In vitro cross-resistance to doravirine in a panel of HIV-1 clones harbouring multiple NNRTI resistance mutations

Liver Damage During Treatment with Reverse-Transcriptase Inhibitors in HIV Patients

The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 1996 has markedly enhanced the life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLWH), largely due to the effectiveness of reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs). These drugs target the reverse transcriptase enzyme, crucial for the HIV virus to convert its RNA into DNA within host cells, effectively disrupting the viral replication process. This action reduces the patient's viral load, helping preserve immune function and prevent progression to AIDS. Consequently, the predominant causes of mortality among individuals living with HIV have transitioned from opportunistic infections and AIDS-related cancers to liver disease and cardiovascular complications. Liver damage in PLWH could arise from multiple sources including co-infections, chronic substance use, and notably, antiretroviral therapy itself, which can be hepatotoxic. This review highlights the risks of hepatic damage associated with nucleoside and non-nucleoside RTIs and underscores the variability in hepatotoxicity risks among different drugs. It emphasizes the necessity for regular monitoring of liver health in PLWH and adjusting antiretroviral regimens to minimize liver fibrosis risk. This risk is particularly pronounced in patients who associate the infection with hepatitis B or C virus, where the potential for hepatotoxicity significantly increases.

Intermittent doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) maintains a high level of viral suppression in virologically suppressed people living with HIV

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine whether doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) given 5 or 4 days a week was able to maintain viral suppression in people living with HIV (PLHIV).

METHODS

In this observational, retrospective study, we included all PLHIVs who had received intermittent DOR/3TC/TDF between 10/01/2019 and 01/31/2021, in two French hospitals.

RESULTS

Forty-three PLHIVs were included, median (IQR) age: 52 years (48-58), ART duration: 15 years (8-23), duration of virological suppression: 6 years (2-10). Median follow-up was 78 weeks (IQR 62-97). One virological failure (VF) occurred at W38 (HIV-RNA = 61 and 76 copies/mL), in a patient with no viral resistance at baseline or at time of VF, and during the study period five individuals discontinued DOR/3TC/TDF due to adverse events. There were no significant changes during follow-up in the CD4 count, CD4/CD8 ratio, body weight or residual viremia rate.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest the potential for intermittent DOR/3TC/TDF to maintain virological control.

Doravirine responses to HIV-1 viruses bearing mutations to NRTIs and NNRTIs under in vitro selective drug pressure

OBJECTIVES

The NNRTI doravirine has been recently approved for the first-line treatment of HIV-infected patients, eliciting favourable responses against viruses bearing the K103N, Y181C and G190A mutations. This study used in vitro drug selections to elaborate the breadth of doravirine responses against viruses bearing NNRTI and NRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs).

METHODS

WT clinical isolates (n = 6) and viruses harbouring common NRTI and NNRTI RAMs (n = 6) were serially passaged in escalating concentrations of doravirine, doravirine/islatravir, doravirine/lamivudine and rilpivirine over 24 weeks. Genotypic analysis ascertained the appearance and accumulation of NNRTI RAMs. Phenotypic drug susceptibility assays assessed resistance conferred by acquired NNRTI RAMs.

RESULTS

For WT viruses, doravirine pressure led to the appearance of V108I or V106A/I/M RAMs after 8 weeks, conferring low-level (∼2-fold) resistance. After 24 weeks, the accumulation of three to six secondary RAMs, including F227L, M230L, L234I and/or Y318, resulted in high-level (>100-fold) resistance to doravirine. Notably, viruses with these doravirine RAMs remained susceptible to rilpivirine and efavirenz. This contrasted with rilpivirine where acquisition of E138K, L100I and/or K101E resulted in >50-fold cross-resistance to all NNRTIs. Doravirine selection of viruses bearing common NRTI and NNRTI RAMs showed delayed acquisition of RAMs compared with WT virus. Pairing doravirine with islatravir or lamivudine attenuated the development of NNRTI RAMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Doravirine showed favourable resistance profiles against viruses harbouring NRTI and NNRTI RAMs. The high barrier to resistance to doravirine coupled with the long intracellular half-life of islatravir may provide the opportunity for long-acting treatment options.

Residual phenotypic susceptibility to doravirine in multidrug-resistant HIV-1 from subjects enrolled in the PRESTIGIO Registry

OBJECTIVES

Doravirine shows a rather distinct resistance profile within the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) class. This study aimed to evaluate the phenotypic susceptibility to doravirine, rilpivirine and etravirine in a panel of multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1 isolates collected from people living with HIV (PLWH) enrolled in the PRESTIGIO Registry.

METHODS

Recombinant viruses expressing PLWH-derived protease, reverse transcriptase coding regions were generated from plasma samples at virological failure with documented resistance to protease inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, NNRTIs and integrase strand transfer inhibitors. In vitro susceptibility was assessed through a phenotypic assay measuring fold-change values with respect to the reference NL4-3 virus. Genotypic susceptibility was computed by the Stanford HIVdb algorithm 8.9-1.

RESULTS

Plasma samples were collected from 22 PLWH: 20 (91%) were male, median age 55 years (IQR 50-58), time since HIV-1 diagnosis 27 years (23-31) and time on antiretroviral treatment 23 years (22-26). Median doravirine, etravirine and rilpivirine fold-change values were 9.8 (2.9-40.4), 42.9 (3.1-100.0) and 100.0 (17.9-100.0), respectively. According to the fold-change cut-offs, full susceptibility was observed in five (23%), four (18%) and one (5%) cases with doravirine, etravirine and rilpivirine, respectively. Irrespective of the presence of specific doravirine mutations, higher numbers of NNRTI mutations correlated with higher fold-change values for doravirine. By comparing the distribution of fold-change values with the Stanford HIVdb predicted susceptibility, a significant correlation was detected for doravirine and rilpivirine but not etravirine.

CONCLUSION

Despite extensive cross-resistance among NNRTIs, doravirine can be a valid option in a proportion of PLWH with MDR HIV-1. Doravirine activity appeared to be inferred with fair accuracy by the HIVdb algorithm.

Future of Antiretroviral Drugs and Evolution of HIV-1 Drug Resistance

Highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy has been used for many years, but the use in low- and middle-income countries of antiretroviral drugs with low genetic barrier to resistance, combined with limited availability of viral load testing, has led to higher rates of acquired drug resistance, sustaining the rate of transmitted drug resistance. Here, we describe the evolution of ARV drugs with the ongoing development of injectable long-acting forms and the requirements regarding all new ARV drugs (i.e., no transmitted drug resistance, no cross-resistance and high genetic barrier to resistance). Then, we report the evolution of both transmitted and acquired resistance regarding new ARV drugs. The WHO has set very ambitious but motivating goals for HIV testing, treatment and viral suppression, aiming to achieve rates of 95% for all three by 2025. Reaching these goals requires a wide implementation and use of close virological monitoring in LMICs.

Potential role of doravirine for the treatment of HIV-1-infected persons with transmitted drug resistance

BACKGROUND

Doravirine has a unique resistance profile but how this profile might increase its usefulness beyond first-line therapy in persons with susceptible viruses has not been well studied. We sought to determine scenarios in which doravirine would retain activity against isolates from ART-naïve persons with transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and to identify gaps in available doravirine susceptibility data.

METHODS

We analyzed published in vitro doravirine susceptibility data and applied the results to 42,535 RT sequences from ART-naïve persons published between 2017 and 2021. NNRTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were defined as those with a Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database doravirine penalty score either alone or in combination with other mutations.

RESULTS

V106A, Y188L, F227C/L, M230L, and Y318F were associated with the greatest reductions in doravirine susceptibility. However, several NNRTI DRMs and DRM combinations lacking these canonical resistance mutations had > tenfold reduced susceptibility including G190E, one isolate with G190S, three isolates with L100I + K103N, one isolate with K103N + P225H, and isolates with L100I + K103N + V108I and K101E + Y181C + G190A. Of the 42,535 ART-naïve sequences, 3,374 (7.9%) contained a NNRTI DRM of which 2,788 (82.6%) contained 1 DRM (n = 33 distinct mutations), 426 (12.6%) contained 2 DRMs (79 distinct pairs of mutations), and 143 (4.2%) contained ≥ 3 DRMs (86 distinct mutation patterns). Among the 2,788 sequences with one DRM, 112 (4.0%) were associated with ≥ 3.0-fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while 2,625 (94.2%) were associated with < 3.0-fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for individual NNRTI DRMs in 51 sequences (1.8%). Among the 426 sequences with two NNRTI DRMs, 180 (42.3%) were associated with ≥ 3.0 fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while just 32 (7.5%) had < 3.0 fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for 214 (50.2%) sequences containing two NNRTI DRMs.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line therapy containing doravirine plus two NRTIs is expected to be effective in treating most persons with TDR as more than 80% of TDR sequences had a single NNRTI DRM and as more than 90% with a single DRM were expected to be susceptible to doravirine. However, caution is required for the use of doravirine in persons with more than one NNRTI DRM even if none of the DRMs are canonical doravirine-resistance mutations.

Doravirine-associated resistance mutations in antiretroviral therapy naïve and experienced adults with HIV-1 subtype C infection in Botswana

OBJECTIVES

There are limited data on the prevalence of doravirine (DOR)-associated drug resistance mutations in people with HIV (PWH) in Botswana. This cross-sectional, retrospective study aimed to explore the prevalence of DOR-associated resistance mutations among ART-naïve and -experienced PWH in Botswana enrolled in the population-based Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP).

METHODS

A total of 6078 HIV-1C pol sequences were analysed for DOR-associated resistance mutations using the Stanford HIV drug resistance database, and their levels were predicted according to the Stanford DRM penalty scores and resistance interpretation. Virologic failure was defined as HIV-1 RNA load (VL) >400 copies/mL.

RESULTS

Among 6078 PWH, 5999 (99%) had known ART status, and 4529/5999 (79%) were on ART at time of sampling. The suppression rate among ART-experienced was 4517/4729 (96%). The overall prevalence of any DOR-associated resistance mutations was 181/1473 (12.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 10.7-14.1]); by ART status: 42/212 (19.8% [95% CI: 14.7-25.4]) among ART-failing individuals (VL ≥400 copies/mL) and 139/1261 (11.0% [95% CI: 9.3-12.9]) among ART-naïve individuals (P < 0.01). Intermediate DOR-associated resistance mutations were observed in 106/1261 (7.8% [95% CI: 6.9-10.1]) in ART-naïve individuals and 29/212 (13.7% [95% CI: 9.4-8.5]) among ART-experienced participants (P < 0.01). High-level DOR-associated resistance mutations were observed in 33/1261 (2.6% [95% CI: 1.8-3.7]) among ART-naïve and 13/212 (6.1% [95% CI: 3.6-10.8]) among ART-failing PWH (P < 0.01). PWH failing ART with at least one EFV/NVP-associated resistance mutation had high prevalence 13/67 (19.4%) of high-level DOR-associated resistance mutations.

CONCLUSION

DOR-associated mutations were rare (11.0%) among ART-naive PWH but present in 62.7% of Botswana individuals who failed NNRTI-based ART with at least one EFV/NVP-associated resistance mutation. Testing for HIV drug resistance should underpin the use of DOR in PWH who have taken first-generation NNRTIs.

High Prevalence of Doravirine Resistance in HIV-1-Infected Patients with Virological Failure to an NNRTI-Based Single-Tablet Regimen

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of resistance to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based single-tablet regimen (STR) in Taiwanese patients and clarify the clinical implications of using doravirine in patients who fail NNRTI treatment.

Patients and Methods

Taiwanese patients infected with HIV-1 who failed NNRTI-based STR treatment were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2020. Mutations associated with drug resistance were identified using the 2019 International Antiviral Society-USA list of drug-resistant mutations in HIV, and drug susceptibility was assessed according to the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database version 9. Median values of continuous variables were compared between two groups using the Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

A total of 107 patients were included, of whom 29 were treatment failure to the initial STRs, and 78 failed treatment after switching to an STR. Seventy-four patients failed treatment with TDF/FTC/EFV (Atripla), 30 with TDF/FTC/RPV (Complera) and 3 with TAF/FTC/RPV (Odefsey). The prevalence rates of resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), NNRTIs, protease inhibitors (PIs) and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) were 76%, 86%, 3% and 2%, respectively. Among the 29 patients failure to the initial STRs, 62% developed doravirine resistance, compared to 64% of the 78 the patients who failed treatment after switching to an STR. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of specific NNRTI or doravirine resistance-associated mutations between these two groups. The patients with K65R mutations were more likely to have NNRTI resistance (p = 0.037) and doravirine resistance (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings showed a high rate of doravirine cross-resistance in patients with NNRTI-based STR treatment failure. Doravirine should be used cautiously as a salvage regimen in patients who fail NNRTI treatment.

Impact of HIV-1 Resistance-Associated Mutations on Susceptibility to Doravirine: Analysis of Real-World Clinical Isolates

Clinical management of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection may be negatively impacted by either acquired or transmitted drug resistance. Here, we aim to extend our understanding of the impact of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) on the susceptibility of clinical isolates to the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) doravirine. Clinical isolates from people living with HIV-1 undergoing routine testing for susceptibility to doravirine and other approved NNRTIs (etravirine, rilpivirine, efavirenz, and nevirapine) were collected from August 2018 to August 2019. Susceptibility in the presence/absence of NNRTI and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations was determined using cutoffs for relative fold change in inhibition (ratio of the 50% inhibitory concentration [IC₅₀] of patient virus compared with the IC₅₀ of a wild-type reference strain). Biological cutoffs of 3- to 15-fold change were investigated for doravirine, with preestablished cutoffs used for the other NNRTIs. Of 4,070 clinical isolates, 42.9% had ≥1 NNRTI RAM. More isolates were susceptible to doravirine (92.5-96.7%) than to etravirine (91.5%), rilpivirine (89.5%), efavirenz (81.5%), or nevirapine (77.5%). Based on a 3-fold cutoff, doravirine susceptibility was retained in 44.7-65.8% of isolates resistant to another NNRTI and 28.5% of isolates resistant to all other tested NNRTIs. The presence of NRTI RAMs, including thymidine analog mutations, was associated with doravirine hypersusceptibility in some isolates, particularly in the absence of NNRTI RAMs. These results support the favorable resistance profile of doravirine and are of particular importance given the challenge posed by both acquired and transmitted resistance.

Deep sequencing of HIV-1 reveals extensive subtype variation and drug resistance after failure of first-line antiretroviral regimens in Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Deep sequencing could improve understanding of HIV treatment failure and viral population dynamics. However, this tool is often inaccessible in low- and middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the genetic patterns of resistance emerging in West African HIV-1 subtypes during first-line virological failure, and the implications for future antiretroviral options.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participants were selected from a Nigerian cohort of people living with HIV who had failed first-line ART and subsequently switched to second-line therapy. Whole HIV-1 genome sequences were generated from first-line virological failure samples with Illumina MiSeq. Mutations detected at ≥2% frequency were analysed and compared by subtype.

RESULTS

HIV-1 sequences were obtained from 101 participants (65% female, median age 30 years, median 32.9 months of nevirapine- or efavirenz-based ART). Thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) were detected in 61%, other core NRTI mutations in 92% and NNRTI mutations in 99%. Minority variants (<20% frequency) comprised 18% of all mutations. K65R was more prevalent in CRF02_AG than G subtypes (33% versus 7%; P = 0.002), and ≥3 TAMs were more common in G than CRF02_AG (52% versus 24%; P = 0.004). Subtype G viruses also contained more RT cleavage site mutations. Cross-resistance to at least one of the newer NNRTIs, doravirine, etravirine or rilpivirine, was predicted in 81% of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive drug resistance had accumulated in people with West African HIV-1 subtypes, prior to second-line ART. Deep sequencing significantly increased the detection of resistance-associated mutations. Caution should be used if considering newer-generation NNRTI agents in this setting.

NNRTI and Liver Damage: Evidence of Their Association and the Mechanisms Involved

Due to the improved effectiveness and safety of combined antiretroviral therapy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become a manageable, chronic condition rather than a mortal disease. However, HIV patients are at increased risk of experiencing non-AIDS-defining illnesses, with liver-related injury standing out as one of the leading causes of death among these patients. In addition to more HIV-specific processes, such as antiretroviral drug-related toxicity and direct injury to the liver by the virus itself, its pathogenesis is related to conditions that are also common in the general population, such as alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, viral hepatitis, and ageing. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are essential components of combined anti-HIV treatment due to their unique antiviral activity, high specificity, and acceptable toxicity. While first-generation NNRTIs (nevirapine and efavirenz) have been related largely to liver toxicity, those belonging to the second generation (etravirine, rilpivirine and doravirine) seem to be generally safe for the liver. Indeed, there is preclinical evidence of rilpivirine being hepatoprotective in different models of liver injury, independently of the presence of HIV. The present study aims to review the mechanisms by which currently available anti-HIV drugs belonging to the NNRTI family may participate in the development of liver disease.

Is there a role for doravirine in African HIV treatment programmes? A large observational resistance study in South Africa

INTRODUCTION

Dolutegravir has replaced efavirenz in most low- and middle-income countries, due to better tolerability and formidable resistance profile, but dolutegravir side effects suggest alternatives are needed. We evaluated doravirine resistance in South Africa as a first step to assess whether doravirine may replace dolutegravir.

METHODS

A retrospective dataset was analysed for predicted doravirine susceptibility, including sequences obtained from three patient groups. First, data from 277 patients initiating antiretroviral treatment (ART) were collected between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Second, data from 788 patients experiencing NNRTI-based ART failure were obtained between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Third, data derived from 584 patients who had genotypic drug resistance testing requested after NNRT-based failure as part of individual patient management between January 2016 and December 2019. Pol sequences were generated using validated population-based in-house genotyping and submitted to Stanford HIVdb v8.9.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Less than 5% of patients initiating ART presented with genotypic doravirine resistance, whereas most patients experiencing NNRTI-based ART failure presented with predicted intermediate (41.0%) or high-level resistance (43.8%) to doravirine. High-level resistance to doravirine was commonly predicted by the presence of at least three DRMs (79.7%). The predicted resistance profile to doravirine in ART-naïve patients is promising, but less so in those experiencing failure to first-generation NNRTIs. Accumulation of NNRTI DRMs seems to be an important factor in the poor resistance prediction for doravirine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although doravirine is approved as initial therapy in patients who are ART-naïve, it is currently recommended to obtain a genotype prior to the initiation of ART. Clinical studies are needed to ascertain whether predicted resistance profiles in ART naïve and NNRTI-treated patients translate into poor clinical outcomes, especially in settings where genotypic resistance testing is not available.