Cell culture selections reveal favourable drug resistance profiles for doravirine and islatravir

Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and a low propensity for resistance. We investigated a switch from bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority trial at 89 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 11 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL for at least 3 months on bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation allocation schedule, with block randomisation based on a block size of four, to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or continue bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide orally once daily, with matching placebos taken by all participants. Participants, investigators, study staff, and sponsor personnel involved in study drug administration or clinical evaluation of participants were masked to treatment assignment until week 48. Participants were instructed at each visit to take one tablet from each of the two bottles received, one of study drug and one of placebo, once daily, and participants were assessed at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; US Food and Drug Administration snapshot; prespecified non-inferiority margin 4%). The study is ongoing, with all remaining participants in post-treatment follow-up, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04223791.

FINDINGS

We screened 726 individuals for eligibility between Feb 18 and Sept 3, 2020, of whom 643 (88·6%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group (183 [28·5%] women and 460 [71·5%] men). 322 participants were switched to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) and 321 continued bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (two participants [one with a protocol deviation and one who withdrew] assigned to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment). The last follow-up visit for the week 48 analysis occurred on Aug 26, 2021. At week 48, two (0·6%) of 322 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with one (0·3%) of 319 participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference 0·3%, 95% CI -1·2 to 2·0). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. 25 (7·8%) participants in the doravirine and islatravir group had headache compared with 23 [7·2%] participants in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group; 101 (31·4%) compared with 98 (30·7%) had infections; and eight (2·5%) participants in each group discontinued therapy due to adverse events. 32 (9·9%) participants had treatment-related adverse events in the islatravir and doravirine group comapred with 38 (11·9%) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -19·7 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·20 × 109/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

Switching to daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) was non-inferior to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at week 48. However, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support the further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Structure-based design and optimization lead to the identification of novel dihydrothiopyrano[3,2-d]pyrimidine derivatives as potent HIV-1 inhibitors against drug-resistant variants

With our continuous endeavors in seeking potent anti-HIV-1 agents, we reported here the discovery, biological characterization, and druggability evaluation of a class of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. To fully explore the chemical space of the NNRTI-binding pocket, novel series of dihydrothiopyrano [3,2-d]pyrimidines were developed by employing the structure-based design strategy. Most of the derivatives were endowed with prominent antiviral activities against HIV-1 wild-type and resistant strains at nanomolar levels. Among them, compound 23h featuring the aminopiperidine moiety was identified as the most potent inhibitor, with EC50 values ranging from 3.43 to 21.4 nmol/L. Especially, for the challenging double-mutants F227L + V106A and K103N + Y181C, 23h exhibited 2.3- to 14.5-fold more potent activity than the first-line drugs efavirenz and etravirine. Besides, the resistance profiles of 23h achieved remarkable improvement compared to efavirenz and etravirine. The binding target of 23h was further confirmed to be HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Molecular modeling studies were also performed to elucidate the biological evaluation results and give guidance for the optimization campaign. Furthermore, no apparent inhibition of the major CYP450 enzymes and hERG channel was observed for 23h. Most importantly, 23h was characterized by good pharmacokinetic properties and excellent safety in vivo. Collectively, 23h holds great promise as a potential candidate for its effective antiviral efficacy and favorable drug-like profiles.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of doravirine in real-world people with HIV

AIMS

The pharmacokinetics of doravirine has been studied in clinical trials but not in real-world settings. Our study aims to characterize and identify factors influencing doravirine (a CYP3A4 substrate) pharmacokinetics in real-world people with HIV (PWH).

METHODS

A total of 174 doravirine concentrations measured in 146 PWH followed up in the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program at the University Hospital of Lausanne (Switzerland) between 2019 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Demographic data, clinical information and comedications were recorded during the routine SHCS visits (every 3-6 months). Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the clinical significance of the covariates retained in the final model were performed using NONMEM.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination best described doravirine pharmacokinetics. Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and, to a lesser extent age, were the only tested covariates to significantly impact doravirine clearance (CL). Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors reduced CL by 50%, and a 30% decrease in CL was observed in an 80-year-old compared with a 55-year-old PWH. The effect of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors was prominent, explaining 59% of between-subject variability in CL. Model-based simulations predicted 2.8-fold and 1.6-fold increases in median steady-state trough and maximum doravirine concentrations, respectively, when a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor was co-administered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and age influence doravirine pharmacokinetics. However, given the good tolerability of doravirine, dosing adjustment of doravirine is probably not mandatory in those situations. TDM remains useful essentially in specific clinical situations, such as hepatic impairment, suspected nonadherence or pregnancy.

Doravirine responses to HIV-1 viruses bearing mutations to NRTIs and NNRTIs under in vitro selective drug pressure

OBJECTIVES

The NNRTI doravirine has been recently approved for the first-line treatment of HIV-infected patients, eliciting favourable responses against viruses bearing the K103N, Y181C and G190A mutations. This study used in vitro drug selections to elaborate the breadth of doravirine responses against viruses bearing NNRTI and NRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs).

METHODS

WT clinical isolates (n = 6) and viruses harbouring common NRTI and NNRTI RAMs (n = 6) were serially passaged in escalating concentrations of doravirine, doravirine/islatravir, doravirine/lamivudine and rilpivirine over 24 weeks. Genotypic analysis ascertained the appearance and accumulation of NNRTI RAMs. Phenotypic drug susceptibility assays assessed resistance conferred by acquired NNRTI RAMs.

RESULTS

For WT viruses, doravirine pressure led to the appearance of V108I or V106A/I/M RAMs after 8 weeks, conferring low-level (∼2-fold) resistance. After 24 weeks, the accumulation of three to six secondary RAMs, including F227L, M230L, L234I and/or Y318, resulted in high-level (>100-fold) resistance to doravirine. Notably, viruses with these doravirine RAMs remained susceptible to rilpivirine and efavirenz. This contrasted with rilpivirine where acquisition of E138K, L100I and/or K101E resulted in >50-fold cross-resistance to all NNRTIs. Doravirine selection of viruses bearing common NRTI and NNRTI RAMs showed delayed acquisition of RAMs compared with WT virus. Pairing doravirine with islatravir or lamivudine attenuated the development of NNRTI RAMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Doravirine showed favourable resistance profiles against viruses harbouring NRTI and NNRTI RAMs. The high barrier to resistance to doravirine coupled with the long intracellular half-life of islatravir may provide the opportunity for long-acting treatment options.

Potential role of doravirine for the treatment of HIV-1-infected persons with transmitted drug resistance

BACKGROUND

Doravirine has a unique resistance profile but how this profile might increase its usefulness beyond first-line therapy in persons with susceptible viruses has not been well studied. We sought to determine scenarios in which doravirine would retain activity against isolates from ART-naïve persons with transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and to identify gaps in available doravirine susceptibility data.

METHODS

We analyzed published in vitro doravirine susceptibility data and applied the results to 42,535 RT sequences from ART-naïve persons published between 2017 and 2021. NNRTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were defined as those with a Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database doravirine penalty score either alone or in combination with other mutations.

RESULTS

V106A, Y188L, F227C/L, M230L, and Y318F were associated with the greatest reductions in doravirine susceptibility. However, several NNRTI DRMs and DRM combinations lacking these canonical resistance mutations had > tenfold reduced susceptibility including G190E, one isolate with G190S, three isolates with L100I + K103N, one isolate with K103N + P225H, and isolates with L100I + K103N + V108I and K101E + Y181C + G190A. Of the 42,535 ART-naïve sequences, 3,374 (7.9%) contained a NNRTI DRM of which 2,788 (82.6%) contained 1 DRM (n = 33 distinct mutations), 426 (12.6%) contained 2 DRMs (79 distinct pairs of mutations), and 143 (4.2%) contained ≥ 3 DRMs (86 distinct mutation patterns). Among the 2,788 sequences with one DRM, 112 (4.0%) were associated with ≥ 3.0-fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while 2,625 (94.2%) were associated with < 3.0-fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for individual NNRTI DRMs in 51 sequences (1.8%). Among the 426 sequences with two NNRTI DRMs, 180 (42.3%) were associated with ≥ 3.0 fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while just 32 (7.5%) had < 3.0 fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for 214 (50.2%) sequences containing two NNRTI DRMs.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line therapy containing doravirine plus two NRTIs is expected to be effective in treating most persons with TDR as more than 80% of TDR sequences had a single NNRTI DRM and as more than 90% with a single DRM were expected to be susceptible to doravirine. However, caution is required for the use of doravirine in persons with more than one NNRTI DRM even if none of the DRMs are canonical doravirine-resistance mutations.

Role of islatravir in HIV treatment and prevention: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent updates on the potential role of islatravir for HIV treatment and prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Islatravir is an investigational antiretroviral agent with unique pharmacologic properties that facilitate flexible dosing regimens. Islatravir has demonstrated potent antiviral activity and a high barrier to resistance when combined with doravirine and lamivudine. A simplified two-drug HIV treatment regimen of islatravir combined with doravirine has also demonstrated comparable efficacy to standard of care three-drug regimens. The long half-life and high potency of islatravir's active metabolite may support its use as a long-acting option for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). A once monthly oral dose of islatravir maintains effective concentrations of its active metabolite over the entire dosing interval. Furthermore, an investigational implantable formulation has been projected to provide efficacious concentrations for at least a year and exhibits comparable distribution into vaginal and rectal tissues making it a promising PrEP option for male and female individuals. Islatravir has minimal risks of drug interactions as it is not a substrate, inducer, or inhibitor of major drug metabolizers and transporters. Finally, clinical trials demonstrate islatravir's favorable safety profile revealing only mild and transient adverse events.

SUMMARY

Leveraging the unique pharmacological properties of islatravir offers opportunities for simplified HIV treatment regimens and long-acting PrEP making it a valuable addition to the antiretroviral arsenal.

Doravirine and Islatravir Have Complementary Resistance Profiles and Create a Combination with a High Barrier to Resistance

Doravirine (DOR), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), was approved for treatment of HIV-1 infection in 2018. In the pivotal phase 3 trials, DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD, 7 out of 747 (0.9%) treatment-naive participants treated with DOR plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) met protocol-defined virologic failure criteria and showed phenotypic resistance to DOR at week 48. The most common DOR resistance-associated mutation (RAM) detected in 5 of the 7 resistant isolates was F227C. Six isolates bearing NRTI RAMs (M184V and/or K65R) were resistant to lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) but not to other approved NRTIs. All DOR-resistant isolates were susceptible or hypersusceptible (fold change of <0.25) to islatravir (ISL), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI). Isolate hypersusceptibility to ISL required F227C, in contrast to zidovudine, an NRTI, which required M184V. Based on the frequent emergence of F227C, we hypothesized that DOR and ISL would create a combination (DOR/ISL) with a high barrier to resistance. In de novo resistance selection studies in MT4-GFP cells (MT4 cells engineered to express green fluorescent protein), DOR/ISL synergistically prevented viral breakthrough at a threshold of 2× the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀). DOR/ISL exhibited a higher barrier to resistance than DOR/3TC and dolutegravir (DTG)/3TC. Resistance analysis showed no emergence of substitutions at F227, an observation consistent with its ability to confer hypersusceptibility to ISL. Overall, the data demonstrate that DOR/ISL creates a 2-drug combination with a higher barrier to resistance, consistent with the reported clinical activity.

Doravirine: its role in HIV treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed evidence concerning the novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor doravirine, aiming to identify situations where it may be selected in preference to integrase inhibitors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Doravirine is licenced for the treatment of HIV-1 in North America and Europe. In two multicentre randomized controlled trials, noninferiority with comparator drugs efavirenz and darunavir/ritonavir was observed at 96 weeks. Doravirine is associated with a lower incidence of neuropsychiatric side effects relative to efavirenz, and favourable lipid changes relative to darunavir over 96 weeks. A lower incidence of weight gain, relative to indirect comparisons with integrase inhibitors, was observed. Doravirine has a high genetic barrier to resistance with retained activity in the presence of single NNRTI mutations K103N, Y181C and G190A. Primary drug resistance is infrequent and may be higher in South Africa relative to European populations. Doravirine may be used in renal or hepatic impairment and has a low potential for drug-drug interactions.

SUMMARY

Doravirine is a well tolerated and effective agent in ART-naive patients. Direct comparison with integrase inhibitors, and evidence on the outcomes of treatment with doravirine in the presence of prior NNRTI experience are required to better elucidate which patients will benefit most from doravirine therapy.

Distribution characteristics of drug resistance mutations of HIV CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC and CRF08_BC from patients under ART in Ganzhou, China

BACKGROUND

Drug resistance mutation (DRM)-associated virological failure has become a critical issue for ART and the elimination of HIV.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the distribution characteristics of DRMs of HIV CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC and CRF08_BC, the predominant subtypes in China.

METHODS

Patients receiving ART up to 31 August 2020 in Ganzhou in China were recruited. Full-length sequences of the HIV pol gene were amplified from patients with virological failure. DRMs and antiretroviral susceptibility were explored using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database HIVdb Program.

RESULTS

Overall, 279 of 2204 patients under ART were found to have virological failure. Nine HIV subtypes were identified among 211 sequences that were amplified successfully and CRF08_BC (37.0%), CRF01_AE (26.1%) and CRF07_BC (25.6%) were the most prevalent, with mutation frequencies of 44.9% (35/78), 52.7% (29/55) and 35.2% (19/54), respectively. The most common DRMs of these three subtypes were K103N and M184V, while the mutation frequencies of M41L, D67N, K70R, K101E, V106M, Y181C, K219E, H221Y and N348I were obviously different among subtypes. The resistance levels and frequencies for antiretroviral drugs for these three subtypes were similar and resistances to nevirapine, efavirenz, lamivudine and emtricitabine were the most frequently observed. Compared with CRF01_AE and CRF07_BC, CRF08_BC had higher proportions of DRMs for NRTIs and lower frequencies of resistance to NRTIs and NNRTIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution characteristics of DRMs of HIV CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC and CRF08_BC were inconsistent and should be considered when selecting antiretroviral strategies, developing new drugs and controlling HIV strains containing DRMs.