Comparative efficacy of five antibiotics on experimental airborne legionellosis in guinea-pigs

Treatment strategies for Legionella infection

Given the nonspecific clinical manifestations of Legionnaires' disease and the high mortality of untreated Legionnaires' disease, we recommend routine use of Legionella testing, especially the Legionella urinary antigen test, for all patients with community-acquired pneumonia. This includes patients with ambulatory pneumonia and hospitalized children. Legionella cultures should be more widely available, especially in hospitals where the drinking water is colonized with Legionella. Azithromycin or levofloxacin can be considered as first-line therapy. Other antibiotics including tetracyclines, tigecycline, other fluoroquinolones and other macrolides (especially clarithromycin) are also effective. The clinical response of quinolones may be somewhat more favorable compared to macrolides, but the outcome is similar. If the Legionnaires' disease is hospital-acquired, culturing of the hospital drinking water for Legionella is indicated.

Experimental models of pulmonary infection

Experimental models of pulmonary infection are being discussed, focused on various aspects of good experimental design, such as choice of animal species and infecting strain, and route of infection/inoculation techniques (intranasal inoculation, aerosol inoculation, and direct instillation into the lower respiratory tract). In addition, parameters to monitor pulmonary infection are being reviewed such as general clinical signs, pulmonary-associated signs, complication of the pulmonary infection, mortality rate, and parameters after dissection of animals. Examples of pulmonary infection models caused by bacteria, fungi, viruses or parasites in experimental animals with intact or impaired host defense mechanisms are shortly summarized including key-references.

In vitro extracellular and intracellular activities of clavulanic acid and those of piperacillin and ceftriaxone alone and in combination with tazobactam against clinical isolates of Legionella species

The activities of ceftriaxone, piperacillin, tazobactam, clavulanic acid, and combinations of ceftriaxone or piperacillin with tazobactam against 22 clinical Legionella isolates were measured by broth microdilution and macrodilution methods and in macrophages. The broth microdilution MICs that inhibited 90% of strains tested were 2 and 1 microgram/ml for ceftriaxone and tazobactam, respectively. Broth macrodilution MICs were 8 and 1 microgram/ml, respectively, for the two Legionella pneumophila strains tested with piperacillin and were 0.25 and 0.5 microgram/ml, respectively, for clavulanate. No significant intracellular anti-L. pneumophila activity was observed for ceftriaxone (32 micrograms/ml), piperacillin (32 micrograms/ml), tazobactam alone (16 micrograms/ml), clavulanate alone (2 micrograms/ml), or tazobactam in combination with ceftriaxone (ceftriaxone/tazobactam at 32/4 and 16/16 micrograms/ml) or piperacillin (32/4 micrograms/ml). Erythromycin (1 microgram/ml) was active against intracellular L. pneumophila in the same macrophage model of infection. It is very unlikely that tazobactam or clavulanate, alone or in combination with beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, will be effective for the treatment of Legionnaires' disease in humans.

Comparative postantibacterial activities of pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin against intracellular multiplication of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1

The inhibitory and postantibacterial activities of pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin against virulent Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 were evaluated in cell-free and cellular models. In the absence of macrophages (with the tissue culture medium alone), bacterial numbers remained unchanged at 24 h in the presence of 0.1 microgram of pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or ofloxacin per ml and 1.0 microgram of pefloxacin per ml, whereas they were reduced in the presence of 1.0 microgram of ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin per ml. Experiments to evaluate the postantibacterial effects of these drugs were therefore performed with concentrations of 0.1 microgram/ml. In the cell-free model, brief exposure (1 h) of bacteria to each antimicrobial agent resulted in a transient decrease in numbers followed by logarithmic growth. In the cellular model, all three drugs (at 0.1 and 1.0 microgram/ml) inhibited the intracellular multiplication of L. pneumophila. The intracellular postantibacterial effects of 0.1 microgram of pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin per ml, which were left in contact with L. pneumophila-infected human macrophages for 24 h, were evaluated at various times after removal of the drugs. Pefloxacin was found to exhibit a significant inhibitory effect at 72 h, whereas following the removal of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, rapid bacterial multiplication occurred, leading to the destruction of the macrophage monolayer within 48 h. Thus, while pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin all inhibited the multiplication of L. pneumophila in human monocyte-derived macrophages, only pefloxacin exhibited a prolonged postantibacterial effect.

WIN 57273 is bactericidal for Legionella pneumophila grown in alveolar macrophages

The in vitro antimicrobial activity of WIN 57273, a new quinolone antimicrobial agent, was determined for 21 Legionella strains, using broth macrodilution and agar dilution testing methods; ciprofloxacin and erythromycin were tested as well. Three different buffered yeast extract media were used for the agar dilution studies, two of which were made with starch rather than charcoal. Broth macrodilution susceptibility testing was performed with buffered yeast extract broth and two Legionella pneumophila strains. Antimicrobial inhibition of L. pneumophila growth in guinea pig alveolar macrophages was also studied, using a method able to detect bacterial killing. The MICs for 90% of the 21 strains of Legionella spp. grown on buffered charcoal yeast extract medium were 0.125 microgram/ml for WIN 57273, 0.25 microgram/ml for ciprofloxacin, and 1.0 micrograms/ml for erythromycin. These MICs were falsely high, because of inhibition of drug activity by the medium used. Use of less drug-antagonistic, starch-containing media did not support good growth of the test strains. The broth macrodilution MICs for two strains of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 were less than or equal to 0.03 microgram/ml for WIN 57273 and ciprofloxacin and 0.125 microgram/ml for erythromycin. WIN 57273, ciprofloxacin, and erythromycin all inhibited growth of L. pneumophila in guinea pig alveolar macrophages at concentrations of 1 microgram/ml, but only WIN 57273 prevented regrowth or killed L. pneumophila after removal of extracellular antimicrobial agent.

Pefloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Pefloxacin is a fluorinated quinolone that is structurally related to nalidixic acid. It can be administered both orally and intravenously, and has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-negative organisms and staphylococci. The pharmacokinetic profile of pefloxacin is characterised by high bioavailability after oral administration, a long half-life and good penetration of tissue and body fluids. Data from mainly non-comparative studies suggest that pefloxacin has the potential for use in a variety of serious or difficult-to-treat and nosocomially acquired infections in hospitalised and immunocompromised patients. Such infections have included respiratory tract, urogenital tract, and bone and joint infections, septicaemia and surgical infections, in addition to severe Gram-negative infections in neutropenic cancer patients. Pefloxacin demonstrates comparable efficacy with ampicillin combined with gentamicin in upper gynaecological tract infections, ceftazidime in nosocomially acquired Gram-negative infections and co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim + sulphamethoxazole) in uncomplicated urinary tract infections and typhoid fever. Although the place of pefloxacin in this new and expanding class of 4-quinolone antibacterial drugs has yet to be defined and it appears to be a well-tolerated and useful drug for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalised patients, further studies are awaited with interest for confirmation of these preliminary results.