Improving outcomes and antibiotic stewardship (IOAS) for patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections through use of rapid testing: a quasi-experimental multicentre study of the Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC Kit

Delving into discrepancies, a single-center experience with Accelerate Pheno for gram-negative bacteremia, a rapid phenotypic susceptibility testing method

Objective

Discrepancies or inaccuracies between testing methods can create confusion or lead to clinical harm if antibiotics are inappropriately chosen. We report our clinical experience using the Accelerate Pheno™ followed by routine automated susceptibilities by the Vitek®2 for positive blood cultures with gram-negative rods.

Design

This was a retrospective review of positive gram-negative blood cultures, including comparison of susceptibility testing results and impact on clinical care.

Setting

Academic teaching hospital.

Patients participants

All patients admitted to the hospital with gram-negative bacteremia from January 2020 to December 2022.

Methods

Microbiology was reviewed for discrepancies as defined by very major errors (VMEs), major errors (MEs), and minor errors (mEs). Clinical charts were reviewed for antibiotic therapy.

Results

Positive blood cultures with gram-negative rods were included (n = 262). Between these two methods, overall essential agreement was 93.7% (2162/2304) and categorical agreement 93.5% (2159/2306). There were 147 discrepancies noted, including 6 VMEs, 25 MEs, and 116 mEs accounting for 96 patients. Antibiotic choice was changed in 8 patients due to perceived suboptimal empiric therapy based on the rapid susceptibility results.

Conclusions

The Accelerate Pheno tended to over-call resistance compared to the Vitek®2. Few patients (8) received the incorrect antibiotic based on the Pheno result. Stewardship programs may choose to optimize their rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing reporting to help minimize confusion and guide appropriate antibiotic selection.

Evaluating the impact of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bloodstream infections: a review of actionability, antibiotic use and patient outcome metrics

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is a core function of the clinical microbiology laboratory and is critical to the management of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) to facilitate optimal antibiotic therapy selection. Recent technological advances have resulted in several rapid methods for determining susceptibility direct from positive blood culture that can provide turnaround times in under 8 h, which is considerably shorter than conventional culture-based methods. As diagnostic results do not directly produce a medical intervention, actionability is a primary determinant of the effect these technologies have on antibiotic use and ultimately patient outcomes. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies consistently show that rapid AST significantly reduces time to results and improves antimicrobial therapy for patients with BSI across various methods, patient populations and organisms. To date, the clinical impact of rapid AST has been demonstrated in some observational studies, but randomized controlled trials have not been sufficiently powered to validate many of these findings. This article reviews various metrics that have been described in the literature to measure the impact of rapid AST on actionability, antibiotic exposure and patient outcomes, as well as highlighting how implementation and workflow processes can affect these metrics.

Approaches to Reduce Use and Duration of Anti-MRSA Agents for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: A Review of Recent Literature

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have the potential to effectively deescalate unnecessary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage. This review summarizes literature published from 2014 through 2021 describing contemporary ASP methods and their resulting effectiveness at reducing anti-MRSA agent use (ie vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, and clindamycin). This review of the literature examined the following strategies, which had reports of success in either decreasing the use or duration of anti-MRSA agents: prospective review and feedback, antibiotic timeouts, health system or department protocol changes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid testing of patient samples. Most of the current literature continue to support most ASP interventions including antibiotic timeouts, pathways, and molecular testing including MRSA nasal PCRs and rapid diagnostic testing can be successful at reducing unnecessary anti-MRSA use.

Mortality due to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteremia in an Endemic Region: No Better than a Toss of a Coin

The incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bloodstream infections (BSIs) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Little evidence exists regarding the epidemiology of BSIs and the use of appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy in endemic regions. Novel diagnostic tests (RDTs) may facilitate and improve patient management. Data were assessed from patients with MDR Gram-negative bacteremia at a university tertiary hospital over a 12-month period. In total, 157 episodes of MDR Gram-negative BSI were included in the study. The overall mortality rate was 50.3%. Rapid molecular diagnostic tests were used in 94% of BSI episodes. In univariate analysis, age (OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03, 1.08) p < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.51 (95% CI 1.25, 1.83) p < 0.001), procalcitonin ≥ 1(OR 3.67 (CI 95% 1.73, 7.79) p < 0.001), and monotherapy with tigecycline (OR 3.64 (95% CI 1.13, 11.73) p = 0.030) were the only factors associated with increased overall mortality. Surprisingly, time to appropriate antimicrobial treatment had no impact on mortality. MDR pathogen isolation, other than Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumanii, was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.35 (95% CI 0.16, 0.79) p = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, the only significant factor for mortality was procalcitonin ≥ 1 (OR 2.84 (95% CI 1.13, 7.11) p = 0.025). In conclusion, in an endemic area, mortality rates in MDR BSI remain notable. High procalcitonin was the only variable that predicted death. The use of rapid diagnostics did not improve mortality rate.

Impact of phenotypic rapid diagnostic assay on duration of empiric antibiotics for gram-negative bacteremia

Objective

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are increasingly being implemented as antimicrobial stewardship tools to facilitate antibiotic modification and reduce complications related to their overutilization. We measured the clinical impact of a phenotypic RDT with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the setting of gram-negative bacteremia.

Setting and participants

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we evaluated adult patients with gram-negative bacteremia who received at least 72 hours of an antibiotic.

Methods

The primary outcome was the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy for gram-negative bacteremia. Secondary outcomes included time-to-directed therapy, proportion of modifications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and subsequent infection with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) or C. difficile infection (CDI).

Results

The duration of empiric antibiotics decreased in the RDT+AMS group (4 days vs 2 days; P < .01). Time to directed therapy decreased from 75.0 to 27.9 hours (P < .01).

Conclusions

The clinical outcomes of LOS, MDRO, and CDI were reduced. The phenotypic RDT demonstrated an improvement in stewardship measures and clinical outcomes.

Impact on time to active antimicrobial therapy with 24-hour pharmacist review of Accelerate Pheno BC Kit results

The Accelerate Pheno platform provides rapid identification and susceptibility data. We demonstrate successful incorporation of 24-hour pharmacist review of Accelerate Pheno results that reduced the number of patients going >3 hours from result without an order for active antimicrobial therapy from 29 (2.8%) of 1,043 to 9 (0.85%) of 1,053 (P < .001).

Effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programmes based on rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of haematologic patients having high-risk factors for bacteraemia related mortality: A post-hoc analysis of an RCT

OBJECTIVES

A randomised controlled trial showed that rapid phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) with antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP) increases the proportion of haematologic patients with bacteraemia receiving optimal targeted therapy within 72 hrs of blood culture collection. The present post-hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of rapid phenotypic AST intervention in haematologic patients at high risk of a poor outcome from bacteraemia.

METHODS

Haematologic patients with bacteraemia (n = 116) were assigned randomly to a conventional AST group or a rapid AST group. The two outcome measures were the proportion of patients receiving optimal targeted therapy at 72 hrs post-blood culture collection and the time to optimal targeted therapy; subgroup analysis was conducted based on baseline demographics (age, sex) and prognostic (Charlson comorbidity index, haematologic treatment intensity, Pitt bacteraemia score, appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy and multidrug-resistant organism) indicators. The interaction effect between the intervention and subgroup factors was examined using regression model analysis.

RESULTS

Age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, haematologic treatment intensity, Pitt bacteraemia score and appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy had no significant interaction effects on the proportion of patients receiving optimal targeted therapy (P = 0.129-0.826). However, infection by a multidrug-resistant organism did have a significant interaction effect (P = 0.042). Regarding time to optimal targeted therapy, there were no significant interaction effects between the intervention and subgroup factors (P = 0.156-0.848).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid phenotypic AST intervention may accelerate early optimal targeted antimicrobial treatment of haematologic patients, even those in high-risk subgroups with bacteraemia.

Real-World Impact of the Accelerate PhenoTest ® BC Kit on patients with bloodstream infections in IOAS (Improving Outcomes and Antimicrobial Stewardship): A Quasi-Experimental Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. The IOAS (Improving Outcomes and Antimicrobial Stewardship) study seeks to evaluate the impact of the Accelerate PhenoTest® BC Kit (AXDX) on antimicrobial use and clinical outcomes in BSIs.

METHODS

This multicenter, quasi-experimental study compared clinical and antimicrobial stewardship metrics, prior to and after implementation of AXDX testing, to evaluate the impact this technology has on patients with BSI. Laboratory and clinical data from hospitalized patients with BSI (excluding contaminants) were compared between two arms, one that underwent testing on AXDX (post-AXDX) and one that underwent alternative organism identification and susceptibility testing (pre-AXDX). The primary outcomes were time to optimal therapy (TTOT) within 96 hours of blood culture positivity and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 854 patients with BSI (435 pre-AXDX, 419 post-AXDX) were included. Median TTOT was 17.2 hours shorter in the post-AXDX arm (23.7 hours) compared to the pre-AXDX arm (40.9 hours; P<0.0001). Compared with pre-AXDX, median time to first antimicrobial modification (24.2 versus 13.9 hours; P<0.0001) and first antimicrobial de-escalation (36.0 versus 27.2 hours; P=0.0004) were shorter in the post-AXDX arm. Mortality (8.7% pre-AXDX versus 6.0% post-AXDX), length of stay (7.0 pre-AXDX versus 6.5 days post-AXDX), and adverse drug events were not significantly different between arms. Length of stay was shorter in the post-AXDX arm (5.4 versus 6.4 days; P=0.03) among patients with Gram-negative bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

For BSIs, use of AXDX was associated with significant decreases in TTOT, first antimicrobial modification, and time to antimicrobial de-escalation.