The comparative in-vitro activity of ofloxacin

Mobile Genetic Elements of Vibrio cholerae and the Evolution of Its Antimicrobial Resistance

Vibrio cholerae (VC) is the causative agent of the severe dehydrating diarrheal disease cholera. The primary treatment for cholera is oral rehydration therapy (ORT). However, in case of moderate to severe dehydration, antibiotics are administered to reduce morbidity. Due to the emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) strains of VC routinely used antibiotics fail to be effective in cholera patients. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is encoded in the genome of bacteria and is usually acquired from other organisms cohabiting in the environment or in the gut with which it interacts in the gut or environmental niche. The antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) are usually borne on mobile genetic elements (MGEs) like plasmids, transposons, integrons and SXT constin. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) helps in the exchange of ARGs among bacteria leading to dissemination of AMR. In VC the acquisition and loss of AMR to many antibiotics have been found to be a dynamic process. This review describes the different AMR determinants and mechanisms of resistance that have been discovered in VC. These ARGs borne usually on MGEs have been recovered from isolates associated with past and present epidemics worldwide. These are responsible for resistance of VC to common antibiotics and are periodically lost and gained contributing to its genetic evolution. These resistance markers can be routinely used for AMR surveillance in VC. The review also presents a precise perspective on the importance of the gut microbiome in the emergence of MDR VC and concludes that the gut microbiome is a potential source of molecular markers and networks which can be manipulated for the interception of AMR in the future.

Multiple-Dose-Kinetics of Ofloxacin after Intraperitoneal Application in CAPD Patients

Pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin in plasma and peritoneal fluid were studied in 11 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Seven patients without peritonitis received 20 mg ofloxacin added to 2L dialysate i.p. every 6 h for one day only, while 4 patients with acute peritonitis were treated with this same dosage every 4 h for 3 days, then every 6 h for the next 7 days. Ofloxacin concentrations in plasma and dialysate were determined by HPLC.

After i.p. drug application there was a rapid elimination of ofloxacin from dialysate, this being significantly faster in patients with peritonitis as compared to those without. Likewise, the total amount lost from the first bag after a 3 h dwell was higher in the peritonitis group (84.7±1.5%; mean±SEM) than in the non-peritonitis group (75.6±2.1 %). Twenty-four h after start of ofloxacin treatment, the mean peritoneal fluid concentrations at the end of each exchange studied were all above 3 mg/L. In patients with peritonitis, plasma concentrations of ofloxacin rose to 0.94±0.05 mg/L after 24 h reaching a Cmax of 1.8±0.2 mg/L after a tmax of 84±23 h.lntraperitoneal administration of ofloxacin was well tolerated, and no local or systemic adverse events were observed. Peritonitis episodes that were caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis (3) and by E. coli (1) were cured in all patients.

Quinolone antibiotics

The quinolone antibiotics arose in the early 1960s, with the first examples possessing a narrow-spectrum of activity with unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties. Over time, the development of new quinolone antibiotics has led to improved analogues with an expanded spectrum and high efficacy. Nowadays, quinolones are widely used for treating a variety of infections. Quinolones are broad-spectrum antibiotics that are active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including mycobacteria, and anaerobes. They exert their actions by inhibiting bacterial nucleic acid synthesis through disrupting the enzymes topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase, and by causing breakage of bacterial chromosomes. However, bacteria have acquired resistance to quinolones, similar to other antibacterial agents, due to the overuse of these drugs. Mechanisms contributing to quinolone resistance are mediated by chromosomal mutations and/or plasmid gene uptake that alter the topoisomerase targets, modify the quinolone, and/or reduce drug accumulation by either decreased uptake or increased efflux. This review discusses the development of this class of antibiotics in terms of potency, pharmacokinetics and toxicity, along with the resistance mechanisms which reduce the quinolones' activity against pathogens. Potential strategies for future generations of quinolone antibiotics with enhanced activity against resistant strains are suggested.

Preparation and evaluation of ofloxacin-loaded palmitic acid solid lipid nanoparticles

The purpose of this study was to use solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) to improve the pharmacological activity of ofloxacin. Ofloxacin-loaded SLN were prepared using palmitic acid as lipid matrix and poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) as emulsifier by a hot homogenization and ultrasonication method. The physicochemical characteristics of SLN were investigated by optical microscope, scanning electron microscopy, and photon correlation spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetics was studied after oral administration in mice. In vitro antibacterial activity and in vivo antibacterial efficacy of the SLN were investigated using minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and a mouse protection model. The results demonstrated that the encapsulation efficiency, loading capacity, diameter, polydispersivity index, and zeta potential of the nanoparticles were 41.36% ± 1.50%, 4.40% ± 0.16%, 156.33 ± 7.51 nm, 0.26 ± 0.04, and −22.70 ± 1.40 mv, respectively. The SLN showed sustained release and enhanced antibacterial activity in vitro. Pharmacokinetic results demonstrated that SLN increased the bioavailability of ofloxacin by 2.27-fold, and extended the mean residence time of the drug from 10.50 to 43.44 hours. Single oral administrations of ofloxacin-loaded nanoparticles at 3 drug doses, 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 20 mg/kg, all produced higher survival rates of lethal infected mice compared with native ofloxacin. These results indicate that SLN might be a promising delivery system to enhance the pharmacological activity of ofloxacin.

Quinolones for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis

The most commonly sexually transmitted bacteria are Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. The quinolones ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin have been shown to have activity against both of these bacteria in vitro and in vivo. Ofloxacin is particularly well suited for the treatment of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis cervical infection, which can be considered the earliest manifestation of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Not only can ofloxacin be effectively used as a single agent, it is also useful in treating urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae. Although it has moderate activity against anaerobes in general, ofloxacin does have activity against the anaerobes commonly isolated from female patients with soft tissue pelvic infections. Thus, ofloxacin has the potential for being utilized to treat early salpingitis.

Quantitative structure-activity relationship model for prediction of genotoxic potential for quinolone antibacterials

Antibiotics are of concern because of their widespread usage, their potential role in the spread and maintenance of bacterial resistance, and because of the selection pressure on microbes. In this study, the genotoxic potential of 20 quinolone antibacterials, including 5 first-generation, 8 second-generation, and 7 third-generation quinolones, was determined. While all of the antibacterials studied showed genotoxic potential, the molar concentration for each antibacterial that produces 10% (EC10) of the maximum response of corresponding antibacterial ranged from 0.61 to 2917.0 nM, and was greatly dependent on chemical structures. A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) was established by applying a quantum chemical modeling method to determine the factors required for the genotoxic potential of quinolone antibacterials. The octanol-water coefficient (logP(ow)) adjusted bythe pH and energies of the highest occupied molecular orbital (epsilon(HOMO)) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (epsilon(LUMO)) were selected as hydrophobic and electronic chemical descriptors, respectively. The genotoxic potentials of quinolone antibacterials were found to be dependent on their logP(ow) and epsilon(HOMO), while the effects of epsilon(LUMO) on the genotoxic potentials could not be identified. The QSAR model was also used to predict the genotoxic potentials for 14 quinolone antibacterials, including 1 second-generation, 2 third-generation, and 11 fourth-generation quinolone antibacterials. A correlation between the genotoxic potentials and their minimal inhibition concentrations (MIC50) against Streptococcus pneumoniae from the literature for 18 quinolone antibacterials was observed, providing a potential method to estimate MIC50.

The fluoroquinolone antibacterials: past, present and future perspectives

The history of the development of the quinolones is described from the first quinolone, nalidixic acid, via the first 6-fluorinated quinolone norfloxacin, to the latest extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones. The structural modifications made to the basic quinolone and naphthyridone nucleus and to the side chains have allowed improvements to be made such that the next group of fluoroquinolones after norfloxacin, exemplified by ciprofloxacin, had high activity against gram-negative species and a number of atypical pathogens, good-to-moderate activity against gram-positive species and were well absorbed and distributed. These compounds have been successfully used in the clinic for a decade and the size of the market has risen in recent years to only a little less than that for penicillins and macrolides. Notwithstanding the broad spectrum of these compounds, defects became evident. The growth in understanding of structure activity relationships with fluoroquinolones has enabled the development of even better compounds. The targets in fluoroquinolone research during the last few years include: improvements in pharmacokinetic properties, greater activity against gram-positive cocci and anaerobes, activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, and improvements in activity against non-fermentative gram-negative species. The compounds developed in the recent years have fulfilled some but not all of these goals; improved bioavailability is one target achieved with most of the more recent compounds allowing for once-daily dosing. Gatifloxacin, moxifoxacin and trovafloxacin have all greatly improved the activity against gram-positive cocci, particularly pneumococci, and against anaerobes. They are not quite as active as ciprofloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae, and show no substantial improvements in activity against non-fermentative species. Clinafloxacin, gemifloxacin and sitafloxacin have even better activity against gram-positive cocci and are as active as ciprofloxacin against most gram-negatives, though gemifloxacin is less active than the other new compounds against gram-negative anaerobes. These three compounds do retain some activity against a number of ciprofloxacin-resistant species (gram-positive and gram-negative), but whether this activity will be adequate for clinical use is at present unclear. Both clinafloxacin and sitafloxacin contain a chloro substituent at position 8 of the quinolone nucleus. A halogen at this position in a number of compounds, though giving good activity, has also been associated with phototoxicity. Several fluoroquinolones have had to be withdrawn or strictly limited in their use post-marketing and in some cases no obvious relationship can be seen between the adverse effects and structural features, making this an area for urgent research.

A phase-II study of trovafloxacin for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis can cause an insidious, asymptomatic infection in both men and women. Trovafloxacin, a fluoronaphthyridone antibiotic related to the fluoroquinolones, has broad antibacterial activity that encompasses C. trachomatis.

GOAL OF STUDY

We designed a phase-II study to determine the efficacy and safety of trovafloxacin for chlamydial infections.

STUDY DESIGN

Four once-daily dosing regimens were used: 200 mg for 7 days, 200 mg for 5 days, 100 mg for 7 days, and 50 mg for 7 days.

RESULTS

Sixty-four men and 66 women were enrolled. Of the 73 bacteriologically evaluable patients, 20 received 200 mg for 7 days, 18 received 200 mg for 5 days, 14 received 100 mg for 7 days, and 21 received 50 mg for 7 days. Bacteriologic failure occurred in 1 patient (5%) in the 200-mg 7-day group, 2 patients (14%) in the 100-mg group, and 1 patient (5%) in the 50-mg group. No clinical failures were noted among the 30 C. trachomatis infected men with nongonococcal urethritis, although 1 patient had only improved at the final visit. Safety data were available from 119 patients. Of 86 patients receiving the three highest dosing regimens, 17 (20%) had at least one adverse event, judged treatment-related in only 9 (10 %). Of 33 patients receiving the lowest dose, 5 (15%) had an adverse event, three (9%) of which were considered treatment related. No adverse event was severe.

CONCLUSION

In doses ranging from 200 mg to 50 mg daily for a week and 200 mg daily for 5 days, trovafloxacin appears to be effective for chlamydial infections and is well tolerated.

Evaluation of the effects of ambroxol on the ofloxacin concentrations in bronchial tissues in COPD patients with infectious exacerbation

Infectious excerbations of COPD are generally due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus species, and other Gram-negative bacteria. Ofloxacin has potent activity against Gram-negative species but is less effective against Gram-positive species including Streptococcus pneumoniae. It has also been shown that the administration of ambroxol increases the concentration of some antibiotics in pulmonary tissues. The aim of the study was to determine whether ambroxol increases the bronchial tissue concentrations of ofloxacin to a level exceeding the MIC90 of the bacterial species less susceptible to ofloxacin. 24 patients with COPD were randomized in two groups. Drug regimens of ofloxacin alone (200 mg twice daily) or ofloxacin (200 mg twice daily)+ambroxol (30 mg thrice daily) were administered over 10 d. A fibroscopy was performed on day 10 with bronchial biopsies and broncho-alveolar lavage. At steady state, concentrations of drug in plasma and bronchial samples were assayed by HPLC with fluorometric detection. There was no significant difference in the bronchial levels of ofloxacin between the two groups; however, in alveolar cells, ofloxacin concentration was three times higher in the group with ambroxol. Ambroxol does not increase ofloxacin concentrations in bronchial tissue because high concentrations are already present in the lung.

Topical 0.3% ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin in treatment of bacterial keratitis: a new method for comparative evaluation of ocular drug penetration

AIMS

This study was designed to assess the relative corneal penetration of topical drops of three antibiotics and to relate those levels to minimum inhibitory concentrations for organisms associated with bacterial keratitis.

METHODS

Four drops of each of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin (0.3% topical ophthalmic preparations) were given to 12 patients undergoing corneal transplantation. After the recipient tissue was removed, corneal drug penetration was measured using high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Intracorneal concentrations of ofloxacin (geometric mean 0.81 mg kg-1) were significantly higher than both ciprofloxacin (0.60 mg kg-1; p = 0.048) and norfloxacin (0.54 mg kg-1; p = 0.012). Ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin concentrations did not differ significantly (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Review of the minimum inhibitory concentrations of the fluoroquinolones against ocular pathogens reveals that ciprofloxacin is more potent than ofloxacin against many bacteria; ofloxacin is in turn more potent than norfloxacin. These data favour the selection of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin rather than norfloxacin for the empirical treatment of corneal infection. The greater potency of ciprofloxacin offsets the superior penetration of ofloxacin. There is a need for improved clinical trial data concerning the use of fluoroquinolone eyedrops in ulcerative keratitis; some encouraging data are available for ciprofloxacin but not (in humans) for norfloxacin or ofloxacin.

Ocular penetration of topical ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin drops and their effect upon eyelid flora

A double blind, prospective study was undertaken to compare aqueous humour penetration of topical 0.3% norfloxacin and 0.3% ciprofloxacin and their effect upon normal eyelid flora in 39 patients undergoing cataract surgery. Lid swabs were taken before and after six 1 hourly applications of single drops of ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin given before surgery. Aqueous humour was aspirated at surgery and antibiotic concentration assayed using high performance liquid chromatography. The mean aqueous humour concentrations were: ciprofloxacin 220 ng ml-1, norfloxacin 140 ng ml-1. Although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.112) the trend demonstrated may be relevant clinically, especially considering the greater activity of ciprofloxacin. Both coagulase negative staphylococcal (p = 0.004) and total bacterial (p = 0.019) lid counts dropped sixfold after ciprofloxacin treatment but the smaller reductions noted after norfloxacin application did not achieve statistical significance (p > 0.1). The reduction of external eye flora experienced with ciprofloxacin suggests that this may be a useful presurgical prophylactic agent.

Aqueous humor penetration of ofloxacin given by various routes

We studied the aqueous humor penetration of ofloxacin after topical, oral, and intravenous administration in 51 consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery. Aqueous humor concentration (mean +/- SD) was 0.53 +/- 0.35 mg/l when ofloxacin 0.3% eyedrops were instilled topically six times, one drop every three hours, until 90 minutes preoperatively, and 0.63 +/- 0.29 mg/l (P = .45) when two additional instillations were made, one drop every 30 minutes, until 30 minutes before aqueous humor aspiration. Aqueous humor concentration two hours after a single 200-mg oral dose (0.38 +/- 0.15 mg/l) was significantly lower (P = .048) than that 12 hours after the same oral dose (0.58 +/- 0.24 mg/l). Two hours following an intravenous infusion of 200 mg of ofloxacin, aqueous humor concentration was 0.33 +/- 0.19 mg/l. Our results suggest that therapeutic levels above the minimum inhibitory concentration for many bacteria cultured in endophthalmitis can be achieved in aqueous humor after either topical or oral administration, which indicates that this antibiotic passes easily through the corneal and the blood aqueous barriers.

Use of the quinolones for the prophylaxis and therapy of infections in immunocompromised hosts

The prevention and treatment of infections are major issues of supportive care in patients with haematological malignancies. Because of their broad antimicrobial activity, the use of fluoroquinolones for prophylaxis in neutropenic patients has been extensively studied. In comparison with placebo, norfloxacin reduces the incidence of Gram-negative infections, whereas Gram-positive bacterial and fungal infections remain unaffected. Ofloxacin and enoxacin also bacterial and fungal infections remain unaffected. Ofloxacin and enoxacin also produce a reduction in fever and documented infections. In randomized studies comparing ciprofloxacin with cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) plus colistin (each in combination with nonabsorbable antifungal agents), conflicting results were obtained. The incidence of documented Gram-negative bacterial infections was markedly reduced by ciprofloxacin prophylaxis; however, the number of Gram-positive infections may increase dramatically. Combining ciprofloxacin with a macrolide antibiotic in an attempt to prevent streptococcal infections can result in breakthrough bacteraemias due to resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Empirical antimicrobial therapy after quinolone prophylaxis should also be directed against microorganisms susceptible to quinolones, since sustained eradication by oral administration cannot be assumed with certainty. Clinical trials comparing intravenous quinolones in combination with aminoglycosides with widely used standard regimens for the treatment of infections in cancer patients indicate equivalent efficacy; however, in studies of ciprofloxacin alone, response rates were significantly lower compared with standard combinations. Therefore, quinolone monotherapy as empirical treatment in febrile neutropenic patients cannot be recommended.

Quinolones in sexually transmitted diseases

The role of quinolones in the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases is assessed. Little is known of their activity against Treponema pallidum. These compounds are all highly active against Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and have produced good in vivo results with a single dose. Only the more recent compounds show useful antichlamydial activity in vitro. Clinical trials with ofloxacin demonstrate the efficacy of a single daily dose for 7 days for chlamydial genital infection in men and women. Results for treatment of bacterial vaginosis have so far been disappointing. Ciprofloxacin and fleroxacin are effective for chancroid. The potential for treating pelvic inflammatory disease with new quinolones is discussed.

Comparison of ofloxacin and metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis

The efficacy and safety of ofloxacin, 200 mg twice daily for 7 days, was compared with metronidazole, 400 mg twice daily for 7 days, for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). Diagnosis of BV was confirmed by at least 3 of the following 4 criteria: the presence of an abnormal vaginal discharge on examination, clue cells on microscopy of vaginal specimens, vaginal pH greater than 5.0 and a positive amine test. Vaginal specimens were examined for Mobiluncus spp, analysed for the succinate/lactate (S/L) ratio and cultured for Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Bacteroides spp. and Mycoplasma hominis. Patients were reviewed on completion of treatment (visit 2) and 14 days later (visit 3). The diagnosis of BV was accepted in 119 of 149 patients recruited, 60 of whom received treatment with ofloxacin and 59 received metronidazole. Sixty-two patients, 31 in each treatment group, completed the study. Diagnostic cure at visit 2 was significantly better in the metronidazole group with cure rates of 56% (metronidazole) vs 23% (ofloxacin) (P = 0.001); this was associated with higher eradication rates for G. vaginalis (100% vs 56%) and Bacteroides spp. (97% vs 49%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical cure at either visit 2 or 3 or in diagnostic cure at visit 3. Both treatments were well tolerated. We conclude that metronidazole is likely to remain the first choice of treatment for BV but ofloxacin offers a safe and effective alternative.

Safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

In two multicenter trials, lomefloxacin and cefaclor were compared as treatments for acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. In total, 522 adult outpatients were enrolled at 50 centers in the United States. Patients were randomized to treatment groups receiving either 400 mg lomefloxacin orally once daily (n = 259) or 250 mg cefaclor every 8 hours (n = 263) for 7-10 days. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, severity of exacerbation, smoking history, theophylline use, and baseline pathogens. The most common baseline pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae, found in 32% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and in 29% in the cefaclor group, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13% and 16%, respectively), Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis (12% and 13%), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (10% in both groups). Bacterial eradication rates 1-4 days after the completion of treatment for all patients with baseline pathogens were 81.8% in the lomefloxacin group and 62.7% in the cefaclor group (p less than 0.001). Clinical success (disappearance or improvement of presenting signs and symptoms) was noted in 80.0% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and 64.7% in the cefaclor group (p = 0.002). Eradication rates for the subgroup of patients who had pathogens susceptible in vitro to both study drugs and who completed treatment were 97.1% for lomefloxacin and 84.6% for cefaclor (p = 0.002). Clinical success rates in this subgroup were 92.4% for lomefloxacin and 90.1 for cefaclor (p = 0.585). Treatment-related adverse events were reported for 7% of patients in the lomefloxacin group and 5% in the cefaclor group. The most common adverse events in both groups were nausea and diarrhea. Six patients were withdrawn from treatment with lomefloxacin and four from the cefaclor group because of adverse events. There was no clinical or laboratory evidence of theophylline interaction with either treatment. Once-daily oral administration of 400 mg lomefloxacin was an effective, well-tolerated alternative to 250 mg of cefaclor three times daily in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Ofloxacin clinical pharmacokinetics

Ofloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone with a spectrum of activity similar to other fluoroquinolones with activity which includes Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycobacterium spp., Mycoplasma spp. and Legionella pneumophila. Through its additional mechanisms of action, ofloxacin may be less susceptible to the development of resistance from Staphylococcus aureus commonly seen with currently available fluoroquinolones. The impact of these findings cannot be evaluated without further clinical experience. The pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin are characterised by almost complete bioavailability (95 to 100%), peak serum concentrations in the range of 2 to 3 mg/L after a 400mg oral dose and an average half-life of 5 to 8h. In comparison with other available quinolones, elimination is more highly dependent on renal clearance, which may lead to more frequent dosage adjustments in patients with impaired renal function. Ofloxacin appears less likely to affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs (e.g. theophylline) which commonly interact with fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin and enoxacin. The properties of ofloxacin make it a therapeutic alternative to currently available fluoroquinolones.

Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria isolated from intra-abdominal infections to ofloxacin and interaction of ofloxacin with metronidazole

The in vitro activities of ofloxacin alone and in combination with metronidazole against 177 anaerobic bacteria isolated from intra-abdominal infections, as determined by broth microdilution, showed that some Bacteroides fragilis strains were susceptible and that most other B. fragilis group species strains were resistant to ofloxacin. Isolates of other anaerobic species and genera, including those causing female genital tract disease, were generally susceptible to ofloxacin. Ofloxacin in combination with metronidazole usually showed an additive or indifferent interaction but no antagonism.

Quinolones in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by intracellular pathogens

Intracellular pathogens are inhibited to varying degrees, depending upon the strain of the organism and the quinolone tested. Quinolones achieve levels in the lower respiratory tract that equal or exceed serum concentrations, and they also achieve good intracellular concentrations. Experimental models of intracellular infection have demonstrated the efficacy of ciprofloxacin, difloxacin, fleroxacin, ofloxacin and pefloxacin. Animal models of experimental legionellosis have confirmed in vivo their efficacy in this field. Thus, quinolones appear to be a safe and efficacious alternative treatment in lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) due to intracellular pathogens. Considering the in vitro and experimental studies, quinolones should play an important role in the treatment of LRTI caused by intracellular pathogens, and prospective controlled studies are strongly recommended.

Pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities of quinolones in combination with clindamycin, metronidazole, and ornidazole

To enhance the antimicrobial spectrum of the quinolones against anaerobic organisms and gram-positive bacteria, we investigated in two studies the parenteral combinations of ciprofloxacin (200 mg) and ofloxacin (200 mg) with metronidazole (500 mg) or clindamycin (600 mg) and the oral combinations of enoxacin (400 mg) and fleroxacin (400 mg) with metronidazole (400 mg), clindamycin (300 mg), or ornidazole (500 mg) (only with fleroxacin). The pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities (SBAs) against 5 aerobic and 2 anaerobic species (total, 58 strains) were determined in two groups of 10 healthy volunteers by using a randomized crossover study design. The additions of metronidazole, clindamycin, and ornidazole did not affect the pharmacokinetics of the quinolones. The combination of clindamycin with ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and, to a lesser extent, fleroxacin resulted in an increase of the SBA against gram-positive strains (mean peak titers): Staphylococcus aureus, ciprofloxacin alone, 1:5.5; ciprofloxacin-clindamycin, 1:19.9; ofloxacin alone, 1:3.6; ofloxacin-clindamycin, 1:17.5; fleroxacin alone, 1:4.3; fleroxacin-clindamycin, 1:8.1; Streptococcus pneumoniae (fleroxacin and enoxacin were not tested), ciprofloxacin alone, 1:2.0; ciprofloxacin-clindamycin, 1:53; ofloxacin alone, 1:2.6; and ofloxacin-clindamycin, 1:49.2. The high SBA of quinolones against gram-negative bacteria was not affected by the combinations; however, relatively low activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa were detected. In general, against anaerobic bacteria, low bactericidal activities were determined in both studies (mean peak titers ranged from 1:2.1 to 1:3.1; mean trough titers range from 1:2.0 to 1:2.9). In clinical settings with severe mixed infections, a parenteral therapy consisting of modern quinolones together with clindamycin or imidazole derivatives seems to be active and offers no obvious interactions.

A review of the antimicrobial activity of the fluoroquinolones

The evolution of the fluoroquinolones is described, and structure-activity relationships outlined. The in-vitro antimicrobial activities of ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin and pefloxacin against a wide range of organisms are critically reviewed. In-vitro factors influencing fluoroquinolone activity are discussed. Reports of the acquisition of resistance to the fluoroquinolones are evaluated. Finally, possible future directions for this group of antibiotics are discussed.

Ofloxacin: a review

Ofloxacin is a new fluorinated quinolone antibiotic with a broad spectrum of activity against a variety of gram-positive and -negative bacteria including Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In addition, ofloxacin has significant activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis and this may give rise to new indications for the class of quinolone antibiotics. Clinical trials to date have demonstrated the efficacy of ofloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and sexually transmitted diseases. Adverse effects to ofloxacin are usually mild and include gastrointestinal, central nervous system, and hypersensitivity reactions. Significant drug interactions with ofloxacin have not been reported.