The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology

Neutropenic Rat Thigh Infection Model for Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Anti-Infectives

The neutropenic mouse infection model is extensively used to characterize the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of anti-infective agents. However, it is difficult to evaluate agents following intravenous (i.v.) infusions using this model. Furthermore, in many drug discovery programs, lead identification and optimization is performed in rats, and pharmacology is performed in mice. Alternative models of infection are needed for robust predictions of PK/PD in humans. The rat is an alternative model of infection which can overcome the shortcomings of the mouse model. However, the rat neutropenic thigh infection (NTI) model has not been adequately characterized for evaluation of the PK/PD of anti-infectives. The aim of this study was to characterize the PK/PD of ciprofloxacin against bacterial pathogens in a rat NTI model. We studied the PK/PD relationships of ciprofloxacin against wild-type Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae in neutropenic Wistar rats following administration of 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg as single intravenous boluses and 30- and 60-min infusions. The PK/PD of ciprofloxacin against all four pathogens was AUC/MIC dependent and independent of the duration of administration at 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg. At human-equivalent rat doses, the PK/PD targets of ciprofloxacin achieved in rats for microbiological cure were similar to those reported in human patients. The neutropenic rat thigh infection model can be used to evaluate anti-infective agents intended to be administered as infusions in the clinic, and it complements the mouse model, increasing the robustness of PK/PD predictions in humans. IMPORTANCE Many antibiotics are administered as intravenous infusions in the clinic, especially in intensive care units. Anti-infective drug discovery companies develop clinical candidates that are intended to be administered as i.v. infusions in the clinic. However, there are no well-characterized models with which they can evaluate the PK/PD of the candidates following i.v. infusions. The neutropenic rat thigh infection model reported in this study helps in evaluating anti-infective agents that are intended to be administered as i.v. infusions in the clinic. The rat model is useful for simulating the clinical conditions for i.v. infusions for treatment of infections, such as acute bacterial skin and skin structure, lung, and urinary tract infections. This model is predictive of efficacy in humans and can serve as an additional confirmatory model, along with the mouse model, for determining the proof of concept and for making robust predictions of efficacy in humans.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: resistance in vitro

This article reviews resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam as an aspect of its primary pharmacology, linked thematically with recent reviews of the basic in vitro and in vivo translational biology of the combination (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77: 2321-40 and 2341-52). In Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, single-step exposures to 8×  MIC of ceftazidime/avibactam yielded frequencies of resistance from <∼0.5 × 10-9 to 2-8 × 10-9, depending on the host strain and the β-lactamase harboured. β-Lactamase structural gene mutations mostly affected the avibactam binding site through changes in the Ω-loop: e.g. Asp179Tyr (D179Y) in KPC-2. Other mutations included ones proposed to reduce the permeability to ceftazidime and/or avibactam through changes in outer membrane structure, up-regulated efflux, or both. The existence, or otherwise, of cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other antibacterial agents was also reviewed as a key element of the preclinical primary pharmacology of the new agent. Cross-resistance between ceftazidime/avibactam and other β-lactam-based antibacterial agents was caused by MBLs. Mechanism-based cross-resistance was not observed between ceftazidime/avibactam and fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides or colistin. A low level of general co-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed in MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. For example, among 2821 MDR Klebsiella spp., 3.4% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 0.07% of 8177 non-MDR isolates. Much of this was caused by possession of MBLs. Among 1151 MDR, XDR and pandrug-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from the USA, 11.1% were resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, in contrast to 3.0% of 7452 unselected isolates. In this case, the decreased proportion susceptible was not due to MBLs.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established β-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent β-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac172).