Treatment with rilpivirine does not alter plasma concentrations of the CYP3A substrates tadalafil and midazolam in humans

Dose-dependent induction of CYP3A activity by St. John's wort alone and in combination with rifampin

The dose dependence of the effect of enzyme inducers and the effect of the combined administration of two inducers that exert their effect via the same induction pathway (pregnane X receptor) have not been well studied. Using oral midazolam microdoses (30 μg), we have investigated CYP3A4 induction by St. John's wort (SJW) in 11 healthy volunteers using low (300 mg/day containing 7.48 mg hyperforin), therapeutic (900 mg/day), and supratherapeutic doses of SJW (1800 mg/day) for 14 days. SJW was then co-administered with rifampin (600 mg/day) for a further 7 days to evaluate the effect of the combined administration of two inducers. In addition, intravenous midazolam microdoses (10 μg) were administered before SJW, at SJW 1800 mg/day, and during administration of the two inducers to assess the hepatic contribution to total induction (semi-simultaneous administration). Administration of SJW increased oral midazolam clearance 1.96-fold (300 mg/day), 3.86-fold (900 mg/day), and 5.62-fold (1800 mg/day), and 17.5-fold after the addition of rifampin. Concurrently, the clearance of intravenous midazolam increased 2.05-fold (1800 mg/day) and 2.93-fold (SJW + rifampin). These results show that rifampin significantly enhances the induction of the highest SJW doses both hepatically and overall and suggest that these metabolic effects occur predominantly in the gut. These findings also suggest that in drug interactions involving strong and moderate enzyme inducers, the perpetrator effects of the strong inducer are decisive for the interaction.

The Use of Microdosing for In vivo Phenotyping of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes: Where Do We Stand? A Narrative Review

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes play a central role in the elimination of approximately 80% of all clinically used drugs. Differences in CYP enzyme activity between individuals can contribute to interindividual variability in exposure and, therefore, treatment outcome. In vivo CYP enzyme activity could be determined with phenotyping. Currently, (sub)therapeutic doses are used for in vivo phenotyping, which can lead to side effects. The use of microdoses (100 µg) for in vivo phenotyping for CYP enzymes could overcome the limitations associated with the use of (sub)therapeutic doses of substrates. The aim of this review is to provide a critical overview of the application of microdosing for in vivo phenotyping of CYP enzymes. A literature search was performed to find drug-drug interaction studies of CYP enzyme substrates that used microdoses of the respective substrates. A substrate was deemed sensitive to changes in CYP enzyme activity when the pharmacokinetics of the substrate significantly changed during inhibition and induction of the enzyme. On the basis of the currently available evidence, the use of microdosing for in vivo phenotyping for subtypes CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP2E1 is not recommended. Microdosing can be used for the in vivo phenotyping of CYP2C19 and CYP3A. The recommended microdose phenotyping test for CYP2C19 is measuring the omeprazole area-under-the-concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC0-24) after administration of a single 100 µg dose. CYP3A activity could be best determined with a 0.1-75 µg dose of midazolam, and subsequently measuring AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) or clearance. Moreover, there are two metrics available for midazolam using a limited sampling strategy: AUC over 10 h (AUC0-10) and AUC from 2 to 4 h (AUC2-4).

Repurposing of rilpivirine for preventing platelet β3 integrin-dependent thrombosis by targeting c-Src active autophosphorylation

BACKGROUND

HIV-infected individuals are known to be at higher risk for thrombotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), which may also be differentially affected by components of anti-HIV drugs. To identify the effects of a series of FDA-approved anti-HIV drugs on platelet aggregation in humans, focusing on the novel pharmacological effects of rilpivirine (RPV), a reverse transcriptase inhibitor, on platelet function both in vitro and in vivo and the mechanisms involved.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In vitro studies showed that RPV was the only anti-HIV reagent that consistently and efficiently inhibited aggregation elicited by different agonists, exocytosis, morphological extension on fibrinogen, and clot retraction. Treatment of mice with RPV significantly prevented thrombus formation in FeCl3-injured mesenteric vessels, postcava with stenosis surgery, and ADP -induced pulmonary embolism models without defects in platelet viability, tail bleeding, and coagulation activities. RPV also improved cardiac performance in mice with post-ischemic reperfusion. A mechanistic study revealed that RPV preferentially attenuated fibrinogen-stimulated Tyr773 phosphorylation of β3-integrin by inhibiting Tyr419 autophosphorylation of c-Src. Molecular docking and surface plasmon resonance analyses showed that RPV can bind directly to c-Src. Further mutational analysis showed that the Phe427 residue of c-Src is critical for RPV interaction, suggesting a novel interaction site for targeting c-Src to block β3-integrin outside-in signaling.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated that RPV was able to prevent the progression of thrombotic CVDs by interrupting β3-integrin-mediated outside-in signaling via inhibiting c-Src activation without hemorrhagic side effects, highlighting RPV as a promising reagent for the prevention and therapy of thrombotic CVDs.

Pharmacokinetics of Ruxolitinib in HIV Suppressed Individuals on Antiretroviral Agent Therapy from the ACTG A5336 Study

Ruxolitinib is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved orally administered Janus kinase (1/2) inhibitor that reduces cytokine-induced inflammation. As part of a randomized, phase 2, open-label trial, ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) was administered to HIV-positive, virologically suppressed individuals (33 men, 7 women) on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for 5 weeks. Herein, we report the population PK subsequently determined from this study. Plasma concentrations of ruxolitinib (294 samples) and antiretroviral agents were measured at week 1 (N = 39 participants) and week 4 or 5 (N = 37). Ruxolitinib PK was adequately described with a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with distribution volumes normalized to mean body weight (91.5 kg) and a separate typical clearance for participants administered efavirenz (a known cytochrome P450 3A4 inducer). Participants administered an ART regimen with efavirenz had an elevated typical apparent oral clearance versus the integrase inhibitor regimen group (22.5 vs 12.9 L/hr; N = 14 vs 25). Post hoc predicted apparent oral clearance was likewise more variable and higher (P < .0001) in those administered efavirenz. There was  an ≈25% variation in ruxolitinib plasma exposures between week 1 and week 4/5. ART plasma concentrations resembled those from PK studies without ruxolitinib. Therefore, integrase inhibitor-based ART regimens may be preferred over efavirenz-based regimens when ruxolitinib is administered to HIV-positive individuals.

Effect of rilpivirine on the pharmacokinetics of methadone in HIV-Infected Chinese patients

Background: The combination of rilpivirine with methadone may result in complex interactions secondary to the induction of oxidative metabolism by rilpivirine. Research design and methods: TMC278IFD4007 was a single-center, prospective, open-label, multiple-dose study with 12 HIV-infected Chinese participants. The objective was to evaluate the potential effect of rilpivirine on the pharmacokinetics of methadone. The participants received a daily dose of 25 mg rilpivirine for 11 days with individualized methadone ranging from 25 to 100 mg. Pharmacokinetic studies of methadone were conducted on day 1 and 11. Opiate withdrawal symptoms were evaluated. Results: A large inter-subject variability was noted in methadone pharmacokinetics. Rilpivirine increased methadone minimum and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmin; Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve versus methadone alone (least-square mean ratio; 90% confidence interval) by 5% (1.05; 0.46, 2.39), 5% (1.05; 0.73, 1.52), and 6% (0.75; 0.74, 1.50) as measured in S-methadone, and 5% (1.05; 0.50, 2.22), 5% (1.05; 0.74, 1.50), and 5% (1.05; 0.76, 1.46) as measured in R-methadone, respectively. No opioid withdrawal symptoms or methadone dose adjustments were reported. Co-administration was well tolerated without serious adverse effects or discontinuations. Conclusion: Concomitant administration of rilpivirine was unlikely to have significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of methadone.

Rivaroxaban and macitentan can be coadministered without dose adjustment but the combination of rivaroxaban and St John's wort should be avoided

AIMS

We assessed the potential mutual interaction of oral macitentan (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate) at steady-state with single-dose oral rivaroxaban (CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrate) and evaluated the effect of the CYP3A and P-glycoprotein inducer St John's wort (SJW) on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers completed this open-label, monocentre, two-period, one-sequence phase I clinical trial. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan (10 mg) was assessed on study days 3 (single dose), 15 (steady-state), 16 (impact of rivaroxaban) and 29 (after induction by oral SJW), and of rivaroxaban on days 2 (single dose), 16 (impact of macitentan at steady-state) and 29 (after induction by SJW). Concurrently, we quantified changes of CYP3A activity using oral microdoses of midazolam (30 μg).

RESULTS

Rivaroxaban and macitentan did not significantly change the pharmacokinetics of each other. After induction with SJW, CYP3A activity increased by 272% and geometric mean ratios of macitentan AUC decreased by 48% and of C_max by 45%. Concurrently, also geometric mean ratios of rivaroxaban AUC and C_max decreased by 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence for a relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between macitentan and rivaroxaban suggesting that these two drugs can be combined without dose adjustment. SJW strongly increased CYP3A activity and substantially reduced rivaroxaban and macitentan exposure while estimated net endothelin antagonism only decreased by 20%, which is considered clinically irrelevant. The combination of SJW with rivaroxaban should be avoided.