Information provision for antibacterial dosing in the obese patient: a sizeable absence?

Macrolide Treatment Failure due to Drug–Drug Interactions: Real-World Evidence to Evaluate a Pharmacological Hypothesis

Macrolide antibiotics have received criticism concerning their use and risk of treatment failure. Nevertheless, they are an important class of antibiotics and are frequently used in clinical practice for treating a variety of infections. This study sought to utilize pharmacoepidemiology methods and pharmacology principles to estimate the risk of macrolide treatment failure and quantify the influence of their pharmacokinetics on the risk of treatment failure, using clinically reported drug–drug interaction data. Using a large, commercial claims database (2006–2015), inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create a cohort of patients who received a macrolide for three common acute infections. Furthermore, an additional analysis examining only bacterial pneumonia events treated with macrolides was conducted. These criteria were formulated specifically to ensure treatment failure would not be expected nor influenced by intrinsic or extrinsic factors. Treatment failure rates were 6% within the common acute infections and 8% in the bacterial pneumonia populations. Regression results indicated that macrolide AUC changes greater than 50% had a significant effect on treatment failure risk, particularly for azithromycin. In fact, our results show that decreased or increased exposure change can influence failure risk, by 35% or 12%, respectively, for the acute infection scenarios. The bacterial pneumonia results were less significant with respect to the regression analyses. This integration of pharmacoepidemiology and clinical pharmacology provides a framework for utilizing real-world data to provide insight into pharmacokinetic mechanisms and support future study development related to antibiotic treatments.

Optimising antimicrobial use in humans - review of current evidence and an interdisciplinary consensus on key priorities for research

Addressing the silent pandemic of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a focus of the 2021 G7 meeting. A major driver of AMR and poor clinical outcomes is suboptimal antimicrobial use. Current research in AMR is inequitably focused on new drug development. To achieve antimicrobial security we need to balance AMR research efforts between development of new agents and strategies to preserve the efficacy and maximise effectiveness of existing agents. Combining a review of current evidence and multistage engagement with diverse international stakeholders (including those in healthcare, public health, research, patient advocacy and policy) we identified research priorities for optimising antimicrobial use in humans across four broad themes: policy and strategic planning; medicines management and prescribing systems; technology to optimise prescribing; and context, culture and behaviours. Sustainable progress depends on: developing economic and contextually appropriate interventions; facilitating better use of data and prescribing systems across healthcare settings; supporting appropriate and scalable technological innovation. Implementing this strategy for AMR research on the optimisation of antimicrobial use in humans could contribute to equitable global health security.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosing simulations of amoxicillin in obese adults receiving co-amoxiclav

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections are more frequent in obese patients and are most often treated by co-amoxiclav, using similar dosing regimens to those used for non-obese subjects. No data are available on amoxicillin pharmacokinetics among obese subjects receiving co-amoxiclav.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective, single-centre, open-label, non-randomized, crossover pharmacokinetic trial having enrolled obese otherwise healthy adult subjects. A first dose of co-amoxiclav (amoxicillin/clavulanate 1000/200 mg) was infused IV over 30 min, followed by a second dose (1000/125 mg) administered orally, separated by a washout period of ≥24 h. We assayed concentrations of amoxicillin by a validated ultra HPLC-tandem MS technique. We estimated population pharmacokinetic parameters of amoxicillin by non-linear mixed-effect modelling using the SAEM algorithm developed by Monolix.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven subjects were included in the IV study, with 24 included in the oral part of the study. Median body weight and BMI were 109.3 kg and 40.6 kg/m2, respectively. Amoxicillin pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Mean values for clearance, central volume, intercompartmental clearance and peripheral volume were, respectively, 14.6 L/h, 9.0 L, 4.2 L/h and 6.4 L for amoxicillin. Oral bioavailability of amoxicillin was 79.7%. Amoxicillin Cmax after oral administration significantly reduced with weight (P = 0.013). Dosing simulations for amoxicillin predicted that most of the population will achieve the pharmacodynamic target of fT>MIC ≥40% with the regimen of co-amoxiclav 1000/200 mg (IV) or 1000/125 mg (oral) q8h for MICs titrated up to 0.5 mg/L (IV) and 1 mg/L (oral).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic goals for amoxicillin can be obtained in obese subjects.

Safety and efficacy of omadacycline by body mass index in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: Subanalysis from a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To examine the safety and efficacy of omadacycline by body mass index (BMI) in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) from a Phase III trial.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized for suspected CABP were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous omadacycline or moxifloxacin, with an optional transition to oral, for a total of 7-14 days. Early clinical response (ECR) was assessed 72-120 h after receipt of the first dose, and clinical success was assessed 5-10 days after the last dose (post-treatment evaluation [PTE]). ECR was defined as improvement in at least two CABP symptoms with no worsening of other symptoms or use of rescue antibacterial treatment; success at PTE was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms to the extent that further antibacterial therapy was unnecessary. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory measures. Between-treatment comparisons were made by World Health Organization BMI categories and by diabetes history.

RESULTS

Distribution of patients in the normal weight, overweight, and obese subgroups was fairly even. Clinical success for omadacycline-treated patients at ECR were similar across ascending BMI groups (OMC: 82.9%, 80.5%, 76.9%; MOX: 88.6%, 80.7%, 76.9%). Outcomes by diabetes status were generally similar in omadacycline- and moxifloxacin-treated patients. Patients who had clinical success or clinical stability at ECR generally showed continued clinical success at PTE. Safety profiles for omadacycline and moxifloxacin were largely similar across BMI subgroups and by diabetes history.

CONCLUSION

The omadacycline fixed-dosing strategy showed consistent safety and efficacy in patients with CABP of different body sizes.

[Anti-infective treatment in obesity-"just double it?"]

Adaequate antibiotic therapy is crucial for successful anti-infective therapy. In addition to the choice of the right antibiotic and the duration of therapy, the dose also plays a decisive role. Obesity has an influence on the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics, which can lead to underdosing if previous weight-independent dosing regimes are used. It is therefore necessary to carry out systematic measurements of concentrations in obese patients. Since pharmacokinetic differences between plasma and the interstitial fluid of different target tissues have been observed for different antibiotics, the measurement is also necessary in the target tissue. The technique of microdialysis is best suited for this purpose as it allows concentrations to be measured continuously in the target tissue.

Diagnostic and medical needs for therapeutic drug monitoring of antibiotics

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antibiotics has been practiced for more than half a century, but it is still not widely applied for infected patients. It has a traditional focus on limiting toxicity of specific classes of antibiotics such as aminoglycosides and vancomycin. With more patients in critical care with higher levels of sickness severity and immunosuppression as well as an increasingly obese and ageing population, an increasing risk of suboptimal antibiotic exposure continues to escalate. As such, the value of TDM continues to expand, especially for beta-lactams which constitute the most frequently used antibiotic class. To date, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of infectious microbes rather than classification in terms of susceptible and resistant can be reported. In parallel, increasingly sophisticated TDM technology is becoming available ensuring that TDM is feasible and can deliver personalized antibiotic dosing schemes. There is an obvious need for extensive studies that will quantify the improvements in clinical outcome of individual TDM-guided dosing. We suggest that a broad diagnostic and medical investigation of the TDM arena, including market analyses and analytical technology assessment, is a current priority.

Severe Obesity Increases Risk of Infection After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The increasing prevalence of obesity has resulted in an increased number of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs) performed in patients with a high body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether obesity negatively affects (1) complication rate, (2) reoperation and revision rate, and (3) patient-reported outcome in rTHA.

METHODS

In this registry-based study, we prospectively followed 444 rTHAs (cup: n = 265, stem: n = 57, both: n = 122) performed in a specialized high-volume orthopedic center between 2013 and 2015. The number of complications, and reoperation and revision surgery was registered until 5 years postoperatively. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was evaluated preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Patients were categorized based on BMI to nonobese (<30 kg/m², n = 328), obese (30-35 kg/m², n = 82), and severe obese (≥35 kg/m², n = 34).

RESULTS

Severe obese patients, but not obese patients, had higher risks of complications and re-revision than nonobese patients. In particular, the risk of infection following rTHA was higher in severe obese patients (24%) compared to nonobese patients (3%; relative risk, 7.7). Severe obese patients had overall poorer OHS than nonobese patients, but improvement in OHS did not differ between severe obese and nonobese patients. No differences between obese and nonobese groups on OHS were observed.

CONCLUSION

In our study, severe obesity was associated with an increased risk of infection following rTHA. Patients with high BMI should be counseled appropriately before surgery.

Plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin in morbidly obese and non-obese surgical patients: a controlled clinical trial

Objectives

To assess the pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of fosfomycin in obese and non-obese surgical patients.

Methods

Fifteen obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery and 15 non-obese patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery received an intravenous single short infusion of 8 g of fosfomycin. Fosfomycin concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS in plasma and microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue up to 8 h after dosing. The pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) by non-compartmental methods.

Results

Thirteen obese patients (BMI 38–50 kg/m2) and 14 non-obese patients (BMI 0–29 kg/m2) were evaluable. The pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin in obese versus non-obese patients were characterized by lower peak plasma concentrations (468 ± 139 versus 594 ± 149 mg/L, P = 0.040) and higher V (24.4 ± 6.4 versus 19.0 ± 3.1 L, P = 0.010). The differences in AUC∞ were not significant (1275 ± 477 versus 1515 ± 352 mg·h/L, P = 0.16). The peak concentrations in subcutaneous tissue were reached rapidly and declined in parallel with the plasma concentrations. The drug exposure in tissue was nearly halved in obese compared with non-obese patients (AUC∞ 1052 ± 394 versus 1929 ± 725 mg·h/L, P = 0.0010). The tissue/plasma ratio (AUCISF/AUCplasma) was 0.86 ± 0.32 versus 1.27 ± 0.34 (P = 0.0047).

Conclusions

Whereas the pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin in plasma of surgical patients were only marginally different between obese and non-obese patients, the drug exposure in subcutaneous tissue was significantly lower in the obese patients.

Evaluation of treatment options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the obese patient

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a major cause of infection in both the hospital and community setting. Obesity is a risk factor for infection, and the prevalence of this disease has reached epidemic proportions worldwide. Treatment of infections in this special population is a challenge given the lack of data on the optimal antibiotic choice and dosing strategies, particularly for treatment of MRSA infections. Obesity is associated with various physiological changes that may lead to altered pharmacokinetic parameters. These changes include altered drug biodistribution, elimination, and absorption. This review provides clinicians with a summary of the literature pertaining to the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations when selecting antibiotic therapy for the treatment of MRSA infections in obese patients.