Spectrophotometric detection of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with the EUCAST broth microdilution method: is it time for automated MIC reading of EUCAST antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species?

Twenty Years in EUCAST Anti-Fungal Susceptibility Testing: Progress & Remaining Challenges

Since its inception in 2002, the EUCAST Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee (AFST) has developed and refined susceptibility testing methods for yeast, moulds and dermatophytes, and established epidemiological cut-off values and breakpoints for antifungals. For yeast, three challenges have been addressed. Interpretation of trailing growth in fluconazole susceptibility testing, which has been proven without impact on efficacy if below the 50% endpoint. Variability in rezafungin MIC testing due to laboratory conditions, which has been solved by the addition of Tween 20 to the growth medium in E.Def 7.4. And third, interpretation of MICs for rare yeast with no breakpoints, where recommendations have been established for MIC-based clinical advice. For moulds, refinements include the validation of spectrophotometer reading for A. fumigatus to facilitate objective MIC determination, and for dermatophytes the establishment of a microdilution method with automated reading and a selective medium to minimise the risk of contaminations. Recent initiatives involve development and validation of agar-based screening assays for detection of potential azole and echinocandin resistance in A. fumigatus and Aspergillus species, respectively, and of terbinafine resistance in Trichophyton species. Moreover, the development of a EUCAST guidance document for molecular resistance testing represents an advancement, particularly for identifying target gene alterations associated with resistance. In summary, EUCAST AFST continues to play a pivotal role in standardizing AFST and facilitating accurate interpretation of susceptibility data for clinical decision-making. Adoption of EUCAST breakpoints for commercial test methods, however, requires thorough validation to ensure concordance with EUCAST reference testing species-specific MIC distributions.

EUCAST-Obtained Olorofim MICs against Aspergillus and Scedosporium Species and Lomentospora prolificans Showed High Agreements between Visual Inspection and Spectrophotometric Readings

Previous studies show high agreement between MIC spectrophotometric readings and visual inspection of azoles and amphotericin B against Aspergillus fumigatus isolates. Here, we tested and compared the in vitro activity of a novel antifungal, olorofim, against Aspergillus spp., Scedosporium spp., and Lomentospora prolificans by visual inspection and spectrophotometric readings. Clinical isolates of Aspergillus (n = 686) and Scedosporium (n = 36) spp. and L. prolificans (n = 13) were tested. Olorofim MICs were evaluated-following the EUCAST E.Def 9.4 procedure-by visual inspection or spectrophotometric readings (combinations of either ≥90% or ≥95% fungal growth inhibition endpoints compared to drug-free control endpoints and different wavelengths [405 nm, 450 nm, 492 nm, 540 nm, and 620 nm]). We observed high in vitro activity of olorofim against all tested Aspergillus spp. (MICs up to 0.06 mg/L), except for A. calidoustus, and against L. prolificans and Scedosporium spp. (MICs up to 0.125 mg/L). The combination of ≥90% fungal growth inhibition endpoints at wavelengths of ≥492 nm resulted in high essential agreements with A. fumigatus and lesser agreement with non-fumigatus Aspergillus, Scedosporium spp., and L. prolificans, although the number of isolates studied was low. This single-center study shows high agreement among olorofim MICs against A. fumigatus by visual inspection and spectrophotometric readings (≥90% fungal growth inhibition endpoints and wavelengths of ≥492 nm) and encouraging results against non-fumigatus Aspergillus spp., Scedosporium spp., and L. prolificans.