New antibiotics in clinical pipeline for treating infections caused by metallo-β-lactamases producing Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss novel antibiotics under clinical development, focusing on agents showing in-vitro activity against metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producing carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently, only a few approved agents show activity, alone or in synergistic combinations, against MBL-producing CR-GNB. If approved by regulatory agencies in case of favorable results from ongoing (and, for some agents, already completed) phase-3 studies, some novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations could become available in the next few years as additional important options for treating MBL-producing CR-GNB infections. Additional interesting agents that belong both to BL/BLI combinations and to antibiotic classes other than BL and BL/BLI combinations have also shown activity against MBL-producing CR-GNB, with most of them being in early phases of clinical development.

SUMMARY

Improving the use of these novel agents through virtuous antimicrobial stewardship frameworks able to guarantee both the efficacious treatment of infections requiring their use and the avoidance of their use whenever not necessary remains a challenge of utmost importance that should not be overlooked.

Comparison of BD Phoenix and disk diffusion to broth microdilution for determining cefepime susceptibility among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

There are increasing reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) that test as cefepime-susceptible (S) or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD). However, there are no data to compare the cefepime testing performance of BD Phoenix automated susceptibility system (BD Phoenix) and disk diffusion (DD) relative to reference broth microdilution (BMD) against carbapenemase-producing (CPblaKPC-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP CRE) isolates. Cefepime susceptibility results were interpreted according to CLSI M100Ed32. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (miEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for BD Phoenix (NMIC-306 Gram-negative panel) and DD relative to BMD. Correlates were also analyzed by the error rate-bounded method. EA and CA for CPblaKPC-CRE isolates (n = 64) were <90% with BD Phoenix while among non-CP CRE isolates (n = 58), EA and CA were 96.6%, and 79.3%, respectively. CA was <90% with DD for both cohorts. No ME or VME was observed for either isolate cohort; however, miEs were >10% for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix and DD tests. For error rate-bounded method, miEs were <40% for IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 ranges for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix. Regarding disk diffusion, miEs were unacceptable for all MIC ranges among CPblaKPC-CRE. For non-CP CRE isolates, only IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 range was acceptable at 37.2%. Using this challenge set of genotypic-phenotypic discordant CRE, the BD Phoenix MICs and DD susceptibility results trended higher (toward SDD and resistant phenotypes) relative to reference BMD results yielding lower CA. These results were more prominent among CPblaKPC-CRE than non-CP CRE.

Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of Cefepime Susceptibility in Escherichia coli from Whole-Genome Sequencing Data

The declining cost of performing bacterial whole-genome sequencing (WGS) coupled with the availability of large libraries of sequence data for well-characterized isolates have enabled the application of machine-learning (ML) methods to the development of nonlinear sequence-based predictive models. We tested the ML-based model developed by Next Gen Diagnostics for prediction of cefepime phenotypic susceptibility results in Escherichia coli. A cohort of 100 isolates of E. coli recovered from urine (n = 77) and blood (n = 23) cultures were used. The cefepime MIC was determined in triplicate by reference broth microdilution and classified as susceptible (MIC of ≤2 μg/mL) or not susceptible (MIC of ≥4 μg/mL) using the 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. Five isolates generated both susceptible and not susceptible MIC results, yielding categorical agreement of 95% for the reference method to itself. Categorical agreement of ML to MIC interpretations was 97%, with 2 very major (false, susceptible) and 1 major (false, not susceptible) errors. One very major error occurred for an isolate with blaCTX-M-27 (MIC mode, ≥32 μg/mL) and one for an isolate with blaTEM-34 for which the MIC cefepime mode was 4 μg/mL. One major error was for an isolate with blaCTX-M-27 but with a MIC mode of 2 μg/mL. These preliminary data demonstrated performance of ML for a clinically important antimicrobial-species pair at a caliber similar to phenotypic methods, encouraging wider development of sequence-based susceptibility prediction and its validation and use in clinical practice.

Activity of ertapenem/zidebactam (WCK 6777) against problem Enterobacterales

Background

Secondary healthcare will remain pressured for some years, both because SARS-CoV-2 will circulate as a nosocomial pathogen, and owing to backlogs of patients awaiting delayed elective procedures. These stresses will drive the use of Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT), which will need to cover increasingly resistant Gram-negative opportunists. We evaluated the activity of ertapenem/zidebactam, proposed for 2 + 2 g q24h administration.

Materials and methods

MICs were determined, by BSAC agar dilution, for 1632 Enterobacterales submitted to the UK national reference laboratory for investigation of antimicrobial resistance.

Results

Over 90% of Escherichia coli with AmpC, ESBLs, KPC, metallo- or OXA-48 carbapenemases were inhibited by ertapenem/zidebactam 1:1 at ertapenem’s current 0.5 mg/L breakpoint. For other major Enterobacterales, the proportions inhibited by ertapenem/zidebactam 1:1 at 0.5 mg/L were mostly 65% to 90% but were lower for Klebsiella pneumoniae/oxytoca with metallo- or OXA-48 β-lactamases. However, animal studies support an 8 mg/L breakpoint for ertapenem/zidebactam, based on a shortened T_>MIC being needed compared with ertapenem alone. On this basis ertapenem/zidebactam would count as active against 90%–100% of isolates in all groups except K. pneumoniae/oxytoca with MBLs (±OXA-48), where MICs and percent susceptibility vary substantially even with inocula within the BSAC acceptable range.

Conclusions

Ertapenem/zidebactam has a proposed once-daily regimen well suited to OPAT. Even on highly conservative breakpoint projections, it has potential against MDR E. coli, including metallo-carbapenemase producers. If trial data sustain the 8 mg/L breakpoint indicated by animal experiments, its potential will extend widely across infections due to ESBL-, AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.