Characteristics of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis isolates from broiler breeder farms

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone class antibiotic used for treatment infections caused by various multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens including enterococci. However, recently, linezolid-resistant isolates in animals are considered as a human health hazard. In a broiler operation system, antimicrobial resistance can be transferred to the environment and commercial broiler via the fecal-oral route. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) from broiler parent stock in a broiler operation system. Among 297 E. faecalis isolates from 85 flocks in 8 broiler breeder farms, the prevalence of chloramphenicol- and linezolid-resistant isolates was 0 to 12.1% and 0 to 8.0%, respectively; however, there were no significant differences between farms. Therefore, a total of 14 (4.7%) chloramphenicol- and/or linezolid-resistant E. faecalis showed resistance to 7 or more antimicrobial classes. The drug-resistance gene optrA, which can confer resistance to linezolid, tedizolid, and phenicols, was found in 8 (2.69%) isolates, and 7 (2.36%) of the 8 optrA-positive isolates co-carried the phenicol exporter gene fexA. However, E. faecalis isolates from 3 of 8 broiler breeder farms only carried the optrA and/or fexA genes. As linezolid is one of the last antimicrobial treatments of choice for multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens including E. faecalis, the presence of antibiotic-resistant E. faecalis in broiler breeder farms should be monitored to prevent the introduction of linezolid-resistant strains to the food chain.

Investigation of mechanism and molecular epidemiology of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis in China

Enterococcus is a major cause of important nosocomial infections. Linezolid, the first member of an entirely new class of antibiotics (oxazolidinones), is effective against serious infections caused by Enterococcus. However, resistance to linezolid has been discovered throughout the world rapidly. From 2011 to 2013, nine linezolid-resistant E. faecalis isolates were collected and the possible mechanisms of linezolid resistance, including mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA genes and in ribosomal proteins L3 and L4, and the multiresistance gene cfr, were investigated. Furthermore, an epidemiological survey of the nine linezolid-resistant E. faecalis isolates was performed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and DiversiLab. The three methods were compared to evaluate their merits and demerits, respectively. We failed to find the resistance mechanisms that have been revealed in recent years by PCR and sequencing analysis in the linezolid-resistant E. faecalis. Epidemiological investigation suggested that a small-scale outbreak of linezolid-resistant E. faecalis emerged in neurosurgery ICU from March to May of 2013. DiversiLab was a reliable typing tool and a suitable alternative to PFGE because it was as discriminatory as PFGE and better than MLST.

Linezolid update: stable in vitro activity following more than a decade of clinical use and summary of associated resistance mechanisms

Linezolid, approved for clinical use since 2000, has become an important addition to the anti-Gram-positive infection armamentarium. This oxazolidinone drug has in vitro and in vivo activity against essentially all Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The in vitro activity of linezolid was well documented prior to its clinical application, and several ongoing surveillance studies demonstrated consistent and potent results during the subsequent years of clinical use. Emergence of resistance has been limited and associated with invasive procedures, deep organ involvement, presence of foreign material and mainly prolonged therapy. Non-susceptible organisms usually demonstrate alterations in the 23S rRNA target, which remain the main resistance mechanism observed in enterococci; although a few reports have described the detection of cfr-mediated resistance in Enterococcus faecalis. S. aureus isolates non-susceptible to linezolid remain rare in large surveillance studies. Most isolates harbour 23S rRNA mutations; however, cfr-carrying MRSA isolates have been observed in the United States and elsewhere. It is still uncertain whether the occurrences of such isolates are becoming more prevalent. Coagulase-negative isolates (CoNS) resistant to linezolid were uncommon following clinical approval. Surveillance data have indicated that CoNS isolates, mainly Staphylococcus epidermidis, currently account for the majority of Gram-positive organisms displaying elevated MIC results to linezolid. In addition, these isolates frequently demonstrate complex and numerous resistance mechanisms, such as alterations in the ribosomal proteins L3 and/or L4 and/or presence of cfr and/or modifications in 23S rRNA. The knowledge acquired during the past decades on this initially used oxazolidinone has been utilized for developing new candidate agents, such as tedizolid and radezolid, and as linezolid patents soon begin to expire, generic brands will certainly become available. These events will likely establish a new chapter for this successful class of antimicrobial agents.

Zyvox® Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum (ZAAPS) program: report of linezolid activity over 9 years (2004-12)

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the activity and spectrum of linezolid and comparators tested against 7972 Gram-positive clinical isolates as part of the Zyvox(®) Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum (ZAAPS) Program for 2012. Moreover, to provide molecular characterization for associated resistance mechanisms and epidemiological typing.

METHODS

A total of 7972 isolates were collected from 73 medical centres (33 countries) on five continents. Isolates were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution following the CLSI M07-A9 document. MIC interpretations were based on CLSI and EUCAST criteria.

RESULTS

Linezolid showed MIC50 and MIC90 results of 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively, when tested against Staphylococcus aureus. These isolates were inhibited by linezolid at ≤2 mg/L, except for four S. aureus exhibiting higher MIC values (4-8 mg/L), which had cfr and/or target site mutations, including a first detection of cfr in an isolate from Brazil. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were susceptible to linezolid (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 mg/L), with only eight isolates exhibiting high MIC results (16-32 mg/L). These CoNS had cfr and/or single or multiple target site alterations in 23S rRNA and/or ribosomal proteins (L3, L4). The same species of linezolid-resistant CoNS collected from the same hospital were clonally related to those observed in previously surveyed years. Linezolid exhibited stable modal MIC and MIC50 results when tested against enterococci, regardless of the species or vancomycin resistance phenotype; in addition, linezolid inhibited all streptococci at ≤2 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

This surveillance report documents stable linezolid activity and susceptibility rates against a large and longitudinal collection of clinical isolates worldwide.