications. There were no significant differences between the sexes in clinical features. Median survival from the time of diagnosis to the conclusion of the study period (1955 to 1984) was 22 years for females and 25 years for males (NS). Median length of survival beyond the age of 18 years was eight years for females and 12 years for males (NS). Stepwise logistic regression and Cox regression analysis applied to 11 variables identified the S-K clinical score at 18 years of age as the best predictor of survival to the age of 23 years. The median durations of survival after the age of 18 years for patients with clinical scores of 30 to 49, 50 to 64, and 65 to 75 at age 18 were five, seven and a half, and 12 years, respectively (p less than 0.0001). Low clinical score, low weight percentile, and Pseudomonas cepacia colonization of the lower respiratory tract at the age of 18 years indicated a poor prognosis. On the other hand, high clinical score, good weight percentile, and colonization with Staphylococcus aureus alone were likely to be found in patients with mild disease and an increased likelihood of long-term survival with preserved pancreatic function.