Comparative activity of ceftobiprole against Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates from Europe and the Middle East: the CLASS study

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Ceftobiprole and Comparator Compounds against Nation-Wide Bloodstream Isolates and Different Sequence Types of MRSA

Bloodstream infections by bacteria, especially multidrug-resistant bacteria, remain a worldwide public health concern. We evaluated the antibacterial activity of ceftobiprole and comparable drugs against different bloodstream isolates and different sequence types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in China. We found that MRSA, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), and methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MSCNS) displayed ceftobiprole sensitivity rates of >95%, which are similar to the rates for linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin. Of the tested MRCNS strains, 90.4% were sensitive to ceftobiprole. The sensitivities of ST59, ST398, and ST22 MRSA to ceftobiprole were higher than that of ST239. Ceftobiprole's MIC50/90 value against Enterococcus faecalis was 0.25/2 mg/L, whereas Enterococcus faecium was completely resistant to this drug. Ceftobiprole exhibited no activity against ESBL-positive Enterobacterales, with resistance rates between 78.6% and 100%. For ESBL-negative Enterobacterales, excluding Klebsiella oxytoca, the sensitivity to ceftobiprole was comparable to that of ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime. The MIC50/90 value of ceftobiprole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 2/16 mg/L, and for Acinetobacter baumannii, it was 32/>32 mg/L. Thus, ceftobiprole shows excellent antimicrobial activity against ESBL-negative Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (comparable to that of ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime); however, it is not effective against ESBL-positive Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii. These results provide important information to clinicians.

OUP accepted manuscript

Objectives

To evaluate the susceptibility to ceftobiprole of clinical bacterial isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in Europe.

Methods

A total of 20 000 non-duplicate bacterial isolates were collected in 2016–19 from patients with documented infections at medical centres located in 17 countries in Europe. Bacterial identification was confirmed and susceptibility to ceftobiprole and comparator agents was tested using the EUCAST broth microdilution methodology and interpretive criteria by a central microbiology laboratory.

Results

Of the 20 000 isolates, 10 007 (50.0%) were Gram-positive and 9993 (50.0%) were Gram-negative. The most common species was Staphylococcus aureus (35.0%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (15.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.0%), Escherichia coli (9.7%) and Haemophilus influenzae (3.0%). Overall, 99.7% (6981/7000) of S. aureus, including 99.5% (3483/3502) of MRSA, 97.8% (2941/3007) of S. pneumoniae, 100% (605/605) of H. influenzae and 76.3% (5492/7197) of Enterobacterales isolates were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Susceptibility to ceftobiprole was higher for isolates from northern and western Europe as compared with eastern and southern Europe.

Conclusions

Ceftobiprole continues to exhibit potent and broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates from Europe, and as expected, with a slight north-to-south and west-to-east susceptibility gradient.

New cephalosporins for the treatment of pneumonia in internal medicine wards

The burden of hospital admission for pneumonia in internal medicine wards may not be underestimated; otherwise, cases of pneumonia are a frequent indication for antimicrobial prescriptions. Community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia are characterized by high healthcare costs, morbidity and non-negligible rates of fatality. The overcoming prevalence of resistant gram-negative and positive bacteria (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin and ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases producing Enterobacteriaceae) has made the most of the first-line agents ineffective for treating lower respiratory tract infections. A broad-spectrum of activity, favourable pulmonary penetration, harmlessness and avoiding in some cases a combination therapy, characterise new cephalosporins such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftobiprole, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftaroline. We aimed to summarise the role and place in therapy of new cephalosporins in community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia within the setting of internal medicine wards. The "universal pneumonia antibiotic strategy" is no longer acceptable for treating lung infections. Antimicrobial therapy should be individualized considering local antimicrobial resistance and epidemiology, the stage of the illness and potential host factors predisposing to a high risk for specific pathogens.

Ceftobiprole Activity against Bacteria from Skin and Skin Structure Infections in the United States from 2016 through 2018

Ceftobiprole medocaril is an advanced-generation cephalosporin prodrug that has qualified infectious disease product status granted by the US FDA and is currently being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. In this study, the activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against more than 7,300 clinical isolates collected in the United States from 2016 through 2018 from patients with skin and skin structure infections. The major species/pathogen groups were S. aureus (53%), Enterobacterales (23%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7%), beta-hemolytic streptococci (6%), Enterococcus spp. (4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (2%). Ceftobiprole was highly active against S. aureus (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 mg/liter; 99.7% susceptible by EUCAST criteria; 42% methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]). Ceftobiprole also exhibited potent activity against other Gram-positive cocci. The overall susceptibility of Enterobacterales to ceftobiprole was 84.8% (>99.0% susceptible for isolate subsets that exhibited a non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL] phenotype). A total of 74.4% of P. aeruginosa, 100% of beta-hemolytic streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 99.6% of Enterococcus faecalis isolates were inhibited by ceftobiprole at ≤4 mg/liter. As expected, ceftobiprole was largely inactive against Enterobacterales that contained ESBL genes and Enterococcus faecium Overall, ceftobiprole was highly active against most clinical isolates from the major Gram-positive and Gram-negative skin and skin structure pathogen groups collected at U.S. medical centers participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program during 2016 to 2018. The broad-spectrum activity of ceftobiprole, including potent activity against MRSA, supports its further evaluation for a potential ABSSSI indication.

Ceftobiprole: drug evaluation and place in therapy

Introduction: Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, including also methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Ceftobiprole is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia, in several European and non-European countries. Areas covered: In this narrative review, we discuss the current place in therapy of ceftobiprole, both within and outside approved indications. An inductive MEDLINE/PubMed search of the available literature was conducted. Expert opinion: There are three main reasons which render ceftobiprole an attractive option for the empirical and targeted treatment of CAP and HAP: (i) its broad spectrum of activity; (ii) its activity against MRSA; (iii) its good safety profile. For these indications, ceftobiprole should be employed thoughtfully, in those scenarios in which its intrinsic advantages could be maximized. The use of ceftobiprole outside approved indications could be justified in specific scenarios, such as when other approved alternatives are ineffective, when the risk of toxicity due to other agents is unacceptable, and for salvage therapy. In the near future, ongoing phase 3 studies and further observational experiences could both enlarge the current panel of approved indications and enrich our knowledge on the use of ceftobiprole for off-label indications.

In vitro evidence of the synergistic interaction of ceftopibrole and other antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative isolates

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole in combination with other antimicrobials against 27 selected Gram-negative isolates, including ESBL-producing E. coli and KPC-OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae. Ceftobiprole activity in combination with amikacin, colistin, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam and rifampin was evaluated by time-kill curves and gradient-cross method (except colistin). Among the 27 strains tested with gradient strips most were resistant to ceftobiprole. Synergy was observed in some cases with piperacillin/tazobactam. There was at least one synergistic combination towards 9 isolates belonging to different species. No antagonism was observed with any of the antibiotic tested. In time-kill curves, performed for 12 selected isolates, synergistic interaction was more frequent, occurring with 32/60 combinations. The most interesting results of our study are the bactericidal effects of ceftobiprole in combination with colistin or piperacillin/tazobactam tested against Gram-negative isolates, including KPC and OXA-48-producing K. pneumoniae.

Susceptibility to ceftobiprole of respiratory-tract pathogens collected in the United Kingdom and Ireland during 2014-2015

Purpose

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) can cause significant morbidity and mortality and are becoming increasingly difficult to treat because of the growing prevalence of resistance to conventional antimicrobial agents. This study aimed to assess the current in vitro susceptibility of respiratory tract pathogens collected from the UK and Ireland to ceftobiprole, an advanced-generation cephalosporin, as compared with other antibiotics.

Methods

Pathogens isolated from patients with LRTIs were analyzed as part of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Programme during 2014–2015. Antibiotic susceptibility was evaluated using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints, including the ceftobiprole pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic non-species-specific breakpoint when species-specific breakpoints were not available.

Results

One thousand one hundred and sixty-eight isolates from community-onset LRTIs and 1,264 isolates from hospital-onset LRTIs were analyzed. The ceftobiprole susceptibility rate was 99.8% (428/429) for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 100% (502/502) for Haemophilus influenzae, and 99.6% (236/237) for Moraxella catarrhalis. All Staphylococcus aureus isolates, including methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA; N=181) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA; N=35), were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Overall, ceftobiprole susceptibility was observed in 88.1% (215/244) of Escherichia coli isolates, 83.4% (156/187) of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates and 86.7% (98/113) of Enterobacter spp. isolates.

Conclusion

Ceftobiprole had in vitro activity against all S. aureus (both MSSA and MRSA) isolates, and almost all S. pneumoniae isolates, as well as against Gram-negative bacteria associated with community-onset or hospital-onset LRTIs. Based on this analysis, ceftobiprole is a good treatment option when broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage is needed for LRTIs.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against contemporary Gram-positive and -negative organisms collected from Europe (2015)

Susceptibility testing of ceftobiprole and comparators against 12,240 isolates was performed following CLSI/EUCAST guidelines. The percentage of susceptible MRSA isolates was higher for ceftobiprole (96.5% susceptible) than for ceftaroline (86.2% susceptible). Both ceftobiprole (MIC_50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L) and ceftaroline (MIC_50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L) demonstrated potent activity against coagulase-negative staphylococci. Ceftobiprole demonstrated good potency against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC_50/90 values of 0.5/2 mg/L); ceftaroline (MIC_50/90, 2/8 mg/L) was 4-fold less active against these strains. Ceftobiprole activity was comparable to that of the other β-lactam agents tested against S. pneumoniae (MIC_90, 0.5 mg/L vs 0.12-2 mg/L [other β-lactams]), viridans-group streptococci (MIC₉₀,0.25 mg/L vs 0.006-1 mg/L [other β-lactams]), and β-hemolytic streptococci (MIC_90,0.03 mg/L vs 0.015-0.06 mg/L [other β-lactams]). Overall, 73.8% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates tested were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole inhibited 70.4% of P. aeruginosa at ≤4 mg/L and all isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis at ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftobiprole was active in vitro against a broad range of clinically-relevant contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates.

In vitro activity of ceftobiprole on 440 Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bronchopulmonary infections

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole on 440 Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains isolated from bronchopulmonary infections (2010-2014).

METHODS

S. aureus isolates were characterized for methicillin resistance, PVL status, and clonal complex. All isolates were tested for minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) determination by broth microdilution method for ceftobiprole, ceftaroline fosamil, and comparator antibiotics (linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin, and daptomycin).

RESULTS

A total of 325 (74%) strains were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 115 (26%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); 105 (24%) S. aureus strains were PVL-positive, including 35.2% (37/105) MRSA and 64.8% (68/105) MSSA. Ceftobiprole was highly active against S. aureus with MIC₉₀ of 1 mg/L, MICs ranging between 0.12 and 4mg/L (only one resistant strain, MIC of 4 mg/L). MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ were twice lower in MSSA than MRSA. Moreover, PVL⁺ MRSA were slightly more susceptible to ceftobiprole (MIC₅₀ of 0.5 mg/L and MIC₉₀ of 1 mg/L) than PVL^- MRSA (MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ of 1 mg/L). The ceftobiprole-resistant strain was also resistant to ceftaroline fosamil and presented the D239L mutation in PBP2A. The comparator antibiotics were equally active on the strains tested, with MIC₉₀ of 0.5 mg/L for ceftaroline fosamil, tigecycline, and daptomycin; 1 mg/L for vancomycin; and 2 mg/L for linezolid.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that ceftobiprole is highly active against S. aureus and is an effective alternative to vancomycin or linezolid in the management of staphylococcal pneumonia. However, close monitoring of isolates should be maintained to prevent resistant strain diffusion.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review of the currently available treatment options

This review is the result of discussions that took place at the 5th MRSA Working Group Consensus Meeting and explores the possible treatment options available for different types of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), focusing on those antibiotics that could represent a valid alternative to vancomycin. In fact, whilst vancomycin remains a viable option, its therapy is moving towards individualised dosing. Other drugs, such as the new lipoglycopeptides (oritavancin, dalbavancin and telavancin) and fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline and ceftobiprole), are showing good in vitro potency and in vivo efficacy, especially for patients infected with micro-organisms with higher vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Tedizolid is an attractive agent for use both in hospital and community settings, but the post-marketing data will better clarify its potential. Daptomycin and linezolid have shown non-inferiority to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA bacteraemia and non-inferiority/superiority to vancomycin in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Thus, several options are available, but more data from clinical practice, especially for invasive infections, are needed to assign specific roles to each antibiotic and to definitely include them in the new antibacterial armamentarium.

Ceftobiprole for the treatment of pneumonia: a European perspective

Ceftobiprole, a new broad spectrum, parenteral cephalosporin, exhibits potent in vitro activity against a number of Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Gram-negative pathogens associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Ceftobiprole has demonstrated noninferiority in two large-scale pivotal studies comparing it to ceftriaxone with or without linezolid in CAP, with clinical cure rates 86.6% versus 87.4%, or ceftazidime in HAP, with clinical cure rates of 77% versus 76%, respectively. However, ceftobiprole was inferior in the subgroup of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Ceftobiprole has so far demonstrated a good safety profile in preliminary studies, with similar tolerability to comparators. The most commonly observed adverse events of ceftobiprole included headache and gastrointestinal upset. It is the first cephalosporin monotherapy approved in the EU for the treatment of both CAP and HAP (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia).

Ceftobiprole medocaril: a review of its use in patients with hospital- or community-acquired pneumonia

Ceftobiprole, the active metabolite of the prodrug ceftobiprole medocaril (Zevtera(®)), is a new generation broad-spectrum intravenous cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ceftobiprole exhibits potent in vitro activity against a number of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It is the first cephalosporin monotherapy approved in the EU for the treatment of both HAP (excluding ventilator associated-pneumonia [VAP]) and CAP. In phase III trials, ceftobiprole medocaril was noninferior, in terms of clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit, to ceftazidime plus linezolid in patients with HAP and to ceftriaxone ± linezolid in patients with CAP severe enough to require hospitalization. In patients with HAP, noninferiority of ceftobiprole medocaril to ceftazidime plus linezolid was not demonstrated in a subset of patients with VAP. In patients with CAP, ceftobiprole medocaril was effective in those at risk for poor outcomes (pneumonia severity index ≥91, Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team score IV-V or bacteraemic pneumonia). In the phase III trials, ceftobiprole medocaril was generally well tolerated, with ≈10 % of patients discontinuing the treatment because of adverse events. The most common treatment-related adverse events occurring in ceftobiprole recipients in the trials in patients with HAP or CAP included nausea, diarrhoea, infusion site reactions, vomiting, hepatic enzyme elevations and hyponatraemia. Therefore, ceftobiprole medocaril monotherapy offers a simplified option for the initial empirical treatment of patients with HAP (excluding VAP) and in those with CAP requiring hospitalization.

Rates of susceptibility of carbapenems, ceftobiprole, and colistin against clinically important bacteria collected from intensive care units in 2007: Results from the Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART)

BACKGROUND

Data on susceptibility to ceftobiprole and colistin, and the complete evolutionary trends of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of important carbapenem agents among important pathogens collected in intensive care units (ICUs) in Taiwan are lacking.

METHODS

We surveyed the MIC distribution patterns of ceftobiprole and colistin and susceptibility profiles of some important pathogens collected from patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) of major teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan in 2007. We also investigated the rates of nonsusceptibility to powerful carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem) among four important species of Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Proteus mirabilis) collected during the same period. MIC breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute in 2014 were applied.

RESULTS

Colistin showed excellent in vitro activity (susceptibility rate, 96%) against Acinetobacter baumannii isolates but moderate (73-77% susceptibility rate) activity against isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and E. cloacae. The ceftobiprole MIC₉₀ value was 4 μg/mL for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 16 μg/mL for P. aeruginosa. The phenotype of methicillin resistance did not markedly increase the MIC value of ceftobiprole among S. aureus isolates. Interestingly, the proportion of isolates that displayed nonsusceptibility to imipenem was significantly higher among P. mirabilis isolates than among isolates of the other three Enterobacteriaceae species, regardless of the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

CONCLUSION

Continuous monitoring of susceptibility profiles of ICU pathogens to important antibiotics is warranted to provide appropriate antimicrobial regimens against infections in the ICU.

Ceftobiprole activity against over 60,000 clinical bacterial pathogens isolated in Europe, Turkey, and Israel from 2005 to 2010

Ceftobiprole medocaril is a newly approved drug in Europe for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (excluding patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia but including ventilated HAP patients) and community-acquired pneumonia in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole against prevalent Gram-positive and -negative pathogens isolated in Europe, Turkey, and Israel during 2005 through 2010. A total of 60,084 consecutive, nonduplicate isolates from a wide variety of infections were collected from 33 medical centers. Species identification was confirmed, and all isolates were susceptibility tested using reference broth microdilution methods. Ceftobiprole had high activity against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (100.0% susceptible), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), beta-hemolytic streptococci, and Streptococcus pneumoniae (99.3% susceptible), with MIC90 values of 0.25, 0.12, ≤ 0.06, and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. Ceftobiprole was active against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (98.3% susceptible) and methicillin-resistant CoNS, having a MIC90 of 2 μg/ml. Ceftobiprole was active against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 μg/ml) but not against most Enterococcus faecium isolates. Ceftobiprole was very potent against the majority of Enterobacteriaceae (87.3% susceptible), with >80% inhibited at ≤ 0.12 μg/ml. The potency of ceftobiprole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 2/>8 μg/ml; 64.6% at MIC values of ≤ 4 μg/ml) was similar to that of ceftazidime (MIC50/90, 2/>16 μg/ml; 75.4% susceptible), but limited activity was observed against Acinetobacter spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. High activity was also observed against all Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90, ≤ 0.06 μg/ml) and Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90, ≤ 0.06/0.25 μg/ml) isolates. Ceftobiprole demonstrated a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity against this very large longitudinal sample of contemporary pathogens.

Activity of ceftobiprole against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin, linezolid or vancomycin, and strains with defined SCCmec types

Ceftobiprole is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Gram-negative pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of ceftobiprole against MRSA isolates with decreased susceptibility to daptomycin, linezolid or vancomycin as well as isolates from staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) types I, II, III and IV. Overall, ceftobiprole demonstrated high potency against the 216 isolates tested, with MIC50 and MIC90 values (minimum inhibitory concentrations required to inhibit 50% and 90% of the isolates, respectively) of 1mg/L and 2mg/L (97.2% susceptible). The MIC90 for ceftobiprole was 2mg/L against the linezolid-non-susceptible, daptomycin-non-susceptible and vancomycin-intermediate (VISA and hVISA) subsets and was 1mg/L against the vancomycin-resistant (VRSA) strains. The MIC50/90 values for ceftobiprole were 2/4, 1/2, 2/2 and 1/1mg/L against SCCmec types I, II, III and IV, respectively. SCCmec type I strains had the highest MICs, with six strains exhibiting a ceftobiprole MIC of 4mg/L and 15 strains at 2mg/L. Ceftobiprole demonstrated potent activity against MRSA, including subsets of isolates with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin, linezolid and vancomycin. The activity of ceftobiprole against these resistant phenotypes indicates that it may have clinical utility in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant S. aureus and across strains from prevalent SCCmec types.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics evaluation of ceftobiprole medocaril for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a promising role in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Cure rates, however, with ceftobiprole at the doses studied may be inferior to conventional treatment in the ventilator-acquired subset of HAP.

AREAS COVERED

Literature was sought using PubMed and through abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (2006 - 2012) and the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2007 - 2012). The authors used the search terms "ceftobiprole," "BAL9141," "RO63-9141," "BAL5788," and 'RO5788." The article discusses the activity, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical trials of ceftobiprole in HAP. The article also provides discussion of how PK/PD parameters play a role in the outcome of HAP treatment and how dosing in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) should be reconsidered in light of altered PK/PD.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with normal PK and non-VAP, ceftobiprole is effective for the treatment of HAP in the recommended doses, ceftobiprole is unlikely to achieve the desired PD targets when PK parameters are altered in VAP (e.g., increased volume of distribution and clearance). In these settings, off-label use at higher doses may overcome these limitations; but in the presence of alternative therapies, it cannot be currently recommended.

Bacteremic pneumonia caused by extensively drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance threatens the successful treatment of pneumococcal infections. Here we report a case of bacteremic pneumonia caused by an extremely drug-resistant strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae, nonsusceptible to at least one agent in all classes but vancomycin and linezolid, posing an important new public health threat in our region.

Ceftazidime for respiratory infections

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime is a third-generation cephalosporin that has activity against Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and the limited number of antimicrobial agents in development have necessitated a review of the current status of treatments involving ceftazidime.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on studies examining the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime against recent clinical isolates and recent randomized controlled trials studying the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime, and discusses strategies for the optimal use of ceftazidime for treating respiratory tract infections, mainly hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).

EXPERT OPINION

Although ceftazidime remains an important option for HAP treatment, its role as an effective antimicrobial agent has been compromised by the sharp increase in resistance rates over the last decade, especially in P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. To maintain or improve the clinical use of ceftazidime in patients with severe HAP, it will be essential to gain a thorough understanding of local resistance patterns, reserve ceftazidime use when pathogens are susceptible to other third-generation cephalosporins, optimize ceftazidime therapy using prolonged or continuous infusion, determine the effectiveness of the combination of ceftazidime with inhibitors of broad-spectrum β-lactamases and role of combination therapy for P. aeruginosa infections, and judiciously use antimicrobial agents through individualization of antimicrobial therapy for HAP.