Comparison of a 5 day regimen of cefdinir with a 10 day regimen of cefprozil for treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Study of drug utilization pattern for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients attending a government hospital in kerala, India

Objective:

Drug utilization studies are powerful exploratory tools to ascertain the role of drugs in society. This study was conducted to establish the drug utilization pattern and the common adverse drug reactions for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in one of the government hospitals in Kerala, India.

Methods:

This was a prospective observational study aimed at recognizing the drug utilization pattern for the treatment of acute exacerbation of COPD for 7-day under nonexperimental settings. All information significant to the study was collected from the case records and discussions conducted with the inpatients and bystanders during ward rounds, with the support of a physician. Moreover, daily follow-ups were conducted to assemble data on amendment in therapy, add-on therapy, and clinical improvement until the patient was discharged from the hospital or to an upper limit of 7-day, whichever is earlier.

Results:

All the patients in this study received combination therapy. Among the inhalational β-agonists, salbutamol accounted for 74% use. Parenteral steroids were used in 78% of the patients and all of them received hydrocortisone. Steroid inhalers were used only in 25% of the patients. Anticholinergics were used in 77.5% of patients. Antibiotics were used in 86.7% patients. The main adverse effects noted were dry mouth (15%) and bad taste (10%) and these adverse effects were highly correlated with the use of anticholinergics (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Despite the use of drugs according to the availability and physician's preference, it was found in the analysis that majority were in accordance with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria recommendations.

Cefdinir: an oral cephalosporin for the treatment of respiratory tract infections and skin and skin structure infections

Cefdinir is an oral third-generation cephalosporin (also known as an advanced-spectrum or generation cephem) with good in vitro activity against the pathogens responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections. The drug distributes very well in respiratory tract tissues and fluids, as well as skin blisters and ear fluids; its pharmacokinetic profile allows once- or twice-daily administration. Oral cefdinir 300 mg twice daily or 600 mg once daily in adults and adolescents, or 14 mg/kg/day in one or two daily doses in pediatric patients, administered for 5 or 10 days, has shown good clinical and bacteriological efficacy, at least equivalent to that of other oral agents in randomized controlled trials conducted in patients with community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, sinusitis, acute otitis media, pharyngitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections. Cefdinir is well tolerated and the oral suspension has shown superior taste or palatability over other comparator oral antimicrobial agents. Thus, cefdinir continues to represent an important cephalosporin option for the treatment of adult, adolescent and pediatric patients with mild or moderate respiratory tract or cutaneous infections, especially in areas with elevated rates of beta-lactamase production in Haemophilus influenzae and where resistance to other commonly used agents has emerged (e.g., macrolides, penicillins, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole).

Role of oral extended-spectrum cephems in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

Risk stratification is the recommended approach for treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) to optimize the chances of clinical success. The suggested oral therapy for "simple or uncomplicated" AECB, which is predominantly a result of infection due to Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, includes advanced macrolides and 2nd- or 3rd-generation cephalosporins, in addition to the older 1st-line agents (aminopenicillins, doxycycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and erythromycin). In light of increasing resistance of H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae to the older agents, the specific directed structural modification of the cephalosporin nucleus resulted in the development of extended-spectrum 3rd-generation oral cephems with enhanced beta-lactamase stability and improved activity against Gram-positive pathogens (penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae and oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus). Analysis of results of double-blind randomized clinical trials assessing efficacy of the extended-spectrum oral cephems published since 2000 demonstrates that both cefdinir and cefditoren have similar point estimates of success in comparison to their comparators (cefuroxime, cefprozil, or Locarbacef), when either the clinical cure or the bacteriologic response was analyzed. Thus, oral extended-spectrum 3rd-generation cephems, which retain antimicrobial efficacy against the traditional respiratory pathogens despite changing resistance patterns, offer excellent coverage against the key pathogens involved in simple or uncomplicated AECB.

Role for 5-day, once-daily extended-release clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

BACKGROUND

Clarithromycin is commonly dosed for 7 or more days in patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). Studies with other antibiotics have shown equivalent efficacy, reduced/similar frequency of adverse events, improved adherence and patient satisfaction, and lower treatment costs with a shorter treatment course.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population was derived from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind (North America)/single-blind (France) comparative trials in which outpatients at least 35 years old with a presumptive diagnosis of obstructive ABECB were randomized to receive clarithromycin extended-release (ER) 1000 mg once daily for 5 days or a comparator agent--clarithromycin immediate-release (IR) 500 mg twice daily for 7 days (in North America) or telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 days (in France).

RESULTS

A total of 818 patients were randomized (411 to clarithromycin ER and 407 to a comparator agent). The clinical cure rate in clinically evaluable patients at the follow-up visit was 90% each for the clarithromycin ER group (318/353) and the comparator group (318/355). The patient bacteriological cure rate and the overall target pathogen eradication rate in clinically and bacteriologically evaluable patients were each 92% for the clarithromycin ER group (155/168 and 189/205, respectively) and 93% for the comparator group (147/158 and 183/197, respectively) at the follow-up visit. The study drugs were generally well tolerated, with < 2% of patients discontinuing their treatment prematurely due to a drug-related adverse event. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 18% (73/411) in the clarithromycin ER group and 24% (97/407) in the comparator group. Clarithromycin ER-treated patients reported statistically significantly fewer episodes of abdominal pain than did patients treated with a comparator agent (0.2% vs. 1.7%, respectively; p = 0.037). This combined analysis is limited by differing blinding methods, comparator agents, and their duration of administration. Furthermore, many patients were excluded from the clinically and bacteriologically evaluable group due to lack of a pretreatment target pathogen.

CONCLUSION

A once daily, 5-day clarithromycin ER regimen appears to be a suitable choice for treating patients with ABECB.

Antibiothérapie des exacerbations de bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive : analyse critique des essais cliniques

OBJECTIVE

The authors had for aim to assess the role of antibiotics in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

Comparative antibiotic trials were collected through systematic search on Medline data base--well-designed studies were selected.

RESULTS

Eight equivalence studies were selected. No clear difference between antibiotics was demonstrated. The shortest treatment was as effective as the longest.

CONCLUSION

No antibiotic has demonstrated its superiority. A new generation of antibiotic comparative trials for exacerbation of COPD is clearly needed.

Role of infection and antimicrobial therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Over the past several years, the significance of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in patients with chronic airflow obstruction has become increasingly apparent due to the impact these episodes have on the natural history of disease. It is now known that frequent AECOPD can adversely affect a patient's health-related quality of life and short- and long-term pulmonary function. The economic burden of these episodes is also substantial. AECOPDs represent a local and systemic inflammatory response to both infectious and noninfectious stimuli, but the majority of episodes are likely related to bacterial or viral pathogens. Patients with purulent sputum and multiple symptoms are the most likely to benefit from treatment with antibiotics. Antibiotic choice should be tailored to the individual patient, taking into account the severity of the episode and host factors which might increase the likelihood of treatment failure. Current evidence suggests that therapeutic goals not only include resolution of the acute episode, but also prolonging the time to the next event. In the future, preventing exacerbations will likely become increasingly accepted as an additional therapeutic goal in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Clinical efficacy of newer agents in short-duration therapy for community-acquired pneumonia

Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most important respiratory tract pathogen implicated in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), is becoming increasingly resistant in vitro to the beta -lactams and macrolides, and fluoroquinolone resistance has been detected. A growing body of evidence suggests that prolonged antimicrobial use may contribute directly and indirectly to increased antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory pathogens. Long-term exposure to antimicrobial agents, especially less-potent agents, directly increases selection pressure for resistance. Indirectly, poor patient compliance, multiple daily dosing, and the increased risk of adverse events further complicate the resistance issue and diminish the efficacy of long-term antimicrobial use. Controlled clinical trials addressing the appropriate duration of therapy for CAP are lacking. However, available data suggest that with appropriate antibiotic selection, based on appropriate spectrum, potency, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, lower respiratory tract infections in outpatients can be successfully treated in <7 days rather than the 7-14 days currently recommended.

Comparative efficacy of once daily, 5-day short-course therapy with clarithromycin extended-release versus twice daily, 7-day therapy with clarithromycin immediate-release in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of two clarithromycin regimens, extended-release (ER) 1000 mg once daily for 5 days and immediate-release (IR) 500 mg twice daily for 7 days, in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study of ambulatory patients at least 40 years old with a presumptive diagnosis of ABECB, purulent sputum, and documented evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) < 70% of predicted value. Clinical cure, bacteriological cure, and target pathogen eradication rates were determined at a test-of-cure visit (study days 14-40). Safety was assessed based on the incidence of study drug-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 485 patients were randomized (240 to ER and 245 to IR). Clinical cure rates were similar for evaluable patients treated with ER (84%, 157/187) and those treated with IR (84%, 172/204) (95% CI -7.9, 7.2). The bacteriological cure rates were 87% (82/94) and 89% (91/102), and the overall target pathogen eradication rates were 88% (107/122) and 89% (117/131) for the respective treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was 13% (31/240) in the ER group and 18% (45/245) in the IR group. The rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was lower with ER (8%, 19/240) compared to IR (11%, 26/245). Clarithromycin ER-treated patients reported statistically significantly fewer adverse events due to abnormal taste than did clarithromycin IR-treated patients (3% and 8%, respectively, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Both once-daily, 5-day, short-course therapy with clarithromycin ER and 7-day, twice-daily therapy with clarithromycin IR were effective in resolving clinical signs/symptoms of ABECB and eradicating the causative pathogens, with no statistically significant difference in clinical cure rate between the treatment groups. Clarithromycin ER was better tolerated, causing fewer gastrointestinal adverse events and statistically significantly fewer reports of abnormal taste as compared with clarithromycin IR.

Cefdinir: a review of its use in the management of mild-to-moderate bacterial infections

Cefdinir (Omnicef) is an oral third-generation cephalosporin with good in vitro activity against many pathogens commonly causative in community-acquired infections. The drug provides good coverage against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common respiratory tract pathogens. Cefdinir is stable to hydrolysis by commonly occurring plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases and retains good activity against beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. The drug distributes into various tissues (e.g. sinus and tonsil) and fluids (e.g. middle ear), and has a pharmacokinetic profile that allows for once- or twice-daily administration.Cefdinir, administered for 5 or 10 days, has shown good clinical and bacteriological efficacy in the treatment of a wide range of mild-to-moderate infections of the respiratory tract and skin in adults, adolescents and paediatric patients in randomised, controlled trials. In adults and adolescents, cefdinir is an effective treatment for both lower (acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis [ABECB], community-acquired pneumonia) and upper (acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, streptococcal pharyngitis) respiratory tract infections, and uncomplicated skin infections. Its bacteriological and clinical efficacy in patients with lower respiratory tract infections was equivalent to that of comparator agents (cefprozil [bacteriological only], loracarbef, cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor). In one trial in patients with ABECB, cefdinir produced a higher rate of clinical cure than cefprozil (95% CIs indicated nonequivalence). Cefdinir also produced good clinical and bacteriological responses equivalent to responses with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. In addition, it was at least as effective as penicillin V (phenoxymethylpenicillin) in streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and as effective as cefalexin in uncomplicated skin infections. In paediatric patients aged > or =6 months, cefdinir showed similar efficacy to that of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or cefprozil in acute otitis media, and cefalexin in uncomplicated skin infections. Cefdinir given for 5 or 10 days was at least as effective as penicillin V for 10 days in patients with streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Cefdinir is usually well tolerated. Diarrhoea was the most common adverse event in trials in all age groups. Although the incidence of diarrhoea in cefdinir recipients was generally higher than in adults and adolescents treated with comparators, discontinuation rates due to adverse events were generally similar for cefdinir and comparator groups. In conclusion, cefdinir is a third-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity encompassing pathogens that are commonly causative in infections of the respiratory tract or skin and skin structure. Depending on the infection being treated, cefdinir can be administered as a convenient once- or twice-daily 5- or 10-day regimen. Clinical evidence indicates that cefdinir is an effective and generally well tolerated drug with superior taste over comparator antibacterial agents and is therefore a good option for the treatment of adults, adolescents and paediatric patients with specific mild-to-moderate respiratory tract or skin infections, particularly in areas where beta-lactamase-mediated resistance among common community-acquired pathogens is a concern.

Short-course antimicrobial therapy of respiratory tract infections

Accumulating evidence suggests that short-course (</=5 days, </=3 days for azithromycin) antimicrobial therapy may be at least as effective as and, in some cases, may be more effective than traditional longer (10- to 14-day) therapies. In group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis, short-course therapy with 6 days of amoxicillin, 4-5 days of a variety of cephalosporins and 5 days of clarithromycin modified-release and telithromycin are all reasonable alternatives to traditional 10-day penicillin therapy. Short-course (i.e. 3-day) azithromycin therapy is not recommended because of suboptimal clinical and bacteriological results compared with penicillin therapy, unless the dosage is doubled from 10 to 20 mg/kg/day for all 3 days. In uncomplicated acute suppurative otitis media, single-dose intramuscular ceftriaxone or 3- to 5-day short-course oral antimicrobial therapy should be effective in the majority (>/=80%) of patients. However, more research is clearly needed in the subpopulations of children <2 years of age and in those with unresponsive/recurrent disease, since short-course therapy may not be successful in the majority of these patients. In sinusitis, most short-course therapy data have involved maxillary disease in adult patients. Regimens have included 3 days of azithromycin or cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) or 5 days of cefpodoxime, telithromycin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Preliminary results are encouraging but more study is clearly needed, especially in the paediatric population. In acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, short-course therapy with a variety of cephalosporins, second-generation fluoroquinolones and advanced generation macrolides/azalides/ketolides are all reasonable alternatives to traditional 7- to 14-day therapies. Cost containment in antimicrobial therapy should involve consideration of short-course therapy in the management of the most common types of respiratory tract infections.

Short-course therapy of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter comparison of extended-release versus immediate-release clarithromycin

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two clarithromycin formulations given for 5 days to patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of ambulatory patients between 40 and 75 years of age with a medical history of chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a presumptive diagnosis of ABECB who met Anthonisen Type 1 criteria (increased dyspnea, increased sputum volume and increased sputum purulence). Eligible patients received a 5-day course of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) 500 mg once daily or clarithromycin immediate-release (IR) 250 mg twice daily. Clinical cure, bacteriological cure and pathogen eradication rates were determined at the end of therapy and at a follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Clinical cure rates were similar at the test-of-cure visit for evaluable patients in the clarithromycin ER group (97%, 298/307) and clarithromycin IR group (98%, 300/307) (95% CI (-3.2, 1.9)). The bacteriological cure rate was 89% and the pathogen eradication rate was 90% in both treatment groups. Resolution or improvement in cough, sputum production, sputum volume and sputum appearance was observed in > 90% of evaluable patients in each treatment group. The incidence of study drug-related adverse events was 6.6% (23/351) in the clarithromycin ER group and 5.4% (19/352) in the clarithromycin IR group. The most frequently occurring study drug-related adverse events were abdominal pain, diarrhea and taste perversion.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin ER 500 mg once daily for 5 days is equivalent to clarithromycin IR 250 mg twice daily for 5 days in treating adults with ABECB. Both regimens were effective in resolving clinical signs and symptoms of ABECB and eradicating the target pathogens, and were well tolerated.

Cefdinir: an advanced-generation, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin

BACKGROUND

Cefdinir is an advanced-generation, broad-spectrum cephalosporin antimicrobial agent that has been approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, acute maxillary sinusitis, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, acute bacterial otitis media, and uncomplicated skin and skin-structure infections in adult and pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article was to review the in vitro antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, and potential role of cefdinir.

METHODS

Studies were identified by a MEDLINE search (January 1983-September 2001) of the English-language medical literature, a review of identified articles and their bibliographies, and a review of data on file with the manufacturer. Clinical efficacy data were selected from all published trials mentioning cefdinir. Information concerning in vitro susceptibility, safety, chemistry, and the pharmacokinetic profile of cefdinir also was reviewed.

RESULTS

Cefdinir has a broad spectrum of activity against many gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefdinir is stable to hydrolysis by 13 of the common beta-lactamases. It is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (mean time to peak plasma concentration, 3 hours) and is almost entirely eliminated via renal clearance of unchanged drug. The terminal disposition half-life of cefdinir is approximately 1.5 hours. Efficacy has been demonstrated in 19 clinical trials in adults and children with upper and lower respiratory tract infections (eg, pharyngitis, sinusitis, acute otitis media, acute bronchitis, acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia), and skin and skin-structure infections. The adverse-event profile is similar to that of comparator agents, although in 4 adult and adolescent studies and 1 adult study, diarrhea occurred significantly more frequently in cefdinir recipients than in recipients of penicillin V, cephalexin, cefaclor, and cefprozil.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefdinir is an alternative to other antimicrobial agents and can be dosed once or twice daily for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections and skin and skin-structure infections. Similar to other oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, cefdinir has activity against common pathogens of the respiratory tract and skin and is stable in the presence of selected beta-lactamases. The clinical choice of an oral expanded-spectrum cephalosporin will be based on patient acceptance, frequency of administration, and cost.

Randomized, double-blind study comparing 5- and 7-day regimens of oral levofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

A randomized, double-blind, multicentre study was conducted in adult patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), to compare the efficacy of a 5-day course of levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, with the standard 7-day regimen at the same dose. Five hundred and thirty-two patients from 48 centres in 10 countries were randomized to receive levofloxacin: 268 and 264 received the 5- and 7-day courses, respectively. The primary efficacy analysis was the clinical response at 7-10 days post-treatment in the per-protocol (PP) population. Clinical success rates in the primary PP analysis of 482 patients were 82.8% (197/238) for the 5-day group and 84.8% (207/244) for the 7-day group. The difference in success rates was -2.1% with a 95% CI of (-9.1 to 4.9%). The bacteriological response showed eradication rates of 82.1% (92/112) and 83.2% (84/101) in the 5- and 7-day groups, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated. These results show that for patients with AECB levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 5 days provides equivalent clinical and bacteriological success to the same dose given for 7 days irrespective of the patient's age, the frequency of exacerbations or the presence of co-existing cardiopulmonary or chronic obstructive airways disease.

Selection of clinical, patient-reported, and economic end points in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) places tremendous burden on patients, providers, employers, and health care systems.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to (1) review the clinical, patient-reported, and economic measures used to evaluate disease burden and treatment effectiveness in AECB in clinical trials and (2) propose a guide for selecting study end points in AECB that will help capture all the relevant disease outcomes.

METHODS

Two literature searches of the PubMed database were conducted to identify studies of clinical trials in bronchitis and evaluate the clinical, patient-reported, and economic end points used in these studies.

RESULTS

Previous studies have focused primarily on clinician-assessed outcomes, which do not capture the full impact of AECB on patients' lives. Reporting mechanisms for most end points have been inconsistent, limiting the ability to compare information or interpret differences. Previous studies have given limited attention to patient-reported outcomes and the economic implications of AECB. Patient-reported outcomes such as speed of symptom relief and work productivity are important parameters for assessing treatment effectiveness and provide practical information for treatment evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional research is needed to develop, examine, and validate patient-reported outcomes and the indirect costs of AECB. Measuring the relevant clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes in AECB patients using standardized methods may lead to a clearer understanding of the disease burden and the role, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment.