Rare occurrence of doravirine resistance-associated mutations in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients

DORAVIR: a French national survey of people with HIV-1 treated with an antiretroviral regimen including doravirine

BACKGROUND

Doravirine is the latest NNRTI to be approved for the treatment of HIV-1 and has a different resistance profile from first-generation NNRTIs. Our aim was to investigate the virological efficacy of antiretroviral treatment including doravirine in people living with HIV-1 (PLWHIV), the factors associated with virological failure (VF) and those associated with the emergence of reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations in the case of VF.

METHODS

A retrospective national survey of PLWHIV who were either naive or experienced on antiretroviral treatment including doravirine was conducted. VF was defined as two consecutive plasma viral loads (VLs) of ≥50 copies/mL or one VL of ≥200 copies/mL. Genotypic resistance tests were interpreted using the Stanford (v9.4.1) and ANRS (v33) algorithms.

RESULTS

Of the 589 PLWHIV treated with a doravirine-containing regimen, 8.5% were naive and 91.5% had prior antiretroviral experience; 56.9% were infected with HIV-1 B subtype. Overall, 88.3% and 85.1% of participants were virologically controlled at Month (M)3 and M6 of doravirine treatment, respectively. In multivariable analysis, CRF02_AG subtype, higher zenith plasma HIV-1 RNA VL, doravirine initiation in the context of failure and baseline V179D mutation presence were associated with VF. Among 88 PLWHIV who experienced virological failure at M6, 15.9% had a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) HIV RT mutations. In multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with the occurrence of mutations was a genotypic sensitivity score that was not fully sensitive.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is one of the largest to characterize the virological efficacy of doravirine-containing regimens in clinical practice and to identify factors associated with VF or emergence of resistance mutations that should be considered in clinical management.

Prevalence and Phenotypic Susceptibility to Doravirine of the HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase V106I Polymorphism in B and Non-B Subtypes

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding the susceptibility of the reverse transcriptase V106 polymorphism to doravirine.

METHODS

Doravirine susceptibility was measured in site-directed mutants (SDMs) containing V106I, V106A, V106M, and Y188L mutations in subtype B (NL4-3, HXB2) and CRF02_AG background and in recombinant viruses with RT harboring V106I alone derived from 50 people with HIV.

RESULTS

HIV-1 B subtype was detected in 1523 of 2705 cases. Prevalence of V106I was 3.2% in B and 2.5% in non-B subtypes, and was higher in subtype F (8.1%) and D (14.3%). Fold-changes (FC) in susceptibility for SDMs were below doravirine biological cutoff (3.0) for V106I, but not for V106A, V106M, and Y188L. Clinically derived viruses tested included 22 B (median FC, 1.2; interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-1.6) and 28 non-B subtypes (median FC, 1.8; IQR, 0.9-3.0). Nine (18%) viruses showed FC values equal or higher than the doravirine biological FC cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of the HIV-1 RT V106I polymorphism in MeditRes HIV consortium remains low, but significantly more prevalent in subtypes D and F. V106I minimally decreased the susceptibility to doravirine in SDMs and most clinical isolates. Reduced susceptibility seems to occur at increased frequency in subtype F1; however, the clinical impact remains to be investigated.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04894357.

Recommendations for the use of antiretroviral therapy in adults living with human immunodeficiency virus in Singapore

ABSTRACT

Since the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), the mortality attributable to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has decreased by 80%. Newer antiretroviral agents are highly efficacious, have minimal side effects as compared to older drugs, and can be formulated as combination tablets to reduce patients' pill burden. Despite these advances, 680,000 people worldwide died of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related illnesses in 2020. The National ART and Monitoring Recommendations by the National HIV Programme have been created to guide physicians on the prescribing of ART based on the patients' needs. These recommendations are based on international guidelines and tailored to the local context and unique domestic considerations. We hoped that with the publication of these recommendations, the care of people living with HIV can be enhanced, bringing us closer to ending HIV in our lifetime.

Doravirine Plus Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors as a 2-Drug Treatment-Switch Strategy in People Living with HIV: The Real-Life DORINI Multicentric Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Few data are available about the efficacy, durability, and tolerability of doravirine (DOR) + integrase strand inhibitors (INI) as a switching strategy among antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH).

SETTING

Retrospective, multicenter cohort study investigating the durability, efficacy, and tolerability of 2 off-label drug associations of DOR + INI among ART-experienced PLWH.

METHODS

The study included PLWH who switched to DOR combined with either raltegravir (RAL) or dolutegravir (DTG) between June 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, with at least 1 follow-up (FU) visit. Virologic, biometric, and metabolic parameters were evaluated at baseline (T0) and at 1-3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses assessed the 28-week probability of persistence on the regimens. Patient satisfaction was measured using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ninety-five PLWH were included, 52 in DOR + RAL and 43 in DOR + DTG. Six treatment discontinuations were reported during a mean of 37 (±17) weeks of FU (incidence of 2.7 × 1000 person-weeks FU). Only 2 were the result of virological failure without resistance mutations. DOR + DTG demonstrated significantly higher 28-week persistence than DOR + RAL (HR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.24-2.90, log-rank: P = 0.003). Weight, waist circumference, and fasting lipids reduced considerably at T3 vs T0. Overall, high satisfaction with the new treatment was reported, particularly in the DOR + RAL (68 (64-72)/72), compared with the DOR + DTG group (58 (50-65)/72, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience revealed few treatment discontinuations, improved metabolic parameters, and high patient satisfaction among ART-experienced PLWH switching to DOR combined with INI, irrespective of the specific INI used.

Prophylaxis by doravirine-lamivudine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or elvitegravir-cobicistat-emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide after sexual exposure to HIV

HIV post- exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a prevention tool for individuals with a recent potential exposure to HIV. Doravirine has been available since 2019 in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine and has not been evaluated as a PEP. DOR/3TC/TDF is our department's most commonly prescribed PEP treatment since 2021. This study evaluates the completion rate of the DOR/3TC/TDF as compared to EVG/c/FTC/TAF for PEP, which was the regimen prescribed until 2020 in our hospital.This retrospective observational study was conducted between January 2020 and September 2021. The subjects included consecutively were adults who consulted for an HIV sexual exposure accident and for whom DOR/3TC/TDF in 2021 or EVG/c/FTC/TAF in 2020 was prescribed. The outcomes were the completion rate to the end of treatment (28 days), the seroconversion rate, and the description of side effects.During the study period, 311 people were included: 140 treated with DOR/3TC/TDF and 171 treated with EVGc/FTC/TAF. Considering subjects with a follow-up visit, the completion rate was 96.8% (90/93) in the DOR/3TC/TDF group, and 94.6% (123/130) in the EVG/c/FTC/TAF group (p-value: 0.53). The number of people lost to follow-up was nearly equivalent in both groups: 27.1% (38/140) in the DOR/3TC/TDF group and 23.4% (40/171) in the EVG/c/FTC/TAF group (p-value: 0.45). A side effect was described for 38% (36/94) in the DOR/3TC/TDF group, and 29.7% (38/128) in the EVG/c/FTC/TAF group. No cases of seroconversion were observed.DOR/3TC/TDF appears to have a similar safety profile to EVG/c/FTC/TAF. Due to its lower cost, it seems to be a treatment option for consideration in the context of HIV-exposure accidents.

Doravirine responses to HIV-1 viruses bearing mutations to NRTIs and NNRTIs under in vitro selective drug pressure

OBJECTIVES

The NNRTI doravirine has been recently approved for the first-line treatment of HIV-infected patients, eliciting favourable responses against viruses bearing the K103N, Y181C and G190A mutations. This study used in vitro drug selections to elaborate the breadth of doravirine responses against viruses bearing NNRTI and NRTI resistance-associated mutations (RAMs).

METHODS

WT clinical isolates (n = 6) and viruses harbouring common NRTI and NNRTI RAMs (n = 6) were serially passaged in escalating concentrations of doravirine, doravirine/islatravir, doravirine/lamivudine and rilpivirine over 24 weeks. Genotypic analysis ascertained the appearance and accumulation of NNRTI RAMs. Phenotypic drug susceptibility assays assessed resistance conferred by acquired NNRTI RAMs.

RESULTS

For WT viruses, doravirine pressure led to the appearance of V108I or V106A/I/M RAMs after 8 weeks, conferring low-level (∼2-fold) resistance. After 24 weeks, the accumulation of three to six secondary RAMs, including F227L, M230L, L234I and/or Y318, resulted in high-level (>100-fold) resistance to doravirine. Notably, viruses with these doravirine RAMs remained susceptible to rilpivirine and efavirenz. This contrasted with rilpivirine where acquisition of E138K, L100I and/or K101E resulted in >50-fold cross-resistance to all NNRTIs. Doravirine selection of viruses bearing common NRTI and NNRTI RAMs showed delayed acquisition of RAMs compared with WT virus. Pairing doravirine with islatravir or lamivudine attenuated the development of NNRTI RAMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Doravirine showed favourable resistance profiles against viruses harbouring NRTI and NNRTI RAMs. The high barrier to resistance to doravirine coupled with the long intracellular half-life of islatravir may provide the opportunity for long-acting treatment options.

Changes in Metabolic Profile in PLWHIV Switching to Doravirine-Based Regimen

Thanks to the modern ARV regimens and the fact that the morbidity and mortality of metabolic syndrome increases with age, clinicians are continuously researching effective and safe antiretroviral regimens with low impact on the lipid profile. Doravirine (DOR) is the latest non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that shows long-term safety and tolerability and a favorable lipid profile. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of DOR-based three-drug regimens on the lipid profile in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 38 treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH) switching to this regimen, following the eligibility criteria. We carried out comparison analysis of immunological and metabolic parameters between baseline and 48 weeks of follow up. In our cohort of treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed PLWH, three-drug regimens with DOR showed good efficacy and a positive profile on lipid metabolism at 48 weeks of follow up.

Future of Antiretroviral Drugs and Evolution of HIV-1 Drug Resistance

Highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy has been used for many years, but the use in low- and middle-income countries of antiretroviral drugs with low genetic barrier to resistance, combined with limited availability of viral load testing, has led to higher rates of acquired drug resistance, sustaining the rate of transmitted drug resistance. Here, we describe the evolution of ARV drugs with the ongoing development of injectable long-acting forms and the requirements regarding all new ARV drugs (i.e., no transmitted drug resistance, no cross-resistance and high genetic barrier to resistance). Then, we report the evolution of both transmitted and acquired resistance regarding new ARV drugs. The WHO has set very ambitious but motivating goals for HIV testing, treatment and viral suppression, aiming to achieve rates of 95% for all three by 2025. Reaching these goals requires a wide implementation and use of close virological monitoring in LMICs.

Real-life use of Doravirine in treatment-experienced people living with HIV: A multicenter Italian study

Use of doravirine (DOR), a new nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors recently approved for HIV treatment, is still unclear in clinical practice and real-life data are scarce. We retrospectively investigated the rationale for switching people with HIV to DOR-containing/-based regimens in a real-life cohort. Among 132 patients (68.9% males, median age 56 years), the main reasons to start DOR were prevention of toxicities (39.4%) and dyslipidemia (18.2%). DOR was combined with integrase inhibitors in 40.9% cases, and in 25.7% of patients, DOR was prescribed without availability of a genotypic resistance test. Twenty-four weeks after the switch to DOR-containing/-based regimens, no significant changes in CD4+ T-cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, detectable HIV-RNA, serum creatinine levels, and body weight were detected. By contrast, a significant reduction in lipids (both cholesterol and triglycerides) was observed in 52 patients for whom a follow-up assessment was available (P = .008 and .01, respectively). Our data confirmed that switching to DOR-containing/-based regimens may have a favorable impact on lipid profile and a neutral impact on weight gain. However, more data are needed to support its use in patients who do not have a genotypic test available or have an extensive nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors-associated resistance, as well as its use in a dual regimen, especially in combination with second-generation integrase inhibitors.

Approved HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the past decade

HIV reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors are the important components of highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAARTs) for anti-HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis in clinical practice. Many RT inhibitors and their combination regimens have been approved in the past ten years, but a review on their drug discovery, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy is lacking. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of RT inhibitors (tenofovir alafenamide, rilpivirine, doravirine, dapivirine, azvudine and elsulfavirine) approved in the past decade, regarding their drug discovery, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy in randomized controlled trials. Novel RT inhibitors such as islatravir, MK-8504, MK-8507, MK8583, IQP-0528, and MIV-150 will be also highlighted. Future development may focus on the new generation of novel antiretroviral inhibitors with higher bioavailability, longer elimination half-life, more favorable side-effect profiles, fewer drug-drug interactions, and higher activities against circulating drug-resistant strains.

Indolylarylsulfones bearing phenylboronic acid and phenylboronate ester functionalities as potent HIV‑1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

To explore the chemical space around the entrance channel of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) binding pocket, we innovatively designed and synthesized a series of novel indolylarylsulfones (IASs) bearing phenylboronic acid and phenylboronate ester functionalities at the indole-2-carboxamide as new HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) through structure-based drug design. All the newly synthesized compounds exhibited excellent to moderate potency against wild-type (WT) HIV-1 with EC₅₀ values ranging from 6.7 to 42.6 nM. Among all, (3-ethylphenyl)boronic acid substituted indole-2-carboxamide and (4-ethylphenyl) boronate ester substituted indole-2-carboxamide were found to be the most potent inhibitors (EC₅₀ = 8.5 nM, SI = 3310; EC₅₀ = 6.7 nM, SI = 3549, respectively). Notably, (3-ethylphenyl)boronic acid substituted indole-2-carboxamide maintained excellent activities against the single HIV-1 mutants L100I (EC₅₀ = 7.3 nM), K103N (EC₅₀ = 9.2 nM), as well as the double mutant V106A/F227L (EC₅₀ = 21.1 nM). Preliminary SARs and molecular modelling studies are also discussed in detail.

Doravirine: its role in HIV treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed evidence concerning the novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor doravirine, aiming to identify situations where it may be selected in preference to integrase inhibitors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Doravirine is licenced for the treatment of HIV-1 in North America and Europe. In two multicentre randomized controlled trials, noninferiority with comparator drugs efavirenz and darunavir/ritonavir was observed at 96 weeks. Doravirine is associated with a lower incidence of neuropsychiatric side effects relative to efavirenz, and favourable lipid changes relative to darunavir over 96 weeks. A lower incidence of weight gain, relative to indirect comparisons with integrase inhibitors, was observed. Doravirine has a high genetic barrier to resistance with retained activity in the presence of single NNRTI mutations K103N, Y181C and G190A. Primary drug resistance is infrequent and may be higher in South Africa relative to European populations. Doravirine may be used in renal or hepatic impairment and has a low potential for drug-drug interactions.

SUMMARY

Doravirine is a well tolerated and effective agent in ART-naive patients. Direct comparison with integrase inhibitors, and evidence on the outcomes of treatment with doravirine in the presence of prior NNRTI experience are required to better elucidate which patients will benefit most from doravirine therapy.

Low prevalence of doravirine-associated resistance mutations among polish human immunodeficiency-1 (HIV-1)–infected patients

Introduction

Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that retains activity against common NNRTI resistance mutations. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of DOR resistance mutations compared with that of resistance mutations for other NNRTIs among HIV-1-infected treatment‐experienced and -naïve patients from Poland.

Methods

Resistance to DOR and other NNRTIs was assessed in two datasets: 1760 antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1 patients and 200 treatment‐experienced patients. All 1960 sequences were derived from the patients using bulk sequencing. For resistance analyses, Stanford HIV drug resistance database scores were used.

Results

Overall, DOR resistance was present in 32 patients (1.62%), of whom 13 (0.74%) were naïve and 19 (9.50%) were treatment-experienced. The most common DOR resistance mutations observed among the naïve patients were A98G and K101E (0.2% each), and those among cART-experienced patients were L100I (2.0%), K101E, V108I, H221Y, and P225H (1.5% each). Furthermore, among the naïve patients, less common resistance to DOR (0.7%) compared with that to nevirapine (NVP) (2.1%; p = 0.0013) and rilpivirine (5.40%; p < 0.0001) was observed. For sequences obtained from treatment-experienced patients, the frequency of resistance to DOR (9.5%) was lower than that for efavirenz (25.5%; p < 0.0001) and NVP (26.0%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The frequency of transmitted drug resistance to DOR is low, allowing for effective treatment of antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients and rapid treatment initiation. In cART-experienced patients, this agent remains an attractive NNRTI option with a higher genetic barrier to resistance.

Cell culture selections reveal favourable drug resistance profiles for doravirine and islatravir

BACKGROUND

The newer generation NNRTIs, including doravirine and rilpivirine, were designed to show high potency and overcome K103N, Y181C and G190A resistance.

OBJECTIVES

To assess emergent resistance to doravirine and rilpivirine, alone and paired with lamivudine or islatravir through in vitro drug selections.

METHODS

Subtype B (n = 3), non-B subtype (n = 3), and pNL4.3 viral isolates were passaged in cord blood mononuclear cells with progressively increasing concentrations of drug(s). Genotypic analysis compared the acquisition and accumulation of drug resistance mutations at weeks 8 and 24 following drug pressure. Cell-based phenotypic assays assessed cross-resistance patterns to NNRTIs by acquired resistance mutations.

RESULTS

Doravirine pressure resulted in the acquisition of V108I (6/7) and V106A/I/M (5/7) mutations at weeks 8, followed by F227L (4/7), Y318F (4/7), M230L (2/7) or L234I (2/7) by weeks 24. In contrast, rilpivirine resulted in E138K (5/7) followed by L100I (3/7), K101E (1/7), or M230L (1/7). Doravirine resistance pathways retained susceptibility to rilpivirine, whereas rilpivirine resistance conferred intermediate resistance (12-152-fold) to doravirine. Dual selections with islatravir or lamivudine delayed and diminished emergent resistance to doravirine, resulting in V108I (9/15) with fewer or no other changes at weeks 24. There was a lesser delay in emergent resistance to rilpivirine when combined with islatravir or lamivudine. The M184V mutation did not arise in dual selections with islatravir or lamivudine.

CONCLUSIONS

Doravirine showed a more robust resistance profile compared with other NNRTIs. The long intracellular half-life of islatravir and delayed acquisition of resistance in dual selections provide an opportunity for long-acting treatment options.

The algorithm used for the interpretation of doravirine transmitted drug resistance strongly influences clinical practice and guideline recommendations

OBJECTIVES

We report the results of the reverse transcriptase (RT)/protease (PR) transmitted drug resistance (TDR) prevalence study in 2018, focusing on doravirine resistance-associated mutations and the differences observed when Stanford or French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS)/Spanish Network of AIDS Research (RIS)/IAS-USA resistance interpretation algorithms are used to describe clinically relevant resistance.

METHODS

We used the WHO 2009 list to investigate the prevalence of NNRTI, NRTI and PI TDR, in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients, adding mutations E138A/G/K/Q/R, V106I, V108I, V179L, G190Q, H221Y, F227C/L/V, M230IDR, L234I, P236L and Y318F in RT. The prevalence of doravirine resistance-associated mutations, as described by Soulie et al. in 2019, was evaluated. Clinically relevant TDR was investigated using the latest versions of ANRS, RIS, IAS-USA and Stanford algorithms.

RESULTS

NNRTI mutations were detected in 82 of 606 (13.5%) patients. We found 18 patients (3.0%) with NRTI mutations and 5 patients (0.8%) with PI mutations. We detected 11 patients harbouring doravirine resistance-associated mutations (prevalence of 1.8%). Furthermore, we observed important differences in clinically relevant resistance to doravirine when ANRS/RIS (0.7%), IAS-USA (0.5%) or Stanford algorithms (5.0%) were used. V106I, which was detected in 3.8% of the patients, was the main mutation driving these differences. V106I detection was not associated with any of the clinical, demographic or virological characteristics of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of NRTI and PI TDR remains constant in Spain. Doravirine TDR is very infrequent by RIS/ANRS/IAS-USA algorithms, in contrast with results using the Stanford algorithm. Further genotype-phenotype studies are necessary to elucidate the role of V106I in doravirine resistance.

Is there a role for doravirine in African HIV treatment programmes? A large observational resistance study in South Africa

INTRODUCTION

Dolutegravir has replaced efavirenz in most low- and middle-income countries, due to better tolerability and formidable resistance profile, but dolutegravir side effects suggest alternatives are needed. We evaluated doravirine resistance in South Africa as a first step to assess whether doravirine may replace dolutegravir.

METHODS

A retrospective dataset was analysed for predicted doravirine susceptibility, including sequences obtained from three patient groups. First, data from 277 patients initiating antiretroviral treatment (ART) were collected between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Second, data from 788 patients experiencing NNRTI-based ART failure were obtained between February 2013 and October 2014 as part of a national survey. Third, data derived from 584 patients who had genotypic drug resistance testing requested after NNRT-based failure as part of individual patient management between January 2016 and December 2019. Pol sequences were generated using validated population-based in-house genotyping and submitted to Stanford HIVdb v8.9.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Less than 5% of patients initiating ART presented with genotypic doravirine resistance, whereas most patients experiencing NNRTI-based ART failure presented with predicted intermediate (41.0%) or high-level resistance (43.8%) to doravirine. High-level resistance to doravirine was commonly predicted by the presence of at least three DRMs (79.7%). The predicted resistance profile to doravirine in ART-naïve patients is promising, but less so in those experiencing failure to first-generation NNRTIs. Accumulation of NNRTI DRMs seems to be an important factor in the poor resistance prediction for doravirine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although doravirine is approved as initial therapy in patients who are ART-naïve, it is currently recommended to obtain a genotype prior to the initiation of ART. Clinical studies are needed to ascertain whether predicted resistance profiles in ART naïve and NNRTI-treated patients translate into poor clinical outcomes, especially in settings where genotypic resistance testing is not available.

Surveillance of HIV-1 primary infections in France from 2014 to 2016: toward stable resistance, but higher diversity, clustering and virulence?

OBJECTIVES

Patients with primary HIV-1 infection (PHI) are a particular population, giving important insight about ongoing evolution of transmitted drug resistance-associated mutation (TDRAM) prevalence, HIV diversity and clustering patterns. We describe these evolutions of PHI patients diagnosed in France from 2014 to 2016.

METHODS

A total of 1121 PHI patients were included. TDRAMs were characterized using the 2009 Stanford list and the French ANRS algorithm. Viral subtypes and recent transmission clusters (RTCs) were also determined.

RESULTS

Patients were mainly MSM (70%) living in the Paris area (42%). TDRAMs were identified among 10.8% of patients and rose to 18.6% when including etravirine and rilpivirine TDRAMs. Prevalences of PI-, NRTI-, first-generation NNRTI-, second-generation NNRTI- and integrase inhibitor-associated TDRAMs were 2.9%, 5.0%, 4.0%, 9.4% and 5.4%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, age >40 years and non-R5 tropic viruses were associated with a >2-fold increased risk of TDRAMs. Regarding HIV diversity, subtype B and CRF02_AG (where CRF stands for circulating recombinant form) were the two main lineages (56% and 20%, respectively). CRF02_AG was associated with higher viral load than subtype B (5.83 versus 5.40 log10 copies/mL, P=0.004). We identified 138 RTCs ranging from 2 to 14 patients and including overall 41% from the global population. Patients in RTCs were younger, more frequently born in France and more frequently MSM.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2007, the proportion of TDRAMs has been stable among French PHI patients. Non-B lineages are increasing and may be associated with more virulent CRF02_AG strains. The presence of large RTCs highlights the need for real-time cluster identification to trigger specific prevention action to achieve better control of the epidemic.

Review of Doravirine Resistance Patterns Identified in Participants During Clinical Development

Background:

Doravirine (DOR) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in patients with no known DOR resistance-associated mutations. DOR was rationally designed to address limitations associated with other approved NNRTIs, particularly resistance from common NNRTI resistance-associated mutants containing K103N, Y181C, or G190A reverse transcriptase substitutions.

Setting:

Data to date from both in vitro studies and clinical trials have been compiled to summarize the resistance profile of DOR.

Methods:

We analyzed data from in vitro studies and phase 2 and 3 trials to assess the emergence of resistance-associated mutations and their impact on efficacy among participants treated with DOR.

Results:

DOR exhibited a distinct resistance profile compared with efavirenz and rilpivirine in vitro and in vivo; mutant viruses that were resistant to DOR showed limited cross-resistance to efavirenz and rilpivirine. In clinical trials, the development of DOR resistance-associated substitutions in reverse transcriptase was uncommon.

Conclusion:

Overall, minimal cross-resistance across NNRTIs was observed for DOR and limited development of DOR-related resistance. These data should assist clinicians in further understanding the resistance profile of DOR, so appropriate treatment decisions can be made for their patients.

Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Drug Interaction Profile of Doravirine

Doravirine is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that has demonstrated good efficacy, tolerability, and safety for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection in phase III clinical trials. Doravirine achieved non-inferiority when compared with efavirenz- and darunavir/ritonavir-based regimens. Fewer adverse effects, including neuropsychiatric effects were observed with doravirine compared with efavirenz. Key pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics as well as drug-drug interactions and the resistance profile were assessed in this clinical review. Doravirine is a pyridinone NNRTI with potent antiviral activity against wild-type HIV-1 virus and common NNRTI variants. Studies in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected individuals have shown that doravirine has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for once-daily dosing, with an elimination half-life of around 15 h, median time to maximum plasma concentrations of 1-4 h, and time to steady-state concentration of 7 days. The pharmacokinetics of doravirine are not greatly influenced by sex, age, race, or hepatic impairment. Although no dose adjustment is required for doravirine in renal impairment when given as a single tablet, the fixed-dose combination tablet of doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is not recommended in patients with a creatinine clearance of < 50 mL/min. Doravirine has a low potential for drug-drug interactions and does not impact on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs. However, it is metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes and is thus susceptible to interactions with CYP3A inhibitors and inducers. Strong CYP3A inhibitors can significantly increase doravirine exposure; however, this is not considered to be clinically relevant. Conversely, strong CYP3A inducers, such as rifampin, are contraindicated with doravirine owing to a significant reduction in exposure with potential for impaired virological efficacy. Moderate CYP3A inducers, such as rifabutin, may be co-administered if the doravirine dose is increased to 100 mg twice daily. Doravirine has a unique resistance profile and has demonstrated in vitro activity against some of the most common, clinically relevant NNRTI-resistant mutations. Prevalence of baseline NNRTI resistance to doravirine appears to be low in treatment-naïve cohorts. Further data on the efficacy of doravirine in patients with previous treatment experience and/or transmitted NNRTI resistance are required to further inform its place in the current armamentarium of drugs for the treatment of HIV infection.

Doravirine and Its Potential in the Treatment of HIV: An Evidence-Based Review of the Emerging Data

The utility of doravirine in the management of HIV-1 infection is approved for use in patients who are antiretroviral-naïve as well as patients who have achieved stable virologic suppression and are interested in replacing their current antiretroviral therapy. The role of doravirine continues to evolve as data emerges on the potential for new combination therapy with the investigational agent, islatravir, as well as a potential strategy to minimize post-marketing safety concerns with recommended first-line agents, such as integrase inhibitors. The goal of this review is to assess recent and emerging data on the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, doravirine.

Prevalence of doravirine-associated resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-experienced patients from two large databases in France and Italy

Objectives

Doravirine, a novel NNRTI, selects for specific mutations in vitro, including mutations at reverse transcriptase (RT) positions 106, 108, 188, 227, 230 and 234. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of doravirine-associated resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-experienced patients.

Methods

Doravirine-associated resistance mutations identified in vitro or in vivo were studied in a set of 9199 HIV-1 RT sequences from HIV-1 antiretroviral-experienced patients, including 381 NNRTI-failing patients in France and Italy between 2012 and 2017. The following mutations were considered as resistance mutations: V106A/M, V108I, Y188L, G190S, F227C/L/V, M230I/L, L234I, P236L, K103N + Y181C, K103N + P225H and K103N + L100I.

Results

The frequencies of doravirine-associated resistance mutations (total dataset versus NNRTI-failing patients) were: V106A/M, 0.8% versus 2.6%; V108I, 3.3% versus 9.2%; Y188L, 1.2% versus 2.6%; G190S, 0.3% versus 2.1%; F227C/L/V, 0.5% versus 1.8%; M230I/L, 2.8% versus 0%; L234I, 0.1% versus 0.5%; K103N + Y181C, 3.9% versus 3.9%; K103N + P225H, 2.9% versus 4.7%; and K103N + L100I, 1.7% versus 3.9%, with a significantly higher proportion of these mutations in the NNRTI-failing group (P &lt; 0.05), except for M230I/L and K103N + Y181C. The overall prevalence of sequences with at least one doravirine-associated resistance mutation was 12.2% and 34.9% in the total dataset and NNRTI-failing patients (P &lt; 0.001), respectively. In comparison, the prevalence of the common NNRTI mutations V90I, K101E/P, K103N/S, E138A/G/K/Q/R/S, Y181C/I/V and G190A/E/S/Q were higher (8.9%, 7.9%, 28.6%, 12.6%, 14.2% and 8.9%, respectively).

Conclusions

These results suggest that doravirine resistance in antiretroviral-experienced patients generally and specifically among NNRTI-failing patients is lower than resistance to other NNRTIs currently used, confirming its distinguishing resistance pattern.

Doravirine: A Return of the NNRTI Class?

Objective: To compare and contrast doravirine (DOR) with other agents in the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) class, review safety and efficacy data from both completed and ongoing clinical trials, and outline the potential place in therapy of DOR. Data Sources: A literature search using the PubMed database (inception to June 2019) was conducted using the search terms HIV, doravirine, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, NNRTI, and MK-1439. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Clinical data were limited to those published in the English language from phase 2 or 3 clinical trials. Ongoing trials were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov. Data Synthesis: DOR was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on the strength of 2 phase 3 randomized, double-blind, noninferiority clinical trials with additional studies currently underway examining its utility in other clinical scenarios. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The role of NNRTIs as part of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy has diminished in recent years given the introduction of more tolerable individual ARV agents and regimens. Despite this, new agents are still needed in the therapeutic arena because treatment failure as well as intolerance can still occur with many first-line therapies. The optimal place in therapy of DOR remains to be defined. Conclusions: DOR is a new NNRTI that represents a potential treatment option for treatment-naïve patients, without many of the previously described untoward effects of the NNRTI class.