A double-blind, randomized study assessing the equivalence of valacyclovir 1000 mg once daily versus 500 mg twice daily in the episodic treatment of recurrent genital herpes. Genival Study Group

Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Acyclovir in Oncologic Pediatric Patients

Background: Acyclovir represents the first-line prophylaxis and therapy for herpes virus infections. However, its pharmacokinetics in children exposes them to the risk of ineffective or toxic concentrations. The study was aimed at investigating the population pharmacokinetics (POP/PK) of intravenous (IV) acyclovir in oncologic children.

Methods: Patients (age, 8.6 ± 5.0 years, 73 males and 47 females) received IV acyclovir for prophylaxis (n = 94) and therapy (n = 26) under a therapeutic drug monitoring (i.e., minimum and maximal plasma concentrations, >0.5 and <25 mg/L, respectively). Plasma concentrations were fitted by nonlinear mixed effect modeling and a simulation of dosing regimens was performed. Findings were stratified according to an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) threshold of 250 ml/min/1.73 m².

Results: The final 1-compartment POP/PK model showed that eGFR had a significant effect on drug clearance, while allometric body weight influenced both clearance and volume of distribution. The population clearance (14.0 ± 5.5 L/h) was consistent across occasions. Simulation of standard 1-h IV infusion showed that a 10-mg/kg dose every 6 h achieved target concentrations in children with normal eGFR (i.e., ≤250 ml/min/1.73 m²). Increased eGFR values required higher doses that led to an augmented risk of toxic peak concentrations. On the contrary, simulated prolonged (i.e., 2 and 3-h) or continuous IV infusions at lower doses increased the probability of target attainment while reducing the risk of toxicities.

Conclusion: Due to the variable pharmacokinetics of acyclovir, standard dosing regimens may not be effective in some patients. Prospective trials should confirm the therapeutic advantage of prolonged and continuous IV infusions

Feasibility of Continuous Infusions of Acyclovir

Current guidelines for severe herpes simplex virus infection recommend 21 days of intravenous therapy. The thrice-daily administration of intravenous acyclovir makes it challenging to deliver as outpatient therapy. We describe 2 cases with confirmed or presumed neonatal herpes simplex virus encephalitis treated with acyclovir administered as a continuous-infusion at home and review the pharmacologic and clinical evidence for continuous infusions of acyclovir.

Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper

Purpose

This Position Paper aims to review and discuss the available data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antibacterials, antifungals and antivirals in critically ill adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This Position Paper also provides a practical guide on how TDM can be applied in routine clinical practice to improve therapeutic outcomes in critically ill adult patients.

Methods

Literature review and analysis were performed by Panel Members nominated by the endorsing organisations, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic and Critically Ill Patient Study Groups of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), International Association for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC). Panel members made recommendations for whether TDM should be applied clinically for different antimicrobials/classes.

Results

TDM-guided dosing has been shown to be clinically beneficial for aminoglycosides, voriconazole and ribavirin. For most common antibiotics and antifungals in the ICU, a clear therapeutic range has been established, and for these agents, routine TDM in critically ill patients appears meritorious. For the antivirals, research is needed to identify therapeutic targets and determine whether antiviral TDM is indeed meritorious in this patient population. The Panel Members recommend routine TDM to be performed for aminoglycosides, beta-lactam antibiotics, linezolid, teicoplanin, vancomycin and voriconazole in critically ill patients.

Conclusion

Although TDM should be the standard of care for most antimicrobials in every ICU, important barriers need to be addressed before routine TDM can be widely employed worldwide.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06050-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prospective, Controlled Study of Acyclovir Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients

The current recommendations for intravenous (i.v.) acyclovir dosing in obese patients suggest using ideal body weight (IBW) rather than total body weight (TBW). To our knowledge, no pharmacokinetic analysis has validated this recommendation. This single-dose pharmacokinetic study was conducted in an inpatient oncology population. Enrollment was conducted by 1:1 matching of obese patients (>190% of IBW) to normal-weight patients (80 to 120% of IBW). All patients received a single dose of i.v. acyclovir, 5 mg/kg, infused over 60 min. Consistent with current recommendations, IBW was used for obese patients and TBW for normal-weight patients. Serial plasma concentrations were obtained and compared. Seven obese and seven normal-weight patients were enrolled, with mean body mass indexes of 45.0 and 22.5 kg/m(2), respectively. Systemic clearance was substantially higher in the obese than normal-weight patients (mean, 19.4 ± 5.3 versus 14.3 ± 5.4 liters/h; P = 0.047). Area under the concentration-time curve was lower in the obese patients (15.2 ± 2.9 versus 24.0 ± 9.4 mg · h/liter; P = 0.011), as was maximum concentration (5.8 ± 0.9 versus 8.2 ± 1.3 mg/liter; P = 0.031). Utilization of IBW for dose calculation of i.v. acyclovir in obese patients leads to lower systemic exposure than dosing by TBW in normal-weight patients. While not directly evaluated in this study, utilization of an adjusted body weight for dose determination appears to more closely approximate the exposure seen in normal-weight patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01714180.).

Oral antiviral therapy for prevention of genital herpes outbreaks in immunocompetent and nonpregnant patients

BACKGROUND

Genital herpes is caused by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) or 2 (HSV-2). Some infected people experience outbreaks of genital herpes, typically, characterized by vesicular and erosive localized painful genital lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of three oral antiviral drugs (acyclovir, famciclovir and valacyclovir) prescribed to suppress genital herpes outbreaks in non-pregnant patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the search portal of the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and pharmaceutical company databases up to February 2014. We also searched US Food and Drug Administration databases and proceedings of seven congresses to a maximum of 10 years. We contacted trial authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected parallel-group and cross-over randomized controlled trials including patients with recurrent genital herpes caused by HSV, whatever the type (HSV-1, HSV-2, or undetermined), with at least four recurrences per year (trials concerning human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients or pregnant women were not eligible) and comparing suppressive oral antiviral treatment with oral acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir versus placebo or another suppressive oral antiviral treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected eligible trials and extracted data. The Risk of bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. Treatment effect was measured by the risk ratio (RR) of having at least one genital herpes recurrence. Pooled RRs were derived by conventional pairwise meta-analyses. A network meta-analysis allowed for estimation of all possible two-by-two comparisons between antiviral drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 26 trials (among which six had a cross-over design) were included. Among the 6950 randomly assigned participants, 54% (range 0 to 100%) were female, mean age was 35 years (range 26 to 45.1), and the mean number of recurrences per year was 11 (range 6.3 to 17.8). Duration of treatment was two to 12 months. Risk of bias was considered high for half of the studies and unclear for the other half. A total of 14 trials compared acyclovir versus placebo, four trials compared valacyclovir versus placebo and 2 trials compared valacyclovir versus no treatment. Three trials compared famciclovir versus placebo. Two trials compared valacyclovir versus famciclovir and one trial compared acyclovir versus valacyclovir versus placebo.We analyzed data from 22 trials for the outcome: risk of having at least one clinical recurrence. We could not obtain the outcome data for four trials. In placebo-controlled trials, there was a low quality evidence that the risk of having at least one clinical recurrence was reduced with acyclovir (nine parallel-group trials, n = 2049; pooled RR 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.58), valacyclovir (four trials, n = 1788; pooled RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.69), or famciclovir (two trials, n = 732; pooled RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.64). The six cross-over trials showed larger treatment effects on average than the parallel-group trials. We found evidence of a small-study effect for acyclovir placebo-controlled trials (adjusted pooled RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.75). In analyzing parallel-group trials by daily dose, no clear evidence was found of a dose-response relationship for any drug. In head-to-head trials, the risk of having at least one recurrence was increased with valacyclovir rather than acyclovir (one trial, n = 1345; RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.34) and was not significantly different from that seen with famciclovir as compared with valacyclovir (one trial, n = 320; RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.63).We included 16 parallel-arm trials in a network meta-analysis and we were unable to determine which of the drugs was most effective in reducing the risk of at least one clinical recurrence (after adjustment for small-study effects, pooled RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.11 for valacyclovir vs acyclovir; pooled RR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.49 for famciclovir vs acyclovir; and pooled RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.75 for famciclovir vs valacyclovir). Safety data were sought but were reported as total numbers of adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Owing to risk of bias and inconsistency, there is low quality evidence that suppressive antiviral therapy with acyclovir, valacyclovir or famciclovir in pacients experiencing at least four recurrences of genital herpes per year decreases the number of pacients with at least one recurrence as compared with placebo. Network meta-analysis of the few direct comparisons and the indirect comparisons did not show superiority of one drug over another.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ASP2151, a helicase-primase inhibitor, in a murine model of herpes simplex virus infection

ASP2151 (amenamevir) is a helicase-primase inhibitor against herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, and varicella zoster virus. Here, to determine and analyze the correlation between the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of ASP2151, we examined the PD profile of ASP2151 using in vitro plaque reduction assay and a murine model of HSV-1 infection. ASP2151 inhibited the in vitro replication of HSV-1 with a mean 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) of 14 ng/ml. In the cutaneously HSV-1-infected mouse model, ASP2151 dose dependently suppressed intradermal HSV-1 growth, with the effect reaching a plateau at a dose of 30 mg/kg of body weight/day. The dose fractionation study showed that intradermal HSV-1 titers were below the detection limit in mice treated with ASP2151 at 100 mg/kg/day divided into two daily doses and at 30 or 100 mg/kg/day divided into three daily doses. The intradermal HSV-1 titer correlated with the maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC(24h)), and the time during which the concentration of ASP2151 in plasma was above 100 ng/ml (T(>100)). The continuous infusion of ASP2151 effectively decreased intradermal HSV-1 titers below the limit of detection in mice in which the ASP2151 concentration in plasma reached 79 to 145 ng/ml. Our findings suggest that the antiviral efficacy of ASP2151 is most closely associated with the PK parameter T(>100) in HSV-1-infected mice. Based on these results, we propose that a plasma ASP2151 concentration exceeding 100 ng/ml for 21 to 24 h per day provides the maximum efficacy in HSV-1-infected mice.

Population pharmacokinetics of acyclovir in children and young people with malignancy after administration of intravenous acyclovir or oral valacyclovir

Acyclovir is effective in the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections. The aim of this study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of acyclovir observed following treatment with intravenous acyclovir and oral valacyclovir (valaciclovir) in young people with malignancy. Plasma acyclovir concentration-time data were collected from 43 patients (age range, 9 months to 20 years) who had been given multiple doses of acyclovir (5 mg/kg of body weight) and/or valacyclovir (10 mg/kg). Nonlinear mixed-effect modeling was employed to analyze acyclovir population pharmacokinetics and identify influential covariates. Simulations (n = 1,000) were conducted to explore the ability of the current doses to maintain acyclovir concentrations above the recommended 50% inhibitory concentration for HSV or VZV (0.56 mg/liter or 1.125 mg/liter, respectively) for more than 12 h. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination best described the acyclovir concentration-time data. The population mean estimates for clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V), absorption rate (k(a)), and bioavailability (F) were 3.55 liters/h, 7.36 liters, 0.63 h(-1), and 0.60, respectively. Inclusion of body weight and estimated creatinine CL (CL(CR)) in the final model reduced the interindividual variabilities in CL and V from 61% to 24% and from 75% to 36%, respectively. Simulations revealed that with the use of the current doses, maximal efficacy can be achieved in over 45% of patients weighing 25 to 50 kg and with CL(CR) levels of 2.0 to 4.0 liters/h/m(2), but only in a much smaller proportion of patients, with low weights (10 kg) and high CL(CR)s (5.5 liters/h/m(2)), suggesting that higher doses are required for this subgroup. This validated population pharmacokinetic model for acyclovir may be used to develop dosing guidelines for safe and effective antiviral therapy in young people with malignancy.

2-day versus 5-day famciclovir as treatment of recurrences of genital herpes: results of the FaST study

Background: The brief period of viral replication in recurrent genital herpes lesions suggests shorter therapeutic regimens may be as effective as standard 5-day courses. Objective: To demonstrate that a 2-day course of famciclovir 500 mg statim, then 250 mg twice daily was non-inferior to the standard 5-day course of 125 mg twice daily. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned either the 2-day or 5-day famciclovir course and initiated therapy within 12 h of onset of prodromal symptoms. They were instructed to complete daily questionnaires on herpes-related symptoms and functioning and to attend the clinic for assessment of healing 5.5 days after initiating therapy. Results: A total of 873 patients were randomised at least once and 1038 recurrences were treated. The proportion of evaluable recurrences with lesions present at 5.5 days was less in the 2-day arm (24%) than in the 5-day (28%) arm. The upper 97.5% confidence limit (CL) for this difference in favour of the 2-day arm was 2% in favour of the 5-day arm, well within the 10% predefined for non-inferiority. The upper 97.5% CL was similar in the intent-to-treat, evaluable and per-protocol recurrence populations and when adjusted for baseline differences (in gender, age, herpes history and HIV infection) or for clustering of recurrences within patients. Both treatments had similar side-effects; proportion of lesions aborted; time to next recurrence; patient-reported symptoms; and impact on daily functioning. Conclusions: The 2-day course was as safe and effective as the standard 5-day course and can only enhance patient convenience and compliance.

Genital herpes: antiviral therapy for symptom relief and prevention of transmission

The episodic and daily suppressive treatment of genital herpes is safe and effective with the currently available antiviral agents: acyclovir, valacyclovir and famciclovir. Clinical strategies for the comprehensive management of genital herpes simplex virus infections are recommended. Data from recent clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of shorter duration of therapy for recurrences and the use of antivirals for the prevention of transmission are reviewed in this article. The factors influencing the choice of therapy, such as cost, ease of dosing and acyclovir resistance are also discussed.

Genital herpes simplex virus infection in the adolescent: special considerations for management

Genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are increasingly common among adolescents. In developed countries, during the 1990s, adolescent HSV type 2 seroprevalence rates ranged from 4 to 30% depending on the population studied. The clinical diagnosis of genital herpes may be unreliable and laboratory testing is recommended. Aciclovir, valaciclovir, and famciclovir are three antiviral drugs that have proven efficacy in the treatment of genital herpes. These drugs can be used in the treatment of the first episode or for recurrent infections, or can be used long term to suppress recurrent infections. Once or twice daily administration regimens are preferable for adolescents for reasons of adherence, and because it avoids the need to take medication at school. Unproven remedies are used commonly and can be harmful. In addition to antiviral therapy, proper management of the adolescent with genital herpes should also include developmentally appropriate explanations of the diagnosis, treatment and potential complications, recommendations for symptomatic relief, screening for other sexually transmitted infections, and discussion of safer sexual practices. All adolescents should have follow-up visits to complete education and counseling and to assess compliance with antiviral therapy.

Successful treatment of an aciclovir-resistant herpes simplex type 2 infection with cidofovir in an AIDS patient

Management of the increasing frequency of aciclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections among immunocompromised human immunodeficiency virus-infected people demands additional treatment options. We report the case of a 38-year-old patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome who suffered from a perianal butterfly ulcer, which was HSV-2 positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. The ulcer appeared during treatment of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis with ganciclovir. Despite additional valaciclovir therapy the lesion gradually progressed in size. Investigations including histology, PCR analysis and in situ hybridization of a biopsy from the growing ulcer margin confirmed the presence of HSV-2 infection. Importantly, HSV isolates from this specimen were resistant to aciclovir. Based on a report about the successful treatment of aciclovir-resistant HSV infection with cidofovir, our patient received this drug intravenously at a dose of 5 mg kg-1 body weight once weekly for a total of 3 weeks. Concomitant oral probenecid and prehydration were administered to minimize nephrotoxicity. Within 30 days of treatment the ulcer had almost (> 95%) completely healed. We conclude that cidofovir is a potent antiviral drug with a potential usefulness in the treatment of aciclovir-resistant HSV-2 infection. It deserves further investigation in clinical trials.

Pharmacokinetics of oral acyclovir in neonates and in infants: a population analysis

Acyclovir is approved for the treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections in children by the intravenous and oral routes. However, its use by the oral route in children younger than 2 years of age is limited due to a lack of pharmacokinetic data. The objectives of the present study were to determine the typical pharmacokinetics of an oral suspension of acyclovir given to children younger than 2 years of age and the interindividual variabilities in the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters in order to support the proposed dosing regimen (24 mg/kg of body weight three times a day for patients younger than 1 month of age or four times a day otherwise). Children younger than age 2 years with HSV or VZV infections were enrolled in a multicenter study. Children were treated for at least 5 days with an acyclovir oral suspension. Plasma samples were obtained at steady state, before acyclovir administration, and at 2, 3, 5, and 8 h after acyclovir administration. Acyclovir concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. The data were analyzed by a population approach. Data for 79 children were considered in the pharmacokinetic study (212 samples, 1 to 5 samples per patient). Acyclovir clearance was related to the estimated glomerular filtration rate, body surface area, and serum creatinine level. The volume of distribution was related to body weight. The elimination half-life decreased sharply during the first month after birth, from 10 to 15 h to 2.5 h. Bioavailability was 0.12. The interindividual variability was less pronounced when the parameters were normalized with respect to body weight. Hence, dosage adjustment by body weight is recommended for this population. Simulations showed that the length of time that acyclovir remains above the 50% inhibitory concentration during a 24-h period was more than 12 h for HSV but not for VZV. The proposed dosing regimen seems adequate for the treatment of HSV infections, while for the treatment of VZV infections, a twofold increase in the dose seems necessary for children older than age 3 months.

Valaciclovir: a review of its long term utility in the management of genital herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus infections

Valaciclovir is an aciclovir prodrug used to treat infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella zoster virus, and for prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV). Oral valaciclovir provides significantly better oral bioavailability than oral aciclovir itself, contributing to the need for less frequent administration. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of long term (> 90 days) therapy with valaciclovir for the suppression of genital HSV disease in otherwise healthy individuals with HSV infection. In 1 randomised, double-blind trial, once daily valaciclovir (1000 mg, 500 mg and 250 mg) produced statistically significant suppression of disease recurrence, as did twice daily valaciclovir 250 mg and aciclovir 400 mg. Valaciclovir dosages of > or = 500 mg daily are recommended for suppression of genital herpes recurrences in immunocompetent individuals. This disease occurs frequently in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and, in a single randomised double-blind trial, prophylactic valaciclovir (1000 mg once daily or 500 mg twice daily) and aciclovir (400 mg twice daily) were found to be of similar efficacy in the suppression of genital herpes. However, a higher than expected dropout rate indicated that more studies of valaciclovir in patients with HIV are required. In a randomised trial of patients undergoing renal transplant, valaciclovir 2 g 4 times daily for 90 days significantly reduced the incidence and delayed the onset of CMV disease: the incidence in valaciclovir-treated patients who were CMV-seronegative at baseline, and recieived a kidney from a CMV-seropositive donor, was 3% versus 45% for placebo after 90 days of treatment. Acute graft rejection was also reduced in the valaciclovir-treated group. A small study in heart transplant patients compared valaciclovir (2 g 4 times daily) with aciclovir (200 mg 4 times daily) and found a significant reduction in CMV antigenaemia favouring valacilovir at the end of the treatment period. Additional reductions in other indices of CMV in those given valaciclovir compared with aciclovir were also noted. In a preliminary study of prophylaxis for CMV disease in bone marrow transplant recipients valaciclovir (2 g 4 times daily) was superior to aciclovir (800 mg 4 times daily) in terms of time to CMV viraemia or viruria. Although valaciclovir (8 g/day for approximately 30 weeks) reduced the incidence and time to CMV disease compared with aciclovir (3.2 g/day) in patients with advanced HIV disease, valaciclovir was associated with more gastrointestinal complaints and an increased risk of death, leading to premature termination of the study. As yet, no trials comparing the efficacy of valaciclovir with famciclovir (the oral prodrug for penciclovir) in the suppression of recurrent episodes of genital herpes have been published, nor have direct comparisons been made, between valaciclovir with ganciclovir in patients with CMV disease. Valaciclovir is well tolerated at dosages used to suppress recurrent episodes of genital herpes (500 to 1000 mg/day) in immunocompetent and HIV seropositive individuals, with headache being reported most often. However, a potentially fatal thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)-like syndrome has been reported in some immunocompromised patients receiving high-dose prophylactic valaciclovir therapy (8 g/day) for CMV disease for prolonged periods, and the risk of this syndrome appears to be higher in patients with advanced HIV disease. While the clinical benefits of valaciclovir in some immunocompromised patients may outweigh the risk of TMA, close monitoring for symptoms of TMA is indicated in all immunocompromised patients receiving high-dose valaciclovir.

CONCLUSION

Oral valaciclovir is an effective drug for the suppression of recurrent episodes of genital herpes in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)