Pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampicin and the once-daily combination of saquinavir and low-dose ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis

Host-directed therapy against mycobacterium tuberculosis infections with diabetes mellitus

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by the bacterial pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and is one of the principal reasons for mortality and morbidity worldwide. Currently, recommended anti-tuberculosis drugs include isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide. TB treatment is lengthy and inflicted with severe side-effects, including reduced patient compliance with treatment and promotion of drug-resistant strains. TB is also prone to other concomitant diseases such as diabetes and HIV. These drug-resistant and complex co-morbid characteristics increase the complexity of treating MTB. Host-directed therapy (HDT), which effectively eliminates MTB and minimizes inflammatory tissue damage, primarily by targeting the immune system, is currently an attractive complementary approach. The drugs used for HDT are repositioned drugs in actual clinical practice with relative safety and efficacy assurance. HDT is a potentially effective therapeutic intervention for the treatment of MTB and diabetic MTB, and can compensate for the shortcomings of current TB therapies, including the reduction of drug resistance and modulation of immune response. Here, we summarize the state-of-the-art roles and mechanisms of HDT in immune modulation and treatment of MTB, with a special focus on the role of HDT in diabetic MTB, to emphasize the potential of HDT in controlling MTB infection.

Simultaneous determination of first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs and one metabolite of isoniazid by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-tuberculosis coinfection

The incidence rate of tuberculosis (TB) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is 26 times higher than that in other patients. Patients with both infections require long-term combination therapy, which increases therapy complexity and might lead to serious adverse reactions and drug-drug interactions. To optimize therapy for patients with HIV and TB coinfection, we developed an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method to simultaneously quantify four anti-tuberculosis drugs and one isoniazid (INH) metabolite. Blood samples (n = 32) from 16 patients with HIV and TB coinfection were collected. Plasma protein precipitation with acetonitrile was followed by a hydrazine reaction between INH and cinnamaldehyde (CA) to produce phenylhydrazone (CA-INH) and dilution with heptafluorobutyric acid. The separation was performed on an Acquity UHPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm column (2.1 × 100 mm, Waters) with a mobile phase consisting of 10 mmol/L ammonium formate (pH = 4) in water (solvent A) and 0.1 % formic acid in methanol (solvent B) in a gradient elution. The compounds were detected using a positive multiple reaction monitoring model. INH, acetyl-INH (AC-INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), and pyrazinamide (PZA) showed good linear relationships in their quantitative ranges, with lower limits of quantification of 48, 192, 200, 96, and 480 ng/mL, respectively. The inter- and intraday precision was within 15 %, and the accuracy was between 85 % and 115 %. The mean plasma concentrations of INH, AC-INH, RIF, EMB, and PZA in patients were 1990.23 (24–16 600), 863.06 (96–2880), 3507.05 (229–9800), 808.10 (149–2130), and 18 838.33 (240–34 800) ng/mL, respectively. The plasma concentrations detected in the 16 patients were lower than the targeted concentrations in HIV-negative TB patients. In summary, we developed a simple UHPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of first-line TB drugs, and successfully applied it for therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with HIV and TB coinfection. This method will facilitate monitoring of TB drugs in the future.

Cytokine-Mediated Systemic Adverse Drug Reactions in a Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Dolutegravir With Once-Weekly Isoniazid and Rifapentine

Background

Once-weekly isoniazid and rifapentine for 3 months is a treatment option in persons with human immunodeficiency virus and latent tuberculosis infection. This study aimed to examine pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between this regimen and dolutegravir, a first-line antiretroviral medication.

Methods

This was a single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, drug-drug interaction study in healthy volunteers. Subjects received oral dolutegravir 50 mg once daily alone (days 1-4) and concomitantly with once-weekly isoniazid 900 mg, rifapentine 900 mg, and pyridoxine 50 mg (days 5-19). Dolutegravir concentrations were measured on days 4, 14, and 19, and rifapentine, 25-desacetyl-rifapentine, and isoniazid concentrations were measured on day 19. Cytokines and antidrug antibodies to isoniazid and rifapentine were examined at select time points.

Results

The study was terminated following the development of flu-like syndrome and elevated aminotransferase levels in 2 of 4 subjects after the third isoniazid-rifapentine dose. Markedly elevated levels of interferon-γ, CXCL10, C-reactive protein, and other cytokines were temporally associated with symptoms. Antidrug antibodies were infrequently detected. Dolutegravir area under the curve (AUC) was decreased by 46% (90% confidence interval, 27-110%; P = .13) on day 14. Rifapentine and 25-desacetyl rifapentine levels on day 19 were comparable to reference data, whereas isoniazid AUCs were approximately 67%-92% higher in the subjects who developed toxicities.

Conclusions

The combined use of dolutegravir with once-weekly isoniazid-rifapentine resulted in unexpected and serious toxicities that were mediated by endogenous cytokine release. Additional investigations are necessary to examine the safety and efficacy of coadministering these medications.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02771249.

The importance of clinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies in unraveling the determinants of early and late tuberculosis outcomes

Tuberculosis remains a major infectious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current antibiotic regimens, constructed prior to the development of modern pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) tools, are based on incomplete understanding of exposure–response relationships in drug susceptible and multidrug resistant tuberculosis. Preclinical and population PK data suggest that clinical PK–PD studies may enable therapeutic drug monitoring for some agents and revised dosing for others. Future clinical PK–PD challenges include: incorporation of PK methods to assay free concentrations for all active metabolites; selection of appropriate early outcome measures which reflect therapeutic response; elucidation of genetic contributors to interindividual PK variability; conduct of targeted studies on special populations (including children); and measurement of PK–PD parameters at the site of disease.

Effects of cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4 and CYP2C19) inhibition and induction on the exposure of selumetinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in healthy subjects: results from two clinical trials

Purpose

Two phase I, open-label trials in healthy subjects assessed whether co-administration with CYP3A4/CYP2C19 inhibitors, itraconazole/fluconazole (study A), or CYP3A4 inducer, rifampicin (study B), affects the exposure, safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics of selumetinib and its metabolite N-desmethyl selumetinib.

Methods

In study A (n = 26), subjects received a single dose of selumetinib 25 mg and, after 4 days of washout, were randomized to treatment 1 (itraconazole 200 mg twice daily on days 1–11) or treatment 2 (fluconazole 400 mg on day 1 then 200 mg/day on days 2–11) plus co-administration of single-dose selumetinib 25 mg on day 8 (selumetinib staggered 4 h after itraconazole/fluconazole dose); Twenty-one days after discharge/washout, subjects received the alternate treatment. In study B (n = 22), subjects received a single dose of selumetinib 75 mg (day 1) then rifampicin 600 mg/day (days 4–14) plus a single dose of selumetinib 75 mg on day 12. Pharmacokinetic analysis and safety assessments were performed.

Results

Selumetinib co-administered with itraconazole, fluconazole (selumetinib staggered 4 h after itraconazole/fluconazole dose), or rifampicin was well tolerated. Selumetinib exposure was higher when co-administered with itraconazole or fluconazole (area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by 49 and 53%, respectively; maximum plasma concentration (C_max) increased by 19 and 26%, respectively) but lower when co-dosed with rifampicin (AUC and C_max decreased by 51 and 26%, respectively) versus selumetinib dosed alone. Co-administration with itraconazole or rifampicin decreased N-desmethyl selumetinib AUC_(0–t) (11 and 55%, respectively), and C_max (25 and 18%, respectively), with fluconazole, AUC_(0–t) increased by 40%, but there was no effect on C_max.

Conclusions

Co-administration of CYP3A4/CYP2C19 inhibitors will likely increase exposure to selumetinib, while CYP3A4 inducers will likely reduce its exposure.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-016-2153-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacogenetic, and Other Factors Influencing CNS Penetration of Antiretrovirals

Neurological complications associated with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are a matter of great concern. While antiretroviral (ARV) drugs are the cornerstone of HIV treatment and typically produce neurological benefit, some ARV drugs have limited CNS penetration while others have been associated with neurotoxicity. CNS penetration is a function of several factors including sieving role of blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers and activity of innate drug transporters. Other factors are related to pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of the specific ARV agent or mediated by drug interactions, local inflammation, and blood flow. In this review, we provide an overview of the various factors influencing CNS penetration of ARV drugs with an emphasis on those commonly used in sub-Saharan Africa. We also summarize some key associations between ARV drug penetration, CNS efficacy, and neurotoxicity.

Pharmacological interactions between rifampicin and antiretroviral drugs: challenges and research priorities for resource-limited settings

Coadministration of antituberculosis and antiretroviral therapy is often inevitable in high-burden countries where tuberculosis (TB) is the most common opportunistic infection associated with HIV/AIDS. Concurrent use of rifampicin and many antiretroviral drugs is complicated by pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Rifampicin is a very potent enzyme inducer, which can result in subtherapeutic antiretroviral drug concentrations. In addition, TB drugs and antiretroviral drugs have additive (pharmacodynamic) interactions as reflected in overlapping adverse effect profiles. This review provides an overview of the pharmacological interactions between rifampicin-based TB treatment and antiretroviral drugs in adults living in resource-limited settings. Major progress has been made to evaluate the interactions between TB drugs and antiretroviral therapy; however, burning questions remain concerning nevirapine and efavirenz effectiveness during rifampicin-based TB treatment, treatment options for TB-HIV-coinfected patients with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance or intolerance, and exact treatment or dosing schedules for vulnerable patients including children and pregnant women. The current research priorities can be addressed by maximizing the use of already existing data, creating new data by conducting clinical trials and prospective observational studies and to engage a lobby to make currently unavailable drugs available to those most in need.

Novel on-line column extraction apparatus coupled with binary peak focusing for high-performance liquid chromatography determination of rifampicin in human plasma: a strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring

In order to develop a method that is completely suitable for the routine therapeutic drug monitoring, a sensitive and fully automated on-line column extraction apparatus in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography allowing binary peak focusing was developed and validated for the determination of rifampicin in human plasma. Rifapentine was used as an internal standard. The analytical cycle started with the injection of 100 μL of the sample pretreated by protein precipitation in a Venusil SCX extraction column. After the elution, the analytes were transferred and concentrated in an Xtimate C18 trap column. Finally, the trapped analytes were separated by an Xtimate C18 analytical column and were analyzed by an ultraviolet detector at 336 nm. With this new strategy, continuous on-line analysis of the compounds was successfully performed. The method showed excellent performance for the analysis of rifampicin in plasma samples, including calibration curve linearity (All r were larger than 0.9996), sensitivity (lowest limit of quantification was 0.12 μg/mL), method accuracy (within 6.6% in terms of relative error), and precision (relative standard deviations of intra- and interday precision were less than 7.8%). These results demonstrated that the simple, reliable, and automatic method based on on-line column extraction and binary peak focusing is a promising approach for therapeutic drug monitoring in complex biomatrix samples.

CPY3A4-mediated α-hydroxyaldehyde formation in saquinavir metabolism

Saquinavir (SQV) is a protease inhibitor widely used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. We profiled SQV metabolism in mice using a metabolomic approach. Thirty SQV metabolites were identified in mouse feces and urine, of which 20 are novel. Most metabolites observed in mice were recapitulated in human liver microsomes. Among these novel metabolites, one α-hydroxyaldehyde produced from SQV N-dealkylation was noted and verified for the first time. Meanwhile, the corresponding product (3S)-N-tert-butyldecahydro-isoquinoline-3-carboxamide and its further metabolites were identified in mouse urine. The α-hydroxyaldehyde pathway was confirmed by using semicarbazide as a trapping reagent as well. Using recombinant cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes and Cyp3a-null mice, CYP3A was identified as the dominant enzyme contributing to the formation of α-hydroxyaldehyde. This study enhances our knowledge of SQV metabolism, which can be used for predicting drug-drug interactions and further understanding the mechanism of adverse effects associated with SQV.

Pharmacokinetics and 48 week efficacy of adjusted dose indinavir/ritonavir in rifampicin-treated HIV/tuberculosis-coinfected patients: a pilot study

HIV/tuberculosis (HIV/TB)-coinfected patients intolerant/resistant to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) have limited treatment options. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK)/safety/efficacy of an adjusted dose of indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/r) 600/100 mg plus two NRTIs in HIV/TB-coinfected Thais receiving rifampicin-based anti-TB treatment. This was a prospective, open-label study. Eighteen Thai, HIV/TB-coinfected patients between 18 and 60 years were recruited. IDV/r 600 mg/100 mg plus lamivudine and stavudine were administered every 12 h (bid). When rifampicin was stopped, IDV/r was reduced to 400/100 mg BID. Clinical outcomes, adverse events, and concomitant drugs were intensively collected. Intensive 12-h PK was performed after 2 weeks of IDV/r while on rifampicin. Samples were collected: predosing and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after drug intake. The median body weight was 55 kg. The median CD4 was 26 cells/μl. The median HIV RNA was 5.05 log(10) copies/ml. Then 15/18 underwent intensive PK at week 2. The median time between initiating rifampicin and IDV/r was 4.5 months. The median duration of rifampicin during study (rifampicin/IDV/r together) was 15.6 weeks. All received a total of 9 months of antituberculous drugs. The geometric means (GM) of indinavir AUC(0-12) and C(12) were 8.11 mg*h/liter and 0.03 mg/liter, respectively. After stopping rifampicin and reducing IDV/r to 400/100 bid, the GM indinavir C(12) increased to 0.68 mg/liter (p=0.004). In all, 8/18 (44%) had asymptomatic ALT elevation and 2/18 (11%) had symptomatic hepatotoxicity requiring IDV/r discontinuation. All 13 patients who remained on IDV/r treatment had HIV RNA <50 copies/ml at 48 weeks. Concomitant use of rifampicin and IDV/r resulted in subtherapeutic indinavir concentrations. Although 44% of them developed asymptomatic Grade 3/4 transaminitis, the rate of study drug discontinuation due to hepatotoxicity was low. Despite good virological outcome in our cohort, prolonged exposure to subtherapeutic indinavir concentrations may lead to treatment failure.

HIV and TB coinfection: using adjusted doses of lopinavir/ritonavir with rifampin

Evaluation of: Decloedt E, McIlleron H, Smith P, Merry C, Orrell C, Maartens G. Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in HIV-infected adults receiving rifampin with adjusted doses of lopinavir-ritonavir tablets. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55(7), 3195-3200 (2011). HIV and TB coinfection is a widespread problem, especially in resource-limited settings. Interactions between drugs metabolized through cytochrome P450 enzymes and p-glycoprotein efflux pump, such as rifampin and HIV protease inhibitors, complicate the management of both pathologies when they coexist. The article by Decloedt et al. elegantly assesses the pharmacokinetics of three twice-daily escalating doses of lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg, 600/150 mg and 800/200 mg), together with 600 mg daily of rifampin in 21 black African HIV-infected patients without TB. The article also reports safety, tolerability and virological outcomes after 3 weeks. Doubling lopinavir/ritonavir dose overcomes rifampin induction effect with good tolerability. However, concerns arise regarding the real interactions, tolerability and virological efficacy in HIV-TB-coinfected patients, which may differ from healthy volunteers or HIV-infected patients without TB.

AtriplaR/anti-TB combination in TB/HIV patients. Drug in focus

Background

Co-administration of anti-tuberculosis and antiretroviral therapy is often inevitable in high-burden countries where tuberculosis is the most common opportunistic infection associated with HIV/AIDS. Concurrent use of rifampicin and several antiretroviral drugs is complicated by pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction.

Method

Pubmed and Google search following the key words tuberculosis, HIV, emtricitabine, tenofovir efavirenz, interaction were used to find relevant information on each drug of the fixed dose combination Atripla^R

Results

Information on generic name, trade name, pharmacokinetic parameter, metabolism and the pharmacokinetic interaction with Anti-TB drugs of emtricitabine, tenofovir, and efavirenz was obtained.

Conclusion

Fixed dose combination of emtricitabine/tenofovir/efavirenz (ATRIPLA^R) which has been approved by Food and Drug Administration shows promising results as far as safety and efficacy is concerned in TB/HIV co-infection patients, hence can be considered effective and safe antiretroviral drug in TB/HIV management for adult and children above 3 years of age.

Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in HIV-infected adults receiving rifampin with adjusted doses of lopinavir-ritonavir tablets

Rifampin coadministration dramatically reduces plasma lopinavir (LPV) concentrations. In healthy volunteers, doubling the dose of a lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r) capsule formulation overcame this interaction, but a subsequent study of double doses of the tablet formulation was stopped early owing to hepatotoxicity. However, healthy-volunteer study findings may not apply to HIV-infected adults. We evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of LPV in HIV-infected adults virologically suppressed on an LPV/r regimen who were given rifampin, and the dose of the LPV/r tablet formulation was gradually increased. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of LPV/r were evaluated at baseline, a week after commencing rifampin, a week after the LPV/r dose was increased 1.5 times, and a week after the LPV/r dose was doubled. Twenty-one participants were enrolled. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] predose LPV concentrations (C(0)) were 8.1 (6.2 to 9.8) mg/liter at baseline, 1.7 (0.3 to 3.0) mg/liter after 7 days of rifampin, 5.9 (2.1 to 9.9) mg/liter with 1.5 times the dose of LPV/r, and 10.8 (7.0 to 13.1) mg/liter with double-dose LPV/r. There were no significant differences in the LPV area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), C(0), C(12), maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), or half-life (t(1/2)) between the baseline and double-dose LPV/r time points. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with two participants developing asymptomatic grade 3/4 transaminitis. Doubling the dose of the tablet formulation of LPV/r overcomes induction by rifampin. Less hepatotoxicity occurred in our cohort of HIV-infected participants than was reported in healthy-volunteer studies.

Second-line treatment in the Malawi antiretroviral programme: high early mortality, but good outcomes in survivors, despite extensive drug resistance at baseline

OBJECTIVES

The Malawi antiretroviral therapy (ART) programme uses the public health approach to identify ART failure. Advanced disease progression may occur before switching to second-line ART. We report outcomes for patients evaluated and initiated on second-line treatment in Malawi.

METHODS

Patients meeting Malawi immunological or clinical criteria for ART failure in two large urban ART clinics were evaluated for virological failure (viral load >400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) and, if failure was confirmed, initiated on second-line ART (zidovudine/lamivudine/tenofovir/lopinavir/ritonavir). Patients were seen monthly and laboratory evaluations were performed quarterly and as needed. We performed logistic regression modelling to identify factors associated with mortality, mortality or new HIV illnesses, and virological suppression at 12 months.

RESULTS

Of the 109 patients with confirmed virological failure, five patients died prior to initiation, three declined switching and 101 patients initiated second-line treatment. Over 12 months, 10 additional patients died, 34 patients experienced 45 HIV-related events, and 19 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Among survivors, 85.2% had HIV-1 RNA<400 copies/mL at 12 months. While power to distinguish differences was limited, response rates were similar regardless of baseline resistance level. The median CD4 count increase was 142 cells/microL. World Health Organization clinical failure at baseline [odds ratio (OR) 3.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-10.59] and body mass index <18.5 (OR 4.43; 95% CI 1.15-17.12) were risk factors for death. Baseline CD4 count <50 cells/microL was associated with increased risk for death or morbidity at 12 months (OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.01-6.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Second-line treatment in Malawi was associated with substantial mortality, morbidity and toxicity but, among survivors, virological outcomes were favourable.

Rifampin combination therapy for nonmycobacterial infections

The increasing emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has resulted in the increased use of rifampin combination therapy. The data supporting rifampin combination therapy in nonmycobacterial infections are limited by a lack of significantly controlled clinical studies. Therefore, its current use is based upon in vitro or in vivo data or retrospective case series, all with major limitations. A prominent observation from this review is that rifampin combination therapy appears to have improved treatment outcomes in cases in which there is a low organism burden, such as biofilm infections, but is less effective when effective surgery to obtain source control is not performed. The clinical data support rifampin combination therapy for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) after extensive debridement and for the treatment of prosthetic heart valve infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Importantly, rifampin-vancomycin combination therapy has not shown any benefit over vancomycin monotherapy against MRSA infections either clinically or experimentally. Rifampin combination therapy with daptomycin, fusidic acid, and linezolid needs further exploration for these severe MRSA infections. Lastly, an assessment of the risk-benefits is needed before the addition of rifampin to other antimicrobials is considered to avoid drug interactions or other drug toxicities.

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome among HIV-infected South African infants initiating antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence, clinical manifestations and risk factors for immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in young children initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

DESIGN

A prospective cohort of antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected children less than 24 months of age enrolled in a treatment strategies trial in Johannesburg, South Africa.

METHODS

Among 169 HIV-infected children initiating HAART, April 2005 to November 2006, the records of 83 children suspected to have IRIS within 6 months of starting treatment were reviewed to determine whether they met criteria for IRIS. Seven were excluded due to incomplete follow-up. Pretreatment and post-treatment characteristics of children with and without IRIS were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 34/162 (21%) children developed IRIS at a median of 16 days (range 7-115 days) post-HAART initiation. Bacille Calmette-Guérin reaction was most common occurring in 24/34 (71%) children, primarily injection site lesions and/or ipsilateral axillary lymphadenitis with abscess. Other IRIS conditions (not mutually exclusive) included Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n = 12), cytomegalovirus pneumonia (n = 1), Streptococcus pneumonia sepsis (n = 1), and severe seborrheic dermatitis (n = 1). Children with IRIS were younger (median age 7 vs. 10 months, P = 0.007) with a lower CD4 cell percentage (median 13.9 vs. 19.2, P = 0.009) at HAART initiation than controls. After 24 weeks on HAART, 62% of IRIS cases vs. 28% of controls had HIV RNA more than 400 copies/ml (P = 0.001), odds ratio = 2.88 (95% confidence interval = 1.14-7.29) after adjusting for baseline factors.

CONCLUSION

Infants and young children with advanced HIV disease initiating HAART are at high risk for developing IRIS, leading to additional morbidity and possibly impairing virologic response to antiretroviral treatment.

Clinical experience with the combined use of lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin

Thirty-four patients treated concomitantly with lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin were evaluated. Overall, only 15% used the recommended increased dose of lopinavir/ritonavir. Of patients on a nonadjusted dose of lopinavir/ritonavir, 67% had a subtherapeutic lopinavir plasma concentration and 38% had a detectable viral load. Forty percent of patients on an increased dose of lopinavir/ritonavir prematurely stopped the drug combination because of adverse events. Combined use of lopinavir/ritonavir and rifampicin is challenging as it implies balancing between suboptimal efficacy and toxicity.

Antiretroviral therapy in developing countries: pharmacologic considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recent studies in the field of clinical pharmacology of antiretroviral drugs and highlights the relevance of the findings to clinical practice in developing countries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Differences in antiretroviral pharmacokinetics are associated with polymorphisms of genes encoding drug metabolizing enzymes. Inadequate concentrations of antiretrovirals in children are common. A study in African children found subtherapeutic concentrations in 40% of patients receiving efavirenz at recommended doses.

SUMMARY

Recent findings on the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral agents relevant to clinical practice in developing countries are reviewed. Widespread poverty impacts negatively on HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention efforts. Improved access to treatment, social and economic support and pharmacology research in target populations are needed.

Unexpected Hepatotoxicity of Rifampin and Saquinavir/Ritonavir in Healthy Male Volunteers

OBJECTIVES: Rifampin is a potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme (CYP3A4) that metabolizes most protease inhibitor (PI) antiretrovirals. This study was designed to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the coadministration of the PIs saquinavir and ritonavir (a CYP3A4 inhibitor used as a pharmacoenhancer of other PIs) and rifampin when coadministered in healthy HIV-negative volunteers. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, one sequence, two-period crossover study involving 28 healthy HIV-negative volunteers, arm 1 was randomized to receive saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily while arm 2 received rifampin 600 mg once daily for 14 days. Both arms were then to receive concomitant saquinavir/ritonavir and rifampin for 2 additional weeks. Vital signs, electrocardiography, laboratory analyses, and blood levels of total saquinavir, ritonavir, rifampin, and desacetyl-rifampin, the primary metabolite of rifampin, were measured. RESULTS: In arm 1, 10/14 (71%) and, in arm 2, 11/14 (79%) participants completed the first study phase; eight participants in arm 1 and nine in arm 2 went on to receive both saquinavir/ritonavir and rifampin. Following substantial elevations (>/= grade 2) in hepatic transaminases in participants receiving the coadministered agents, the study was discontinued prematurely. Two participants in arm 1 displayed moderate elevations after five and four doses of rifampin, respectively. In arm 2, all participants experienced severe elevations within 4 days of initiating saquinavir/ritonavir. Clinical symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and headache) were more common and severe in arm 2. Clinical symptoms abated and transaminases normalized following drug discontinuation. Limited pharmacokinetic data suggest a possible relationship between transaminase elevation and elevated rifampin and desacetyl-rifampin concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Although not confirmed in HIV-infected patients, the data indicate that rifampin should not be coadministered with saquinavir/ritonavir.

A double transgenic mouse model expressing human pregnane X receptor and cytochrome P450 3A4

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), the most abundant human cytochrome P450 in liver, participates in the metabolism of approximately 50% of clinically used drugs. The pregnane X receptor (PXR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, is the major activator of CYP3A4 transcription. However, because of species differences in response to PXR ligands, it is problematic to use rodents to assess CYP3A4 regulation and function. The generation of double transgenic mice expressing human PXR and CYP3A4 (TgCYP3A4/hPXR) would provide a solution to this problem. In the current study, a TgCYP3A4/hPXR mouse model was generated by bacterial artificial chromosome transgenesis in Pxr-null mice. In TgCYP3A4/hPXR mice, CYP3A4 was strongly induced by rifampicin, a human-specific PXR ligand, but not by pregnenolone 16alpha-carbonitrile, a rodent-specific PXR ligand. Consistent with CYP3A expression, hepatic CYP3A activity increased approximately 5-fold in TgCYP3A4/hPXR mice pretreated with rifampicin. Most antihuman immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors are CYP3A substrates and their interactions with rifamycins are a source of major concern in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. By using TgCYP3A4/hPXR mice, human PXR-CYP3A4-mediated rifampicin-protease inhibitor interactions were recapitulated, as the metabolic stability of amprenavir, nelfinavir, and saquinavir decreased 52, 53, and 99%, respectively, in the liver microsomes of TgCYP3A4/hPXR mice pretreated with rifampicin. In vivo, rifampicin pretreatment resulted in an approximately 80% decrease in the area under the serum amprenavir concentration-time curve in TgCYP3A4/hPXR mice. These results suggest that the TgCYP3A4/hPXR mouse model could serve as a useful tool for studies on CYP3A4 transcription and function in vivo.

High incidence of adverse events in healthy volunteers receiving rifampicin and adjusted doses of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets

OBJECTIVE

Previous research in healthy volunteers has demonstrated that rifampicin and adjusted doses of lopinavir/ritonavir soft-gel capsules resulted in adequate exposure to lopinavir. Our objective was to study the combined use of rifampicin and the newly introduced lopinavir/ritonavir tablets.

METHODS

A total of 40 healthy volunteers were planned to start with 600 mg rifampicin once daily from days 1-5. From days 6-15, volunteers were randomized to receive lopinavir/ritonavir tablets dosed as either 600/150 or 800/200 mg twice daily, both in addition to 600 mg rifampicin once daily. A 12 h pharmacokinetic curve was planned on day 15. Safety assessments were conducted regularly throughout the study period.

RESULTS

Eleven volunteers started as the first group in this study. No major complaints occurred during day 1-5 (rifampicin only). After addition of lopinavir/ritonavir, eight volunteers suffered from both nausea and vomiting, one from nausea only, and one from vomiting only. On day 7, increases in aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) levels were reported in all volunteers and on day 8, the study was prematurely terminated. The AST/ALT levels continued to rise and peaked (grade 2, n = 2; grade 3, n = 1; grade 4, n = 8) on days 9-10. All values returned to normal within 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed a high incidence of adverse events when a higher than standard dose of the new lopinavir/ritonavir tablets was combined with rifampicin. In the future, this drug combination should not be given to healthy volunteers. Liver function should be carefully monitored when rifampicin and lopinavir/ritonavir are combined in patients.