Multicentre study of posaconazole delayed-release tablet serum level and association with hepatotoxicity and QTc prolongation

Triazole antifungal drug interactions-practical considerations for excellent prescribing

Systemic antifungal therapy is critical for reducing the mortality from many invasive and chronic fungal infections. Triazole antifungals are the most frequently prescribed antifungals but require attention to dosing and drug interactions. Nearly 600 severe drug-drug interactions and over 1100 moderate interactions requiring dose modifications are described or anticipated with systemic antifungal agents (see https://www.aspergillus.org.uk/antifungal-drug-interactions/). In this article, we address the common and less common, but serious, drug interactions observed in clinical practice with triazole antifungals, including a group of drugs that cannot be prescribed with all or most triazole antifungals (ivabradine, ranolazine, eplerenone, fentanyl, apomorphine, quetiapine, bedaquiline, rifampicin, rifabutin, sirolimus, phenytoin and carbamazepine). We highlight interactions with drugs used in children and new agents introduced for the treatment of haematological malignancies or graft versus host disease (midostaurin, ibrutinib, ruxolitinib and venetoclax). We also summarize the multiple interactions between oral and inhaled corticosteroids and triazole antifungals, and the strategies needed to optimize the therapeutic benefits of triazole antifungal therapy while minimizing potential harm to patients.

Utility of triazole antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists: Endorsed by the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

Triazole antifungals (i.e., fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole) are commonly used in clinical practice to prevent or treat invasive fungal infections. Most triazole antifungals require therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) due to highly variable pharmacokinetics, known drug interactions, and established relationships between exposure and response. On behalf of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP), this insight describes the pharmacokinetic principles and pharmacodynamic targets of commonly used triazole antifungals and provides the rationale for utility of TDM within each agent.

Modified Potato Starch as a Potential Retardant for Prolonged Release of Lidocaine Hydrochloride from Methylcellulose Hydrophilic Gel

The problem of drug delivery often concentrates on the prolongation of drug activity. Application of natural polymers which are biodegradable and inexpensive is in the interest of many researchers. The aim of this study was the application of newly synthesized starch derivatives as potential functional excipients proposed for hydrophilic gel with lidocaine hydrochloride (LH) to prolong drug release from the hydrogel matrix. In our study, we investigated the effect of starch modified with citric acid on the release kinetics of LH using UV-VIS and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), as well as viscosity and pH measurements. We demonstrated the effectiveness of citric-acid-modified starch in prolonging the release of LH from methylcellulose gel.

Elevated posaconazole trough concentrations are not associated with increased risk for posaconazole toxicity in lung transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

Posaconazole is used for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in lung transplant recipients (LTR). Previous studies have not described the relationship between elevated posaconazole trough concentrations and adverse drug reactions in this population.

METHODS

This IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital included LTR who had posaconazole trough concentrations measured. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate elevated posaconazole trough concentrations and changes in liver function tests as well as QTc interval. A secondary aim of this study was to identify patient factors associated with elevated posaconazole trough levels.

RESULTS

A total of 109 LTR were included. The average age was 58.1 years (IQR, 48-65), the majority were male (56%). A total of 932 trough levels were assessed with a median number of 8 (IQR, 5-15) levels per patient. The median posaconazole trough concentration was 1.7 mg/L (IQR, 1.1-2.5). Hepatotoxicity, as defined by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), was observed in 73.4% of subjects, with the majority classified as grade 1 (67.5%). However, there was no correlation between elevated posaconazole levels and aspartate aminotransferase (r = .03), alanine aminotransferase (r = .04), alkaline phosphatase (r = .04), and total bilirubin (r = .02). There was also no correlation between posaconazole trough concentrations and QTc interval (r = .03).

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that no correlation exists between whole blood posaconazole levels and hepatotoxicity or QTc prolongation. Based on these results, posaconazole dose reductions may not be warranted for posaconazole levels that are significantly above the therapeutic target to avert risk for hepatotoxicity or QTc prolongation.

Challenges in the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Immunocompromised Children

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Voriconazole remains the drug of choice for the treatment of IA in children; however, the complex kinetics of voriconazole in children make dosing challenging and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) essential for treatment success. The overarching goal of this review is to discuss the role of voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, echinocandins, and combination antifungal therapy for the treatment of IA in children. We also provide a detailed discussion of antifungal TDM in children.

Analyzing adverse drug reaction using statistical and machine learning methods: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are unintended negative drug-induced responses. Determining the association between drugs and ADRs is crucial, and several methods have been proposed to demonstrate this association. This systematic review aimed to examine the analytical tools by considering original articles that utilized statistical and machine learning methods for detecting ADRs.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted based on articles published between 2015 and 2020. The keywords used were statistical, machine learning, and deep learning methods for detecting ADR signals. The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

We reviewed 72 articles, of which 51 and 21 addressed statistical and machine learning methods, respectively. Electronic medical record (EMR) data were exclusively analyzed using the regression method. For FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data, components of the disproportionality method were preferable. DrugBank was the most used database for machine learning. Other methods accounted for the highest and supervised methods accounted for the second highest.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the 72 main articles, this review provides guidelines on which databases are frequently utilized and which analysis methods can be connected. For statistical analysis, >90% of the cases were analyzed by disproportionate or regression analysis with each spontaneous reporting system (SRS) data or electronic medical record (EMR) data; for machine learning research, however, there was a strong tendency to analyze various data combinations. Only half of the DrugBank database was occupied, and the k-nearest neighbor method accounted for the greatest proportion.

Hepatic safety of the antifungal triazole agent posaconazole: characterization of adverse event reports in a manufacturer's safety database

BACKGROUND

Second-generation triazoles including posaconazole are efficacious for prophylaxis and salvage treatment of life-threatening invasive fungal diseases but have been associated with hepatic adverse events (AEs). This report evaluated hepatic AEs in posaconazole-treated patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Hepatobiliary AEs with posaconazole exposure in the company's global safety database were analyzed to characterize underlying medical conditions and concomitant drug exposure.

RESULTS

As of October 2019, 516 cases (168 from clinical trials, 348 from postmarketing use) containing 618 hepatobiliary AEs were reported regardless of causality. Frequently reported terms were hyperbilirubinemia, hepatic failure, and hepatic function abnormal (clinical trials reports) and hepatotoxicity, hepatocellular injury, and hepatic function abnormal (postmarketing reports). Cases reporting concurrent medications associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) included 8% with verified severe DILI (vMost-DILI) concern, 24% with verified mild to moderate DILI (vLess-DILI) concern, and 37% received both vMost-DILI and vLess-DILI-concern medications in the DILIrank data set.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of concomitant medications with known risks for hepatic injury appears to be an important contributor for the development of hepatotoxicity in patients treated with posaconazole.

Antifungal Drugs TDM: Trends and Update

PURPOSE

The increasing burden of invasive fungal infections results in growing challenges to antifungal (AF) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in AF TDM.

METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search for articles during 2016-2020 using "TDM" or "pharmacokinetics" or "drug-drug-interaction" with "antifungal," consolidated for each AF. Selection was limited to English language articles with human data on drug exposure.

RESULTS

More than 1000 articles matched the search terms. We selected 566 publications. The latest findings tend to confirm previous observations in real-life clinical settings. The pharmacokinetic variability related to special populations is not specific but must be considered. AF benefit-to-risk ratio, drug-drug interaction (DDI) profiles, and minimal inhibitory concentrations for pathogens must be known to manage at-risk situations and patients. Itraconazole has replaced ketoconazole in healthy volunteers DDI studies. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling is widely used to assess metabolic azole DDI. AF prophylactic use was studied more for Aspergillus spp. and Mucorales in oncohematology and solid organ transplantation than for Candida (already studied). Emergence of central nervous system infection and severe infections in immunocompetent individuals both merit special attention. TDM is more challenging for azoles than amphotericin B and echinocandins. Fewer TDM requirements exist for fluconazole and isavuconazole (ISZ); however, ISZ is frequently used in clinical situations in which TDM is recommended. Voriconazole remains the most challenging of the AF, with toxicity limiting high-dose treatments. Moreover, alternative treatments (posaconazole tablets, ISZ) are now available.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM seems to be crucial for curative and/or long-term maintenance treatment in highly variable patients. TDM poses fewer cost issues than the drugs themselves or subsequent treatment issues. The integration of clinical pharmacology into multidisciplinary management is now increasingly seen as a part of patient care.

Consensus guidelines for optimising antifungal drug delivery and monitoring to avoid toxicity and improve outcomes in patients with haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, 2021

Antifungal agents can have complex dosing and the potential for drug interaction, both of which can lead to subtherapeutic antifungal drug concentrations and poorer clinical outcomes for patients with haematological malignancy and haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Antifungal agents can also be associated with significant toxicities when drug concentrations are too high. Suboptimal dosing can be minimised by clinical assessment, laboratory monitoring, avoidance of interacting drugs, and dose modification. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays an increasingly important role in antifungal therapy, particularly for antifungal agents that have an established exposure-response relationship with either a narrow therapeutic window, large dose-exposure variability, cytochrome P450 gene polymorphism affecting drug metabolism, the presence of antifungal drug interactions or unexpected toxicity, and/or concerns for non-compliance or inadequate absorption of oral antifungals. These guidelines provide recommendations on antifungal drug monitoring and TDM-guided dosing adjustment for selected antifungal agents, and include suggested resources for identifying and analysing antifungal drug interactions. Recommended competencies for optimal interpretation of antifungal TDM and dose recommendations are also provided.

Effect of High-Dose Posaconazole on Serum Levels in Adult Patients with Hematologic Malignancy

Posaconazole (POS) appears to have dose-proportional pharmacokinetics; however, there is a paucity of real-life data. We retrospectively evaluated 67 patients with hematologic cancer who had POS dose increases from 300 mg/day to either 400 mg/day (n = 52) or 300 mg twice daily (BID) (n = 15) and for whom POS serum levels were measured. Median POS levels were 840 ng/ml, 1,625 ng/ml, and 2,710 ng/ml for the dosages of 300 mg/day, 400 mg/day, and 300 mg BID, respectively. Significant interpatient variability in serum levels was noted.

Evaluating posaconazole, its pharmacology, efficacy and safety for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Safe and effective antifungal medications used for prophylaxis and treatment are pivotal in their management. Posaconazole is a promising triazole antifungal agent.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss the pharmacological properties of posaconazole, including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability profile, together with efficacy data for prophylaxis and treatment as well as its use in special populations based on current literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Posaconazole has a favorable safety and tolerability profile; however, caution is advised when co-administered with agents that are CYP3A4 inhibitors, because their concentration may significantly increase, and their levels should be closely monitored. It has an extended spectrum of activity against yeasts and filamentous fungi. It is successfully used as prophylaxis for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It is the first line treatment for oropharyngeal candidiasis and is also used as a salvage treatment for refractory IFDs. Currently available formulations include the oral suspension, delayed-release tablets and solution for intravenous infusion, all with different PK/PD properties and indications. Its use in children and adolescents is currently being examined in Phase-II clinical trials.

Posaconazole treatment of refractory coccidioidomycosis in dogs

Background

The majority of dogs with coccidioidomycosis recover with administration of fluconazole or itraconazole, although some cases are refractory or the dogs do not tolerate administration of these medications.

Objectives

The objective was to describe the treatment outcomes and therapeutic monitoring of 8 dogs with refractory coccidioidomycosis treated with posaconazole.

Animals

Eight dogs with refractory coccidioidomycosis.

Methods

Retrospective case series. Medical records from Veterinary Specialty Center of Tucson were searched to identify dogs with refractory coccidioidomycosis that were treated with posaconazole. Clinical information and the results of monitoring trough serum posaconazole concentrations were retrieved.

Results

Eight dogs with refractory coccidioidomycosis were treated with 2.5 to 10 mg/kg per day of posaconazole. Six of 8 dogs recovered or developed clinical remission while administered posaconazole. Thirteen serum concentrations from 8 dogs tested were >1 μg/mL (range, 1.52 to >6 μg/mL) and the drug was well‐tolerated by 7 dogs. One dog required dosage reductions and treatment was ultimately discontinued because of hepatotoxicosis.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Posaconazole should be considered as a treatment option for dogs with refractory coccidioidomycosis. Monitoring of indicators of liver function or injury along with therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to tailor dosage in the event of hepatic toxicosis.

Managing uncertainty in antifungal dosing: antibiograms, therapeutic drug monitoring and drug-drug interactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A number of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors in critically ill or severely immunosuppressed patients influence the effectiveness of antifungal therapy making dosing less certain. Recent position papers from infectious diseases societies and working groups have proposed methods for dosage individualization of antibiotics in critically ill patients using a combination of population pharmacokinetic models, Monte-Carlo simulation and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide dosing. In this review, we examine the current limitations and practical issues of adapting a pharmacometrics-guided dosing approaches to dosing of antifungals in critically ill or severely immunosuppressed populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review the current status of antifungal susceptibility testing and challenges in incorporating TDM into Bayesian dose prediction models. We also discuss issues facing pharmacometrics dosage adjustment of newer targeted chemotherapies that exhibit severe pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with triazole antifungals.

SUMMARY

Although knowledge of antifungal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic is maturing, the practical application of these concepts towards point-of-care dosage individualization is still limited. User-friendly pharmacometric models are needed to improve the utility of TDM and management of a growing number of severe pharmacokinetic antifungal drug-drug interactions with targeted chemotherapies.

Mucormycosis

Mucormycosis is a rare but aggressive fungal disease that mainly affects patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and those who are severely immunocompromised, including patients with hematological malignancies and solid organ transplant recipients. Early recognition of infection is critical for treatment success, followed by prompt initiation of antifungal therapy with lipid formulation amphotericin B. Posaconazole and isavuconazole should be used for stepdown and salvage therapy. Surgical debridement is key for tissue diagnosis and treatment and should be pursued urgently whenever possible. In addition to surgery and antifungal therapy, reverting the underlying risk factor for infection is important for treatment response.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Posaconazole

Posaconazole is typically used for preventing invasive yeast and mold infections such as invasive aspergillosis in high-risk immunocompromised patients. The oral suspension was the first released formulation and many pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of this formulation have been published. Erratic absorption profiles associated with this formulation were widely reported. Posaconazole exposure was found to be significantly influenced by food and many gastrointestinal conditions, including pH and motility. As a result, low posaconazole plasma concentrations were obtained in large groups of patients. These issues of erratic absorption urged the development of the subsequently marketed delayed-release tablet, which proved to be associated with higher and more stable exposure profiles. Shortly thereafter, an intravenous formulation was released for patients who are not able to take oral formulations. Both new formulations require a loading dose on day 1 to achieve high posaconazole concentrations more quickly, which was not possible with the oral suspension. So far, there appears to be no evidence of increased toxicity correlated to the higher posaconazole exposure achieved with the regimen for these formulations. The higher systemic availability of posaconazole for the delayed-release tablet and intravenous formulation have resulted in these two formulations being preferable for both prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease. This review aimed to integrate the current knowledge on posaconazole pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, major toxicity, existing resistance, clinical experience in special populations, and new therapeutic strategies in order to get a clear understanding of the clinical use of this drug.

Therapeutic drug monitoring and adverse events of delayed-release posaconazole tablets in patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis

BACKGROUND

Posaconazole delayed-release tablets offer better bioavailability than the liquid suspension, but no post-marketing data are available in immunocompetent hosts such as those with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA).

OBJECTIVES

To explore the pharmacokinetics and adverse event (AE) profile of posaconazole tablets in patients with CPA.

METHODS

Patients started on posaconazole tablets at the National Aspergillosis Centre (NAC), Manchester, UK between February 2014 and October 2015 were identified from the NAC database and analysed retrospectively. The medical records were reviewed for factors that could affect posaconazole serum levels and the development of AEs.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included; 50 (69%) were male and the mean age was 48.5 ± 12 years. Therapeutic levels (≥1 mg/L) were achieved in 90% of cases on 200 mg versus 90% of cases on 300 mg daily (P = not significant). Based on multivariate analysis, female sex (P = 0.041), a 100 mg daily dose (P < 0.001), asthma (P = 0.01) and bronchiectasis (P = 0.001) were associated with subtherapeutic levels. Forty-nine (68%) patients developed AEs, mainly fatigue (37%), dyspnoea (18%) and nausea (12%). AEs were present on 115/196 (59%) occasions on 300 mg/day and on 45/115 (39%) occasions on 200 mg/day (P < 0.01). The mean level was 1.81 ± 0.96 mg/L for patients reporting no AEs and 1.90 ± 1.11 mg/L for those reporting AEs (P = not significant). Factors associated with AEs of grade ≥2 were a daily dose of 300 versus 200 mg (P = 0.001) and asthma (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower-than-recommended posaconazole tablet dose achieved therapeutic levels in most patients and was better tolerated. Males were more likely to achieve a therapeutic level. Underlying conditions affected the degree and frequency of AEs.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Posaconazole Tablet Formulation in Chinese Participants at High Risk for Invasive Fungal Infection

INTRODUCTION

This study characterized the multidose pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of posaconazole tablets used as prophylactic antifungal therapy in Chinese patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) at risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI).

METHODS

Participants in this open-label, single-arm, phase 1b study received posaconazole 300 mg twice daily on day 1 and then once daily for up to 28 days. In the intensive PK sampling subgroup, posaconazole was administered under fasting conditions on days 1 and 8, and blood samples were regularly collected over 24 h. Trough PK sampling was conducted in all participants on days 1, 2, 3, 8, 14, 21, and 28 without regard for food intake. Population PK characteristics were predicted using PK modeling. Primary endpoints were steady-state average concentration (C_avg) and percentage of participants with steady-state C_avg (predicted and observed) > 500 ng/ml. Treatment safety and efficacy were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Sixty-five adult Chinese participants were enrolled. On day 8, steady-state arithmetic mean C_avg was 1610 ng/ml (% coefficient of variation [%CV] 42.8%) in the intensive PK subgroup (n = 20). All participants achieved a steady-state C_avg > 500 ng/ml. Predicted C_avg (pC_avg) was 1770 ng/ml (%CV 33.7%) in the total population (n = 64); 92.2% of participants had pC_avg values ≥ 500 ng/ml (n = 59). The posaconazole tablet safety profile was consistent with that of the oral formulation, and the IFI rate was 3%.

CONCLUSION

In Chinese AML patients, the posaconazole 300-mg tablet provided PK data comparable with those of previous studies and was generally well tolerated and efficacious.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02387983.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights of the Recent Literature

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), herbal-induced liver injury, and herbal and dietary supplement (HDS)-induced liver injury are an important aspect of drug safety. Knowledge regarding responsible drugs, mechanisms, risk factors, and the diagnostic tools to detect liver injury have continued to grow in the past year. This review highlights what we considered the most significant publications from among more than 1800 articles relating to liver injury from medications, herbal products, and dietary supplements in 2017 and 2018. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study highlighted several areas of ongoing study, including the potential utility of human leukocyte antigens and microRNAs as DILI risk factors and new data on racial differences, the role of alcohol consumption, factors associated with prognosis, and updates on the clinical signatures of autoimmune DILI, thiopurines, and HDS agents. Novel data were also generated from the Spanish and Latin American DILI registries as well as from Chinese and Korean case series. A few new agents causing DILI were added to the growing list in the past 2 years, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, as were new aspects of chemotherapy-associated liver injury. A number of cases reported previously described hepatotoxins confirmed via the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM; e.g., norethisterone, methylprednisolone, glatiramer acetate) and/or the DILIN method (e.g., celecoxib, dimethyl fumarate). Additionally, much work centered on elucidating the pathophysiology of DILI, including the importance of bile salt export pumps and immune-mediated mechanisms. Finally, it must be noted that, while hundreds of new studies described DILI in 2017-2018, the quality of such reports must always be addressed. Björnsson reminds us to remain very critical of the data when addressing the future utility of a study, which is why it is so important to adhere to a standardized method such as RUCAM when determining DILI causality. While drug-induced hepatotoxicity remains a diagnosis of exclusion, the diverse array of publications that appeared in 2017 and 2018 provided important advances in our understanding of DILI, paving the way for our improved ability to make a more definitive diagnosis and risk assessment.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Posaconazole Delayed Release Tablets and Suspension in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients

OBJECTIVES

Posaconazole is effective in preventing invasive fungal infections in neutropenic pediatric patients. The oral suspension has challenges in administration and absorption that are theorized to be minimized with delayed release tablets. However, this has not been validated in the pediatric population. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of posaconazole suspension and delayed release tablets in pediatric hematology/oncology patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review in pediatric hematology/oncology patients was conducted from February 2013 to February 2017. Data collected include patient demographic data; posaconazole formulation, dose, and serum concentrations; and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with 353 serum posaconazole concentrations were included; 51.6% of concentrations drawn while patients were receiving posaconazole suspension were therapeutic, whereas 62.5% of concentrations drawn while patients were receiving posaconazole delayed release tablets were therapeutic (p = 0.035). Serum concentrations drawn while taking acid suppression (histamine receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors) and posaconazole suspension were less likely to be therapeutic (p < 0.0001) compared with those taken while receiving delayed release tablets. Adverse event profiles were similar between both formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed release tablets proved more effective in achieving therapeutic serum posaconazole concentrations than posaconazole suspension, with minimal difference in adverse events, in pediatric hematology/oncology patients.

Evaluation of Intravenous Posaconazole Dosing and Pharmacokinetic Target Attainment in Pediatric Patients

Limited data exist on intravenous (IV) posaconazole dosing and the risk for hepatotoxicity it confers to children. In this study, we evaluated dosing and resulting trough levels in 10 pediatric patients on IV posaconazole. A therapeutic level in these patients was achieved 95% of the time. We found a median minimum effective dose of 6.55 mg/kg of body weight. No correlation was found between the duration or posaconazole trough level and an increased alanine transaminase level.

Using State Transition Models to Explore How the Prevalence of Subtherapeutic Posaconazole Exposures Impacts the Clinical Utility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Posaconazole Tablets and Oral Suspension

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been recommended in guidelines for patients receiving posaconazole oral suspension, but its utility in patients receiving posaconazole tablet, which has an improved bioavailability, remains unclear. We used state transition models with first-order Monte Carlo microsimulation to re-examine the posaconazole exposure-response relationships reported in two Phase III clinical trials (prophylaxis with posaconazole oral suspension - Models 1 & 2) and a third multicenter observational TDM study (Model 3). We simulated the impact of TDM-guided interventions to improve initial average posaconazole concentrations (C_avg) to reduce clinical failure (in Models 1 & 2) and breakthrough invasive fungal disease (bIFD) in Model 3. Simulations were then repeated using posaconazole tablet C_avg distributions in place of the oral suspension formulation. In all three models with posaconazole oral suspension, TDM interventions associated with maximal improvement in posaconazole C_avg reduced absolute rates of subtherapeutic exposures (C_avg < 700 ng/mL) by 25-49%. Predicted reductions in absolute clinical failure rates were 11% in Model 1 and 6.5% in Model 2, and a 12.6% reduction in bIFD in Model 3. With the tablet formulation, maximally-effective TDM interventions reduced subtherapeutic exposures by approximately 5% in all three models and absolute clinical failure rates by 3.9% in Model 1, and 1.6% in Model 2; and a 1.6% reduction in bIFD in Model 3. Our modeling suggests that routine TDM during prophylaxis with posaconazole tablets may have limited clinical utility unless populations with higher prevalence (>10%) of subtherapeutic exposures can be identified based on clinical risk factors.

Refining the therapeutic range of posaconazole and isavuconazole for efficient therapeutic drug monitoring using a bioassay approach

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal triazole was recommended, except for isavuconazole (ISA) whose target trough concentrations (C_min ) need to be specified. Concerning posaconazole (POS), tablet formulation results in higher exposure but no upper C_min threshold has been yet proposed. We aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of POS and ISA, using a bioassay approach as surrogate marker of antifungal activity, in order to refine the therapeutic C_min of both antifungals. A bioassay using a cellulose disk diffusion method was performed to determine the growth inhibition zone (GIZ) of POS and ISA on Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida parapsilosis (ISA only). GIZs of plasma from patients undergoing TDM for POS (n = 136) or ISA (n = 40) were determined. GIZs of plasma patients and antifungal C_min were highly correlated for ISA (A. fumigatus: ρ = 0.942, P < 0.0001; C. parapsilosis: ρ = 0.949, P < 0.0001) and POS (ρ = 0.922, P < 0.0001), and these relationships were represented with a Michaelis-Menten model. Based on this modeling, the recommended thresholds of 0.7, 1, and 1.25 mg/L for the POS C_min corresponded to 50.1, 55.2, and 59.1% of the maximal GIZ, respectively. We propose an upper threshold of 4.8 mg/L for the POS C_min and a lower threshold of 2.0 mg/L for the C_min of ISA, as they respectively corresponded to concentrations leading to 90% and 50% of the maximal GIZ on A. fumigatus. The determination of antifungal activity using this bioassay allowed refining target C_min of POS and ISA, especially the upper threshold of POS (4.8 mg/L) and the lower threshold of ISA (2.0 mg/L).

Single-centre study of therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole in lung transplant recipients: factors affecting trough plasma concentrations

Objectives

This study describes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of posaconazole suspension and modified release (MR) tablets in lung transplant (LTx) recipients and evaluates factors that may affect posaconazole trough plasma concentration (Cmin).

Methods

A single-centre, retrospective study evaluating posaconazole Cmin in LTx recipients receiving posaconazole suspension or MR tablets between January 2014 and December 2016.

Results

Forty-seven LTx patients received posaconazole suspension, and 78 received the MR tablet formulation; a total of 421 and 617 Cmin measurements were made, respectively. Posaconazole was concurrently administered with proton pump inhibitor in ≥ 90% of patients. The median (IQR) of initial posaconazole Cmin following 300 mg daily of posaconazole tablet was significantly higher than that of 800 mg daily of posaconazole suspension [1.65 (0.97-2.13) mg/L versus 0.81 (0.48-1.15) mg/L, P < 0.01]. Variability in posaconazole Cmin was apparent regardless of the formulations prescribed and dose adjustments were routinely undertaken to maintain therapeutic Cmin. A clear dose-response relationship was observed in patients receiving posaconazole MR tablets. Non-specific adverse events (fatigue, tremor, lethargy, sweating, nausea/vomiting and weight loss) were reported in 3/78 (4%) patients receiving posaconazole MR tablets. Posaconazole Cmin in these three patients was determined to be 9.6, 6.2 and 2.3 mg/L.

Conclusions

The current study has provided clinically important insights into the TDM of posaconazole in LTx recipients. Routine TDM should be undertaken in LTx recipients receiving posaconazole suspension and/or MR tablets.

Invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients: report from TIMM-8 2017

Trends in Medical Mycology (TIMM) is the biennial meeting of the Infectious Disease Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). It brings together clinicians and researchers from across the world to share the latest R&Ds in medical mycology. Despite advances in treatment, invasive fungal infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in certain high-risk groups of patients, particularly in immunocompromised patients, including those undergoing solid organ transplantation and those with acute leukemia. The challenges for clinicians are now compounded by the rapid development of multidrug resistance. The latest data and approaches to identifying patients at high risk for invasive fungal infections, ensuring early diagnosis and achieving effective treatment, including when and how to use therapeutic drug monitoring with azoles, were shared with >1000 clinicians and researchers from around the world attending the eighth TIMM, held in Belgrade, Serbia, in October 2017 (TIMM-8 2017).

Prevention of Invasive Aspergillus Fungal Infections with the Suspension and Delayed-Release Tablet Formulations of Posaconazole in Patients with Haematologic Malignancies

Posaconazole is a triazole antifungal used to prevent invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients receiving chemotherapy or haemotopoietic stem cell transplantation. Due to highly variable bioavailability of the oral suspension formulation, a delayed-release tablet was developed which showed improved bioavailability. A minimal target posaconazole plasma concentration of 0.7 mg/L is recommended for prophylaxis of IFIs. However, the relationship between plasma concentration of posaconazole and its efficacy against IFIs remains unclear. We analysed trough posaconazole concentrations and response against IFIs in 50 and 104 patients with haematologic malignancies receiving prophylactic posaconazole as the tablet or suspension formulation, respectively. Mean plasma concentration of posaconazole was 1.91 ± 1.06 mg/L and 0.82 ± 0.57 mg/L in the tablet and the oral suspension group, respectively (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients reaching the minimal target concentration of 0.7 mg/L was 92.0% and 47.1% in the tablet and oral suspension groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Emergent aspergillosis occurred in 9 (8.7%) patients in the suspension group and in none of the patients taking the tablet formulation (p = 0.032). Our results show a relationship between plasma concentrations of posaconazole and its prophylactic efficacy in patients with haematologic malignancies. Target posaconazole concentrations are reached more efficiently with the tablet than with the suspension formulation.