Prospective evaluation of a continuous infusion vancomycin dosing nomogram in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemofiltration

Serum concentration of continuously administered vancomycin influences efficacy and safety in critically ill adults: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Vancomycin is used to treat Gram-positive infections in critically ill adults. For vancomycin administered by continuous infusion (CI), various target ranges have been used, ranging from 15-20 mg/L to 30-40 mg/L. This systematic literature review was conducted to investigate the impact of steady-state serum concentration (Css) of CI on safety and efficacy of therapy in critically ill adults.

METHODS

Relevant literature was identified by searching two electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library) and Google Scholar from inception until July 2023, focusing on studies reporting measured Css and treatment outcomes (e.g. mortality, nephrotoxicity) with CI. Due to study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis of the evidence was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one publications were included with a total of 2949 patients. Mortality was higher (two studies, n = 388 patients) and clinical cure was lower (one study, n = 40 patients) with Css < 15 mg/L measured 24 h after initiation of CI (C24). An adequate loading dose appeared most important for maintaining higher C24. Generally, higher Css was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) (15 studies, n = 2331 patients). It was calculated that Css < 25 mg/L (versus ≥25 mg/L) was preferable for reducing nephrotoxicity (three studies, n = 515 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite sparse data availability, the target range of 15-25 mg/L in CI may increase clinical cure and reduce mortality and AKI. In future research, vancomycin Css cohorts should be formed to allow evaluation of the impact of Css of CI on treatment outcomes.

Pursuing the Real Vancomycin Clearance during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Is There Adequate Target Attainment?

INTRODUCTION

Vancomycin is used in intensive care unit (ICU) patients for the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. The vancomycin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index is a ratio of the area under the concentration to the minimum inhibitory concentration ≥400-600 h*mg/L. This target can generally be achieved by a plasma concentration of 20-25 mg/L. Together with the pathophysiological alterations and pharmacokinetic variability associated with critical illness, the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may complicate the attainment of adequate vancomycin concentrations. The primary objective was the prevalence of attainment of vancomycin concentrations 20-25 mg/L after 24 h in adult ICU patients receiving CRRT. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate target attainment at days 2 and 3 and to calculate vancomycin clearance (CL) by CRRT and residual diuresis.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study in adult ICU patients on CRRT, which received at least 24 h continuous infusion of vancomycin. Between May 2020 and February 2021, daily vancomycin residual blood gas and dialysate samples were collected from 20 patients, every 6 h and if possible vancomycin urine samples. Vancomycin was analysed with an immunoassay method. The CL by CRRT was calculated by a different approach correcting for the downtime and providing insight into the degree of filter patency.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with vancomycin concentrations <20 mg/L was 50% 24 h after starting vancomycin (n = 10). No differences were observed in patient characteristics. The target vancomycin concentration 20-25 mg/L was only achieved in 30% of the patients. On days 2 and 3, despite the use of TDM and albeit in lower percentages, sub- and supratherapeutic levels were still observed. Taking downtime and filter patency into account resulted in lower vancomycin CL.

CONCLUSIONS

50% of the studied ICU patients on CRRT showed subtherapeutic vancomycin concentrations 24 h after starting therapy. The results reveal that optimization of vancomycin dosage during CRRT therapy is needed.

Antibiotic Therapy in the Critically Ill with Acute Renal Failure and Renal Replacement Therapy: A Narrative Review

The outcome for critically ill patients is burdened by a double mortality rate and a longer hospital stay in the case of sepsis or septic shock. The adequate use of antibiotics may impact on the outcome since they may affect the pharmacokinetics (Pk) and pharmacodynamics (Pd) of antibiotics in such patients. Acute renal failure (ARF) occurs in about 50% of septic patients, and the consequent need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) makes the renal elimination rate of most antibiotics highly variable. Antibiotics doses should be reduced in patients experiencing ARF, in accordance with the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), whereas posology should be increased in the case of CRRT. Since different settings of CRRT may be used, identifying a standard dosage of antibiotics is very difficult, because there is a risk of both oversimplification and failing the therapeutic efficacy. Indeed, it has been seen that, in over 25% of cases, the antibiotic therapy does not reach the necessary concentration target mainly due to lack of the proper minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) achievement. The aim of this narrative review is to clarify whether shared algorithms exist, allowing them to inform the daily practice in the proper antibiotics posology for critically ill patients undergoing CRRT.

Continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a prospective interventional study

BACKGROUND

A prospective interventional study comparing outcomes in critically ill patients receiving intermittent infusion (II) or continuous infusion (CI) of vancomycin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment, therapeutic efficacy and safety among critically ill patients who received CI or II of vancomycin in a prospective interventional trial and to explore the correlations of effluent flow rate (EFR) with PK/PD indices.

METHODS

This prospective interventional study was conducted in two independent intensive care units (ICUs) from February 2021 to January 2022. Patients in one ICU were assigned to receive CI (intervention group) of vancomycin, whereas patients in the other ICU were assigned to receive II regimen (control group). The primary outcome was to compare the PK/PD target attainment, including target concentration and target area under the curve over 24 h to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC₂₄/MIC).

RESULTS

Overall target attainment of PK/PD indices was higher with CI compared with II, irrespective of target concentration (78.7% vs. 40.5%; P < 0.05) or AUC₂₄/MIC (53.2% vs. 28.6%; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in clinical success (72.2% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.183) and microbiological success (83.3% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.681) between the patients treated with CI or II of vancomycin. Adverse reactions occurred at similar rates (0.0% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.462), and mortality between the two modalities was also not significant different (21.7% vs. 17.9%; P = 0.728). Correlation analysis showed a weak to moderately inverse correlation of EFR with observed concentration (r = - 0.3921, P = 0.01) and AUC₂₄/MIC (r = - 0.3811, P = 0.013) in the II group, whereas the correlation between EFR and observed concentration (r = - 0.5711, P < 0.001) or AUC₂₄/MIC (r = - 0.5458, P < 0.001) in the CI group was stronger.

CONCLUSION

As compared to II, CI of vancomycin in critically ill patients undergoing CVVH was associated with improved attainment of PK/PD indices. Furthermore, the inverse correlation of PK/PD indices with EFR was stronger among patients treated with CI of vancomycin. Trial registration The trial was registered in the Chinese clinical trial registration center (21/01/2021-No. ChiCTR2100042393).

Evaluation of dosing strategies and trough concentrations of vancomycin in patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Recommendations regarding vancomycin dosing in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current dosing practices of pharmacists for patients treated with CVVH, develop guidelines for optimal dosing and monitoring of vancomycin to improve target trough attainment, and reduce pharmacist workload.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study. was performed of critically ill adult patients from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients were included if they received vancomycin during CVVH for at least 48 h. Patients with significant residual kidney function, defined as daily urine output >400 ml or significant fluctuations (≥1000 ml/h in a 24-h period) in their hemofiltration rates, were excluded. Interruptions in CVVH up to 6 h/day were permitted. Dosing strategies with two dosing categories were defined: (1) dosing based on random serum levels (dosing by level, DBL) or (2) scheduled vancomycin dosing (SD).

SETTING

Academic medical center in Detroit, Michigan.

PATIENTS

Critically ill adult patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the study period, 942 patients were evaluated and 200 met inclusion criteria, for a total of 586 serum vancomycin levels. There were 141 patients with 443 random vancomycin serum levels in the DBL group and 59 patients with143 vancomycin trough levels in the SD group. Mean vancomycin trough levels were similar between groups (17.1 ± 6 vs. 16.5 ± 4 mcg/ml) for the DBL and SD groups, respectively. For the primary end point of overall target trough achievement of 15-20 mcg/ml, significantly more trough levels in the SD group were in the 15-20 mcg/ml range compared with the DBL group, 50% vs. 38%; p < 0.001, respectively. When target trough range was extended to 10-20 mcg/ml, success rates were similar between groups (74% DBL vs. 82% SD, p = 0.021). The number of interventions required by the pharmacist, including notes per day and orders per day, were reduced by approximately 50% when the SD strategy was utilized. Scheduled vancomycin dosing regimens of 15-22 mg/kg every 12-24 h were required to yield trough levels in the 15-20 mcg/ml range.

CONCLUSIONS

Target vancomycin trough achievement of 15-20 mcg/ml occurred more frequently when vancomycin was scheduled at a dose of 15-22 mg/kg every 12-24 h based on ultrafiltration rate and may alleviate the time and cost associated with frequent vancomycin serum monitoring.

Effects of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on vancomycin trough concentrations in critically ill children

Background

Vancomycin trough concentrations are associated with clinical outcomes and drug adverse effects. This study investigates the effects of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) on vancomycin trough concentrations in critically ill children with a vancomycin dosage of 40–60 mg/kg/day.

Methods

Children with steady-state vancomycin trough concentrations admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into CVVH and non-CVVH groups according to treatment differences and renal function. Vancomycin trough concentrations were then compared between the groups, and risk factors for supratherapeutic trough concentrations (>20 mg/L) were analyzed with logistic regression.

Results

Of the 119 patients included, 35 were enrolled in the CVVH group and 84 in the non-CVVH group. Median vancomycin trough concentrations were significantly higher in the CVVH group than those in the non-CVVH group [14.9 (IQR =9.6–19.6) vs. 9.3 (IQR =7.0–13.4), P<0.001] and the proportion of therapeutic trough concentrations (10–20 mg/L) was similar between CVVH and non-CVVH groups (54.3% vs. 39.3%, P=0.133). However, CVVH therapy patients had a significantly higher proportion of supratherapeutic trough concentrations (20.0% vs. 1.2%, P=0.001) compared to the non-CVVH group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) III score ≥28 (OR =13.7; 95% CI, 1.4–137.0; P=0.026] was an independent risk factor for supratherapeutic trough concentrations in critically ill patients.

Conclusions

CVVH therapy affects vancomycin trough concentrations and is associated with supratherapeutic concentrations with a 40–60 mg/kg/day vancomycin dosage. PRISM III scores ≥28 may serve as an independent risk factor for supratherapeutic trough concentrations in children receiving CVVH therapy.

Comparison of intermittent versus continuous-infusion vancomycin for treating severe patients in intensive care units

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic characteristics between intermittent infusion and continuous infusion of vancomycin for critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units.

Methods

Intermittent therapy was administered for 60 minutes and prescribed as a loading dose of 30 mg/kg and continued with 15 mg/kg q12 h. Continuous infusion was prescribed as a loading dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 30 mg/kg on constant infusion pump. Blood samples from vancomycin intermittent infusion group were collected 1 h before third dose, 1 h, 8 h and 24 h after third dose infusion. Blood samples from vancomycin continuous infusion group were collected 1 h after loading dose, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, and 48 h after continuous infusion initiation.

Results

Median serum concentration of continuous infusion group at 24-hour was 23.59 μg/mL [14.52–28.97], while of intermittent infusion group at 23-hour was 12.30 μg/mL [7.27–18.12] and on 25-hour was 17.58 μg/mL [12.5–22.5]. Medians AUC_24–48h were 357.2 mg.h/L and 530.2 mg.h/L for intermittent infusion and continuous infusion groups, respectively (p = 0.559).

Conclusion

Vancomycin CI reached steady state earlier, which guaranteed therapeutic levels from the first day and made it possible to manage therapeutic drug monitoring faster.

Antibiotic Dosing for Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Intermittent Hemodialysis, Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy, and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Update

Objective: To summarize current antibiotic dosing recommendations in critically ill patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT), and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), including considerations for individualizing therapy. Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed from January 2008 to May 2019 was performed to identify English-language literature in which dosing recommendations were proposed for antibiotics commonly used in critically ill patients receiving IHD, PIRRT, or CRRT. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All pertinent reviews, selected studies, and references were evaluated to ensure appropriateness for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Updated empirical dosing considerations are proposed for antibiotics in critically ill patients receiving IHD, PIRRT, and CRRT with recommendations for individualizing therapy. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review defines principles for assessing renal function, identifies RRT system properties affecting drug clearance and drug properties affecting clearance during RRT, outlines pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dosing considerations, reviews pertinent updates in the literature, develops updated empirical dosing recommendations, and highlights important factors for individualizing therapy in critically ill patients. Conclusions: Appropriate antimicrobial selection and dosing are vital to improve clinical outcomes. Dosing recommendations should be applied cautiously with efforts to consider local epidemiology and resistance patterns, antibiotic dosing and infusion strategies, renal replacement modalities, patient-specific considerations, severity of illness, residual renal function, comorbidities, and patient response to therapy. Recommendations provided herein are intended to serve as a guide in developing and revising therapy plans individualized to meet a patient's needs.