Evaluation of integrase resistance in individuals who failed a regimen containing dolutegravir in French and Italian clinical settings

Virological Failure After Switch to Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Injectable Therapy: An In-depth Analysis

BACKGROUND

Long-acting (LA) injectable therapy with cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) is currently used as maintenance treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and has a low risk for virological failure (VF). Although the risk is low, the circumstances and impact of VF in the real-world setting merit further evaluation.

METHODS

We performed an in-depth clinical, virological, and pharmacokinetic analysis on the reasons behind and the impact of VF during LA CAB/RPV therapy in 5 cases from the Netherlands. Genotypic resistance testing was performed after the occurrence of VF, and drug plasma (trough) concentrations were measured after VF was established and on any other samples to assess on-treatment drug levels. CAB and RPV drug levels that were below the first quartile of the population cutoff (≤Q1) were considered to be low.

RESULTS

Five cases who were eligible for LA CAB/RPV experienced VF despite a low predicted risk at baseline. Genotypic resistance testing revealed extensive selection of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-associated mutations in all cases, and integrase strand transfer inhibitor mutations in 4 cases. All cases displayed low drug levels of either CAB, RPV, or both during the treatment course, likely contributing to the occurrence of VF. In 3 cases, we were able to identify the potential mechanisms behind these low drug levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first in-depth multiple case analysis of VF on LA CAB/RPV therapy in a real-world setting. Our observations stress the need to be aware for (evolving) risk factors and the yield of a comprehensive clinical, virological, and pharmacokinetic approach in case of failure.

Real-world prevalence of integrase inhibitor resistance and virological failure since adoption as guideline-preferred therapy

Background

Limited data reporting real-world prevalence of integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R) in the USA are available because their recommendation as first-line treatment in 2017. Reported national surveillance data in the USA estimated INSTI-R to be 6.3% as of 2018. This article aims to describe estimated prevalence of INSTI-R within a single clinic network in Chicago, IL, USA, and identify risk factors for resistance and virological failure (VF).

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-centre study of adults with HIV starting an INSTI-containing regimen between September 2017 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the difference in INSTI-R of the sample population compared with the national prevalence. Other outcomes included VF and documented INSTI-R mutations.

Results

Of 948 participants screened, 321 were included. Eight people had baseline INSTI-R testing results available, of which five had INSTI-R at baseline for an estimated prevalence of 1.6%. This estimation was significantly less than the national estimated prevalence of 6.3% (p<0.001). VF occurred in 26 (7.8%) individuals. Because no participants acquired INSTI-R during the study period, investigators were unable to identify risk factors associated with the development of INSTI-R. People with high pre-treatment viral loads had 1.21 (95% CI 1.05-1.39) higher odds of VF.

Conclusions

Amongst participants on INSTI-containing regimens, INSTI-R rates were estimated to be lower than the estimated national prevalence. Detectable pre-switch viral loads were more associated with VF than undetectable viral loads.

A Comprehensive Literature Review of Treatment-Emergent Integrase Resistance with Dolutegravir-Based Regimens in Real-World Settings

After a decade of dolutegravir (DTG) use in various antiretroviral therapy combinations and in diverse populations globally, it is critical to identify HIV strains with reduced drug susceptibility and monitor emergent resistance in people living with HIV who experience virologic failure while on DTG-based regimens. We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify studies that reported DTG resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) emerging under selection pressure. Our review showed that RAMs conferring resistance to DTG were rare in 2-drug and 3-drug regimens used in real-world cohorts, corroborating data from clinical trials. The potency of DTG in maintaining virologic suppression was demonstrated, even in cases of pre-existing resistance to companion drugs in the regimen. Estimates of DTG RAMs depended on the population and certain risk factors, including monotherapy, baseline resistance or lack of genotypic testing, treatment history and prior virologic failure, and suboptimal treatment adherence. The RAMs detected after virologic failure, often in heavily treatment-experienced individuals with prior exposure to integrase strand transfer inhibitors, were G118R, E138K, G140A/C/R/S, Q148H/K/R, N155H, and R263K. Overall, these data highlight the durable effectiveness and high barrier to resistance of DTG as part of combination antiretroviral therapy in a wide variety of settings.

Treatment Emergent Dolutegravir Resistance Mutations in Individuals Naïve to HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors: A Rapid Scoping Review

Background: Dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) rarely leads to virological failure (VF) and drug resistance in integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-naïve persons living with HIV (PLWH). As a result, limited data are available on INSTI-associated drug resistance mutations (DRMs) selected by DTG-containing ART regimens. Methods: We reviewed studies published through July 2023 to identify those reporting emergent major INSTI-associated DRMs in INSTI-naïve PLWH receiving DTG and those containing in vitro DTG susceptibility results using a standardized assay. Results: We identified 36 publications reporting 99 PLWH in whom major nonpolymorphic INSTI-associated DRMs developed on a DTG-containing regimen and 21 publications containing 269 in vitro DTG susceptibility results. DTG-selected DRMs clustered into four largely non-overlapping mutational pathways characterized by mutations at four signature positions: R263K, G118R, N155H, and Q148H/R/K. Eighty-two (82.8%) viruses contained just one signature DRM, including R263K (n = 40), G118R (n = 24), N155H (n = 9), and Q148H/R/K (n = 9). Nine (9.1%) contained ≥1 signature DRM, and eight (8.1%) contained just other DRMs. R263K and G118R were negatively associated with one another and with N155H and Q148H/K/R. R263K alone conferred a median 2.0-fold (IQR: 1.8-2.2) reduction in DTG susceptibility. G118R alone conferred a median 18.8-fold (IQR:14.2-23.4) reduction in DTG susceptibility. N155H alone conferred a median 1.4-fold (IQR: 1.2-1.6) reduction in DTG susceptibility. Q148H/R/K alone conferred a median 0.8-fold (IQR: 0.7-1.1) reduction in DTG susceptibility. Considerably higher levels of reduced susceptibility often occurred when signature DRMs occurred with additional INSTI-associated DRMs. Conclusions: Among INSTI-naïve PLWH with VF and treatment emergent INSTI-associated DRMs, most developed one of four signature DRMs, most commonly R263K or G118R. G118R was associated with a much greater reduction in DTG susceptibility than R263K.