Use of echinocandin prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation

Antifungal stewardship in solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antifungal stewardship (AFS) has emerged as an important component of quality in managing invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and cost-benefit calculations suggest regular training in AFS is well worth the effort.

METHODS

This review will discuss the most common IFIs in solid organ transplantation (SOT)-recipients, how to diagnose them, and current recommendations for antifungal treatment and prophylaxis before demonstrating key takeaway points of AFS in this high-risk population.

RESULTS

Effective AFS starts before a patient is admitted for SOT, through education and regular interactions of the interdisciplinary clinical team involved in patient management, considering local factors such as epidemiological data and knowledge of diagnostic options including local turnaround times. Understanding the spectrum of antifungal agents, their efficacy and safety profiles, and pharmacokinetics, as well as duration of therapy is hereby essential. The most frequent IFIs in SOT recipients are caused by Candida species, followed by Aspergillus species, both with increasing resistance rates. Diagnosis of IFI can be challenging due to unspecific clinical presentation and difficult interpretation of microbiological findings and biomarkers. Prophylactic strategies, such as those for invasive aspergillosis in lung transplantation or invasive candidiasis (IC) in certain liver transplant settings, as well as the selection of the appropriate therapeutic agents require detailed knowledge on the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antifungals.

CONCLUSIONS

Here in this review, we address what constitutes good AFS in this heterogeneous field of solid organ transplant recipients.

Breakthrough invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients exposed to prophylaxis with echinocandins vs other antifungal agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Although echinocandins are recommended as first-line prophylaxis for high-risk orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients, occurrence of breakthrough-invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remains a serious concern. We aim to assess the risk of breakthrough IFIs among OLT recipients exposed to prophylaxis with echinocandins compared to other antifungals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two authors independently searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, study registries and reference lists from inception to March 2021, to retrieve randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing efficacy and safety of echinocandins vs other antifungals for prophylaxis in OLT recipients. Data were independently extracted from two authors, and the quality of included studies was independently assessed according to ROB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. The primary outcome was occurrence of breakthrough IFI at the end of prophylaxis (EOP).

RESULTS

698 articles were screened, and ten studies (3 RCTs and 7 observational) were included. No difference between echinocandins and other antifungals in terms of breakthrough IFIs at the EOP emerged both from RCTs (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.24-2.99) and observational studies (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.28-7.40). No difference emerged also for secondary outcomes. In the subgroup comparison between echinocandins and polyenes, a trend for higher risk of breakthrough IFI at the EOP (OR 4.82, 95% CI 0.97-24.03) was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Echinocandins do not seem to be associated with increased risk of breakthrough IFIs in OLT recipients. However, the large diversity in the comparator group hinders a definitive interpretation. Further studies exploring the relationship between echinocandin use and breakthrough IFIs according to specific comparators are warranted.

Perioperative anidulafungin combined with triazole prophylaxis for the prevention of early invasive candidiasis in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Postoperative factors include prolonged hospital stay, central lines, delayed chest closure, and dehiscence increase IC risk. Correspondingly, current guidelines propose targeted IC coverage early posttransplant with fluconazole or an echinocandin.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was performed on LTRs from January 2016 to January 2020 and evaluated effectiveness of a recent protocol utilizing perioperative anidulafungin for early IC prevention in addition to long-term triazole antifungal prophylaxis. Prior to this protocol, patients were primarily established on itraconazole prophylaxis alone. The primary endpoint was proven or probable IC within 90 days after transplant. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to assess risk factors for invasive fungal infection (IFI).

RESULTS

Among 144 LTRs, there was a numerically lower incidence of IC in the protocol group, although not statistically significant (6% vs. 13%, p = 0.16). Incidence of proven or probable IFI was 7.5% in the protocol cohort and 19.5% in the pre-protocol cohort (p = 0.038). In multivariable analysis, when controlling for lung allocation score (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), donor perioperative culture with fungal growth (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.02-8.92), and dehiscence (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.14-10.85), protocol cohort was not significantly associated with IFI (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.12-1.23).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating combination triazole/echinocandin use in the early post-lung transplant period. These findings demonstrate that in-hospital anidulafungin offers unclear benefit for early IC prevention when used in combination with triazole prophylaxis.

Rates and causative pathogens of surgical site infections attributed to liver transplant procedures and other hepatic, biliary, or pancreatic procedures, 2015-2018

Liver transplant recipients are at high risk for surgical site infections (SSIs). Limited data are available on SSI epidemiology following liver transplant procedures (LTPs). We analyzed data on SSIs from 2015 to 2018 reported to CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network to determine rates, pathogen distribution, and antimicrobial resistance after LTPs and other hepatic, biliary, or pancreatic procedures (BILIs). LTP and BILI SSI rates were 5.7% and 5.9%, respectively. The odds of SSI after LTP were lower than after BILI (adjusted odds ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.85). Among LTP SSIs, 43.1% were caused by Enterococcus spp., 17.2% by Candida spp., and 15.0% by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (CNS). Percentages of SSIs caused by Enterococcus faecium or CNS were higher after LTPs than BILIs, whereas percentages of SSIs caused by Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus faecalis, or viridans streptococci were higher after BILIs. Antimicrobial resistance was common in LTP SSI pathogens, including E. faecium (69.4% vancomycin resistant); Escherichia coli (68.8% fluoroquinolone non-susceptible and 44.7% extended spectrum cephalosporin [ESC] non-susceptible); and Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca (39.4% fluoroquinolone non-susceptible and 54.5% ESC non-susceptible). National LTP SSI pathogen and resistance data can help prioritize studies to determine effective interventions to prevent SSIs and reduce antimicrobial resistance in liver transplant recipients.

Lethal thrombosis of the iliac artery caused by Aspergillus fumigatus after liver transplantation: case report and review of the literature

Background

Aspergillus fumigatus infections frequently occur after solid organ transplantation. Yet, a fungal thrombosis after liver transplantation is an exceptional finding.

Case presentation

We report on a 44-year-old female with an aspergillosis after liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis. On postoperative day (pod) 7, seizures occurred and imaging diagnostics revealed an intracranial lesion. Anidulafungin was initiated in suspicion of mycosis and switched to voriconazole on suspicion of an Aspergillus spp. infection. Progression of the cerebral lesion prompted craniotomy (pod 48) and the aspergillosis was verified. The patient was discharged with oral voriconazole therapy. Re-admission was necessary with acute-on-chronic renal failure after a tacrolimus overdose on pod 130. The patient received a pelvic angiography due to a temperature difference in the legs. It showed a complete iliac artery thrombosis which was subsecutively surgically removed. The histopathological examination revealed an Aspergillus fumigatus conglomerate. The patient died on pod 210 due to systemic aspergillosis.

Conclusion

The acute development of focal neurologic deficits is common in patients with an aspergillosis of the brain. Nevertheless, arterial thrombosis after Aspergillus fumigatus is less frequent and, to the best of our knowledge, its occurrence after liver transplantation has not yet been reported so far. Due to its rarity, we added a review of the literature to this manuscript.

Geotrichum capitatum Invasive Infection Early After Liver Transplant

Geotrichum capitatum is a rare fungal pathogen that has infrequently affected immunocompromised patients with onco-hematologic diseases. Geotrichum capitatum invasive infection has been associated with poor prognosis, with a mortality rate ranging from 50% to 90%. Here, we report the first case of Geotrichum capitatum invasive fungal infection in a liver transplant recipient from an unrelated deceased donor, who was effectively treated with amphotericin B and voriconazole. We also reviewed the available literature in the field.

Factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations in kidney transplant patients with high incidence of invasive fungal infections

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Caspofungin is commonly used in kidney transplant patients for prophylaxis or treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) caused by Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. Factors such as concomitant medications, co-morbidity and rejection often cause caspofungin pharmacokinetic parameters alterations in kidney transplant patients. Here, we aimed to investigate factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations and evaluate its prophylaxis and treatment efficiency for IFIs in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

The prophylaxis and treatment efficiency of caspofungin for IFIs were assessed in 164 kidney transplant patients in the study. Six hundred and fifty-two caspofungin trough concentrations (C_min ) from the 164 patients were monitored by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Basic demographic variables, baseline disease, surgery, rejection, indwelling catheter, coinfection, concomitant medication and other caspofungin-related factors were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess factors influencing caspofungin plasma concentrations.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The success rates were 94.96% (132/139) for caspofungin prevention and 80% (20/25) for caspofungin for IFIs. Caspofungin C_min in the kidney recipients varied largely compared with healthy volunteers (0.10-12.25 mg/L vs. 1.12-1.78 mg/L). Caspofungin C_min significantly increased in patients with continuous renal replacement therapy before transplantation (P = .001), concomitant medication of cyclosporine A (CsA, P = .009), ALB concentration of > 30 g/L (P = .019).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This is an uncontrolled observational study of caspofungin as prophylaxis or treatment for IFIs in kidney transplant patients. Caspofungin could be an effective and well-tolerated option for antifungal prophylaxis and treatment in kidney transplant patients, and a number of factors could influence caspofungin C_min in these patients.

Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in liver transplantation: implications for target attainment for infections with Candida albicans and non-albicans spp

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to assess the population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole and the adequacy of current dosages and breakpoints against Candida albicans and non-albicans spp. in liver transplant (LT) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients initiated i.v. fluconazole within 1 month from liver transplantation (LTx) for prevention or treatment of Candida spp. infections. Multiple assessments of trough and peak plasma concentrations of fluconazole were undertaken in each patient by means of therapeutic drug monitoring. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to define the probability of target attainment (PTA) with a loading dose (LD) of 400, 600, and 800 mg at day 1, 7, 14, and 28 from LTx, followed by a maintenance dose (MD) of 100, 200, and 300 mg daily of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of AUC_24h/MIC ratio ≥ 55.2.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were recruited. A two-compartment model with first-order intravenous input and first-order elimination was developed. Patient's age and time elapsed from LTx were the covariates included in the final model. At an MIC of 2 mg/L, a LD of 600 mg was required for optimal PTAs between days 1 and 20 from LTx, while 400 mg was sufficient from days 21 on. A MD of 200 mg was required for patients aged 40-49 years old, while a dose of 100 mg was sufficient for patients aged ≥ 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluconazole dosages of 100-200 mg daily may ensure optimal PTA against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. Higher dosages are required against C. glabrata. Estimated creatinine clearance is not a reliable predictor of fluconazole clearance in LT patients.

What has changed in the treatment of invasive candidiasis? A look at the past 10 years and ahead

The treatment of invasive candidiasis has changed greatly in the past decade and must continue to evolve if we are to improve outcomes in this serious infection. A review of recent history may provide insights for the future. The morbidity and mortality of invasive candidiasis remain difficult to measure despite an obvious clinical burden. Current treatment guidelines now recommend echinocandins as first-line empirical treatment, with fluconazole as an acceptable alternative for selected patients, reflecting the efficacy demonstrated by echinocandins and increasing resistance observed with fluconazole. The selection of antifungal therapy now must consider not only resistance but also the shift in predominance from Candida albicans to non-albicans species, notably Candida glabrata. The recent emergence of Candida auris has been met with great interest, although the longer-term implications of this phenomenon remain unclear. The broad goal of treatment continues to be administration of safe, efficacious antifungal therapy as soon as possible. Diagnostic methods beyond traditional blood culture present an opportunity to shorten the time to an accurate diagnosis, and earlier treatment initiation based on prophylactic and empirical or pre-emptive strategies seeks to ensure timely therapeutic intervention. In addition, there are novel agents in the antifungal pipeline. These developments, as well as ongoing studies of dosing, toxicity and resistance development, are important items on the current research agenda and may play a role in future changes to the treatment of invasive candidiasis.