In vitro activity of ampicillin and ceftriaxone against ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium

A retrospective study of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with treatment

Introduction

A synergistic antibiotic combination of a penicillin and gentamicin (AG) or ceftriaxone (AC) is used in the management of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE). We compare the treatment outcomes between AG and AC, including low and high dose ceftriaxone (1 and 2 g 12 hourly).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients treated for EFIE at single tertiary centre (2012–2019). Outcome measures examined were 90- and 180-day mortality, treatment associated adverse events and relapse of bacteraemia (within 1 year).

Results

39 patients were enrolled [61.6% given (AC) (n = 24), 24% received ACL (n = 10) and 34% received ACN (n = 14)], 38.4% received AG (n = 15). We noted a difference in the mortality outcomes at 90 and 180 days between those treated with AG and AC overall (6.7% and 33.3%, respectively) although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.114, P = 0.061). No significant difference was noted between these groups in incidence of relapsed bacteraemia with two cases noted in the AC cohort (8.3%, 2/24) and none observed (0/15) in the AG cohort (P = 0.662, P = 0.414). A greater number of adverse events was observed in the AG group (11/15, 73.3%) compared to the overall AC group (6/24, 25.0%) (P = 0.009), with no difference between the high and low dose ceftriaxone groups (P = 0.05).

Conclusion

Combination treatment of EFIE with AC is associated with a reduced number of adverse events in comparison to AG groups. Although increased mortality was observed in the AC group, this did not reach statistical significance, and reflects the greater comorbidities and reduced capacity for surgical source control in this cohort.

Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides Are Leading the Way to Combat Oropathogenic Infections

Oral dental infections are one of the most common diseases affecting humans, with caries and periodontal disease having the highest incidence. Caries and periodontal disease arise from infections caused by oral bacterial pathogens. Current misuse and overuse of antibiotic treatments have led to the development of antimicrobial resistance. However, recent studies have shown that cationic antimicrobial peptides are a promising family of antibacterial agents that are active against oral pathogenic bacteria and also possess less propensity for development of antimicrobial resistance. This timely Review has a focus on two primary subjects: (i) the oral bacterial pathogens associated with dental infections and (ii) the current development of antimicrobial peptides targeting oral pathogens.

Lytic bacteriophages facilitate antibiotic sensitization of Enterococcus faecium

Enterococcus faecium, a commensal of the human intestine, has emerged as a hospital-adapted, multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogen. Bacteriophages (phages), natural predators of bacteria, have regained attention as therapeutics to stem the rise of MDR bacteria. Despite their potential to curtail MDR E. faecium infections, the molecular events governing E. faecium-phage interactions remain largely unknown. Such interactions are important to delineate because phage selective pressure imposed on E. faecium will undoubtedly result in phage resistance phenotypes that could threaten the efficacy of phage therapy. In an effort to understand the emergence of phage resistance in E. faecium, three newly isolated lytic phages were used to demonstrate that E. faecium phage resistance is conferred through an array of cell wall-associated molecules, including secreted antigen A (SagA), enterococcal polysaccharide antigen (Epa), wall teichoic acids, capsule, and an arginine-aspartate-aspartate (RDD) protein of unknown function. We find that capsule and Epa are important for robust phage adsorption and that phage resistance mutations in sagA, epaR, and epaX enhance E. faecium susceptibility to ceftriaxone, an antibiotic normally ineffective due to its low affinity for enterococcal penicillin binding proteins. Consistent with these findings, we provide evidence that phages potently synergize with cell wall (ceftriaxone and ampicillin) and membrane-acting (daptomycin) antimicrobials to slow or completely inhibit the growth of E. faecium Our work demonstrates that the evolution of phage resistance comes with fitness defects resulting in drug sensitization and that lytic phages could serve as effective antimicrobials for the treatment of E. faecium infections.

Is Once-Daily High-Dose Ceftriaxone plus Ampicillin an Alternative for Enterococcus faecalis Infective Endocarditis in Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy Programs?

Ceftriaxone administered as once-daily high-dose short infusion combined with ampicillin has been proposed for the treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy programs (OPAT). This combination requires synergistic activity, but the attainment of ceftriaxone synergic concentration (Cs) with the regimen proposed for OPAT has not been studied. This phase II pharmacokinetic study enrolled healthy adult volunteers who underwent two sequential treatment phases. During phase A, volunteers received 2 g of ceftriaxone each 12 h during 24 h followed by a 7-day wash-out. Then the participants received phase B, which consisted of a single dose of 4 g of ceftriaxone. Throughout both phases, each volunteer underwent intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling over 24 h. Ceftriaxone total and unbound concentrations were measured. Twelve participants were enrolled and completed both phases. Mean ceftriaxone total and free concentrations 24 h after the administration of 2 g each 12 h were 86.44 ± 25.90 mg/liter and 3.59 ± 1.35 mg/liter, respectively, and after the 4-g single dose were 34.60 ± 11.16 mg/liter and 1.40 ± 0.62 mg/liter, respectively. Only 3 (25%) patients in phase A maintained unbound plasma concentrations superior to the suggested Cs = 5 mg/liter during 24 h, and none (0%) in phase B. No grade 3 to 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed. Ceftriaxone optimal exposure combined with ampicillin to achieve maximal synergistic activity against E. faecalis required for the treatment of infective endocarditis remains unknown. However, the administration of a single daily dose of 4 g of ceftriaxone implies a reduction in the time of exposure to the proposed Cs. (This study has been registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials [EudraCT] database under identifier 2017-003127-29.).

A new pharmacodynamic approach to study antibiotic combinations against enterococci in vivo: Application to ampicillin plus ceftriaxone

The combination of ampicillin (AMP) and ceftriaxone (CRO) is considered synergistic against Enterococcus faecalis based on in vitro tests and the rabbit endocarditis model, however, in vitro assays are limited by the use of fixed antibiotic concentrations and the rabbit model by poor bacterial growth, high variability, and the use of point dose-effect estimations, that may lead to inaccurate assessment of antibiotic combinations and hinder optimal translation. Here, we tested AMP+CRO against two strains of E. faecalis and one of E. faecium in an optimized mouse thigh infection model that yields high bacterial growth and allows to define the complete dose-response relationship. By fitting Hill’s sigmoid model and estimating the parameters maximal effect (E_max) and effective dose 50 (ED₅₀), the following interactions were defined: synergism (E_max increase ≥2 log₁₀ CFU/g), antagonism (E_max reduction ≥1 log₁₀ CFU/g) and potentiation (ED₅₀ reduction ≥50% without changes in E_max). AMP monotherapy was effective against the three strains, yielding valid dose-response curves in terms of dose and the index fT_>MIC. CRO monotherapy showed no effect. The combination AMP+CRO against E. faecalis led to potentiation (59–81% ED₅₀ reduction) and not synergism (no changes in E_max). Against E. faecium, the combination was indifferent. The optimized mouse infection model allowed to obtain the complete dose-response curve of AMP+CRO and to define its interaction based on pharmacodynamic parameter changes. Integrating these results with the pharmacokinetics will allow to derive the PK/PD index bound to the activity of the combination, essential for proper translation to the clinic.

Resistance in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

Serious infections owing to vancomycin-resistant enterococci have historically proven to be difficult clinical cases, requiring combination therapy and management of treatment-related toxicity. Despite the introduction of new antibiotics with activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci to the therapeutic armamentarium, significant challenges remain. An understanding of the factors driving the emergence of resistance in vancomycin-resistant enterococci, the dynamics of gastrointestinal colonization and microbiota-mediated colonization resistance, and the mechanisms of resistance to the currently available therapeutics will permit clinicians to be better prepared to tackle these challenging hospital-associated pathogens.

How do I manage a patient with enterococcal bacteraemia?

BACKGROUND

Enterococcal bacteraemia (EB) is common, particularly in the nosocomial setting, and its management poses a challenge for clinicians and microbiologists.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to summarize the more relevant features of EB and to provide a practical state-of-the-art on the topics that more directly affect its management.

SOURCES

Pubmed articles from inception to 31 May 2020.

CONTENT

The following topics are covered: epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics and factors associated with prognosis of EB; diagnosis and work-up, including the use of echocardiography to rule out endocarditis; antibiotic management with special focus on antimicrobial resistance and complicated EB; and the role of infectious disease consultation and the use of bundles in EB. In addition, three clinical vignettes are presented to illustrate the practical application of the guidance provided, and major gaps in the current evidence supporting EB management are discussed.

IMPLICATIONS

EB is associated with large burdens of morbidity and mortality, particularly among fragile and immunosuppressed patients presenting complicated bacteraemia due to multidrug-resistant enterococci. Most cases of EB are caused by Enterococcus faecalis, followed by E. faecium. EB often presents as polymicrobial bacteraemia. Rapidly identifying patients at risk of EB is crucial for timely application of diagnostic techniques and empiric therapy. Early alert systems and rapid diagnostic techniques, such as matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, especially if used together with infectious disease consultation within bundles, appear to improve management and prognosis of EB. Echocardiography is also key in the work-up of EB and should probably be more extensively used, although its exact indications in EB are still debated. Multidisciplinary approaches are warranted due to the complexity and severity of EB.

Comparison of solithromycin with erythromycin in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from China: antibacterial activity, clonality, resistance mechanism, and inhibition of biofilm formation

Solithromycin (SOL), a fourth-generation macrolide and ketolide, has been reported to have robust antibacterial activity against a wide spectrum of Gram-positive bacteria. However, the impact of SOL on planktonic growth and biofilm formation of clinical enterococcus isolates remains unclear. In this study, 276 Enterococcus faecalis isolates and 122 Enterococcus faecium were retrospectively collected from a tertiary hospital from China. SOL against clinical isolates of enterococci from China were evaluated the antimicrobial activity in comparison with erythromycin, and explore its relationship with the clonality, virulence genes and resistance mechanism of these isolates. Our data showed that the MICs of SOL against clinical E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates from China were ≤4 and ≤8 mg l^-1, respectively. ST16 and ST179 were regarded as the risk factor to SOL resistance in E. faecalis. SOL could inhibit but not eradicate the biofilm formation of E. faecalis. The bactericidal effects of SOL against E. faecalis and E. faecium were demonstrated to be similar to linezolid and vancomycin using time-kill assays. In conclusion, SOL showed significantly enhanced antibacterial activity against clinical isolates of E. faecalis and E. faecium from China in comparison to erythromycin. Furthermore, SOL could inhibit the biofilm formation of E. faecalis and have the similar bactericidal ability as linezolid and vancomycin against both E. faecalis and E. faecium.

Prevalence of High-Level Aminoglycoside Resistance and Genes Encoding Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzymes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolated in a University Hospital in Tokyo

High-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) limits treatment options for invasive enterococcal infections. We examined the prevalence of HLAR, carriage of genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, and production of β-lactamase using the disk diffusion method, polymerase chain reaction, and a nitrocefin-based test, respectively, in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from patients at a university hospital in Tokyo in 2010. Of the 100 E. faecalis isolates analyzed, 30 isolates had high-level resistance (HLR) to gentamicin, and 22 isolates had HLR to streptomycin. Of the 40 E. faecium isolates analyzed, 9 isolates had HLR to gentamicin, and 9 isolates had HLR to streptomycin. Of the 39 gentamicin-HLR enterococcal isolates, 24 isolates were non-HLR to streptomycin. All 39 isolates with HLR to gentamicin as well as 19 of 101 without HLR carried aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia. Carriage of ant(6')-Ia was confirmed in 25 of 31 streptomycin-HLR isolates. Production of β-lactamase was documented in none of the E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates. Whole-genome sequencing analysis revealed that all but one E. faecalis isolate that carried aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia and ant(6')-Ia belonged to sequence type (ST) 4 (n = 8), ST16 (n = 4), or ST179 (n = 9). Nevertheless, most of the pairs of isolates had > 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms even among the isolates of the same ST.