Point of care testing for infectious disease: ownership and quality

At-home testing for respiratory viruses: a minireview of the current landscape

The landscape of at-home testing using over-the-counter (OTC) tests has been evolving over the last decade. The United States Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization rule has been in effect since the early 2000s, and it was widely employed during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic to authorize antigen and nucleic acid detection tests for use in central laboratories as well as OTC. During the pandemic, the first at-home tests for respiratory viruses became available for consumer use, which opened the door for additional respiratory virus OTC tests. Concerns may exist regarding the public's ability to properly collect samples, perform testing, interpret results, and report results to public health authorities. However, favorable comparison studies between OTC testing and centralized laboratory test results suggest that OTC testing may have a place in healthcare, and it is likely here to stay. This mini-review of OTC tests for viral respiratory diseases will briefly cover the regulatory and reimbursement environment, current OTC test availability, as well as the advantages and limitations of OTC tests.

An overview of point-of-care testing for infections in critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION

Molecular diagnostic systems for point-of-care (POC) testing are nowadays routinely used and are part of many labs. Although often intended for bedside use outside of the microbiology lab, there is still room for expansion.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the two techniques that are currently the most widespread, real-time polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). An overview is provided of the various manufacturers and products as well as the evidence and current use in clinical practice. The article further sheds light on some newer techniques, such as CRISPR-based diagnostics and lab-on-a-chip, which are still in development.

EXPERT OPINION

With many new platforms and techniques still in the pipeline and their potential currently not yet fully exploited, we expect the use of molecular POC testing to increase in the years to come. However, even when used in hospital - in lab, the main advantages of the tests being fast and easy to perform already provide significant benefits in terms of patient outcome.

Molecular point-of-care devices for the diagnosis of infectious diseases in resource-limited settings - A review of the current landscape, technical challenges, and clinical impact

Molecular point-of-care (POC) tests offer high sensitivity, rapid turnaround times, relative ease of use, and the convenience of laboratory-grade testing in the absence of formal laboratory spaces and equipment, making them appealing options for infectious disease diagnosis in resource-limited settings. In this review, we discuss the role and potential of molecular POC tests in resource-limited settings and their associated logistical challenges. We discuss U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments complexity levels, and the REASSURED criteria as a starting point for assessing options currently available inside and outside of the United States. We then present POC tests currently in research and development phases that have potential for commercialization and implementation in limited-resource settings. Finally, we review published studies that have assessed the clinical impact of molecular POC testing in limited- and moderate-resource settings.

Emergence of circulating influenza A H3N2 viruses with genetic drift in the matrix gene: Be alert of false negative test results

In March 2022, we observed samples with a negative fluorescent signal (60.5%, n=43) for the influenza A matrix gene, and a stronger positive signal for subtype A(H3N2). Forty-three samples were positive in InfA (H3N2) (mean Cq 30.9, range 23.9-35.1) and 26 of the 43 samples were negative in InfA matrix (mean Cq 28.0, range 23.2-30.6). Our multiplex test is a laboratory developed four-target, four-color influenza A reverse-transcription PCR assay targeting the matrix gene, subtypes A(H3N2) and A(H1N1)pdm09. Several samples were negative when retested on commercial influenza Point-of-Care assays. As the matrix gene is a stand-alone target in most commercial diagnostic assays, we caution against false negative subtype A test results.