Antimicrobial stewardship: an evaluation of structure and process and their association with antimicrobial prescribing in NHS hospitals in England

A systematic review of national interventions and policies to optimize antibiotic use in healthcare settings in England

OBJECTIVES

To identify and assess the effectiveness of national antibiotic optimization interventions in primary and secondary care in England (2013-2022).

METHODS

A systematic scoping review was conducted. Literature databases (Embase and Medline) were used to identify interventions and evaluations. Reports included the UK AMR Strategy (2013-2018), National Action Plan (2019-2024) and English Surveillance Programme for Antimicrobial Utilisation and Resistance (ESPAUR) reports (2014-2022). The design, focus and quality of evaluations and the interventions' effectiveness were extracted.

FINDINGS

Four hundred and seventy-seven peer-reviewed studies and 13 reports were screened. One hundred and three studies were included for review, identifying 109 interventions in eight categories: policy and commissioning (n = 9); classifications (n = 1); guidance and toolkits (n = 22); monitoring and feedback (n = 17); professional engagement and training (n = 19); prescriber tools (n = 12); public awareness (n = 17); workforce and governance (n = 12).Most interventions lack high-quality effectiveness evidence. Evaluations mainly focused on clinical, microbiological or antibiotic use outcomes, or intervention implementation, often assessing how interventions were perceived to affect behaviour. Only 16 interventions had studies that quantified effects on prescribing, of which six reported reductions. The largest reduction was reported with structural-level interventions and attributed to a policy and commissioning intervention (primary care financial incentives). Behavioural interventions (guidance and toolkits) reported the greatest impact in hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Many interventions have targeted antibiotic use, each pulling different levers across the health system simultaneously. On the basis of these studies, structural-level interventions may have the greatest impact. Collectively, the combination of interventions may explain England's decline in prescribing but direct evidence of causality is unavailable.

Development of quality indicators for antimicrobial stewardship in Belgian hospitals: a RAND - modified Delphi procedure

INTRODUCTION

Inappropriate antibiotic use is a major cause of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, optimizing antibiotic usage is essential. In Belgium, optimization of antimicrobials for the fight against multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) is followed up by national surveillance by public health authorities. To improve appropriate antimicrobial use in hospitals, an effective national Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) program should include indicators for measuring both the quantity and quality of antibiotic use.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a set of process quality indicators (QIs) to evaluate and improve AMS in hospitals.

METHODS

A RAND-modified Delphi procedure was used. The procedure consisted of a structured narrative literature review to select the QIs, followed by two online questionnaires and an intermediate multidisciplinary panel discussion with experts in infectious diseases from general and teaching hospitals in Belgium.

RESULTS

A total of 38 QIs were selected after the RAND-modified Delphi procedure, from which 11 QIs were selected unanimously. These QIs address compliancy of antibiotic therapy and prophylaxis with local guidelines, documentation of the rationale for antibiotic treatment in the medical record, the availability of AMS Programs and Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy, resistance patterns and antimicrobial prescribing during focused ward rounds.

CONCLUSION

Our study selected 38 relevant process QIs, from which 11 were unanimously selected. The QIs can contribute to the improvement of quality of antibiotic use by stimulating hospitals to present better outcomes and by providing a focus on how to intervene and to improve prescribing of antimicrobials.

Antimicrobial stewardship experiences in acute-care hospitals of Northern Italy: Assessment of structure, process and outcome indicators, 2017-2019

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are effective strategies for optimizing antimicrobial use. We aimed to assess AMS programs implemented in acute-care trusts of the region of Piedmont, Northern Italy.

METHODS

AMS programs were investigated via a survey addressing structure, process and outcome indicators. For outcome indicators, annual means for the years 2017-2019 were considered, as well as the percentage change between 2017 and 2019. Outcome indicators were investigated in relation to structure and process scores using Spearman correlation.

RESULTS

In total, 25 AMS programs were surveyed. Higher scores were achieved for process over structure indicators. Improvements in alcohol-based handrub usage (+30%), total antimicrobial usage (-4%), and percentages of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae over invasive isolates (respectively -16 and -23%) were found between 2017 and 2019. Significant correlations were found between structure score and percentage change in total antimicrobial usage and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae over invasive isolates (Spearman's ρ -0.603, P .006 and ρ -0.433, P .044 respectively).

DISCUSSION

This study identified areas for improvement: accountability, microbiological laboratory quality management and feedback to clinicians. Improving the organization of AMS programs in particular should be prioritized.

CONCLUSION

Repeated measurements of structure and process indicators will be important to guide continuing quality improvement efforts.

Development of an international survey tool to measure confidence and current antimicrobial stewardship practices of hospital pharmacists

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists are identified as key members of hospital antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams in international guidelines. Developing an international standardized tool to measure hospital pharmacists' confidence and practices of AMS will encourage knowledge sharing and better networking between hospital pharmacists internationally.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a survey tool that can be used internationally to assess pharmacists' knowledge, confidence, perceived barriers and current AMS practices.

METHODS

A project team was formed to refine the survey tool that was initially used in a previous survey study. Following revision by the project team, a revised survey tool was sent to the ESCMID Study Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (ESGAP). Feedback from the ESGAP members was considered by the project team to finalize the survey tool.

RESULTS

A total of 88 changes were made to the survey tool after revision by the project team. A total of 43/216 (19.9%) of ESGAP members provided feedback on the survey tool, which led to a further 19 revisions. ESGAP members were agreeable to the questions in the survey tool, with >50% agreeing that each question was suitable. The final survey tool consisted of 42 questions, reduced from 72 questions in the original survey.

CONCLUSIONS

An international survey tool to measure hospital pharmacists' confidence and practices of AMS was developed. This tool will help the wider hospital pharmacy community in conducting local studies on current AMS practices and to identify areas where further support is needed. Use of a standardized survey tool will also allow individual regions/countries to compare their data with other countries to identify potential quality improvement programmes.

Understanding of Future Prescribers About Antimicrobial Resistance and Their Preparedness Towards Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities in Pakistan: Findings and Implications

Background: Insufficient antimicrobial-related training for physicians during their undergraduate education could have a negative impact on their prescribing. Unlike previous studies, this study not only explored the understanding and perception of Pakistani medical students about antibiotics and resistance, but also their preparedness towards antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Methods: An online cross-sectional study was undertaken with final-year medical students using a validated questionnaire from January 2021 to May 2021. Descriptive and inference statistics were applied for data analysis.

Results: Of 411 students, only 6.3% had undergone antimicrobial resistance (AMR) training. 16.1% of students believed that antibiotics are effective for viral ailments. More than half of the students agreed that AMR is a major healthcare problem in Pakistan (65.9%). Most students viewed poor infection control practices (66.9%), the use of too many broad-spectrum antibiotics (68.4%) for a longer duration (62.8%) with inadequate doses (67.9%) as the causes of AMR. The student’s preparation was insufficient in interpreting microbiological and pathological results (26.3%), selecting the correct antibiotics (22.1%), and awareness of the antibiotic spectrum (20.9%). The median preparedness score showed significant differences with sex (p = 0.049), age (p < 0.001), institute type (p = 0.014), and family income (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Pakistani medical students showed adequate understanding of antibiotics, but lacked preparedness for several components of ASPs, including interpretation of microbiological results and spectrum of antibiotics. More steps need to be taken to prepare medical students for AMR and stewardship initiatives adequately.

Quality indicators for hospital antimicrobial stewardship programmes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Measuring the quality and effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes with quality indicators (QIs) is an area of increasing interest. We conducted a systematic review to identify QIs of AMS programmes in the hospital setting and critically appraise their methodological quality.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus/web of science databases and the grey literature for studies that defined and/or described the development process and characteristics of the QIs developed. The Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument was used to critically appraise the methodological quality of the QI sets.

RESULTS

We identified 16 studies of QI sets consisting of 229 QIs. The QI sets addressed a broad range of areas of AMS in the hospital setting and consisted of 75% process indicators, 24% structural indicators and 1% outcome indicators. There was a wide variation in the information and level of detail presented describing the methodological characteristics of the QI sets identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The QIs identified in this study focused on process and structural indicators with few outcome indicators developed-a major deficiency in this area. Future research should focus on the development of outcome indicators or the use of process or structural indicators linked to outcomes to assess AMS. Testing of the QIs in practice is an essential methodological element of the QI development process and should be included in the QI development study or as planned validation work.

Core Recommendations for Antifungal Stewardship: A Statement of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

In recent years, the global public health community has increasingly recognized the importance of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the fight to improve outcomes, decrease costs, and curb increases in antimicrobial resistance around the world. However, the subject of antifungal stewardship (AFS) has received less attention. While the principles of AMS guidelines likely apply to stewarding of antifungal agents, there are additional considerations unique to AFS and the complex field of fungal infections that require specific recommendations. In this article, we review the literature on AMS best practices and discuss AFS through the lens of the global core elements of AMS. We offer recommendations for best practices in AFS based on a synthesis of this evidence by an interdisciplinary expert panel of members of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. We also discuss research directions in this rapidly evolving field. AFS is an emerging and important component of AMS, yet requires special considerations in certain areas such as expertise, education, interventions to optimize utilization, therapeutic drug monitoring, and data analysis and reporting.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Implementation in a Saudi Medical City: An Exploratory Case Study

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in hospitals have long been shown to improve antimicrobials' use and reduce the rates of antimicrobial resistance. However, their implementation in hospitals, especially in developing countries such as Saudi Arabia, remains low. One of the main barriers to implementation is the lack of knowledge of how to implement them. This study aims to explore how an antimicrobial stewardship programme was implemented in a Saudi hospital, the challenges faced and how they were overcome, and the program outcomes. A key stakeholder case study design was used, involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with the core members of the ASP team and analysis of 35 ASP hospital documents. ASP implementation followed a top-down approach and involved an initial preparatory phase and an implementation phase, requiring substantial infectious diseases and clinical pharmacy input throughout. Top management support was key to the successful implementation. ASP implementation reduced rates of multi-drug resistance and prescription of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. The implementation of ASPs in hospital is administrator rather than clinician driven. Outsourcing expertise and resources may help hospitals address the initial implementation challenges.

Development and implementation of a national antimicrobial stewardship surveillance system, with open access data sharing

BACKGROUND

Public Health England (PHE) developed an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) surveillance system and conducted a national pilot to test the feasibility of centrally collecting data from AMS audits performed by NHS hospital trusts. The system was simplified, focusing on requirements of the NHS AMR CQUIN (Commissioning for Quality and Innovation; a financial incentive quality improvement scheme).

AIM

To present results and user feedback from the national pilot, and results from using the AMS surveillance system as part of the AMR CQUIN.

METHODS

An AMS surveillance system was developed and a national pilot conducted in which 33 NHS trusts submitted data and feedback on system utilization. The system was refined based on feedback and deployed nationally to collect AMS data for the 2016-17 AMR CQUIN.

FINDINGS

Most trusts participating in the pilot collected data on documentation of indication (90%). Fewer collected data on documenting review decisions at 48-72 h (36%). On average 83% of patients had an indication documented, whereas 71% had formal documentation of 48-72 h review. AMR CQUIN data were submitted by 88% of trusts for at least one quarter of 2016-17. Approximately 92% of prescriptions had an indication documented and 87.5% of prescriptions had evidence of review within 72 h; these increased by 7 and 10 percentage points respectively between the first and final quarters.

CONCLUSION

The AMS surveillance system allowed AMS audit data from NHS trusts in England to be collected centrally. PHE publishes these data openly online, on PHE Fingertips portal, a national public health data portal. The reported data highlight improvement in the percentage of antibiotic prescriptions with evidence of a documented review within 72 h.

Adaptation of the WHO Essential Medicines List for national antibiotic stewardship policy in England: being AWaRe

OBJECTIVES

Appropriate use of and access to antimicrobials are key priorities of global strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The WHO recently classified key antibiotics into three categories (AWaRe) to improve access (Access), monitor important antibiotics (Watch) and preserve effectiveness of 'last resort' antibiotics (Reserve). This classification was assessed for antibiotic stewardship and quality improvement in English hospitals.

METHODS

Using an expert elicitation exercise, antibiotics used in England but not included in the WHO AWaRe index were added to an appropriate category following a workshop consensus exercise with national experts. The methodology was tested using national antibiotic prescribing data and presented by primary and secondary care.

RESULTS

In 2016, 46/108 antibiotics included within the WHO AWaRe index were routinely used in England and an additional 25 antibiotics also commonly used in England were not included in the WHO AWaRe index. WHO AWaRe-excluded and -included antibiotics were reviewed and reclassified according to the England-adapted AWaRE index with the justification by experts for each addition or alteration. Applying the England-adapted AWaRe index, Access antibiotics accounted for the majority (60.9%) of prescribing, followed by Watch (37.9%) and Reserve (0.8%); 0.4% of antibiotics remained unclassified. There was unexplained 2-fold variation in prescribing between hospitals within each AWaRe category, highlighting the potential for quality improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

We have adapted the WHO AWaRe index to create a specific index for England. The AWaRe index provides high-level understanding of antibiotic prescribing. Subsequent to this process the England AWaRe index is now embedded into national antibiotic stewardship policy and incentivized quality improvement schemes.