Impact of archived M184V/I mutation on the effectiveness of switch to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide among virally suppressed people living with HIV

Trends of pre-treatment drug resistance in antiretroviral-naïve people with HIV-1 in the era of second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitors in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Monitoring the trends of pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) and resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) among antiretroviral-naïve people with HIV (PWH) is important for the implementation of HIV treatment and control programmes. We analysed the trends of HIV-1 PDR after the introduction of second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in 2016 in Taiwan, when single-tablet regimens of non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI-) and INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy became the preferred treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentre study, we included newly diagnosed, antiretroviral-naïve PWH who underwent tests for RAMs between 2016 and 2022. Pre-treatment genotypic resistance testing was performed, along with HIV-1 subtyping and determinations of plasma HIV RNA load and CD4 lymphocyte counts. RAMs were analysed using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database and only RAMs conferring at least low-level resistance were included.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2022, pre-treatment blood samples from 3001 newly diagnosed PWH, which constituted 24.3% of newly diagnosed PWH in Taiwan during the study period, were tested. Of the PWH with analysable gene sequences, the HIV-1 PDR prevalence to NNRTIs, nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), first- and second-generation INSTIs and PIs was 10.0%, 2.1%, 2.5%, 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively. While the trends of PDR remained stable for NRTIs, INSTIs and PIs, there was a significantly increasing trend of PDR to NNRTIs from 6.0% in 2016% to 13.1% in 2022 (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After the introduction of second-generation INSTIs in Taiwan, the trends of HIV-1 PDR to NRTIs and INSTIs remained low. Furthermore, there was no significant decrease of the prevalence of PDR toward NNRTIs between 2016 and 2022.

Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Following Antiretroviral Therapy in People Living with HIV: A Real-World Study of Dynamic Trends and Risk Factors in Hangzhou, China

Purpose

Neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) occur frequently in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). This study aimed to assess the dynamic trends and risk factors of NPAEs among PLWH in Hangzhou taking efavirenz (EFV)- or dolutegravir (DTG)- or elvitegravir (EVG)-based regimens.

Patients and Methods

A total of 287 ART-naive PLWH were included in this study, EFV (400mg)- (n = 122), EFV (600mg)- (n = 37), DTG- (n = 73), EVG-based (n = 47) and other ART regimens (n = 8) as the initial ART regimen were administered for 12 months. All data were collected at five time points within a 12-month follow-up. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used to evaluate sleep disorders and anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. The dynamic trends and potential risk factors of NPAEs were investigated using a generalized linear mixed model.

Results

Mean age was 29.4 (SD: 7.5) years with 97.2% males. After 12 months of ART, the prevalence of sleep disorders and anxiety decreased significantly, although only a slight improvement was observed for depression. In addition, there was a significant positive correlation between sleep disorders, anxiety, and depression. The risk factors for NPAEs differed slightly depending on the choice of ART regimen, but the seven factors most commonly associated with NPAEs were age, sex, marital status, education level, smoking status, body mass index, and WHO clinical stage. Treatment-induced changes in CD4-positive T-cell count and virological suppression did not depend on the particular choice of ART regimen.

Conclusion

The prevalence of sleep disorders and anxiety changed significantly over time on ART and the risks of these disorders were associated with seven common clinical and demographic factors.

Transmitted HIV Drug Resistance in Bulgaria Occurs in Clusters of Individuals from Different Transmission Groups and Various Subtypes (2012-2020)

Transmitted HIV drug resistance in Bulgaria was first reported in 2015 using data from 1988-2011. We determined the prevalence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) and HIV-1 genetic diversity in Bulgaria during 2012-2020 using polymerase sequences from 1053 of 2010 (52.4%) antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive individuals. Sequences were analyzed for DRM using the WHO HIV SDRM list implemented in the calculated population resistance tool at Stanford University. Genetic diversity was inferred using automated subtyping tools and phylogenetics. Cluster detection and characterization was performed using MicrobeTrace. The overall rate of SDRMs was 5.7% (60/1053), with 2.2% having resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 1.8% to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 2.1% to protease inhibitors (PIs), and 0.4% with dual-class SDRMs. We found high HIV-1 diversity, with the majority being subtype B (60.4%), followed by F1 (6.9%), CRF02_AG (5.2%), A1 (3.7%), CRF12_BF (0.8%), and other subtypes and recombinant forms (23%). Most (34/60, 56.7%) of the SDRMs were present in transmission clusters of different subtypes composed mostly of male-to-male sexual contact (MMSC), including a 14-member cluster of subtype B sequences from 12 MMSC and two males reporting heterosexual contact; 13 had the L90M PI mutation and one had the T215S NRTI SDRM. We found a low SDRM prevalence amid high HIV-1 diversity among ART-naive patients in Bulgaria during 2012-2020. The majority of SDRMs were found in transmission clusters containing MMSC, indicative of onward spread of SDRM in drug-naive individuals. Our study provides valuable information on the transmission dynamics of HIV drug resistance in the context of high genetic diversity in Bulgaria, for the development of enhanced prevention strategies to end the epidemic.

Safety and efficacy of switching to elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-experienced people with HIV: a multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the virologic efficacy of switching to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) in patients with controlled HIV infection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study including adult patients with controlled HIV-1 infection on any stable antiretroviral (ART) regimen, who switched to E/C/F/TDF. Success was measured by the proportion of patients with plasma viral load < 50 copies/ml at W48 using the FDA snapshot algorithm. We also assessed risk factors associated with virological failure (VF).

RESULTS

382 patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL who switched to E/C/F/TDF were included in the study. Most patients (69.9%) were male, with median age 44 years (IQR 38-51), who had been on ART for a median of 7 years (IQR 4-13). Median CD4 count was 614/mm³ and 24.6% of the patients had a history of previous virological failure. The reasons for switching were simplification (67.0%) and tolerance issues (22.0%). At week 48, 314 (82.0% [95% CI 78.4-86.0]) patients had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL, 13 (3.5% [95% CI 3.64-8.41]) experienced virological failure. Genotype at failure was available in 6/13 patients with detection of resistance-associated mutations to integrase inhibitors and NRTIs in 5/6 (83.3%) patients. We found no predictive factor associated with virological failure except for a borderline significance with the duration of viral suppression before the switch. Tolerability of E/C/F/TDF was good with 23/382 (6.0%) patients experiencing mild adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, switching well-suppressed patients to E/C/F/TDF resulted in few virologic failures and was well tolerated. However, resistance to integrase inhibitors emerged in patients with virological failure.

Dual therapy with dolutegravir plus boosted protease inhibitor as maintenance or salvage therapy in highly experienced people living with HIV

Real-world experience with dolutegravir (DTG) plus boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) as a two-drug regimen is limited for highly experienced HIV-positive patients with virological failure or intolerance to antiretroviral therapy. Patients receiving DTG plus bPI between September 2016 and June 2019 at 15 designated hospitals for HIV care in Taiwan were retrospectively included in this study. A standardised case record form was used to collect clinical data. The primary endpoint was virological response, defined as achieving or maintaining plasma HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48. A total of 77 patients were included; 58 (75.3%) had documented genotypic resistance to 1-4 antiretroviral classes. The most commonly used PI was darunavir (87.0%; 67/77). Seven patients (9.1%) had no virological data at Week 48, including three with loss to follow-up, one severe hyperlipidaemia, one renal failure and cardiovascular disease, one superimposed HBV infection and one death from anal cancer. The virological response rate increased from 59.7% at baseline to 90.9% at Week 24 and 85.7% at Week 48. The only patient (1.3%) with virological failure at Week 48 had poor adherence and baseline low-level resistance to darunavir with resistance-associated mutations at M46L, I50V and V82A. Compared with baseline, mean total cholesterol increased by 20.1 mg/dL and weight by 2.8 kg at Week 48, while the estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by 14.4 mL/min/1.73m² (both P < 0.05). We conclude that a two-drug regimen containing DTG plus bPI was effective in highly-experienced HIV-positive patients, but metabolic impact and weight gain should be closely monitored.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine maintenance strategy in virologically controlled adults with low HIV-1 DNA: 48 week results from a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial

OBJECTIVES

Low HIV reservoirs may be associated with viral suppression under a lower number of antiretroviral drugs. We investigated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine as a maintenance strategy in people living with HIV (PLHIV) with low HIV-DNA.

METHODS

TRULIGHT (NCT02302547) was a multicentre, open-label, randomized trial comparing a simplification to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine versus a triple regimen continuation (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine with a third agent, control arm) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-DNA <2.7 log10 copies/106 PBMCs and no prior virological failure (VF). The primary endpoint (non-inferiority margin 12%) was the percentage of participants with a plasma viral load (pVL) <50 copies/mL in ITT (Snapshot approach) and PP analyses at Week 48 (W48).

RESULTS

Of the 326 participants screened, 223 (68%) were randomized to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine arm (n = 113) or control arm (n = 110). At W48, the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine and control arms maintained a pVL < 50 copies/mL in 100/113 (88.5%) and 100/110 (90.9%) participants, respectively (ITT difference 2.4%, 95% CI -5.9 to 10.7; PP difference 3.4%, 95% CI -4.2 to 11.0). Six VFs occurred in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine arm (two with emerging mutations M184V and K65R) versus two in the control arm (ITT difference 3.5%, 95% CI -1.9 to 9.4). All VFs were resuppressed after treatment modification.

CONCLUSIONS

Although non-inferiority was shown, simplification to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine should not be used for most PLHIV because of a low risk of VF with resistance.