In vitro and in vivo activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam alone or in combination against mcr-9, serine- and metallo-β-lactamases-co-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex

PURPOSE

Enterobacteriaceae carrying mcr-9, in particularly those also co-containing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) and TEM type β-lactamase, present potential transmission risks and lack adequate clinical response methods, thereby posing a major threat to global public health. The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of a combined ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and aztreonam (ATM) regimen against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex (CRECC) co-producing mcr-9, MBL and TEM.

METHODS

The in vitro antibacterial activity of CZA plus ATM was evaluated using a time-kill curve assay. Furthermore, the in vivo interaction between CZA plus ATM was confirmed using a Galleria mellonella (G. mellonella) infection model.

RESULTS

All eight clinical strains of CRECC, co-carrying mcr-9, MBL and TEM, exhibited high resistance to CZA and ATM. In vitro time-kill curve analysis demonstrated that the combination therapy of CZA + ATM exerted significant bactericidal activity against mcr-9, MBL and TEM-co-producing Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) isolates with a 100% synergy rate observed in our study. Furthermore, in vivo survival assay using Galleria mellonella larvae infected with CRECC strains co-harboring mcr-9, MBL and TEM revealed that the CZA + ATM combination significantly improved the survival rate compared to the drug-treatment alone and untreated control groups.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study represents the first report on the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of CZA plus ATM against CRECC isolates co-harboring mcr-9, MBL and TEM. Our findings suggest that the combination regimen of CZA + ATM provides a valuable reference for clinicians to address the increasingly complex antibiotic resistance situation observed in clinical microorganisms.

Cefiderocol for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model

Background

To limit the use of antimicrobials without disincentivising the development of novel antimicrobials, there is interest in establishing innovative models that fund antimicrobials based on an evaluation of their value as opposed to the volumes used. The aim of this project was to evaluate the population-level health benefit of cefiderocol in the NHS in England, for the treatment of severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections when used within its licensed indications. The results were used to inform the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance in support of commercial discussions regarding contract value between the manufacturer and NHS England.

Methods

The health benefit of cefiderocol was first derived for a series of high-value clinical scenarios. These represented uses that were expected to have a significant impact on patients' mortality risks and health-related quality of life. The clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol relative to its comparators was estimated by synthesising evidence on susceptibility of the pathogens of interest to the antimicrobials in a network meta-analysis. Patient-level costs and health outcomes of cefiderocol under various usage scenarios compared with alternative management strategies were quantified using decision modelling. Results were reported as incremental net health effects expressed in quality-adjusted life-years, which were scaled to 20-year population values using infection number forecasts based on data from Public Health England. The outcomes estimated for the high-value clinical scenarios were extrapolated to other expected uses for cefiderocol.

Results

Among Enterobacterales isolates with the metallo-beta-lactamase resistance mechanism, the base-case network meta-analysis found that cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.32, 95% credible intervals 0.04 to 2.47), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were also associated with lower susceptibility than colistin, but the results were not statistically significant. In the metallo-beta-lactamase Pseudomonas aeruginosa base-case network meta-analysis, cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.44, 95% credible intervals 0.03 to 3.94), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were associated with no susceptibility. In the base case, patient-level benefit of cefiderocol was between 0.02 and 0.15 quality-adjusted life-years, depending on the site of infection, the pathogen and the usage scenario. There was a high degree of uncertainty surrounding the benefits of cefiderocol across all subgroups. There was substantial uncertainty in the number of infections that are suitable for treatment with cefiderocol, so population-level results are presented for a range of scenarios for the current infection numbers, the expected increases in infections over time and rates of emergence of resistance. The population-level benefits varied substantially across the base-case scenarios, from 896 to 3559 quality-adjusted life-years over 20 years.

Conclusion

This work has provided quantitative estimates of the value of cefiderocol within its areas of expected usage within the NHS.

Limitations

Given existing evidence, the estimates of the value of cefiderocol are highly uncertain.

Future work

Future evaluations of antimicrobials would benefit from improvements to NHS data linkages; research to support appropriate synthesis of susceptibility studies; and application of routine data and decision modelling to assess enablement value.

Study registration

No registration of this study was undertaken.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Policy Research Programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135591), conducted through the Policy Research Unit in Economic Methods of Evaluation in Health and Social Care Interventions, PR-PRU-1217-20401, and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 28. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded.

Results

22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies.

Discussion

The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.

The place of new antibiotics for Gram-negative bacterial infections in intensive care: report of a consensus conference

INTRODUCTION

New beta-lactams, associated or not with beta-lactamase inhibitors (NBs/BIs), can respond to the spread of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriales and nonfermenting carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The risk of emergence of resistance to these NBs/BIs makes guidelines necessary. The SRLF organized a consensus conference in December 2022.

METHODS

An ad hoc committee without any conflict of interest (CoI) with the subject identified the molecules (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and cefiderocol); defined 6 generic questions; drew up a list of subquestions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model; and reviewed the literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Seven experts in the field proposed their own answers to the questions in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 10 critical-care physicians without any CoI) and the public. The jury then met alone for 48 h to write its recommendations. Due to the frequent lack of powerful studies that have used clinically important criteria of judgment, the recommendations were formulated as expert opinions as often as necessary.

RESULTS

The jury provided 17 statements answering 6 questions: (1) Is there a place in the ICU for the probabilistic use of new NBs/IBs active against Gram-negative bacteria? (2) In the context of documented infections with sensitivity to several of these molecules, are there pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, ecological or medico-economic elements for prioritization? (3) What are the possible combinations with these molecules and in what context? (4) Should we integrate these new molecules into a carbapenem-sparing strategy? (5) What pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available to optimize their mode of administration in critically ill patients? (6) What are the dosage adaptations in cases of renal insufficiency, hepatocellular insufficiency or obesity?

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should optimize the use of NBs/BIs in ICU patients.

Antimicrobial Resistance in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Predictive Microbiology and Evidence-Based Therapy

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a serious intensive care unit (ICU)-related infection in mechanically ventilated patients that is frequent, as more than half of antibiotics prescriptions in ICU are due to VAP. Various risk factors and diagnostic criteria for VAP have been referred to in different settings. The estimated attributable mortality of VAP can go up to 50%, which is higher in cases of antimicrobial-resistant VAP. When the diagnosis of pneumonia in a mechanically ventilated patient is made, initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy must be prompt. Microbiological diagnosis of VAP is required to optimize timely therapy since effective early treatment is fundamental for better outcomes, with controversy continuing regarding optimal sampling and testing. Understanding the role of antimicrobial resistance in the context of VAP is crucial in the era of continuously evolving antimicrobial-resistant clones that represent an urgent threat to global health. This review is focused on the risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in adult VAP and its novel microbiological tools. It aims to summarize the current evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of resistance in VAP caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria in clinical settings with focus on Gram-negative pathogens. It highlights the evidence-based antimicrobial management and prevention of drug-resistant VAP. It also addresses emerging concepts related to predictive microbiology in VAP and sheds lights on VAP in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

The Virtuous Galleria mellonella Model for Scientific Experimentation

The first research on the insect Galleria mellonella was published 85 years ago, and the larva is now widely used as a model to study infections caused by bacterial and fungal pathogens, for screening new antimicrobials, to study the adjacent immune response in co-infections or in host-pathogen interaction, as well as in a toxicity model. The immune system of the G. mellonella model shows remarkable similarities with mammals. Furthermore, results from G. mellonella correlate positively with mammalian models and with other invertebrate models. Unlike other invertebrate models, G. mellonella can withstand temperatures of 37 °C, and its handling and experimental procedures are simpler. Despite having some disadvantages, G. mellonella is a virtuous in vivo model to be used in preclinical studies, as an intermediate model between in vitro and mammalian in vivo studies, and is a great example on how to apply the bioethics principle of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) in animal experimentation. This review aims to discuss the progress of the G. mellonella model, highlighting the key aspects of its use, including experimental design considerations and the necessity to standardize them. A different score in the “cocoon” category included in the G. mellonella Health Index Scoring System is also proposed.

In vitro and in vivo activity of meropenem+avibactam against MBL-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance has become a public health problem to be solved worldwide and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing bacteria make this problem even more challenging.

METHODS

The interactions of meropenem (MEM) in combination with avibactam (AVI) in growth inhibition on MBL-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) strains were tested. In vitro interactions of MEM+AVI were tested using the microdilution checkerboard assay and time-kill curves. In vivo interactions of MEM+AVI were tested using the Galleria mellonella model.

RESULTS

All strains were multi-drug resistant strains and six of them were proved to produce MBLs. We show that the combination of MEM+AVI generates profound synergistic effects on growth inhibition of all strains, which was better than that of MEM+vaborbactam or imipenem+relebactam. The time-kill curves further confirmed the potent synergistic antibacterial effects of MEM+AVI against MBL-producing CRKP strains. Galleria mellonella studies were consistent with in vitro analysis. Combining MEM with AVI improved survival rates and mean survival days were obviously prolonged compared to the drug alone and the untreated controls.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this study is the first report of MEM+AVI collaborating against MBL-producing CRKP strains. Our findings showed that the combination of MEM+AVI has the potential for antibiotic drug development to combat MBL-producing pathogens.

TP0586532, a Novel Non-Hydroxamate LpxC Inhibitor: Potentiating Effect on In Vitro Activity of Meropenem against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are an urgent threat to public health requiring the development of novel therapies. TP0586532 is a novel non-hydroxamate LpxC inhibitor that inhibits the synthesis of lipopolysaccharides, which are components of the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. Based on the mechanism of action of TP0586532, we hypothesized that it might enhance the antibacterial activity of other antibiotics by increasing the permeability of the outer bacterial membrane. The combination of TP0586532 with meropenem, amikacin, cefepime, piperacillin, and tigecycline showed synergistic and additive effects against carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Checkerboard experiments against 21 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains (13 blaKPC+, 5 blaNDM-1+, 2 blaVIM+, and 1 blaIMP+) showed that the combination of TP0586532 with meropenem yielded synergistic and additive effects against 9 and 12 strains, respectively. In a time-kill assay examining 12 CRE strains, synergistic effects were observed when TP0586532 was combined with meropenem against many of the strains. A membrane permeability assay using ethidium bromide (EtBr) was performed to investigate the mechanism of the potentiating effect. TP0586532 increased the influx of EtBr into a CRE strain, suggesting that TP0586532 increased membrane permeability and facilitated intracellular access for the antibiotics. Our study demonstrates that TP0586532 potentiates the in vitro antibacterial activity of meropenem against CRE. Combination therapy consisting of TP0586532 and meropenem has potential as a treatment for CRE infections. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are an urgent public health threat, as therapeutic options are limited. TP0586532 is a novel LpxC inhibitor that inhibits the synthesis of lipopolysaccharides in the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. Here, we demonstrated the potentiating effects of TP0586532 on the antibacterial activity of meropenem against CRE harboring various types of carbapenemase genes (blaKPC+, blaNDM-1+ blaVIM+, and blaIMP+). TP0586532 also augmented the bactericidal effects of meropenem against CRE strains, even against those with a high level of resistance to meropenem. The potentiating effects were suggested to be mediated by an increase in bacterial membrane permeability. Our study revealed that a combination therapy consisting of TP0586532 and meropenem has the potential to be a novel therapeutic option for CRE infections.

In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Combined with Ceftibuten or Cefpodoxime Against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

Infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales are an increasingly common problem. For many of these infections, no oral treatment options are available. The activity of amoxicillin-clavulanate combined with ceftibuten or cefpodoxime was evaluated against a group of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates possessing a variety of CTX-M- and SHV-type ESBLs; some possessed blaTEM1 as well. In time-kill studies, the combination of subinhibitory concentrations of amoxicillin-clavulanate with ceftibuten was bactericidal and synergistic for all strains with an amoxicillin-clavulanate MIC ≤32 μg/mL, regardless of the type of ESBL and the cephalosporin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). The combination with cefpodoxime was also bactericidal and synergistic against all but one of these strains. These combinations were further tested against two strains of K. pneumoniae and one E. coli in a sepsis model using Galleria mellonella larvae. The combination of amoxicillin-clavulanate with ceftibuten demonstrated a synergistic survival benefit against all three strains. The combination with cefpodoxime also improved survival against the two K. pneumoniae strains, but not the E. coli strain. These findings support combining amoxicillin-clavulanate with ceftibuten, and possibly cefpodoxime, for the treatment of infections due to ESBL producers and suggest that having an amoxicillin-clavulanate MIC of 32 μg/mL or less may predict activity at clinically achievable concentrations. Clinical studies are warranted to further evaluate this therapeutic approach.

Galleria mellonella as a Suitable Model of Bacterial Infection: Past, Present and Future

The increasing interest for Galleria mellonella larvae as an infection model is evidenced by the number of papers reporting its use, which increases exponentially since the early 2010s. This popularity was initially linked to limitation of conventional animal models due to financial, technical and ethical aspects. In comparison, alternative models (e.g. models using Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster or G. mellonella) were cheap, simple to use and not limited by ethical regulation. Since then, similar results have been established with G. mellonella model comparatively to vertebrates, and it is more and more often used as a robust model per se, not only as an alternative to the murine model. This review attempts to summarize the current knowledge supporting the development of this model, both on immunological and microbiological aspects. For that, we focus on investigation of virulence and new therapies for the most important pathogenic bacteria. We also discuss points out directions for standardization, as well as recent advances and new perspectives for monitoring host-pathogen interactions.

Galleria mellonella as an infection model: an in-depth look at why it works and practical considerations for successful application

The larva of the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella is an increasingly popular model for assessing the virulence of bacterial pathogens and the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents. In this review, we discuss details of the components of the G. mellonella larval immune system that underpin its use as an alternative infection model, and provide an updated overview of the state of the art of research with G. mellonella infection models to study bacterial virulence, and in the evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy. Emphasis is given to virulence studies with relevant human and veterinary pathogens, especially Escherichia coli and bacteria of the ESKAPE group. In addition, we make practical recommendations for larval rearing and testing, and overcoming potential limitations of the use of the model, which facilitate intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility.

Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Repurposed Mitomycin C and Imipenem in Combination with the Lytic Phage vB_KpnM-VAC13 against Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that employs different strategies (resistance and persistence) to counteract antibiotic treatments. This study aimed to search for new means of combatting imipenem-resistant and persister strains of K. pneumoniae by repurposing the anticancer drug mitomycin C as an antimicrobial agent and by combining the drug and the conventional antibiotic imipenem with the lytic phage vB_KpnM-VAC13. Several clinical K. pneumoniae isolates were characterized, and an imipenem-resistant isolate (harboring OXA-245 β-lactamase) and a persister isolate were selected for study. The mitomycin C and imipenem MICs for both isolates were determined by the broth microdilution method. Time-kill curve data were obtained by optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) measurement and CFU enumeration in the presence of each drug alone and with the phage. The frequency of occurrence of mutants resistant to each drug and the combinations was also calculated, and the efficacy of the combination treatments was evaluated using an in vivo infection model (Galleria mellonella). The lytic phage vB_KpnM-VAC13 and mitomycin C had synergistic effects on imipenem-resistant and persister isolates, both in vitro and in vivo. The phage-imipenem combination successfully killed the persisters but not the imipenem-resistant isolate harboring OXA-245 β-lactamase. Interestingly, the combinations decreased the emergence of in vitro resistant mutants of both isolates. Combinations of the lytic phage vB_KpnM-VAC13 with mitomycin C and imipenem were effective against the persister K. pneumoniae isolate. The lytic phage-mitomycin C combination was also effective against imipenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strains harboring OXA-245 β-lactamase.

In vitro and in vivo Effect of Antimicrobial Agent Combinations Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with Different Resistance Mechanisms in China

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo effects of different combinations of antimicrobial agents against carbapenemase-producing and non-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from China.

Methods

A checkerboard assay of meropenem (MEM), amikacin (AK), tigecycline (TGC), colistin (COL) and their combinations was carried out against 58 clinical carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKp) isolates, including 11 carbapenemase-non-producing K. pneumoniae isolates and 21 isolates producing KPC-2 enzyme, 11 NDM-1, 13 IMP, one VIM-1 and one OXA-48. The checkerboard assay was analyzed by the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). A time-kill assay and Galleria mellonella infection model were conducted to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo effects of the four drugs alone and in combination.

Results

In the checkerboard assay, TGC+AK and MEM+AK combinations showed the highest synergistic effect against KPC-2 and NDM-1 carbapenemase-producing isolates, with synergy+partial synergy (defined as FICI <1) rates of 76.2% and 71.4% against KPC-2 producers, and 54.5% and 81.8% against NDM-1 producers. TGC+AK and MEM+COL combinations showed the highest rate of synergistic effect against IMP-producing isolates. Against carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, TGC+COL and TGC+AK combinations showed the highest rate of synergy effect (63.6% and 54.5%). MEM+AK showed a synergistic effect against one VIM-1 producer (FICI=0.31) and an additivite effect (FICI=1) against one OXA-48 producer. In the time-kill assay, COL+AK, COL+TGC, COL+MEM and AK+TGC showed good synergistic effects against the KPC-2-producing isolate D16. COL+MEM and COL+TGC combinations showed good effects against the NDM-1-producing isolate L13 and IMP-4-producing isolate L34. Against the carbapenemase-non-producing isolate Y105, MEM+TGC and COL+AK showed high synergistic effects, with log₁₀CFU/mL decreases of 6.2 and 5.5 compared to the most active single drug. In the G. mellonella survival assay, MEM-based combinations had relatively high survival rates, especially when combined with colistin, against KPC-2 producers (90% survival rate) and with amikacin against metallo-beta-lactamase producers (95-100% survival rate).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that different antimicrobial agent combinations should be considered against CRKp infections with different resistance mechanisms.

Mono vs. combo regimens with novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: insights from the literature

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) and imipenem-relebactam (I-R) are combinations of old ß-lactams with novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) able to inhibit some carbapenemases, such as the KPC-type, thus are becoming the standard for difficult-to-treat carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE); a practical question is whether these novel BLBLIs should be used as monotherapy or as part of a combination regimen with other antibiotics, and if so, with which ones, to reduce the emergence of resistant strains and to optimize their efficacy. In this short review, we assessed clinical outcomes in patients with CPE-infections treated with the novel BLBLIs as mono- or combo-regimens, and laboratory studies on the synergistic effects with other antimicrobials. Available evidence on combination therapy is scarce and mainly limited to retrospective studies involving 630 patients treated with CZA: aminoglycosides were used in 39.6% of 336 patients treated with combo-regimens, followed by polymyxin B/colistin (24.4%), tigecycline (24.1%), carbapenems (13.4%) and fosfomycin (5.4%). Aminoglycosides could be useful in case of bloodstream and severe urinary infections. Pneumonia is a risk factor for CZA-resistance emergence: fosfomycin, due to favorable lung pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, could represent an interesting partner; fosfomycin could be added also for osteomyelitis. Tigecycline could be preferred for intrabdominal and skin-soft tissue infections. Due to nephrotoxicity and lack of in vitro synergy, the association CZA/colistin seems not optimal. MVB and I-R were mostly used as monotherapies. Currently, there is no definitive evidence whether combinations are more effective than monotherapies; further studies are warranted, and to date only personal opinions can be provided.

Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance is developing rapidly and threatens to outstrip the rate at which new antimicrobials are introduced. Genetic recombination allows bacteria to rapidly disseminate genes encoding for antimicrobial resistance within and across species. Antimicrobial use creates a selective evolutionary pressure, which leads to further resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship, best use, and infection prevention are the most effective ways to slow the spread and development of antimicrobial resistance.

The role of new β-lactamase inhibitors in gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, traditional β-lactams have dramatically reduced their effectiveness against gram-negative bacteria mainly because of their ability to express multiple β-lactamase or carabapenemases that are not hydrolyzed by the old β-lactam inhibitors (BLIs) such as clavulanic acid, tazobactam, and sulbactam. New BLIs molecules have been developed to face the need of compounds that are active against multidrug or pandrug resistant gram-negative pathogens. The aim of this review is to summarize the new generation of BLIs and β-lactams combinations.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of new molecules with activity against Ambler class A (e.g., extended-spectrum β-lactamases, serine carbapenemases), class C (e.g., AmpC), or class D (e.g., oxacillinase-48) have been recently approved in combination with old β-lactams for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria, and other agents are under investigation. These new compounds include diazabicyclooctanones non-β-lactam inhibitors (e.g., avibactam, relebactam, nacubactam) and boronic acid inhibitors (e.g., vaborbactam).

SUMMARY

Newly approved and investigational new BLIs are expected to offer many advantages for the management of patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Promising characteristics of new compounds include high activity against multi drug resistance gram-negative bacteria and a favorable safety profile.

In vitro evaluation of double carbapenem and colistin combinations against OXA-48, NDM carbapenemase-producing colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains

BACKGROUND

Treatment of pandrug-resistant isolates often necessitates combination therapy. Checkerboard synergy and time-killing assay tests were performed to evaluate the benefits of a triple combination with meropenem, ertapenem, and colistin against 10 colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae clinical isolates harboring different β-lactamases. (bla_OXA-48, bla_NDM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, ertapenem and meropenem (ERT/MEM), meropenem and colistin (MEM/COL), ertapenem, meropenem and colistin (ERT/MEM/COL) combinations were tested using checkerboard techniques and time-kill assays of each antibiotic alone and in combination against 10 colistin-resistant clinical K. pneumoniae isolates. An analysis of K. pneumoniae isolate B6 using a scanning electron microscope revealed morphologic changes in the cell surface after treatment with each antibiotic both alone and in combination. The whole genome of K. pneumoniae KPNB1 was sequenced using an Ion Torrent PGM sequencer.

RESULTS

According to the checkboard results, synergistic combinations were observed with ertapenem/meropenem (5/10 isolates), meropenem/colistin (7/10) and ertapenem/meropenem/colistin (9/10); no antagonism was observed for all combinations. For the time-kill assay results; synergism and bactericidal effects were observed with meropenem/colistin (10/10) and with ertapenem/meropenem/colistin (10/10) combinations, and an indifference effect was observed with the ertapenem and meropenem (10/10) combination. Strain number 1 was found 100% identical to Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae HS11286 according to the outcomes of complete genome sequence analysis, and the strain carried the genes bla_OXA-181, bla_CTXM-15, blaNDM, arr-3, aac (6')-Ib-cr, rmtF, and catB1.

CONCLUSION

Using double carbapenem antibiotics with colistin could be a potential alternative to treat colistin and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. The present study is the first Turkish report of OXA-181-type carbapenemase causing colistin resistance.

Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Experimental Pneumonia Caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing K. pneumoniae in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is an emerging global public health threat that causes life-threatening pneumonia and bacteremia. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) represents a promising advance for the treatment of serious infections caused by KPC-Kp We investigated the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of experimental KPC-Kp pneumonia in persistently neutropenic rabbits. For single-dose and multidose (administration every 8 h) pharmacokinetics, rabbits received ceftazidime-avibactam intravenous infusions at 60/15, 90/22.5, and 120/30 mg/kg of body weight. Ceftazidime mean area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) ranged from 287 to 608 μg·h/ml for a single dose and from 300 to 781 μg·h/ml for multiple doses. Avibactam AUCs ranged from 21 to 48 μg·h/ml for a single dose and from 26 to 48 μg·h/ml for multiple doses. KPC-Kp pneumonia was established by direct endotracheal inoculation. Treatments consisted of ceftazidime-avibactam at 120/30 mg/kg every 6 h, a polymyxin B (PMB) loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg followed by 1.5 mg/kg every 12 h q12h, or no treatment (untreated controls [UC]). There were significant reductions in the residual bacterial burden, lung weights, and pulmonary hemorrhage scores in CZA- and PMB-treated rabbits for a 7-day or a 14-day (P ≤ 0.01) course in comparison with those in the UC. These results corresponded to significant decreases in the bacterial burden in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after a 7-day or a 14-day treatment (P ≤ 0.01). The outcomes demonstrated an improved response at 14 days versus that at 7 days. There was significantly prolonged survival in rabbits treated with CZA for 14 days in comparison with that in the PMB-treated or UC rabbits (P ≤ 0.05). This study demonstrates that ceftazidime-avibactam displays linear dose-proportional exposures simulating those seen from human plasma pharmacokinetic profiles, is active for the treatment of experimental KPC-Kp pneumonia in persistently neutropenic rabbits, and provides an experimental foundation for the treatment of severely immunocompromised patients with this life-threatening infection.

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia infection outbreak in a tertiary urology clinic: analysis of influencing factors with a controlled trial

Background/aim

Carbapenem-resistantKlebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) infections encountered in urology patients differentiate from infections caused by other factors, both in respect to prophylaxis and treatment stage, and require a special approach. We aimed to analyse the predisposing factors and the antibiotherapies for CR-KP infection outbreak in a tertiary urology clinic.

Materials and methods

There were 75 patients in the CR-KP positive group (Group I) and 146 patients in the CR-KP negative group (Group II). Analysis of the predisposing factors for CR-KP infection and comparison of the reinfection rate and the antibiotherapies in the 2 groups were the endpoints.

Results

In the first group, age, comorbidity, previous antibiotic use, and nephrostomy tube rates were higher (P = 0.015, P = 0.001, P = 0.004, and P < 0.001, respectively). In the second group, open urological surgery rate, and the proportion of patients presenting with flank pain, lower urinary tract symptoms, and haematuria were higher (P = 0.029, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.007). In the first group, the proportion of patients treated with transurethral bladder tumour resection was higher, whereas, percutaneous nephrolithotomy was higher in the second group (P = 0.045 for both). While hospitalization and Foley catheterization duration were longer in the first group (P < 0.001 for both), double J stent and nephrostomy duration were longer in the second group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005). Mean leukocyte count at admission was higher in the first group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Advanced age, comorbidities, previous antibiotic use, and prolonged Foley catheterization duration are predisposing factors for this infection in the urology department. Two-week administration of combination antibiotic regimens containing carbapenem were effective for the treatment of this infection.

Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam alone and in combination with polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tandem in vitro time-kill/in vivo Galleria mellonella survival model analysis

Ceftazidime-avibactam is used clinically in combination with a polymyxin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections; however, there are limited data to support this practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxin B alone and in combination against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tandem in vitro time-kill/in vivo Galleria mellonella survival model assay. Three KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were used for all experiments. All isolates harbored mutations in ompk35 and one isolate in ompk36; two isolates were susceptible to both ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxin B, and one was resistant to both. Ceftazidime-avibactam was bactericidal against 2 of 3 strains at ≥2x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) whereas polymyxin B was not bactericidal against any strain at any concentration. Combinations at 1/4x or 1/2x MIC were not bactericidal or synergistic against any of the 3 isolates. In survival experiments, ceftazidime-avibactam at 4x MIC significantly improved larval survival over the untreated control strain whereas polymyxin B at 4x MIC did not. Combining polymyxin B with ceftazidime-avibactam at 4x MIC did not improve survival compared to ceftazidime-avibactam alone. This work indicates there is no improvement in in vitro bactericidal activity or in vivo efficacy when polymyxin B is combined with ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. This combination should be avoided in lieu of ceftazidime-avibactam alone or other potentially more efficacious, less toxic combination regimens.

Ceftazidime/avibactam Improves the Antibacterial Efficacy of Polymyxin B Against Polymyxin B Heteroresistant KPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Hinders Emergence of Resistant Subpopulation in vitro

Due to the increasing multidrug resistance and limited antibiotics, polymyxin B revived as the last resort for the treatment of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). Unfortunately, the heteroresistance hampers polymyxin B monotherapy treatment via the amplification of resistant subpopulation. Reliable polymyxin B based combinations are demanded. Ceftazidime/avibactam has been regarded as a new salvage therapy against CRKP. The occurrence of heteroresistance was confirmed by population analysis profiling (PAP). Our study demonstrated that polymyxin B and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations improved the in vitro antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B and delayed or suppressed the regrowth of resistant subpopulation by time-kill studies. Ceftazidime/avibactam at around MIC values (0.5–1 × MIC) plus clinically achievable concentrations of polymyxin B (0.5–2 mg/L) resulted in sustained killing against polymyxin B-heteroresistant isolates. Active PmrAB and PhoPQ systems and a pmrA mutation (G53R) in resistant subpopulation might associate with heteroresistance, but further investigation was required. Our findings suggested that the heteroresistance represented barriers to polymyxin B efficacy, and the combination of polymyxin B with ceftazidime/avibactam could be potentially valuable for the treatment of heteroresistant CRKP. Further, in vivo studies need to be performed to evaluate the efficacy of this combination against heteroresistant strains.

Efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy or combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A meta-analysis

Clinicians may use ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other active agents to treat infections due to carbapenem-resistant organisms, although no conclusive data support this practice. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam as monotherapy or combination therapy against infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPa). An online literature search was conducted to identify observational studies published as full papers and indexed up to February 2019 comparing the efficacy, in terms of mortality and microbiological cure rates, of ceftazidime/avibactam monotherapy or combination therapy with other active agents for infections due to CRE or CRPa. The relative risk (RR) of mortality and microbiological eradication was estimated based on pooled data from all eligible studies. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis accounting for 396 subjects, of whom 202 received combination therapy. The mortality rate was 38.1% for combination therapy and 30.9% for monotherapy (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.88-1.58; P = 0.259). Similarly, no difference was found between the two groups when analysing the rate of microbiological cure (64.9% for combination therapy vs. 63.4% for monotherapy; RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.85-1.28, P = 0.705). Moreover, no difference was observed for both outcomes when patients infected with P. aeruginosa were excluded from the analysis. This meta-analysis suggests that use of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy or combination therapy for infections due to CRE or CRPa could show a similar effect on mortality and microbiological cure rates. Studies on larger samples are needed to address this important issue.

Emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-3-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in vivo

Objectives

The β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime/avibactam is active against KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Herein, we present molecular and phenotypic characterization of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-3-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that emerged in vivo and in vitro.

Methods

Sequence analysis of blaKPC-3 was performed from clinical and in vitro-generated ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates. Time–kill kinetics and the Galleria mellonella infection model were applied to evaluate the activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem alone and in combination.

Results

The ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant clinical K. pneumoniae isolate revealed the amino acid change D179Y in KPC-3. Sixteen novel mutational changes in KPC-3 among in vitro-selected ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates were described. Time–kill kinetics showed the emergence of a resistant subpopulation under selection pressure with either imipenem or ceftazidime/avibactam. However, combined selection pressure with imipenem plus ceftazidime/avibactam prevented the development of resistance and resulted in bactericidal activity. Concordantly, the G. mellonella infection model revealed that monotherapy with ceftazidime/avibactam is prone to select for resistance in vivo and that combination therapy with imipenem results in significantly better survival.

Conclusions

Ceftazidime/avibactam is a valuable antibiotic against MDR and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Based on time–kill kinetics as well as an in vivo infection model we postulate a combination therapy of ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem as a strategy to prevent the development of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-producing Enterobacterales in vivo.

Optimization and Characterization of a Galleria mellonella Larval Infection Model for Virulence Studies and the Evaluation of Therapeutics Against Streptococcus pneumoniae

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of bacterial pneumonia. Infection is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates and antibiotic resistance within this pathogen is on the rise. Therefore, there is a need for novel antimicrobial therapies. To lower the time and costs of the drug discovery process, alternative in vivo models should be considered. As such, Galleria mellonella larvae can be of great value. The larval immunity consisting of several types of haemocytes is remarkably similar to the human innate immune system. Furthermore, these larvae don’t require specific housing, are cheap and are easy to handle. In this study, the use of a G. mellonella infection model to study early pneumococcal infections and treatment is proposed. Firstly, the fitness of this model to study pneumococcal virulence factors is confirmed using streptococcal strains TIGR4, ATCC^®49619, D39 and its capsule-deficient counterpart R6 at different inoculum sizes. The streptococcal polysaccharide capsule is considered the most important virulence factor without which streptococci are unable to sustain an in vivo infection. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed indeed a higher larval survival after infection with streptococcal strain R6 compared to strain D39. Then, the infection was characterized by determining the number of haemocytes, production of oxygen free radicals and bacterial burden at several time points during the course of infection. Lastly, treatment of infected larvae with the standard antibiotics amoxicillin and moxifloxacin was evaluated. Treatment has proven to have a positive outcome on the course of infection, depending on the administered dosage. These data imply that G. mellonella larvae can be used to evaluate antimicrobial therapies against S. pneumoniae, apart from using the larval model to study streptococcal properties. The in-depth knowledge acquired regarding this model, makes it more suitable for use in future research.

Colistin Does Not Potentiate Ceftazidime-Avibactam Killing of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae In Vitro or Suppress Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance

We tested ceftazidime-avibactam and colistin against 24 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates by time-kill studies. Ceftazidime-avibactam at 0.25×, 1×, and 4× the MIC was bactericidal against 8%, 21%, and 88% of the isolates, respectively. Colistin (2 μg/ml) was bactericidal against 83% (12 h) and 42% (24 h) of the isolates. In combination, synergy and antagonism were identified against 13% and 46% of the isolates, respectively. The combination did not suppress ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Colistin plus ceftazidime-avibactam did not provide a benefit over ceftazidime-avibactam against most CRE isolates.

Antibacterial Activity of Human Simulated Epithelial Lining Fluid Concentrations of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Alone or in Combination with Amikacin Inhale (BAY41-6551) against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae

The role of inhalational combination therapy when treating carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae with newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors has not been established. Using a 72-h in vitro pharmacodynamic chemostat model, we simulated the human exposures achieved in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) following intravenous treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) 2.5 g every 8 h (q8h) alone and in combination with inhaled amikacin (AMK-I) 400 mg q12h, a reformulated aminoglycoside designed for inhalational administration, against three P. aeruginosa isolates (CZA [ceftazidime/avibactam] MICs, 4/4 to 8/4 μg/ml; AMK-I MICs, 8 to 64 μg/ml) and three K. pneumoniae isolates (CZA MICs, 1/4 to 8/4 μg/ml; AMK-I MICs, 32 to 64 μg/ml). Combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in 72-h CFU compared with that of CZA monotherapy against two of three P. aeruginosa isolates (-4.14 log₁₀ CFU/ml, P = 0.027; -1.42 log₁₀ CFU/ml, P = 0.020; and -0.4 log₁₀ CFU/ml, P = 0.298) and two of three K. pneumoniae isolates (0.04 log₁₀ CFU/ml, P = 0.963; -4.34 log₁₀ CFU/ml, P < 0.001; and -2.34 log₁₀ CFU/ml, P = 0.021). When measured by the area under the bacterial growth curve (AUBC) over 72 h, significant reductions were observed in favor of the combination regimen against all six isolates tested. AMK-I combination therapy successfully suppressed CZA resistance development in one K. pneumoniae isolate harboring bla_KPC-3 that was observed during CZA monotherapy. These studies suggest a beneficial role for combination therapy with intravenous CZA and inhaled AMK when treating pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.