Evolution of cellular HIV DNA levels in virologically suppressed patients switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine versus maintaining a triple regimen: a prospective, longitudinal, matched, controlled study

Long-term effects on immunological, inflammatory markers, and HIV-1 reservoir after switching to a two-drug versus maintaining a three-drug regimen based on integrase inhibitors

Objective

To compare the long-term effects on immune parameters, inflammation, and HIV-1 reservoir after switching to a two-drug (2DR) versus maintaining an integrase inhibitor (InSTI)-based three-drug regimen (3DR).

Methods

Cross-sectional study in which HIV-1 treatment-naïve people started and maintained an InSTI-based 3DR or, at different times, switched to 2DR (dolutegravir or darunavir/cobicistat + lamivudine). CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation and exhaustion, plasma concentrations of hs-CRP, D-dimer, P-selectin, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IP-10, sTNFR-I/II, MIP-1α/β, I-FABP, LBP, sCD14, sCD163, MCP-1, and cellular-associated HIV-1-DNA and -RNA were quantified by flow cytometry, different immunoassays, and droplet digital PCR, respectively. The U de Mann-Whitney test evaluated differences between 3DR and 2DR. Immune recovery was evaluated using a general linear model for repeated measures adjusted for different co-variables.

Results

Fifty participants per group were included. The median time on 3DR was 82 months for the 3DR group and 30 months for the 2DR group, after which it switched to 2DR for a median of 57 months. We did not find differences between both groups in any of the parameters analyzed. Specifically, some values in 3DR and 2DR were hs-CRP, 0.92 mg/L (0.45-2.23) vs. 1.23 (0.61-2.38); D-dimer, 190.0 µg/L (150.0-370.0) vs. 190.0 (150.0-397.5); IL-6, 2.8 pg/mL (1.3-5.3) vs. 3.2 (2.1-4.7); sCD14, 4.5 ng/mL (3.3-6.2) vs. 5.0 (3.6-6.1), respectively, all p ≥ 0.399.

Conclusion

In the long term, switching to 2DR does not negatively affect immunologic parameters, inflammatory markers, or HIV-1 reservoir.

Clinical trial registration

identifier NCT04076423.

Four days/week antiretroviral maintenance strategy (ANRS 170 QUATUOR): substudies of reservoirs and ultrasensitive drug resistance

BACKGROUND

In a 4 days/week (4/7 days) maintenance strategy (ANRS-170 QUATUOR trial), the virological impact of an intermittent strategy was assessed by ultrasensitive virological analyses of reservoirs and resistance.

METHODS

HIV-1 total DNA, ultra-sensitive plasma viral load (USpVL) and semen VL were measured in the first 121 participants. Sanger and ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) were performed on the HIV-1 genome (Illumina technology) according to the ANRS consensus. A generalized estimation equation with a Poisson distribution was used to compare changes in the proportion of residual viraemia, detectable semen HIV RNA and HIV DNA within and between the two groups over time.

RESULTS

The proportion of participants with residual viraemia at Day 0 (D0) and Week 48 (W48) was 16.7% and 25.0% in the 4/7 days group and 22.4% and 29.7% in the 7/7 days group, respectively (+8.3% versus +7.3%, P = 0.971). The proportion of detectable DNA (>40 copies/106 cells) at D0 and W48 was 53.7% and 57.4% in the 4/7 days group and 56.1% and 51.8% in the 7/7 days group, respectively (+3.7% versus -4.3%, P = 0.358). Semen HIV RNA was detectable (≥100  copies/mL) in 2.2% of participants at D0 and 4.5% at W48 in the 4/7 days group versus 6.1% and 9.1% in the 7/7 days group, respectively (+2.3% versus +3.0%, P = 0.743). Emerging resistance at failure was more frequent in the 4/7 days group detected by Sanger sequencing: 3/6 participants versus 1/4 in the 7/7 days group, and similar with the UDS assay: 5/6 versus 4/4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the potency of a 4/7 days maintenance strategy on virological suppression at the reservoirs and emergent resistance level, including minority variants.

Evaluation of HIV-DNA and residual viremia levels through week 96 in HIV-infected individuals who continue a two-drug or switch to a three-drug integrase strand transfer inhibitor based regimen

OBJECTIVES

To investigate HIV-DNA and residual viremia (RV) levels over 96 weeks (W96) in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected individuals enrolled in the Be-OnE Study. Individuals were randomized to continue a two-drug regimen with dolutegravir (DTG) plus one RTI or to switch to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF).

STUDY DESIGN

Total HIV-DNA and RV were evaluated at baseline, W48 and W96 with ddPCR technique. Potential relationships between viro-immunological parameters and between/within arms were also assessed.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) HIV-DNA was 2247 (767;4268), 1587 (556;3543) and 1076 (512;2345) copies/10⁶ CD4+T-cells at baseline, W48 and at W96, respectively, while RV was 3 (1;5), 4 (1;9) and 2 (2;4) copies/mL, without significant differences between arms. A significant reduction in HIV-DNA and in RV from baseline to W96 was observed in the E/C/F/TAF-arm (HIV-DNA: -285 [-2257;-45], p=0.010; RV: (-1 [-3;0], p=0.007). In the DTG+1RTI-arm, HIV-DNA and RV levels remained stable (HIV-DNA: -549 [-2269;+307], p=0.182; RV: (-1 [-3;+1], p=0.280). For both HIV-DNA and RV, no significant changes were found overtime between the arms. A positive correlation was found between baseline HIV-DNA and HIV-DNA at W96 (E/C/F/TAF: rs=0.726, p=0.0004; DTG+1RTI: rs=0.589, p=0.010). In general, no significant correlations were found between HIV-DNA, RV and immunological parameters overtime.

CONCLUSIONS

In virologically suppressed individuals, a small reduction in the HIV-DNA and HIV-RNA levels was found from baseline to W96 in individuals who switched to the E/C/F/TAF arm compared to those who remained under DTG+1RTI. However, no significant differences were found in the changes of HIV-DNA and HIV-RNA between the two arms over time.

Immunological and inflammatory changes after simplifying to dual therapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients through week 96 in a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether simplification of antiretroviral treatment to dual therapy (DT) negatively impacts immune recovery (IR), immune activation and inflammation (IA/I), and HIV reservoir.

METHODS

An open-label, single-centre, randomized controlled trial conducted in adult virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients on triple therapy (TT) with elvitegravir-cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide or dolutegravir (DTG), abacavir, and lamivudine (3TC). Participants were randomized to continue TT or switch to DTG, or darunavir/cobicistat (DRVc) plus 3TC. IR was assessed by CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio at 48 and 96 weeks. Changes in immune activation, proliferation, exhaustion, senescence, and apoptosis in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, plasma sCD14, hsCRP, D-dimers, β2-microglobulin, IL-6, TNF-α and IP-10 levels, cell-associated HIV-DNA (CA-DNA), and unspliced HIV-RNA (usRNA) were also analysed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-one participants were enrolled. Fourteen patients did not complete the follow up. In the ITT and PP analysis, the IR was similar between the treatment arms. In the ITT analysis, the median increase in CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio was 0.10, 0.04, and 0.07 at week 48, and 0.09, 0.05, and 0.08 at week 96 for TT, DTG/3TC, and DRVc/3TC, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the slopes of changes in CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio over time were independent of treatment (F = 1.699; p = 0.436) and related only to baseline values (F = 756.871; p = 0.000). There were no differences in IA/I, CA-DNA, or usRNA between treatment arms.

DISCUSSION

Both IR and IA/I, CA-DNA, and usRNA were similar in the three treatment groups, regardless of maintaining TT or simplifying to DTG/3TC or DRVc/3TC in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients.

Quantification of Total HIV DNA as a Marker to Measure Viral Reservoir: Methods and Potential Implications for Clinical Practice

The focus of this review is to examine the importance of quantifying total HIV DNA to target the HIV reservoir and the clinical implications and challenges involved in its future application in clinical practice. Despite intrinsic limitations, the quantification of total HIV DNA is currently the most widely used marker for exploring the HIV reservoir. As it allows estimating all forms of HIV DNA in the infected cells, total HIV DNA load is the biomarker of the HIV reservoir that provides most of the insights into HIV pathogenesis. The clinical role of total HIV-DNA in both untreated and treated patients is extensively supported by important lines of evidence. Thus, predictive models that include total HIV DNA load together with other variables could constitute a prognostic tool for use in clinical practice. To date, however, this marker has been primarily used in experimental evaluations. The main challenge is technical. Although the implementation of droplet digital PCR could improve analytical performance over real-time PCR, the lack of standardization has made cross-comparisons of the data difficult. An effort by investigators to compare protocols is needed. Furthermore, the main effort now should be to involve the biomedical industry in the development of certified assays for in vitro diagnostics use.

Efficacy and durability of two- vs. three-drug integrase inhibitor-based regimens in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients: Data from real-life ODOACRE cohort

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and durability of treatment switch to two-drug (2DR) vs. three-drug (3DR) integrase inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Within the ODOACRE cohort, we selected adult patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL switching to an InSTI-based 2DR or 3DR. Survival analyses were performed to estimate the probability of virological failure (VF, defined as one HIV RNA > 1000 copies/mL or two consecutive HIV RNA > 50 copies/mL) and treatment discontinuation (TD, defined as any modification, intensification or interruption of the regimen), and to evaluate their predictors.

RESULTS

Overall, 1666 patients were included, of whom 1334 (80%) were treated with a 3DR (19.9%, 25.0% and 55.1% elvitegravir-, raltegravir- and dolutegravir-based, respectively) and 332 (20%) with a 2DR (79.2% dolutegravir + lamivudine and 20.8% dolutegravir + rilpivirine). Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 100 (52-150) weeks, 52 (3.1%) patients experienced VF with an incidence of 1.5/100 person-year of follow-up (PYFU). The estimated 96-week probability of VF was similar for the 2DR and 3DR groups (2.3% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.53), but it was higher for elvitegravir (4.9%) and raltegravir (5.0%) than for dolutegravir (1.5%) (P = 0.04). Four hundred (24%) patients discontinued their InSTI-based regimen, with an incidence of 11.3/100 PYFU. At 96 weeks, 3DRs showed a higher probability of TD for any reason (20.6% vs. 11.2%, P < 0.001) and TD for toxicity (9.0% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.02) when compared with 2DRs. A higher risk of TD for central nervous system toxicity was observed for dolutegravir than for elvitegravir and raltegravir (4.0% vs. 2.5% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients, 2DRs showed an efficacy similar to 3DRs but with better tolerability.

Effectiveness, Durability, and Safety of Dolutegravir and Lamivudine Versus Dolutegravir, Lamivudine, and Abacavir in a Real-Life Cohort of HIV-Infected Adults

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir (DTG) plus lamivudine (2-DR) is suggested as an initial and switch option in HIV-1 treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness, durability, and safety of 2-DR compared with DTG plus abacavir/lamivudine (3-DR).

METHODS

This was an observational, ambispective study that included all treatment-naïve (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) patients who started 2-DR or 3-DR between July 1, 2018, and November 30, 2020. The primary end point was noninferiority, at 24 and 48 weeks, of 2-DR versus 3-DR regarding the percentage of patients with viral load (VL)≥50 and 200 copies/mL in TN (4% margin) and VL<50 and 200 copies/mL in TE (margin 12%). Durability of response, and safety were also measured.

RESULTS

242 patients were included (53 TN and 189 TE). Two TN patients on 2-DR had VL≥50 copies/mL and 1 had VL≥200 copies/mL at week 24. In TE patients on 2-DR, 90.2% achieved VL<200 copies/mL at week 24 (difference: 3.8%; 95% CI = -6.3% to 14%) and 91.8% at week 48 (difference: 0.06%; 95% CI = -9% to 10%), meeting noninferiority criteria. Among the 53 TN patients, only 1 VF was observed in 2-DR. In TN patients, the risk of treatment discontinuation was similar between groups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; P = 0.15); similar rates were also found in TE patients (HR = 0.94; P = 0.85). TE patients on 2-DR showed a better safety profile compared with 3-DR patients (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Our results did not show noninferiority in terms of virological effectiveness. Nevertheless, all effectiveness measures support the use of 2-DR in a real-life cohort of TN and TE. Additionally, durability and safety of 2-DR were confirmed to be similar to that of 3-DR.

Short Communication: Efficacy and Safety of Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine as a First-Line Regimen in Clinical Practice

The GEMINI trials have showed that the two drugs regimen of dolutegravir+lamivudine (DTG +3TC) was noninferior to a three-drug regimen as a first line regimen for treatment-naive people living with HIV. The aim of our study was to confirm, in a real-life setting, the efficacy of this regimen. We conducted a retrospective, observational study enrolling treatment-naive patients starting a first-line regimen with lamivudine plus dolutegravir. We evaluated the virological efficacy and the immunological and metabolic profiles. Changes from baseline were evaluated through linear-mixed models for repeated measures. Linear regression analyses were performed to explore variables associated to significant changes in laboratory parameters. We analyzed a total of 20 patients: 15 (75%) were men with a median age of 34.5 years. During a cumulative time of 15.4 patients years of follow up (PYFU), we did not observe any adverse event or treatment discontinuation and all patients achieved virological suppression in the first 6 months from treatment initiation. Increase in CD4⁺ cells was significant at both week 24 (p = .003) and week 48 (p = .007) of follow-up. Moreover, CD4/CD8 ratio also significantly improved [median increase of +0.22 (p = .028) after 48 weeks of follow-up]. As to metabolic parameters, we observed no significant changes in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In a subgroup of 11 patients, we further investigate HIV-1 DNA variations. Our results are in line with the findings of the GEMINI trials, confirming the efficacy and safety of DTG +3TC in treatment-naive patients.

Dolutegravir-Based Regimen for Maintenance of Viral Suppression in People Living with HIV: 48-Week Results in Real-Life Setting

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to a dolutegravir (DTG)-based regimen in a cohort of virological suppressed HIV-infected patients who have previously been treated with different antiretroviral combination. The dynamics of total HIV-DNA and levels of high-sensitivity c-reactive protein, interleukin-6, soluble-CD14, and D-Dimer were also analyzed. Ninety-six individuals who switched to a DTG-containing regimen were followed up for 48 weeks. HIV RNA, CD4⁺ T cell count, weight, and levels of laboratory parameters were recorded at baseline, after 24 and 48 weeks of treatment for all study participants. In a subgroup of patients, HIV DNA and inflammation/coagulation marker levels were also analyzed until week 24. Ninety-three out of 96 patients maintained virological suppression, including patients who switched to dual-therapy from triple-drug combination. Eighteen out of 96 patients had residual viremia at baseline, of which 13 reached the maximal viral suppression at W48. Serum creatinine levels showed a significant increase at weeks 24 and 48. A progressive reduction of total cholesterol was observed from week 24 and up to week 48. No variation in body mass index was detected. HIV DNA, inflammation, and coagulation marker levels did not significantly change during follow-up. Switching to a DTG-based regimen may be a key option for achieving and maintaining maximal virological suppression, even in patients showing residual viremia at baseline. Furthermore, the improvement in blood lipid profile and the overall tolerability observed in this study strongly support the use of these regimens in the aging HIV population.

Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine Two-Drug Regimen: Safety, Efficacy and Diagnostic Considerations for Its Use in Real-Life Clinical Practice-A Refined Approach in the COVID-19 Era

The diagnostic and therapeutic management of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the HIV population brought some known criticalities (and opportunities) to the forefront, for both those who are facing their first therapeutic line today, and for those already well viro-suppressed. The clinical, socioeconomic, and psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic should not affect the long-term care of people living with HIV, which creates an urgent need to optimize the diagnostic and treatment approach to the first-line or switch regimens. The use of dolutegravir plus a lamivudine two-drug regimen is one of the most promising solutions to ease the management of HIV treatment in this difficult period. In this review, we report the most salient features related to the use of this regimen from real-life cohorts, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and studies presented at international conferences up to March 2021. We focused on the diagnostic and clinical-management implications of its use in real life, and how these comply with the contingent historical situation. The issue of the timing and type of diagnostic procedures and the relevance of classical diagnostic tests (such as genotype for resistance detection) is also discussed. According to the currently available results, dolutegravir plus a lamivudine two-drug regimen represents an outstanding tool, whose expected advantages fulfill the current requirements for optimal daily care of our HIV patients.