Loss and gain of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in a non-carbapenemase-producing K1-ST23 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed at revealing the underlying mechanisms of the loss and gain of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in a non-carbapenemase-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp).

METHODS

Here we longitudinally recovered 3 non-carbapenemase-producing K1-ST23 hvKp strains at a one-month interval (KP29105, KP29499 and KP30086) from an elderly male. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole genome sequencing, transcriptomic sequencing, gene cloning, plasmid conjugation, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) were conducted.

RESULTS

Among the 3 hvKp strains, KP29105 was resistant to the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins, KP29499 acquired resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems, while KP30086 restored its susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem and meropenem but retained low-level resistance to ertapenem. KP29105 and KP29499 carried plasmid-encoded genes blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-71, respectively, but KP30086 lost both. Cloning of gene blaCTX-M-71 and conjugation experiment of blaCTX-M-71-carrying plasmid showed that the transformant and transconjugant were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam but had a more than 8-fold increase in MICs. Supplementation with an outer membrane permeabilizer could reduce the MIC of ceftazidime-avibactam by 32 folds, indicating that porins play a key role in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. The OmpK35 of the 3 isolates was not expressed, and the OmpK36 of KP29499 and KP30086 had a novel amino acid substitution (L359R). SDS-PAGE and qRT-PCR showed that the expression of porin OmpK36 of KP29499 and KP30086 was significantly down-regulated compared with KP29105.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we reported the rare ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in a non-carbapenemase-producing hvKp strain. Resistance plasmid carrying blaCTX-M-71 and mutated OmpK36 had a synergetic effect on the resistance.

Crystal structure of the class A extended-spectrum β-lactamase CTX-M-96 in complex with relebactam at 1.03 Angstrom resolution

The use of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors constitutes an important strategy to counteract β-lactamases in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Recent reports have described ceftazidime-/avibactam-resistant isolates producing CTX-M variants with different amino acid substitutions (e.g., P167S, L169Q, and S130G). Relebactam (REL) combined with imipenem has proved very effective against Enterobacterales producing ESBLs, serine-carbapenemases, and AmpCs. Herein, we evaluated the inhibitory efficacy of REL against CTX-M-96, a CTX-M-15-type variant. The CTX-M-96 structure was obtained in complex with REL at 1.03 Å resolution (PDB 8EHH). REL was covalently bound to the S70-Oγ atom upon cleavage of the C7-N6 bond. Compared with apo CTX-M-96, binding of REL forces a slight displacement of the deacylating water inwards the active site (0.81 Å), making the E166 and N170 side chains shift to create a proper hydrogen bonding network. Binding of REL also disturbs the hydrophobic patch formed by Y105, P107, and Y129, likely due to the piperidine ring of REL that creates clashes with these residues. Also, a remarkable change in the positioning of the N104 sidechain is also affected by the piperidine ring. Therefore, differences in the kinetic behavior of REL against class A β-lactamases seem to rely, at least in part, on differences in the residues being involved in the association and stabilization of the inhibitor before hydrolysis. Our data provide the biochemical and structural basis for REL effectiveness against CTX-M-producing Gram-negative pathogens and essential details for further DBO design. Imipenem/REL remains an important choice for dealing with isolates co-producing CTX-M with other β-lactamases.

Mechanisms and fitness of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical strains in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection is a global public health issue, and ceftazidime/avibactam is recommended by international guidelines as the preferred treatment for KPC- and OXA-48-producing CRKP. Since its introduction in Taiwan in 2019, ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strains have emerged. Our aim is to investigate the mechanisms of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in CRKP in Taiwan and study their associated fitness costs.

METHODS

Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant CRKP strains with exposure to ceftazidime/avibactam isolated from clinical specimens were consecutively collected at Taipei Veterans General Hospital in 2020. The serial strains exhibiting ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant phenotypes isolated from the same patient were characterized using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and tested for their growth rates and competitive abilities.

RESULTS

A total of 35 ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant CRKP strains were identified, with 20 being metallo-β-lactamase producers. Ten strains harbored KPC variants, exhibiting MIC for ceftazidime/avibactam ranging from 64 to ≥256 mg/L. The 10 strains demonstrating high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance possessed mutated KPC variants: KPC-33 (n=3), KPC-31 (n=1), KPC-39 (n=1), KPC-44 (n=1), KPC-58 (n=1), KPC-90 (n=1), and two novel KPC variants. Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strains with KPC-33 and KPC-39 showed a significant fitness cost and lower growth rate compared to their parental strains. In contrast, ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strains with KPC-58 and KPC-58 plus D179Y showed similar growth rates and competitive abilities compared to their parental strains.

CONCLUSION

Mutated KPC variants conferred high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in Taiwan. Significant fitness costs were observed in both the ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-33 and KPC-39 strains. Despite conferring a similar level of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, different KPC variants could entail varying degrees of fitness costs.

Efficacy of Zoliflodacin, a Spiropyrimidinetrione Antibiotic, Against Gram-Negative Pathogens

Zoliflodacin is a spiropyrimidinetrione antibiotic that acts by binding to the GyrB part of the DNA gyrase enzyme in bacteria. Its effectiveness for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections has been investigated extensively. Since antibiotic resistance has been reached an alarming rate worldwide, researches on new antimicrobials are considered a priority, especially in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumonia. The aim of this study is to test and compare the effectiveness of zoliflodacin with some traditional antibiotics which are frequently preferred in the treatment of Gram-negative pathogens, primarily K. pneumonia. Additionally, its ability to prevent biofilm formation has also been determined. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of zoliflodacin along with levofloxacin, meropenem, gentamicin, ampicillin/sulbactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were evaluated by broth microdilution method against 15 Gram-negative clinical isolates and three standard strains. Also, the synergism potential of zoliflodacin with other antibiotics was evaluated by the checkerboard method against standard strains of K. pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, the inhibitory effects of zoliflodacin on biofilm formation of standard strains were determined. Zoliflodacin MICs were found to be in the range of 2-64 µg/mL, and its combination with meropenem and ampicillin/sulbactam was found to be synergistic, especially against A. baumannii. Zoliflodacin significantly inhibited A. baumannii biofilm at sub-MIC values. These results indicated that zoliflodacin can be considered as an alternative against infections of Gram-negative pathogens, alone or in combination.

MultiRapid ATB NP test for detecting concomitant susceptibility and resistance of last-resort novel antibiotics available to treat multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales infections

BACKGROUND

Recently developed therapeutics against Gram-negative bacteria include the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV), and imipenem-relebatam (IPR), and the siderophore cephalosporin cefiderocol (FDC). The aim of this study was to develop a test for rapid identification of susceptibility/resistance to CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC for Enterobacterales in a single test for rapid clinical decision making.

METHODS

The MultiRapid ATB NP test is based on the detection of glucose metabolism occurring after bacterial growth in the presence of defined concentrations of CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC, followed by visual detection of colour change of the pH indicator red phenol (red to yellow) generated by the acidification of the medium upon bacterial growth. This test is performed in 96-well microplates. The MultiRapid ATB NP test was evaluated using 78 Enterobacterales isolates and compared to the reference method broth microdilution.

RESULTS

The MultiRapid ATB NP test displayed 97.0% (confidence interval [CI] 92.6-98.8) sensitivity, 97.7% (CI 94.3-99.1) specificity, and 97.4% (CI 95.0-98.7) accuracy. The results were obtained after 3 h of incubation at 35 °C ± 2 °C, representing at least a 15-h gain-of-time compared with currently used antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods.

CONCLUSION

The MultiRapid ATB NP test provided accurate results for the concomitant detection of susceptibility/resistance to CZA, MEV, IPR, and FDC in Enterobacterales, independent of the resistance mechanism. This test may be suitable for implementation in any microbiology routine laboratory.

Ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy versus monotherapy for treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative infection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam combination therapy with that of monotherapy in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB).

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until September 1, 2023. Only studies that compared CZA combination therapy with monotherapy for CR-GNB infections were included.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies (23 retrospective observational studies and 2 prospective studies) involving 2676 patients were included. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the study group receiving combination therapy and the control group receiving monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.18). In addition, no significant differences were observed between the study and the control group in terms of in-hospital mortality (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.79-1.27), 14-day mortality (RR 1.54; 95% CI 0.24-9.91), 90-day mortality (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.62-2.22), and clinical cure rate (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84-1.08). However, the combination group had a borderline higher microbiological eradication rate than the control group (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to monotherapy, CZA combination therapy did not yield additional clinical benefits. However, combination therapy may be associated with favorable microbiological outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of tigecycline dosing in a hollow fiber infection model against clinical bla-KPC producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae isolates

The FDA announced a boxed warning for tigecycline due to progression of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria and increased risk of mortality during treatment. Plasma exposure of tigecycline might not prevent bacteraemia in these cases from the focuses. Hence, we evaluated intensified dosing regimens and breakpoints that might suppress bloodstream infections, caused by progression of infection by e.g., Gram-negatives. A pharmacometric model was built from tigecycline concentrations (100-600 mg daily doses) against clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (MIC 0.125-0.5 mg/L). Regrowth occurred at clinically used doses and stasis was only achieved with 100 mg q8h for the strain with the lowest studied MIC of 0.125 mg/L. Stasis at 24 h was related to fAUC/MIC of 38.5. Our study indicates that even intensified dosing regimens might prevent bloodstream infections only for MIC values ≤0.125 mg/L for tigecycline. This indicates an overly optimistic breakpoint of 1 mg/L for Enterobacterales, which are deemed to respond to the tigecycline high dose regimen (EUCAST Guidance Document on Tigecycline Dosing 2022).

Rapid Detection of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Susceptibility/Resistance in Enterobacterales by Rapid CAZ/AVI NP Test

We developed a novel culture-based test, the Rapid CAZ/AVI NP test, for rapid identification of ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility/resistance in Enterobacterales. This test is based on glucose metabolization upon bacterial growth in the presence of a defined concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam (128/53 μg/mL). Bacterial growth is visually detectable by a red to yellow color change of red phenol, a pH indicator. A total of 101 well characterized enterobacterial isolates were used to evaluate the test performance. This test showed positive percent agreement of 100% and negative percent agreement of 98.5% with overall percent agreement of 99%, by comparison with the MIC gradient strip test (Etest) taken as the reference standard method. The Rapid CAZ/AVI NP test had only 1.5% major errors and 0% extremely major errors. This test is rapid (result within 2 hours 45 minutes), reliable, affordable, easily interpretable, and easy to implement in clinical microbiology laboratories without requiring any specific equipment.

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase variant 44 acquires ceftazidime-avibactam resistance by altering the conformation of active-site loops

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase 2 (KPC-2) is an important source of drug resistance as it can hydrolyze and inactivate virtually all β-lactam antibiotics. KPC-2 is potently inhibited by avibactam via formation of a reversible carbamyl linkage of the inhibitor with the catalytic serine of the enzyme. However, the use of avibactam in combination with ceftazidime (CAZ-AVI) has led to the emergence of CAZ-AVI-resistant variants of KPC-2 in clinical settings. One such variant, KPC-44, bears a 15 amino acid duplication in one of the active-site loops (270-loop). Here, we show that the KPC-44 variant exhibits higher catalytic efficiency in hydrolyzing ceftazidime, lower efficiency toward imipenem and meropenem, and a similar efficiency in hydrolyzing ampicillin, than the WT KPC-2 enzyme. In addition, the KPC-44 variant enzyme exhibits 12-fold lower AVI carbamylation efficiency than the KPC-2 enzyme. An X-ray crystal structure of KPC-44 showed that the 15 amino acid duplication results in an extended and partially disordered 270-loop and also changes the conformation of the adjacent 240-loop, which in turn has altered interactions with the active-site omega loop. Furthermore, a structure of KPC-44 with avibactam revealed that formation of the covalent complex results in further disorder in the 270-loop, suggesting that rearrangement of the 270-loop of KPC-44 facilitates AVI carbamylation. These results suggest that the duplication of 15 amino acids in the KPC-44 enzyme leads to resistance to CAZ-AVI by modulating the stability and conformation of the 270-, 240-, and omega-loops.

In Vitro Activity of New β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations against blaNDM, blaKPC, and ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriales Uropathogens

Antibiotic resistance in uropathogens has increased substantially and severely affected treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Lately, some new formulations, including meropenem/vaborbactam (MEV), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) have been introduced to treat infections caused by drug-resistant pathogens. This study was designed to screen Enterobacteriales isolates from UTI patients and to assess their antimicrobial resistance pattern, particularly against the mentioned (new) antibiotics. Phenotypic screening of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenem resistance was followed by inhibitor-based assays to detect K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), and class D oxacillinases (OXA). Among 289 Enterobacteriales, E. coli (66.4%) was the most predominant pathogen, followed by K. pneumoniae (13.8%) and P. mirabilis (8.3%). The isolates showed higher resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins (70-87%) than to non-β-lactam antimicrobials (33.2-41.5%). NDM production was a common feature among carbapenem-resistant (CR) isolates, followed by KPC and OXA. ESBL producers were susceptible to the tested new antibiotics, but NDM-positive isolates appeared resistant to these combinations. KPC-producers showed resistance to only C/T. ESBLs and carbapenemase encoding genes were located on plasmids and most of the genes were successfully transferred to recipient cells. This study revealed that MEV and CZA had significant activity against ESBL and KPC producers.

The spread of antibiotic resistance to humans and potential protection strategies

Antibiotic resistance is currently one of the greatest threats to human health. Widespread use and residues of antibiotics in humans, animals, and the environment can exert selective pressure on antibiotic resistance bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance gene (ARG), accelerating the flow of antibiotic resistance. As ARG spreads to the population, the burden of antibiotic resistance in humans increases, which may have potential health effects on people. Therefore, it is critical to mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance to humans and reduce the load of antibiotic resistance in humans. This review briefly described the information of global antibiotic consumption information and national action plans (NAPs) to combat antibiotic resistance and provided a set of feasible control strategies for the transmission of ARB and ARG to humans in three areas including (a) Reducing the colonization capacity of exogenous ARB, (b) Enhancing human colonization resistance and mitigating the horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of ARG, (c) Reversing ARB antibiotic resistance. With the hope of achieving interdisciplinary one-health prevention and control of bacterial resistance.

Genomic Insights Into Molecular Characteristics and Phylogenetic Linkage Between the Cases of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae From a Non-tertiary Hospital in China: A Cohort Study

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) strains have been listed as one of the major clinical concerns. Objectives: We investigated CPKP isolates from non-tertiary hospitals to find disseminated clones and analyze extensive phenotypic and genetic diversity in this study. Methods: In this cohort study, a total of 49 CRKP isolates from 3 hospitals in the same region were collected in 2021. The prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were analyzed. Clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical record systems. The molecular types, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles, plasmid replicons, and virulence factors were analyzed. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree and transmission networks were constructed using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Results: The median age of patients (N = 49) was 66.0 years, and 85.7% were male. The most common CRKP infection was nosocomial pneumonia (75.5%), followed by bacteremia (10.2%). More than 53% of isolates were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI). Forty-five isolates were successfully sequenced; the predominant carbapenem-resistant gene was blaKPC-2 (93.3%). The 30-day mortality in our cohort was 24.5%. The most dominant sequence type (ST) was ST11 (60.0%), followed by ST15 (13.3%). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis exhibited dissemination of ST11 strain clones, ST420, and ST15 clones, both within and outside the given hospital. Conclusions: In this surveillance study, several dissemination chains of CRKP were discovered in the hospital and the region, as ST11 was the main epidemic clone. Our findings suggest that effective infection control practices and antimicrobial stewardship are needed in non-tertiary hospitals in China.

In vivo adaptive antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae during antibiotic therapy

Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the leading pathogens contributing to antimicrobial resistance. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) has put the use of clinical antimicrobial agents in a dilemma. In particular, CRKP exhibiting resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, tigecycline and colistin have raised great clinical concern, as these are the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of CRKP infections. Within-host evolution is a survival strategy closely related to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, while little attention has been paid to the in vivo genetic process of conversion from antibiotic-susceptible to resistant K. pneumoniae. Here we have a literature review regarding the in vivo evolution of resistance to carbapenems, ceftazidime/avibactam, tigecycline, and colistin in K. pneumoniae during antibacterial therapy, and summarized the detailed resistance mechanisms. In general, acquiring blaKPC and blaNDM harboring-plasmid, specific mutations in blaKPC, and porin genes, such as ompK35 and ompK36, upregulation of blaKPC, contribute to the development of carbapenem and ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in vivo. Overexpression of efflux pumps, acquiring plasmid-carrying tet (A) variants, and ribosomal protein change can lead to the adaptive evolution of tigecycline resistance. Specific mutations in chromosomes result in the cationic substitution of the phosphate groups of lipid A, thus contributing to colistin resistance. The resistant plasmid might be acquired from the co-infecting or co-colonizing strains, and the internal environment and antibiotic selection pressure contribute to the emergence of resistant mutants. The internal environment within the human host could serve as an important source of resistant K. pneumoniae strains.

β-Lactam potentiators to re-sensitize resistant pathogens: Discovery, development, clinical use and the way forward

β-lactam antibiotics are one of the most widely used and diverse classes of antimicrobial agents for treating both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial infections. The β-lactam antibiotics, which include penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams and carbapenems, exert their antibacterial activity by inhibiting the bacterial cell wall synthesis and have a global positive impact in treating serious bacterial infections. Today, β-lactam antibiotics are the most frequently prescribed antimicrobial across the globe. However, due to the widespread use and misapplication of β-lactam antibiotics in fields such as human medicine and animal agriculture, resistance to this superlative drug class has emerged in the majority of clinically important bacterial pathogens. This heightened antibiotic resistance prompted researchers to explore novel strategies to restore the activity of β-lactam antibiotics, which led to the discovery of β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) and other β-lactam potentiators. Although there are several successful β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in use, the emergence of novel resistance mechanisms and variants of β-lactamases have put the quest of new β-lactam potentiators beyond precedence. This review summarizes the success stories of β-lactamase inhibitors in use, prospective β-lactam potentiators in various phases of clinical trials and the different strategies used to identify novel β-lactam potentiators. Furthermore, this review discusses the various challenges in taking these β-lactam potentiators from bench to bedside and expounds other mechanisms that could be investigated to reduce the global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) burden.

Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Latin American Hospitals

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin and a new non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor capable of inactivating class A, C, and some D β-lactamases. From a collection of 2,727 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (n = 2,235) and P. aeruginosa (n = 492) that were collected between 2016 and 2017 from five Latin American countries, we investigated the molecular resistance mechanisms to CZA of 127 (18/2,235 [0.8%] Enterobacterales and 109/492 [22.1%] P. aeruginosa). First, by qPCR for the presence of genes encoding KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, OXA-48-like, and SPM-1 carbapenemases, and second, by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). From the CZA-resistant isolates, MBL-encoding genes were detected in all 18 Enterobacterales and 42/109 P. aeruginosa isolates, explaining their resistant phenotype. Resistant isolates that yielded a negative qPCR result for any of the MBL encoding genes were subjected to WGS. The WGS analysis of the 67 remaining P. aeruginosa isolates showed mutations in genes previously associated with reduced susceptibility to CZA, such as those involved in the MexAB-OprM efflux pump and AmpC (PDC) hyperproduction, PoxB (bla_OXA-50-like), FtsI (PBP3), DacB (PBP4), and OprD. The results presented here offer a snapshot of the molecular epidemiological landscape for CZA resistance before the introduction of this antibiotic into the Latin American market. Therefore, these results serve as a valuable comparison tool to trace the evolution of the resistance to CZA in this carbapenemase-endemic geographical region. IMPORTANCE In this manuscript, we determine the molecular mechanisms of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates from five Latin American countries. Our results reveal a low rate of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam among Enterobacterales; in contrast, resistance in P. aeruginosa has proven to be more complex, as it might involve multiple known and possibly unknown resistance mechanisms.

Review of novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with implications for pediatric use

Antimicrobial resistance continues to surmount increasing concern globally, and treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and CR Enterobacterales (CRE) remains a challenge for clinicians. Although previously rare, the incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and CR infections in pediatric patients has increased drastically in the last decade and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To combat this issue, 14 novel antibiotics, including three β-lactam/novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLIs) and two novel β-lactams (βLs), have received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration since 2010. Improving clinician understanding of the utility of these novel therapies is imperative to improve judicious decision-making and prevent societal regression to a pre-penicillin era. In this review, we summarize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, clinical efficacy and safety data, dosing considerations, and subsequent role in therapy for ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MER-VAB), imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI-REL), ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ), and cefiderocol in pediatric patients.

Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking studies of aldotetronic acid-based LpxC inhibitors

In order to develop novel inhibitors of the bacterial deacetylase LpxC bearing a substituent to target the UDP binding site of the enzyme, a series of aldotetronic acid-based hydroxamic acids was accessed in chiral pool syntheses starting from 4,6-O-benzylidene-d-glucose and l-arabinitol. The synthesized hydroxamic acids were tested for LpxC inhibitory activity in vitro, revealing benzyl ether 17a ((2S,3S)-4-(benzyloxy)-N,3-dihydroxy-2-[(4-{[4-(morpholinomethyl)phenyl]ethynyl}benzyl)oxy]butanamide) as the most potent LpxC inhibitor. This compound was additionally tested for antibacterial activity against a panel of clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria, bacterial uptake, and susceptibility to efflux pumps. Molecular docking studies were performed to rationalize the observed structure-activity relationships.

Treatment strategies for OXA-48-like and NDM producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections

INTRODUCTION

OXA-48 and NDM are amongst the most prevalent carbapenemase types associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae worldwide, with an increase in their prevalence in recent years. Knowledge on the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) comes from KPC-producing CRKP with limited data available for OXA-48-like and NDM producers. Our aim is to review the literature on the treatment of OXA-48-like and NDM-producing CRKP with the goal of providing an update on the available antibiotic treatment strategies, particularly in light of changing carbapenemase epidemiology and increasing antimicrobial resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed studies looking at the antibiotic treatment and outcome of OXA-48-like and/or NDM-producing CRKP.

EXPERT OPINION

The best available treatment option for OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime-avibactam, where available and when the price permits its use. Colistin remains as the second-line option if in vitro susceptibility is demonstrated with an appropriate method. There is not enough evidence to support the use of meropenem-containing combination therapies for meropenem-resistant OXA-48 producers. Treatment of NDM producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam combination or cefiderocol can be used for NDM producers, where available. Higher cefiderocol MICs against NDM producers is concerning. Aztreonam-avibactam provides hope for the treatment of NDM producers.

Update of clinical application in ceftazidime-avibactam for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections

PURPOSE

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) have become a major global public health threat. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a newer combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The aim of this review is to describe the recent real-world experience of CAZ-AVI for the infections due to MDR-GNB.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for clinical application in CAZ-AVI for MDR-GNB infections. Reference lists were reviewed and synthesized for narrative review.

RESULTS

MDRGNB infections are associated with higher mortality significantly comparing to drug-susceptible bacterial infections. Fortunately, CAZ-AVI shows significant benefits for infections due to KPC or OXA-48 CRE, comparing to colistin, carbapenem, aminoglycoside and other older agents, even in those with immunocompromised status. The efficacy of CAZ-AVI varies in different infection sites due to CRE, which is lower in pneumonia. Early use is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Noteworthy, when adopted as salvage therapy, CAZ-AVI is still superior to other GNB active antibiotics. CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam is recommended as the first line of MBL-CRE infections. However, for infections caused by KPC- and OXA-48-producing isolates, further investigations are needed to demonstrate the benefit of combination therapy. Besides CRE, CAZ-AVI is also active to MDR-PA. However, the development of resistance in CRE and MDR-PA against CAZ-AVI is alarming, and more investigations and studies are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections due to CAZ-AVI-resistant pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI appears to be a valuable therapeutic option in MDR-GNB infections. Using CAZ-AVI appropriately to improve efficacy and decrease the emergence of resistance is important.

Evolutionary Trajectories toward High-Level β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Resistance in the Presence of Multiple β-Lactamases

β-Lactam antibiotics are the first choice for the treatment of most bacterial infections. However, the increased prevalence of β-lactamases, in particular extended-spectrum β-lactamases, in pathogenic bacteria has severely limited the possibility of using β-lactam treatments. Combining β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors can restore treatment efficacy by negating the effect of the β-lactamase and has become increasingly important against infections caused by β-lactamase-producing strains. Not surprisingly, bacteria with resistance to even these combinations have been found in patients. Studies on the development of bacterial resistance to β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have focused mainly on the effects of single, chromosomal or plasmid-borne, β-lactamases. However, clinical isolates often carry more than one β-lactamase in addition to multiple other resistance genes. Here, we investigate how the evolutionary trajectories of the development of resistance to three commonly used β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam, were affected by the presence of three common β-lactamases, TEM-1, CTX-M-15, and OXA-1. First-step resistance was due mainly to extensive gene amplifications of one or several of the β-lactamase genes where the amplification pattern directly depended on the respective drug combination. Amplifications also served as a stepping-stone for high-level resistance in combination with additional mutations that reduced drug influx or mutations in the β-lactamase gene bla_CTX-M-15. This illustrates that the evolutionary trajectories of resistance to β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are strongly influenced by the frequent and transient nature of gene amplifications and how the presence of multiple β-lactamases shapes the evolution to higher-level resistance.

Whole Genome Characterization of the High-Risk Clone ST383 Klebsiella pneumoniae with a Simultaneous Carriage of blaCTX-M-14 on IncL/M Plasmid and blaCTX-M-15 on Convergent IncHI1B/IncFIB Plasmid from Egypt

Recently, Egypt has witnessed the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae, which has posed a serious healthcare challenge. The accelerated dissemination of bla_CTX-M genes among these MDR K. pneumoniae, particularly bla_CTX-M-14 and bla_CTX-M-15, have been noted. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of bla_CTX-M-IV among K. pneumoniae recovered from the laboratory of a major hospital in Alexandria. The 23 tested isolates showed an MDR phenotype and the bla_CTX-M-IV gene was detected in ≈22% of the isolates. The transformation of plasmids harboring bla_CTX-M-IV to chemically competent cells of Escherichia coli DH5α was successful in three out of five of the tested bla_CTX-M-IV-positive isolates. Whole genome sequencing of K22 indicated that the isolate belonged to the high-risk clone ST383, showing a simultaneous carriage of bla_CTX-M-14 on IncL/M plasmid, i.e., pEGY22_CTX-M-14, and bla_CTX-M-15 on a hybrid IncHI1B/IncFIB plasmid, pEGY22_CTX-M-15. Alignment of both plasmids revealed high similarity with those originating in the UK, Germany, Australia, Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, and Morocco. pEGY22_CTX-M-15 was a mosaic plasmid that demonstrated convergence of MDR and virulence genes. The emergence of such a plasmid with enhanced genetic plasticity constitutes the perfect path for the evolution of K. pneumoniae isolates causing invasive untreatable infections especially in a country with a high burden of infectious diseases such as Egypt. Therefore there is an imperative need for countrywide surveillances to monitor the prevalence of these superbugs with limited therapeutic options.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing

Multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a serious global threat due to the rapid global spread and limited antimicrobial options for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) infections sustained by MDR pathogens. Recently, novel β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) have been developed for the treatment of DTR infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although novel βL-βLICs exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo activities against MDR pathogens, emerging resistances to these novel molecules have recently been reported. Resistance to novel βL-βLICs is due to several mechanisms including porin deficiencies, increasing carbapenemase expression and/or enzyme mutations. In this review, we summarized the main mechanisms related to the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in MDR Gram-negative micro-organisms. We focused on antimicrobial activities and resistance traits with particular regard to molecular mechanisms related to resistance to novel βL-βLICs. Lastly, we described and discussed the main detection methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of such molecules. With increasing reports of resistance to novel βL-βLICs, continuous attention should be maintained on the monitoring of the phenotypic traits of MDR pathogens, into the characterization of related mechanisms, and on the emergence of cross-resistance to these novel antimicrobials.

WGS-Based Phenotyping and Molecular Characterization of the Resistome, Virulome and Plasmid Replicons in Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Powdered Milk Produced in Germany

The emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) in German healthcare is worrying. It is not well-investigated in the veterinary world and food chains. In the current study, antibiotic susceptibility profiles of 24 K. pneumoniae strains isolated from powdered milk samples produced in Germany were investigated by a microdilution test. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was applied to identify genomic determinants for antimicrobial resistance (AMR), virulence-associated genes and plasmids replicons. All isolates were susceptible to the majority (14/18) of tested antibiotics. Resistance to colistin, fosfomycin, chloramphenicol and piperacillin was found. The ambler class A ß-lactamase, blaSHV variants were identified in all isolates, of which blaSHV-187 was most prevalent and found in 50% of isolates. Single-nucleotide-variants of oqxA and oqxB conferring resistance to phenicol/quinolone were found in all isolates, and the oqxB17 was the most prevalent found in 46% of isolates. 67% of isolates harbored fosA genes; however, only one was fosfomycin-resistant. Two isolates harbored genes conferring resistance to colistin, despite being susceptible. The majority of identified virulome genes were iron uptake siderophores. Two enterobactins (entB, fepC), six adherence-related genes belonging to E. coli common pilus (ECP) and one secretion system (ompA gene) were found in all isolates. In contrast, yersiniabactin was found in two isolates. One ST23 strain was susceptible to all tested antibiotics, and harbored determinants discriminatory for hypervirulent strains, e.g., aerobactin, salmochelin, yersiniabactin, enterobactin and regulator of mucoid phenotype A genes that are highly associated with hypervirulent K. pneumoniae. The IncF plasmid family was found in all strains, while almost half of the isolates harbored Col440I-type plasmids and nine isolates harbored various Inc-type plasmids. The presence of K. pneumoniae carrying different resistomes and major virulent specific virulomes in powdered milk samples is alarming. This could threaten public health, particularly of neonates and infants consuming dried milk.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Molecular mechanisms underlying bacterial resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI), a combination of ceftazidime and a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (avibactam) that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the European Union, and the National Regulatory Administration in China. CAZ/AVI is used mainly to treat complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, as well as to treat patients infected with Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) susceptible to CAZ/AVI. However, increased clinical application of CAZ/AVI has resulted in the development of resistant strains. Mechanisms of resistance in most of these strains have been attributed to bla_KPC mutations, which lead to amino acid substitutions in β-lactamase and changes in gene expression. Resistance to CAZ/AVI is also associated with reduced expression and loss of outer membrane proteins or overexpression of efflux pumps. In this review, the prevalence of CAZ/AVI-resistance bacteria, resistance mechanisms, and selection of detection methods of CAZ/AVI are demonstrated, aiming to provide scientific evidence for the clinical prevention and treatment of CAZ/AVI resistant strains, and provide guidance for the development of new drugs. This article is categorized under: Infectious Diseases > Molecular and Cellular Physiology.

European Society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by ESICM -European Society of intensive care Medicine)

SCOPE

These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of 3^rd generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination vs. monotherapy.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanni (CRAB). Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low and low certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.

Increasing frequency of OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales worldwide and activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against these isolates

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the increase in the rates of OXA-48-like-producing isolates during 3 years of global surveillance.

METHODS

Among 55?>162 Enterobacterales isolates, 354 carbapenem-resistant isolates carried genes encoding OXA-48-like enzymes. Isolates were susceptibility tested for ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators by broth microdilution methods. Analysis of β-lactam resistance mechanisms and MLST was performed in silico using WGS data.

RESULTS

OXA-48-like-producing isolates increased from 0.5% (94/18 656) in 2016 to 0.9% (169/18?>808) in 2018. OXA-48 was the most common variant; isolates primarily were Klebsiella pneumoniae (318/354 isolates) from Europe and adjacent countries. MLST analysis revealed a diversity of STs, but K. pneumoniae belonging to ST395, ST23 and ST11 were observed most frequently. Thirty-nine isolates harboured MBLs and were resistant to most agents tested. The presence of blaCTX-M-15 (258 isolates), OmpK35 nonsense mutations (232) and OmpK36 alterations (316) was common among OXA-48 producers. Ceftazidime, cefepime and aztreonam susceptibility rates, when applying CLSI breakpoints, were 12%-15% lower for isolates carrying ESBLs alone and with either or both OmpK35 stop codons and OmpK36 alterations. Meropenem and, remarkably, meropenem/vaborbactam were affected by specific OmpK36 alterations when a deleterious mutation also was observed in OmpK35. These mechanisms caused a decrease of 12%-42% in the susceptibility rates for meropenem and meropenem/vaborbactam. Ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility rates were >98.9%, regardless of the presence of additional β-lactam resistance mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by OXA-48-producing isolates are scarce and, as the dissemination of these isolates continues, studies are needed to help physicians understand treatment options for these infections.

In-Vitro Selection of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Resistance in OXA-48-Like-Expressing Klebsiella pneumoniae: In-Vitro and In-Vivo Fitness, Genetic Basis and Activities of β-Lactam Plus Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor or β-Lactam Enhancer Combinations

Ceftazidime/avibactam uniquely demonstrates activity against both KPC and OXA-48-like carbapenemase-expressing Enterobacterales. Clinical resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam in KPC-producers was foreseen in in-vitro resistance studies. Herein, we assessed the resistance selection propensity of ceftazidime/avibactam in K. pneumoniae expressing OXA-48-like β-lactamases (n = 10), employing serial transfer approach. Ceftazidime/avibactam MICs (0.25–4 mg/L) increased to 16–256 mg/L after 15 daily-sequential transfers. The whole genome sequence analysis of terminal mutants showed modifications in proteins linked to efflux (AcrB/AcrD/EmrA/Mdt), outer membrane permeability (OmpK36) and/or stress response pathways (CpxA/EnvZ/RpoE). In-vitro growth properties of all the ceftazidime/avibactam-selected mutants were comparable to their respective parents and they retained the ability to cause pulmonary infection in neutropenic mice. Against these mutants, we explored the activities of various combinations of β-lactams (ceftazidime or cefepime) with structurally diverse β-lactamase inhibitors or a β-lactam enhancer, zidebactam. Zidebactam, in combination with either cefepime or ceftazidime, overcame ceftazidime/avibactam resistance (MIC range 0.5–8 mg/L), while cefepime/avibactam was the second best (MIC: 0.5–16 mg/L) in yielding lower MICs. The present work revealed the possibility of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in OXA-48-like K. pneumoniae through mutations in proteins involved in efflux and/or porins without concomitant fitness cost mandating astute monitoring of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance among OXA-48 genotypes.

In vivo Selection of Imipenem Resistance Among Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant, Imipenem-Susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate With KPC-33 Carbapenemase

We describe in vivo evolution of carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance by analyzing four longitudinal Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from a patient with pneumonia following antimicrobial treatment. The patient had fever, cough associated with expectoration, and new infiltration was found on the chest CT. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to investigate its dynamic change of resistance phenotype. Population analysis profile was performed to investigate the population of Klebsiella pneumoniae. The infection started with a KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae (ZRKP01, ceftazidime-avibactam-S/carbapenem-R). Then, after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment, the strain switched to D179Y mutant that is KPC-33 (ZRKP02, ceftazidime-avibactam-R/carbapenem-S), which restored carbapenem susceptibility. However, the restored carbapenem susceptibility in vivo was not stable and the subsequent use of imipenem against KPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae infection resulted in a reversion of KPC-2 producers (ZRKP03 and ZRKP04, ceftazidime-avibactam-S/carbapenem-R). Genetic analysis demonstrated that all four K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to sequence type 11and had identical capsular polysaccharide (KL47), identical porin genes, and same plasmid replicon types. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that four K. pneumoniae isolates showed a high degree of relatedness. Single nucleotide polymorphisms analysis indicated that the number of mutations observed in the KPC-33 isolate was more than in the wild-type KPC-2 isolates and the four KPC-Kp isolates evolved from a longitudinal evolution of K. pneumoniae harboring bla_KPC-2 gene. This is the first report to observe the in vivo evolution of wild-type KPC-2 to KPC-33 and then the reversion to its original wild-type KPC-2. Through WGS, we demonstrated the role of selective pressure of antibiotic in the mutation and reversion of bla_KPC genes, which leading to the dynamic change of KPC enzymes and the dynamic emergence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems.

Statement: Recently, studies reported the emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains. The KPC mutations mediating ceftazidime-avibactam resistance are generally associated with the restoration of carbapenem susceptibility. However, clinical significance of this observation is unclear. In this manuscript, we demonstrate the role of selective pressure of antibiotic in the mutation and reversion of bla_KPC genes, which leading to the dynamic change of KPC enzymes and the dynamic emergence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to observe the in vivo evolution of wild-type KPC-2 to KPC-33 and then the reversion to its original wild-type KPC-2. It should be noted that understanding the clinical significance of this observation is of critical importance, and reversion to carbapenem susceptibility would not imply a potential role for carbapenems monotherapy. We hope our study will draw attention to clinicians, so that this agent can be used most effectively for the longest period of time.

Selection and characterization of mutational resistance to aztreonam/avibactam in β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

Aztreonam/avibactam is being developed for its broad activity against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, including those with metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Its potential to select resistance in target pathogens was explored. Findings are compared with previous data for ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftaroline/avibactam.

METHODS

Single-step mutants were sought from 52 Enterobacterales with AmpC, ESBL, KPC, MBL and OXA-48-like enzymes. Mutation frequencies were calculated. MICs were determined by CLSI agar dilution. Genomes were sequenced using Illumina methodology.

RESULTS

Irrespective of β-lactamase type and of whether avibactam was used at 1 or 4 mg/L, mutants could rarely be obtained at >4× the starting MIC, and most MIC rises were correspondingly small. Putative resistance (MIC >8 + 4 mg/L) associated with changes to β-lactamases was seen only for mutants of AmpC, where it was associated with Asn346Tyr and Tyr150Cys substitutions. Asn346Tyr led to broad resistance to avibactam combinations; Tyr150Cys significantly affected only aztreonam/avibactam. MIC rises up to 4 + 4 mg/L were seen for producers of mutant KPC-2 or -3 enzymes, and were associated with Trp105Arg, Ser106Pro and Ser109Pro substitutions, which all reduced the MICs of other β-lactams. For producers of other β-lactamase types, we largely found mutants with lesions in baeRS or envZ, putatively affecting drug accumulation. Single mutants had lesions in ampD, affecting AmpC expression or ftsI, encoding PBP3.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of mutational resistance to aztreonam/avibactam appears smaller than for ceftazidime/avibactam, where Asp179Tyr arises readily in KPC enzymes, conferring frank resistance. Asn346 substitutions in AmpC enzymes may remain a risk, having been repeatedly selected with multiple avibactam combinations in vitro.

Ceftazidime-avibactam: are we safe from class A carbapenemase producers' infections?

Recently, new combinations of β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors became available, including ceftazidime-avibactam, and increased the ability to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Despite the reduced time of clinical use, isolates expressing resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam have been reported, even during treatment or in patients with no previous contact with this drug. Here, we detailed review data on global ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility, the mechanisms involved in resistance, and the molecular epidemiology of resistant isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility remains high (≥ 98.4%) among Enterobacterales worldwide, being lower among extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and CRE. Alterations in class A β-lactamases are the major mechanism involved in ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and mutations are mainly, but not exclusively, located in the Ω loop of these enzymes. Modifications in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) 3 and KPC-2 have been observed by many authors, generating variants with different mutations, insertions, and/or deletions. Among these, the most commonly described is Asp179Tyr, both in KPC-3 (KPC-31 variant) and in KPC-2 (KPC-33 variant). Changes in membrane permeability and overexpression of efflux systems may also be associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Although several clones have been reported, ST258 with Asp179Tyr deserves special attention. Surveillance studies and rationale use are essential to retaining the activity of this and other antimicrobials against class A CRE.

Increased gene expression and copy number of mutated blaKPC lead to high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Background

Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam was reported, and it is important to investigate the mechanisms of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in K. pneumoniae with mutations in bla_KPC.

Results

We report the mutated bla_KPC is not the only mechanism related to CZA resistance, and investigate the role of outer porin defects, efflux pump, and relative gene expression and copy number of bla_KPC and ompk35/36. Four ceftazidime/avibactam-sensitive isolates detected wild type bla_KPC-2, while 4 ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates detected mutated bla_KPC (bla_KPC-51, bla_KPC-52, and bla_KPC-33). Compared with other ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates with the minimal inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam ranging 128–256 mg/L, the relative gene expression and copy number of bla_KPC was increased in the isolate which carried bla_KPC-51 and also showed the highest minimal inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam at 2048 mg/L. The truncated Ompk35 contributes rare to ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in our isolates. No significant difference in minimal inhibitory concentration of ceftazidime/avibactam was observed after the addition of PABN.

Conclusions

Increased gene expression and copy number of mutated bla_KPC can cause high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance.

Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: mechanisms of resistance including updated data for novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations

Introduction: Multi-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is currently one of the most pressing emerging issues in bacterial resistance. Treatment of K.pneumoniae infections is often problematic due to the lack of available therapeutic options, with a relevant impact in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare-associated costs. Soon after the launch of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, one of the approved new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, reports of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains developing resistance during treatment were published. Being a hospital-associated pathogen, K.pneumoniae is continuously exposed to multiple antibiotics resulting in constant selective pressure, which in turn leads to additional mutations that are positively selected.Areas covered: Herein the authors present the K.pneumoniae mechanisms of resistance to different antimicrobials, including updated data for ceftazidime-avibactam.Expert opinion: K.pneumoniae is a nosocomial pathogen commonly implicated in hospital outbreaks with a propensity for antimicrobial resistance toward mainstay β-lactam antibiotics and multiple other antibiotic classes. Following the development of drug resistance and understanding the mechanisms involved, we can improve the efficacy of current antimicrobials, by applying careful stewardship and rational use to preserve their potential utility. The knowledge on antibiotic resistance mechanisms should be used to inform the design of novel therapeutic agents that might not be subject to, or can circumvent, mechanisms of resistance.

Clinical Evolution of AmpC-Mediated Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Cefiderocol Resistance in Enterobacter cloacae Complex Following Exposure to Cefepime

We report 2 independent patients from whom carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex strains were identified. The ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was attributed to a 2-amino acid deletion in the R2 loop of AmpC β-lactamase, which concurrently caused resistance to cefepime and reduced susceptibility to cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

Resistance to Novel β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: The "Price of Progress"

Significant advances were made in antibiotic development during the past 5 years. Novel agents were added to the arsenal that target critical priority pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Of these, 4 novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam) reached clinical approval in the United States. With these additions comes a significant responsibility to reduce the possibility of emergence of resistance. Reports in the rise of resistance toward ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam are alarming. Clinicians and scientists must make every attempt to reverse or halt these setbacks.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam plus Meropenem/Vaborbactam When Both Are Used Together Is Achieved in Four Steps in Metallo-β-Lactamase-Negative Klebsiella pneumoniae

Serine β-lactamases are dominant causes of β-lactam resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Recently, this has driven clinical deployment of the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor pairs ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. We show that four steps, i.e., ompK36 and ramR mutation plus carriage of OXA-232 and KPC-3-D178Y variant β-lactamases, confer ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam resistance when both pairs are used together. These findings have implications for decision making about sequential and combinatorial use of these β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor pairs to treat K. pneumoniae infections.

Clinical and Molecular Epidemiologic Characteristics of Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in China

Background

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA)-resistant carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections occur in adults worldwide but are rarely observed in neonates. We evaluated the activities of CZA against CRKP and described the clinical and molecular epidemiology of CZA-resistant CRKP in a NICU prior to CZA approval in China.

Methods

A laboratory-based surveillance of CRKP was conducted from July 2017 to June 2018. Clinical data were initially reviewed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the broth microdilution method. CZA-resistant CRKP isolates were submitted to carbapenemase types screening and multilocus sequence typing.

Results

Over 23.3% (10/43) of CRKP strains were resistant to CZA, MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values being 0.5 μg/mL and >32μg/mL, respectively. Most neonates shared similar clinical features with cesarean (n=8), preterm birth (n=6), low birth weight (n=5), and exposure to carbapenems/β-lactam (n=8). All CZA-resistant CRKP isolates were highly resistant to most tested drugs except for polymyxin B (POL) and tigecycline (TGC). CZA-resistant CRKP isolates showed greater sensitivity to amikacin (AMK), nitrofurantoin (NIT), levofloxacin (LVX) and ciprofloxacin (CIP), compared with CZA-sensitive CRKP. All CZA-resistant CRKP isolates harbored carbapenemase genes, bla_kpc-2 (n=5) being predominant, followed by bla_NDM-1 (n=4) and bla_NDM-5 (n=2). Among these CZA-resistant CRKP isolates, a total of eight different STs were identified. CRKP harboring KPC belonged to ST1419, ST37 and ST11, while NDM types were assigned to ST784, ST1710, ST37 and ST324. Furthermore, other β-lactamase genes including bla_SHV and bla_CTX-M were also found.

Conclusion

Over 23.3% of CRKP strains isolated from neonates were resistant to CZA. Cesarean, preterm birth, low birth weight, and exposure to carbapenems/β-lactam were similar clinical features of most neonates with CZA-resistant CRKP. The predominant carbapenemases of CZA-resistant CRKP were KPC-2 and NDM-1, and KPC-2 producing K. pneumoniae assigned into 3 STs, which indicate the genetic diversity of clinical CZA-resistant CRKP isolates.

Efficacy of piperacillin in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitor IID572 against β-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus in murine neutropenic thigh infection models

OBJECTIVES

The neutropenic murine thigh infection model was used to assess the effectiveness of IID572, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, in rescuing piperacillin activity against bacterial strains expressing various β-lactamase enzymes.

METHODS

Mice (n = 4/group) were inoculated with Enterobacteriaceae or Staphylococcus aureus bacterial strains expressing a range of β-lactamases via intramuscular injection. Two hours after bacterial inoculation, subcutaneous treatment with piperacillin/IID572 or piperacillin/tazobactam every 3 h was initiated. Animals were euthanized via CO2 24 h after the start of therapy and bacterial cfu (log10 cfu) per thigh was determined, and the static dose was calculated.

RESULTS

In a dose-dependent manner, piperacillin/IID572 reduced the thigh bacterial burden in models established with Enterobacteriaceae producing class A, C and D β-lactamases (e.g. ESBLs, KPC, CMY-2 and OXA-48). Piperacillin/IID572 was also efficacious against MSSA strains, including one producing β-lactamase. Static doses of piperacillin/IID572 were calculable from animals infected with all strains tested and the calculated static doses ranged from 195 to 4612 mg/kg/day piperacillin, the active component in the combination. Of the 13 strains investigated, a 1 log10 bacterial reduction was achieved for 9 isolates and a 2 log10 reduction was achieved for 3 isolates; piperacillin/tazobactam was not efficacious against 6 of the 13 isolates tested.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to tazobactam, IID572 was able to rescue piperacillin efficacy in murine thigh infection models established with β-lactamase-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus, including those expressing ESBLs or serine carbapenemases.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam To Treat Life-Threatening Infections by Carbapenem-Resistant Pathogens in Critically Ill Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Data on the effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients are limited. The present retrospective observational cohort study, which was conducted in two general intensive care units (ICUs) in central Greece, compared critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients suffering from carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections receiving CAZ-AVI to patients who received appropriate available antibiotic therapy. Clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety issues were evaluated. A secondary analysis in patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) was conducted. Forty-one patients that received CAZ-AVI (the CAZ-AVI group) were compared to 36 patients that received antibiotics other than CAZ-AVI (the control group). There was a significant improvement in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on days 4 and 10 in the CAZ-AVI group compared to that in the control group (P = 0.006, and P = 0.003, respectively). Microbiological eradication was accomplished in 33/35 (94.3%) patients in the CAZ-AVI group and 21/31 (67.7%) patients in the control group (P = 0.021), and clinical cure was observed in 33/41 (80.5%) versus 19/36 (52.8%) patients (P = 0.010), respectively. The results were similar in the BSI subgroups for both outcomes (P = 0.038 and P = 0.014, respectively). The 28-day survival was 85.4% in the CAZ-AVI group and 61.1% in the control group (log-rank test = 0.035), while there were 2 and 12 relapses in the CAZ-AVI and control groups, respectively (P = 0.042). A CAZ-AVI-containing regime was an independent predictor of survival and clinical cure (odds ratio [OR] = 5.575 and P = 0.012 and OR = 5.125 and P = 0.004, respectively), as was illness severity. No significant side effects were recorded. In conclusion, a CAZ-AVI-containing regime was more effective than other available antibiotic agents for the treatment of CRE infections in the high-risk, mechanically ventilated ICU population evaluated.

Outbreak of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae endowed with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance mediated through a VEB-1-mutant (VEB-25), Greece, September to October 2019

From September to October 2019, seven patients colonised or infected with a ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2-producing K. pneumoniae were detected in two intensive care units of a Greek general hospital. The outbreak strain was sequence type (ST)147 and co-produced KPC-2 and the novel plasmid-borne Vietnamese extended-spectrum β-lactamase (VEB)-25 harbouring a K234R substitution associated with CZA resistance. Epidemiological investigations revealed that the resistance was probably acquired by horizontal transmission independently from previous CZA exposure.

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producer resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam due to a deletion in the blaKPC3 gene

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenemase-producing strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC) are a great health concern, and therapy with ceftazidime-avibactam represents a choice for the treatment of infections involving these strains. We report a strain resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam due to a deletion of six nucleotides in the bla_KPC gene sequence.

METHODS

Two strains, namely AMP920 and AMP2009, were isolated from the same patient a month apart. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed both by broth microdilution and by Etest. Immunoenzymatic assay to detect carbapenemase was performed for both strains. The bla_KPC gene of both strains was amplified by PCR and sequenced. Enzyme activity towards carbapenems was tested by the CarbaNP test and hydrolysis spectrophotometer assay.

RESULTS

The two isolates differed in antimicrobial susceptibility. AMP920 showed meropenem and imipenem resistance (MIC 32 and 32 mg/mL). A month later the carbapenem MIC decreased to 8 and 1 mg/mL respectively, while the ceftazidime-avibactam MIC increased from 1 to 16 mg/mL. Both isolates showed a positive immunoenzymatic test for the KPC enzyme, but only AMP920 showed a positive CarbaNP test hydrolysing imipenem. The Bla_KPC gene was amplified in both strains. After sequencing, the two amplicons showed a KPC3 variant. The gene of the second isolate showed a deletion of six nucleotides at 498-503, resulting in a mutant variant with the deletion of glutamic acid and leucine residues at positions 167 and 168.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected a new deletion in the bla_KPC gene of a clinical strain of K. pneumoniae which resulted in resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam. The amino acids deleted are in the Ω loop (amino acids 165-179) of the KPC enzyme, enhancing ceftazidime affinity and preventing avibactam binding.

Preserving the Dwindling β-lactams-Based Empiric Therapy Options for Gram-Negative Infections in Challenging Resistance Scenario: Lessons Learned and Way Forward

Appropriate empiric therapy reduces mortality and morbidity associated with serious Gram-negative infections. β-lactams (BLs) owing to their safety, efficacy, and coverage spectrum are the most preferred agents for empiric use. Inappropriate use of older penicillins and cephalosporins led to selection and spread of resistant clones. As a result, these valuable agents have lost their reliability compelling clinicians to often use erstwhile last-line therapies such as carbapenems. Excessive carbapenems use imposed collateral damage by selecting difficult-to-treat carbapenem-resistant organisms. Lack of empiric therapeutic options amenable for use in infections caused by contemporary pathogens was realized by the pharmaceutical industry leading to intensive efforts in discovering novel antibiotics. These efforts led to the approval of newer β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combination. This review elaborates the past trends in empirical use of BLs and ensuing patterns of resistance emergence in Gram-negatives. Furthermore, a critical appraisal of newer BL-BLIs has been presented to identify the appropriate clinical situations for their use to ensure clinical efficacy coupled with minimal resistance selection. These learning have been derived from past trends of clinical usage of older empiric therapies so that the therapeutic utility of newer agents is preserved for long in light of dwindling global antibiotics pipeline.

The Role of the Ω-Loop in Regulation of the Catalytic Activity of TEM-Type β-Lactamases

Bacterial resistance to β-lactams, the most commonly used class of antibiotics, poses a global challenge. This resistance is caused by the production of bacterial enzymes that are termed β-lactamases (βLs). The evolution of serine-class A β-lactamases from penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) is related to the formation of the Ω-loop at the entrance to the enzyme’s active site. In this loop, the Glu166 residue plays a key role in the two-step catalytic cycle of hydrolysis. This residue in TEM–type β-lactamases, together with Asn170, is involved in the formation of a hydrogen bonding network with a water molecule, leading to the deacylation of the acyl–enzyme complex and the hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring of the antibiotic. The activity exhibited by the Ω-loop is attributed to the positioning of its N-terminal residues near the catalytically important residues of the active site. The structure of the Ω-loop of TEM-type β-lactamases is characterized by low mutability, a stable topology, and structural flexibility. All of the revealed features of the Ω-loop, as well as the mechanisms related to its involvement in catalysis, make it a potential target for novel allosteric inhibitors of β-lactamases.

Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam alone and in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tandem in vitro time-kill/in vivo Galleria mellonella survival model analysis

Ceftazidime-avibactam is used clinically in combination with a polymyxin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections; however, there are limited data to support this practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxin B alone and in combination against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tandem in vitro time-kill/in vivo Galleria mellonella survival model assay. Three KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were used for all experiments. All isolates harbored mutations in ompk35 and one isolate in ompk36; two isolates were susceptible to both ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxin B, and one was resistant to both. Ceftazidime-avibactam was bactericidal against 2 of 3 strains at ≥2x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) whereas polymyxin B was not bactericidal against any strain at any concentration. Combinations at 1/4x or 1/2x MIC were not bactericidal or synergistic against any of the 3 isolates. In survival experiments, ceftazidime-avibactam at 4x MIC significantly improved larval survival over the untreated control strain whereas polymyxin B at 4x MIC did not. Combining polymyxin B with ceftazidime-avibactam at 4x MIC did not improve survival compared to ceftazidime-avibactam alone. This work indicates there is no improvement in in vitro bactericidal activity or in vivo efficacy when polymyxin B is combined with ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. This combination should be avoided in lieu of ceftazidime-avibactam alone or other potentially more efficacious, less toxic combination regimens.

β-Lactamase Inhibitors To Restore the Efficacy of Antibiotics against Superbugs

Infections caused by resistant bacteria are nowadays too common, and some pathogens have even become resistant to multiple types of antibiotics, in which case few or even no treatments are available. In recent years, the most successful strategy in anti-infective drug discovery for the treatment of such problematic infections is the combination therapy "antibiotic + inhibitor of resistance". These inhibitors allow the repurposing of antibiotics that have already proven to be safe and effective for clinical use. Three main types of compounds have been developed to block the principal bacterial resistance mechanisms: (i) β-lactamase inhibitors; (ii) outer membrane permeabilizers; (iii) efflux pump inhibitors. This Perspective is focused on β-lactamase inhibitors that disable the most prevalent cause of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., the deactivation of the most widely used antibiotics, β-lactams (penicillins, cephalosporines, carbapenems, and monobactams), by the production of β-lactamases. An overview of the most recently identified β-lactamase inhibitors and of combination therapy is provided. The article also covers the mechanism of action of the different types of β-lactamase enzymes as a basis for inhibitor design and target inactivation.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae: determination of disk content and Kirby-Bauer breakpoint for ceftazidime/avibactam

BACKGROUND

Detection of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) antibacterial activity is absolutely vital with the rapid growth of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). But now, there is no available automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing card for CAZ/AVI, so Kirby-Bauer has become an economical and practical method for detecting CAZ/AVI antibacterial activity against Enterobacteriaceae.

RESULT

In this study, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of CAZ/AVI against 386 Enterobacteriaceae (188 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 122 Escherichia coli, 76 Enterobacter cloacae) isolated from clinical patients was performed by broth microdilution. Of the 386 strains, 54 extended spectrum β lactamases negative (ESBL(-)), 104 extended spectrum β lactamases positive (ESBL(+)), 228 CRE. 287 isolates were susceptible to CAZ/AVI and 99 isolates were resistant to CAZ/AVI. At the same time, to obtain optimal content avibactam (AVI) disk containing ceftazidime (30 μg), inhibition zone diameter of four kinds of ceftazidime (30 μg) disk containing different AVI content (0 μg, 10 μg, 25 μg, 50 μg) were tested by Kirby-Bauer method. The microdilution broth method interpretation was used as the standard to estimate susceptible or resistance and then coherence analysis was carried out between Kirby-Bauer and broth microdilution. The result shows the inhibition zone diameter of 30 μg/50 μg disk, susceptible isolates: 20.5 mm-31.5 mm, resistance isolates: 8.25 mm-21.5 mm. The inhibition zone diameter of 30 μg/25 μg disk, susceptible isolates: 19.7 mm-31.3 mm, resistance isolates: 6.5 mm-19.2 mm. The inhibition zone diameter of 30 μg/10 μg disk, susceptible isolates: 19.5 mm-31 mm, resistance isolates: 6.5 mm-11 mm. The inhibition zone diameter of ceftazidime (30 μg), susceptible isolates: 6.5 mm-27.5 mm, resistance isolates 6.5 mm.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that 30 μg/50 μg, 30 μg/25 μg, 30 μg/10 μg CAZ/AVI disk have significant statistical differences to determinate CAZ/AVI antibacterial activity, but for 30 μg/50 μg disk, there has a cross section between susceptible isolates (minimum 20.5 mm) and resistance isolates (maximum 21.5 mm). For 30 μg/25 μg disk, it is hard to distinguish the difference between susceptible isolates (minimum 19.7 mm) and resistance isolates (maximum 19.2 mm), so 30 μg/10 μg CAZ/AVI disk is more conducive to determinate antibacterial activity.

Selection of mutants with resistance or diminished susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam from ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Introduction

Difficult Gram-negative infections are increasingly treated with new β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, e.g. ceftazidime/avibactam. Disturbingly, mutations in KPC carbapenemases can confer ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, which is sometimes selected during therapy. We explored whether this risk extended to AmpC and ESBL enzymes.

Methods

Mutants were selected by plating AmpC-derepressed strains, ESBL producers and ceftazidime-susceptible controls on agar containing ceftazidime + avibactam (1 or 4 mg/L). MICs were determined by CLSI agar dilution; WGS was by Illumina methodology.

Results

Using 2× MIC of ceftazidime + 1 mg/L avibactam, mutants were selected from all strain types at frequencies of 10-7-10-9. Rates diminished to <10-9 with 4 mg/L avibactam or higher MIC multiples, except with AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae. Characterized mutants (n = 10; MICs 4-64 mg/L) of AmpC-derepressed strains had modifications in ampC, variously giving Arg168Pro/His, Gly176Arg/Asp, Asn366Tyr or small deletions around positions 309-314. Mutants of ESBL producers (n = 19; MICs 0.5-16 mg/L) mostly had changes affecting permeability, efflux or β-lactamase quantity; only one had an altered β-lactamase, with an Asp182Tyr substitution in CTX-M-15, raising the ceftazidime/avibactam MIC, but abrogating other cephalosporin resistance. Mutants of ceftazidime-susceptible strains were not sequenced, but phenotypes suggested altered drug accumulation or, for Enterobacter cloacae only, AmpC derepression. In further experiments, avibactam reduced, but did not abolish, selection of AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae by ceftazidime.

Conclusions

Most mutants of AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae had structural mutations in ampC; those of ESBL producers mostly had genetic modifications outside β-lactamase genes, commonly affecting uptake, efflux, or β-lactamase quantity. The clinical significance of these observations remains to be determined.