Maintenance darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy to prevent perinatal HIV transmission, ANRS-MIE 168 MONOGEST study

OBJECTIVES

Because NRTIs can have fetal toxicities, we evaluated a perinatal NRTI-sparing strategy to prevent perinatal HIV transmission. Our primary objective was to determine the proportion maintaining a viral load (VL) of <50 copies/mL up to delivery on darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy, without requiring treatment intensification.

METHODS

In a one-arm, multicentre Phase 2 clinical trial, eligible patients in the first trimester of pregnancy on ART with plasma VL < 50 copies/mL received maintenance monotherapy with darunavir/ritonavir, 600/100 mg twice daily. VL was monitored monthly. ART was intensified in the case of VL > 50 copies/mL. Neonates received nevirapine prophylaxis for 14 days.

RESULTS

Of 89 patients switching to darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy, 4 miscarried before 22 weeks' gestation, 2 changed treatment for elevated liver enzymes without virological failure, and 83 were evaluable for the main outcome. Six had virological failure confirmed on a repeat sample (median VL = 193 copies/mL; range 78-644), including two before switching to monotherapy. In these six cases, ART was intensified with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine. The success rate was 75/83, 90.4% (95% CI, 81.9%-95.7%) considering two patients with VL missing at delivery as failures, and 77/83, 92.8% (95% CI, 84.9%-97.3%) when considering them as successes since both had undetectable VL on darunavir/ritonavir throughout pregnancy. In ITT, the last available VL before delivery was <50 copies/mL in all of the patients. There was no case of perinatal HIV transmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Darunavir/ritonavir maintenance monotherapy required intensification in nearly 10% of cases. This limits its widespread use, thus other regimens should be evaluated in order to limit exposure to antiretrovirals, particularly NRTIs, during pregnancy.

Association of cellular HIV-1 DNA and virological success of antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected sub-Saharan African adults

Background

HIV-1 DNA persists in infected cells, forming viral reservoirs. Pre-antiretroviral treatment (ART) HIV-1 DNA load was reported to predict ART success in European severely immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether HIV-1 DNA levels are associated with virological success in less severely immunocompromised patients who receive early ART in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

The association between pre-ART HIV-1 DNA and the virological response after 30 months on ART was studied in multivariate logistic regression in patients randomised to immediate ART groups in the Temprano trial, which assessed the benefits of early ART in HIV-infected adults in Côte d’Ivoire. HIV-1 DNA was quantified in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) using real-time PCR.

Results

HIV-1 DNA levels were measured in 1013 patients. Their medians [IQR] of pre-ART CD4 count, HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1 DNA levels were 465 [379–578]/mm³, 4.7 [4.0–5.3] log₁₀ copies/ml and 2.9 [2.5–3.2] log₁₀ copies/million PBMC, respectively. Pre-ART HIV-1 DNA was significantly correlated with pre-ART HIV-1 RNA (R = 0.59, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, HIV-1 DNA < 3 log₁₀ copies/million PBMC was significantly associated with virological success at M30 after adjustment for other key variables (ART regimen, IPT, sex, age, WHO clinical stage, CD4 and HIV-1 RNA; aOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.08–2.30; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Low HIV-1 DNA was statistically associated with virological success in this population of sub-Saharan African adults who started treatment with a median pre-ART CD4 count at 465/mm³. HIV-1 DNA could become a useful tool for guiding some therapeutic decisions in the test-and-treat era.

Trial registration TEMPRANO ANRS 12136 ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00495651, date of registration 03/07/2007.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07082-2.

Pre-ART HIV-1 DNA in CD4+ T cells correlates with baseline viro-immunological status and outcome in patients under first-line ART

Objectives

We evaluated the association between pre-ART HIV DNA and HIV-infected participant characteristics at baseline as well as with their response to first-line ART.

Methods

Four hundred and thirty-three patients from the ICONA cohort, starting first-line ART after the year 2000, were analysed. Pre-ART HIV DNA was quantified with the modified COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 Test and normalized by CD4+ T cells. Linear correlation between pre-ART HIV DNA and other continuous markers (HIV RNA, CD4 count, markers of inflammation and coagulation) at baseline was evaluated by means of Pearson correlation coefficient and a linear regression model. Survival analyses and Cox regression models were used to study the association between pre-ART HIV DNA and time to viro-immunoclinical events.

Results

Pre-ART HIV DNA [median (IQR): 10 702 (3397-36 632) copies/106 CD4+ T cells] was correlated with pre-ART HIV RNA [R2 = +0.44, (P < 0.0001)], CD4+ T cells [R2 = -0.58, (P < 0.0001)] and CD4/CD8 ratio [R2 = -0.48, (P < 0.0001)], while weaker correlations were observed with CD8+ T cells (R2 = -0.20, P = 0.01), IL-6 (R2 = +0.16, P = 0.002) and soluble CD14 (R2 = +0.09, P = 0.05). Patients with higher pre-ART HIV DNA showed lower rate and delayed virological response (defined as HIV RNA ≤50 copies/mL), compared with those having lower HIV DNA (67.2% for >10 000, 81.1% for 1000-10 000 and 86.4% for 10-1000 copies/106 CD4+ T cells; P = 0.0004). Higher pre-ART HIV DNA was also correlated with increased risk of virological rebound (defined as HIV RNA >50 copies/mL) by 24 months (17.2% for >10 000, 7.4% for 1000-10 000 and 4.3% for 10-1000 copies/106 CD4+ T cells; P = 0.0048). Adjusted HRs of all virological rebound definitions confirmed these findings (P ≤ 0.02).

Conclusions

Pre-ART HIV DNA, along with HIV RNA and CD4+ T cell count, should be considered as a new staging marker to better identify people at lower (or higher) risk of viral rebound following achievement of virological suppression (≤50 copies/mL).

Quantification of HIV-DNA and residual viremia in patients starting ART by droplet digital PCR: Their dynamic decay and correlations with immunological parameters and virological success

BACKGROUND

Accurate quantification of total HIV-DNA and residual-viremia by sensitive assays is extremely useful to optimize monitoring of ART-treated patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performances of two ddPCR-based assays for HIV-DNA and residual-viremia quantification, and the correlations of pre-ART HIV-DNA with plasma HIV-RNA, CD4 + T, CD4/CD8 and virological-success (VS) during first-line ART.

STUDY DESIGN

Plasma HIV-RNA, total HIV-DNA, CD4 + T, CD4/CD8 were evaluated at baseline of ART, at VS (viral-load <50copies/ml), and at 6 months after VS (6moVS) in 57 newly-diagnosed HIV-1 infected patients, receiving first-line modern ART. HIV-DNA (log10 copies/106CD4 + T) and residual-viremia (copies/ml) were measured with in-house ddPCR assays. Correlations were assessed by Spearman and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests.

RESULTS

HIV-DNA and residual-viremia assays showed a good linear trend between the expected and obtained values (R2 = 0.9913 and 0.9945); lower limits of detection were 32 copies/106CD4 + T and 2 copies/ml, respectively. At baseline, median (IQR) plasma HIV-RNA and HIV-DNA were 4.88(4.28-5.36)log10 copies/ml and 4.00(3.36-4.51) log10 copies/106CD4 + T cells. Residual-viremia was 8(2-26) and 4(2-12) copies/ml at VS and 6moVS. Pre-ART HIV-DNA positively correlated with plasma HIV-RNA at BL (Rho = 0.708, p < 0.001), and with residual-viremia at VS (Rho:0.383,p = 0.002). Notably, higher HIV-DNA correlated with longer time to achieve VS (median[IQR],weeks: 17.8[12.3-29.0] for HIV-DNA ≥4.5 vs. 7.4[4.1-8.7] for HIV-DNA<4.5, p < 0.001). Furthermore, pre-ART HIV-DNA negatively correlated with CD4 + T and CD4/CD8 at baseline, VS and 6moVS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the adoption of ddPCR-based assays for both HIV-DNA and residual-viremia quantifications and corroborate that pre-ART HIV-DNA is an excellent indicator in predicting viroimmunological response and VS in patients starting ART.

Quantification of total HIV-1 DNA in buffy coat cells, feasibility and potential added value for clinical follow-up of HIV-1 infected patients on ART

BACKGROUND

Successfully treated HIV-1 infected patients have a sustained undetectable viral RNA load. In these cases the total HIV-1 DNA load may constitute a valuable tool to further follow the overall viral burden. The value of this marker outside of cure research has been rarely studied.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a quantitative (q)PCR for total HIV-1 DNA quantification in buffy coat cells and to evaluate the value of this parameter in clinical follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

A qPCR using primers and a probe in the conserved HIV-1 LTR region was adapted for use on DNA extracted from buffy coat cells. Sensitivity, accuracy and reproducibility were evaluated using 8E5 cells and samples from naive and treatment experienced patients. The clinical value of DNA load analysis was assessed by testing 119 longitudinal samples from 9 patients before and after ART initiation and 249 cross sectional samples from therapy-experienced patients.

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variability were 5.56 and 5.94 (%CV). HIV-1 DNA was detected in 249 of the 263 (94.7%) patients on ART for at least 5 months (median: 53 months; IQR: 28-84 months). The HIV-1 DNA load varied between 0.60 and 3.37 copies/10⁶ blood cells and showed significant correlation with the pre-ART CD4⁺ T-cell count nadir and peak viral RNA load. ART initiation resulted in a slow and limited decline of the total HIV-1 DNA concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of total HIV-1 DNA from buffy coat cells is feasible, sensitive and reliable. Although determination of the on-therapy HIV-1 DNA load may be informative, regular testing has limited clinical value because of the very slow evolution.

High quality of life, treatment tolerability, safety and efficacy in HIV patients switching from triple therapy to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy: A randomized clinical trial

Trial design

The QoLKAMON study evaluated quality of life, efficacy and treatment safety in HIV patients receiving lopinavir/ritonavir in monotherapy (MT) versus continuing combined antiretroviral triple treatment with a boosted protease inhibitor (TT).

Methods

This was a 24-week, open-label, multicentre study in virologically-suppressed HIV-infected participants (N = 225) with a 2:1 randomization: 146 patients who switched to MT were compared with 79 patients who remained on a TT regimen. The primary endpoint was change in patient-reported outcomes in quality of life as measured by the MOS-HIV and EQ-5D questionnaires. Secondary endpoints included treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, incidence of adverse events and differences in plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) and CD4 cell counts.

Results

Baseline quality of life, measured with the MOS-HIV score, was very good (overall score of 83 ± 10.5 in the MT arm and 82.3 ± 11.3 in the TT arm) and suffered no change during the study in any of the arms (at week 24, 83.5 ± 12.2 in MT arm and 81.9 ± 12.7 in TT arm), without statistically significant differences when compared. In regards to adherence to therapy and patient satisfaction, some aspects (number of doses forgotten in the last week and satisfaction of treatment measured with the CESTA score, dimension 1) improved significantly with MT. There were also no differences in the incidence and severity of adverse events, even though 22.8% of those in the MT arm switched their treatment when they were included in the study. Moreover, there was also no significant difference between the immunological and virological evolution of MT and TT. In the MT arm, the VL was always undetectable in 83% of patients (vs 90.7% in the TT arm) and there were only 6.7% of virological failures with VL > 50 copies/mL (vs 2.3% in the TT arm), without resistance mutations and with resuppression of VL after switching back to TT.

Conclusions

In a new clinical trial, monotherapy as a treatment simplification strategy in HIV-1 infected patients with sustained viral suppression has demonstrated quality of life, safety and efficacy profiles comparable to those of conventional triple therapy regimens.

Total HIV DNA: a global marker of HIV persistence

Among the different markers of HIV persistence in infected cells, total HIV DNA is to date the most widely used. It allows an overall quantification of all viral forms of HIV DNA in infected cells, each playing a different role in HIV replication and pathophysiology. The real-time PCR technology is to date, a precise, sensitive and reproducible technology that allows the description of the distribution of HIV infected cells in blood and tissues. The objective of this review is to present some examples which show the interest to quantify total HIV DNA levels. This marker brought an undeniable and considerable contribution to reservoir studies. Many results, both in clinical and basic research, allowed to get a large overview of the distribution of infected cells in the body, at all stages of HIV disease and during therapy. Future clinical studies aiming at reducing HIV reservoirs will benefit from HIV DNA quantification in blood and tissues, in association with other markers of HIV reservoir activity.

Total HIV-1 DNA, a Marker of Viral Reservoir Dynamics with Clinical Implications

HIV-1 DNA persists in infected cells despite combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), forming viral reservoirs. Recent trials of strategies targeting latent HIV reservoirs have rekindled hopes of curing HIV infection, and reliable markers are thus needed to evaluate viral reservoirs. Total HIV DNA quantification is simple, standardized, sensitive, and reproducible. Total HIV DNA load influences the course of the infection and is therefore clinically relevant. In particular, it is predictive of progression to AIDS and death, independently of HIV RNA load and the CD4 cell count. Baseline total HIV DNA load is predictive of the response to cART. It declines during cART but remains quantifiable, at a level that reflects both the history of infection (HIV RNA zenith, CD4 cell count nadir) and treatment efficacy (residual viremia, cumulative viremia, immune restoration, immune cell activation). Total HIV DNA load in blood is also predictive of the presence and severity of some HIV-1-associated end-organ disorders. It can be useful to guide individual treatment, notably, therapeutic de-escalation. Although it does not distinguish between replication-competent and -defective latent viruses, the total HIV DNA load in blood, tissues, and cells provides insights into HIV pathogenesis, probably because all viral forms participate in host cell activation and HIV pathogenesis. Total HIV DNA is thus a biomarker of HIV reservoirs, which can be defined as all infected cells and tissues containing all forms of HIV persistence that participate in pathogenesis. This participation may occur through the production of new virions, creating new cycles of infection and disseminating infected cells; maintenance or amplification of reservoirs by homeostatic cell proliferation; and viral transcription and synthesis of viral proteins without new virion production. These proteins can induce immune activation, thus participating in the vicious circle of HIV pathogenesis.

Switch to Ritonavir-Boosted versus Unboosted Atazanavir plus Raltegravir Dual-Drug Therapy Leads to Similar Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Clinical Practice

Objectives

To assess immunovirological response, safety and pharmacokinetic of NRTI-sparing regimen dual therapy of atazanavir (ATV) and raltegravir (RAL) in maintenance strategy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of HIV-infected adults followed in French centers (Dat’AIDS cohort), comparing the proportions of virological and therapeutic failures between ATV + RAL and ATV/ritonavir + RAL dual therapy regimens.

Results

283 patients were assessed: 185 switched for ATV + RAL and 98 for ATV/ritonavir + RAL dual therapy. Virological failure rate at week 96 was 13.8% (95% CI, 9.8–17.8), without difference between the two groups (Log-rank Test, p = 0.87). The cumulative percentages of patients remaining free of therapeutic failure at week 24, 48 and 96 of dual therapy were 74.9% (95% CI, 69.9–80.0), 65.4% (95% CI, 59.8–70.9) and 53.4% (95% CI, 47.5–59.2), respectively. Four out of 39 confirmed virological failures developed RAL resistance. By multivariate analysis, virological failure was associated with high HIV-1 RNA zenith (p = 0.02), low CD4+ T-cell count at baseline (p<0.001) and short duration on antiretroviral therapy (p<0.001). Before week 96, dual therapy was discontinued in 44 patients (16%) because of various adverse events, with no difference between the two groups. Minimal plasma levels were targeted in 84% and 87% of patients for ATV and RAL, respectively, and both were significantly higher in ritonavir-boosted regimen.

Conclusions

Emerging RAL-resistance and discontinuations for adverse events resulted in moderate efficacy rates of ATV and RAL dual therapy in heavily pretreated patients.

Residual HIV-1 replication may impact immune recovery in patients on first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral combination therapy raises issues of long-term adherence and toxicity. Initial treatment simplification based on single-drug therapy was investigated in the MONARK trial, which compared first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (arm A) with first-line lopinavir/ritonavir + zidovudine/lamivudine tritherapy (arm B). The MONARK trial is registered as a randomized trial at clinical trials.gov under identifier NCT 00234923.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Immune recovery was compared in patients with undetectable plasma virus (<50 copies/mL) after 60 weeks of treatment (arm A, n = 21; arm B, n = 13).

RESULTS

The week 60 CD4 T cell count and CD4 T cell subset distribution did not differ significantly between the treatment arms. Memory CD4 T cell responses to HIV and recall antigens were better with triple therapy than with monotherapy. The frequencies of activated CD8 T cells and anti-HIV CD8 T cell effector responses were similar in the two arms. However, the repertoire of CD8 T cell effector responses was broader and persistent residual viraemia more frequent (by ultrasensitive PCR) in the monotherapy arm.

CONCLUSIONS

While viral control can be achieved with first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy, the quality of immune recovery is inferior to that obtained with triple therapy, possibly owing to a higher level of residual viral replication. Thus, the benefits of first-line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in terms of toxicity and adherence might be offset by an increased risk of residual viral replication, which may also fuel latent viral reservoirs.

Dynamics of cellular HIV-1 DNA levels over 144 weeks of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus triple therapy in the MONET trial

BACKGROUND

In patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), switching to monotherapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r) can maintain plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression with no treatment-emergent drug resistance; effects on cellular HIV-1 DNA burden are less well characterized.

METHODS

In MONET, patients on stable combination ART for at least 6 months with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL and no history of virologic failure switched to DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily, either alone (n = 127) or with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (n = 129). In a representative subset of 146 patients, total HIV-1 DNA load in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was tested retrospectively at baseline, week 48, week 96, and week 144.

RESULTS

Mean HIV-1 DNA levels at baseline vs week 144 were 2.50 vs 2.49 log10 copies/106 PBMC in the monotherapy arm and 2.59 vs 2.61 log10 copies/106 PBMC in the triple therapy arm, with mean (median) changes of -0.05 (-0.03) and +0.03 (+0.01) log10 copies/106 PBMC in the 2 arms, respectively. Overall baseline HIV-1 DNA levels were higher in patients with nadir CD4 counts <200 cell/µL (P<.05) and in patients who over 144 weeks experienced at least 1 HIV-1 RNA measurement >50 copies/mL (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this substudy of the MONET trial, HIV-1 DNA levels remained stable during 144 weeks of either DRV/r monotherapy or triple therapy with DRV/r + 2 NRTIs. In both treatment arms, baseline HIV-1 DNA levels were predicted by the nadir CD4 cell count and predictive of plasma HIV-1 RNA detection during follow-up.

Cellular HIV reservoir replenishment is not affected by blip or intermittent viremia episodes during darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of blips and persistent viremia episodes on cell-associated HIV-DNA reservoir in extensively pretreated patients receiving ritonavir-boosted darunavir monotherapy (MtDRV/rtv) for 24 months.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients from the MonDAR prospective study (NCT01606722) who received at least 6 months of MtDRV/rtv and had at least two available peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) samples were selected and classified according to the viral outcome as continuous undetectable viremia (cUV; n = 40), blips (n = 31), intermittent viremia (IV; n = 23), and virological failure (VF, two consecutive viral loads >200 copies/ml; n = 20). Proviral HIV-DNA was quantified by real-time PCR in PBMCs samples at baseline, and months 6, 12, 18 and 24. Additionally, HIV-DNA levels were exhaustively analyzed at virological failure and blip episodes.

RESULTS

The HIV-DNA levels remained constant during the 24 months in every group. Neither blips nor intermittent viremia influenced the HIV-DNA levels at short-term or at middle term. By contrast, virological failure episodes gave rise to a significant increase in proviral DNA (2.15 vs. 2.32 log10 HIV-DNA copies/10 PBMCs; P = 0.042). Basal proviral DNA levels more than 2 log10 copies/10 PBMCs predicted the time to viral rebound at any given cut-off point (>20, >50, and >200 copies/ml. HR: 3.02, 2.61, and 3.02, respectively; P ≤ 0.03. Besides, an adherence less than 95% was also strongly associated with virological failure (HR, 3.17; P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Blip episodes and intermittent viremia did not affect the cellular HIV reservoir dynamic during MtDRV/rtv. Higher adherence and an HIV-DNA levels less than 2 log10 copies/10 PBMCs at baseline were associated with a lower risk of virological failure.

Similar evolution of cellular HIV-1 DNA level in darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus triple therapy in MONOI-ANRS136 trial over 96 weeks

Background

A higher proportion of intermittent viremia (to have a HIV-1 RNA viral load>50 copies/mL not confirmed) was reported in the boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy arm in some studies including MONOI trial, and that could have an impact on the replenishment of the HIV-1 DNA reservoirs. The HIV-1 DNA level is an interesting marker which reflects the size of cellular HIV reservoir. Our objectives were to study the impact of 96 weeks of Darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus a triple standard combination on the HIV-1 blood reservoir and factors associated with HIV-1 plasma DNA at baseline in MONOI trial sub-study.

Methodology/Principal Findings

This sub-study is focused on 160 patients (79 patients in monotherapy arm and 81 in tritherapy arm) for whom blood cells were available both at baseline and at week 96 (W96). Baseline HIV-1 plasma DNA was associated with CD4 nadir, pre therapeutic HIV-1 RNA viral load and baseline HIV-1 RNA measured by ultrasensitive assay. A similar median delta HIV-DNA was observed between D0 and W96 in both arms; 0.35 log copies/10⁶ leucocytes in monotherapy arm versus 0.51 log copies/10⁶ leucocytes in tritherapy arm.

Conclusion/Significance

Despite a higher proportion of intermittent viremia in monotherapy arm, a similar evolution of cellular HIV-1 DNA level was observed between mono and triple therapy arm.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00421551 <NCT00421551>