Discordances between molecular assays for rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: frequency, mechanisms and clinical impact

Exploring diagnostic methods for drug-resistant tuberculosis: A comprehensive overview

Despite available global efforts and funding, Tuberculosis (TB) continues to affect a considerable number of patients worldwide. Policy makers and stakeholders set clear goals to reduce TB incidence and mortality, but the emergence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) complicate the reach of these goals. Drug-resistance TB needs to be diagnosed rapidly and accurately to effectively treat patients, prevent the transmission of MDR-TB, minimise mortality, reduce treatment costs and avoid unnecessary hospitalisations. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of laboratory methods for detecting drug resistance in MTB, focusing on phenotypic, molecular and other drug susceptibility testing (DST) techniques. We found a large variety of methods used, with the BACTEC MGIT 960 being the most common phenotypic DST and the Xpert MTB/RIF being the most common molecular DST. We emphasise the importance of integrating phenotypic and molecular DST to address issues like resistance to new drugs, heteroresistance, mixed infections and low-level resistance mutations. Notably, most of the analysed studies adhered to the outdated definition of XDR-TB and did not consider the pre-XDR definition, thus posing challenges in aligning diagnostic methods with the current landscape of TB resistance.

Phenotype versus genotype discordant rifampicin susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: implications for a diagnostic accuracy

IMPORTANCE

An accurate diagnosis of drug resistance in clinical isolates is an important step for better treatment outcomes. The current study observed a higher discordance rate of rifampicin resistance on Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) drug susceptibility testing (DST) than Lowenstein-Jenson (LJ) DST when compared with the rpoB sequencing. We detected a few novel mutations and their combination in rifampicin resistance isolates that were missed by MGIT DST and may be useful for the better management of tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes. Few novel deletions in clinical isolates necessitate the importance of rpoB sequencing in large data sets in geographic-specific locations, especially high-burden countries. We explored the discordance rate on MGIT and LJ, which is important for the clinical management of rifampicin resistance to avoid the mistreatment of drug-resistant TB. Furthermore, MGIT-sensitive isolates may be subjected to molecular methods of diagnosis for further confirmation and treatment options.

Performance of the MeltPro TB assay as initial test for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis with drug-resistance detection

BACKGROUND

The MeltPro TB assay (MeltPro) is a molecular rapid diagnostic test designed for detecting resistance to antituberculosis drugs. However, the performance of MeltPro as an initial diagnostic test for simultaneously detecting the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and drug resistance has not been evaluated. This study aims to assess the performance of MeltPro as initial diagnostic test for simultaneous detection of MTB and drug resistance in clinical samples from patients with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1283 patients with presumptive PTB from two clinical centers, out of which 875 were diagnosed with PTB. The diagnostic accuracy of MeltPro, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), and MGIT 960 for PTB detection was evaluated. Rifampicin (RIF), isoniazid (INH), ethambutol (EMB), streptomycin (STR), and fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance were detected using MeltPro, with Xpert and/or the broth microdilution plate method (MYCOTB) results as references.

RESULTS

For the diagnosis of PTB, MeltPro showed a sensitivity of 69.0%, which was similar to Xpert (72.7%; P > 0.05) and higher than MGIT (58.1%; P < 0.001). The specificity of MeltPro was 97.1%, similar to Xpert (98.0%; P > 0.05). In smear-negative patients, MeltPro's sensitivity was 50.9%, similar to Xpert (56.5%; P > 0.05), and higher than MGIT (33.1%; P < 0.001). Based on Xpert and/or MYCOTB results, MeltPro exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 98.3% and 99.2%, respectively, for detecting RIF resistance. Based on MYCOTB results, MeltPro's sensitivity for detecting resistance to INH, EMB, STR, and FQ was 96.4%, 89.1%, 97.5%, and 90.3%, respectively, with specificities of 96.0%, 96.0%, 95.2%, and 99.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MeltPro TB assay could potentially be an effective alternative as the initial test for rapid diagnosis of PTB with drug-resistance detection in clinical practice.

The MAGMA pipeline for comprehensive genomic analyses of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis samples

BACKGROUND

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) holds great potential for the management and control of tuberculosis. Accurate analysis of samples with low mycobacterial burden, which are characterized by low (<20x) coverage and high (>40%) levels of contamination, is challenging. We created the MAGMA (Maximum Accessible Genome for Mtb Analysis) bioinformatics pipeline for analysis of clinical Mtb samples.

METHODS AND RESULTS

High accuracy variant calling is achieved by using a long seedlength during read mapping to filter out contaminants, variant quality score recalibration with machine learning to identify genuine genomic variants, and joint variant calling for low Mtb coverage genomes. MAGMA automatically generates a standardized and comprehensive output of drug resistance information and resistance classification based on the WHO catalogue of Mtb mutations. MAGMA automatically generates phylogenetic trees with drug resistance annotations and trees that visualize the presence of clusters. Drug resistance and phylogeny outputs from sequencing data of 79 primary liquid cultures were compared between the MAGMA and MTBseq pipelines. The MTBseq pipeline reported only a proportion of the variants in candidate drug resistance genes that were reported by MAGMA. Notable differences were in structural variants, variants in highly conserved rrs and rrl genes, and variants in candidate resistance genes for bedaquiline, clofazmine, and delamanid. Phylogeny results were similar between pipelines but only MAGMA visualized clusters.

CONCLUSION

The MAGMA pipeline could facilitate the integration of WGS into clinical care as it generates clinically relevant data on drug resistance and phylogeny in an automated, standardized, and reproducible manner.

Non-actionable Results, Accuracy, and Effect of First- and Second-line Line Probe Assays for Diagnosing Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Including on Smear-Negative Specimens, in a High-Volume Laboratory

BACKGROUND

Rapid tuberculosis (TB) drug susceptibility testing (DST) is crucial. Genotype MTBDRsl is a widely deployed World Health Organization (WHO)-endorsed assay. Programmatic performance data, including non-actionable results from smear-negative sputum, are scarce.

METHODS

Sputa from Xpert MTB/RIF individuals (n = 951) were routinely-tested using Genotype MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl (both version 2). Phenotypic DST was the second-line drug reference standard. Discrepant results underwent Sanger sequencing.

FINDINGS

89% (849 of 951) of individuals were culture-positive (56%, 476 of 849 smear-negative). MTBDRplus had at least 1 nonactionable result (control and/or TB-detection bands absent or invalid, precluding resistance reporting) in 19% (92 of 476) of smear-negatives; for MTBDRsl, 40% (171 of 427) were nonactionable (28%, 120 of 427 false-negative TB; 17%, 51 of 427 indeterminate). In smear-negatives, MTBDRsl sensitivity for fluoroquinolones was 84% (95% confidence interval, 67%-93), 81% (54%-95%) for second-line injectable drugs, and 57% (28%-82%) for both. Specificities were 93% (89%-98%), 88% (81%-93%), and 97% (91%-99%), respectively. Twenty-three percent (172 of 746) of Xpert rifampicin-resistant specimens were MTBDRplus isoniazid-susceptible. Days-to-second-line-susceptibility reporting with the programmatic advent of MTBDRsl improved (6 [5-7] vs 37 [35-46]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

MTBDRsl did not generate a result in 4 of 10 smear-negatives, resulting in substantial missed resistance. However, if MTBDRsl generates an actionable result, that is accurate in ruling-in resistance. Isoniazid DST remains crucial. This study provides real-world, direct, second-line susceptibility testing performance data on non-actionable results (that, if unaccounted for, cause an overestimation of test utility), accuracy, and care cascade impact.

Alterations in molecular response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against anti-tuberculosis drugs

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB), an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, has plagued humans since the early middle-ages. More than one million deaths are recorded annually due to TB, even in present times. These deaths are primarily attributed to the constant appearance of resistant TB strains. Even with the advent of new therapeutics and diagnostics techniques, tuberculosis remains challenging to control due to resistant M. tuberculosis strains. Aided by various molecular changes, these strains adapt to stress created by anti-tuberculosis drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review thus is an overview of ongoing research in the genome and transcriptome of antibiotic-resistant TB. It explores omics-based research to identify mutation and utilization of differential gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows several mutations distinctive in the first- and second-line drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains. It also explores the expressional differences of genes involved in the fundamental process of the cells and how they help in drug resistance. With the development of transcriptomics-based studies, a new insight has developed to inquire about gene expression changes in drug resistance. This information on expressional pattern changes can be utilized to design the basic platform of anti-TB treatments and therapeutic approaches. These novel insights can be instrumental in disease diagnosis and global containment of resistant TB.

Discordance of the Repeat GeneXpert MTB/RIF Test for Rifampicin Resistance Detection Among Patients Initiating MDR-TB Treatment in Uganda

BACKGROUND

The Global Laboratory Initiative (GLI) guidelines recommend repeat for GeneXpertMTB/RIF (XpertMTB/RIF) in patients with a low pretest probability of rifampicin resistance (RR).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using results of sputum specimens collected from participants screened for the STREAM 2 trial. We recruited all patients with XpertMTB/RIF RR-TB detected who were referred for RR/multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB treatment initiation at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, between September 2017 and October 2019. At baseline, smear microscopy, repeat XpertMTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra, and MTBDRplus assays were done on sputum specimens. Culture-based drug susceptibility testing (DST) was performed on discordant specimens. We analyzed the prevalence and factors associated with discordance between initial and repeat XpertMTB/RIF RR and false XpertMTB/RIF RR. False XpertMTB/RIF RR was defined as no RR detected by any of Xpert Ultra, LPA, or culture DST (reference comparator).

RESULTS

A total of 126/130 patients had repeat XpertMTB/RIF results, of whom 97 (77.0%) had M. tuberculosis detected, 81 (83.5%) had RR detected, and 1 (1.0%) had RR indeterminate. The prevalence of discordant XpertMTB/RIF RR was 15/96 (15.6%), whereas false XpertMTB/RIF RR prevalence was 10/96 (10.4%).Low-bacillary load sputum specimens were more likely to have discordant XpertMTB/RIF RR and false XpertMTB/RIF RR results (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.37; P = .01; aOR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.35; P = .01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show a high false-positive rifampicin resistance rate in low-TB burden patients, which calls for repeat testing in order to prevent unnecessary prescription of anti-MDR-TB therapy.

Clinical Interpretation of Drug Susceptibility Tests in Tuberculosis

:

Prompt and accurate diagnosis of drug resistance is essential for optimal treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. However, only 20% of the more than half a million patients eligible for the treatment of MDR-TB/RR-TB receive an appropriate drug regimen. Drug-resistant TB regimens must include a sufficient number of effective medications, a significant challenge for clinicians worldwide, as most are forced to make therapeutic decisions without any, or very little information on drug susceptibility testing. Although phenotypic DST is still commonly regarded as the gold standard for determining M. tuberculosis susceptibility to antituberculosis drugs, it has several limitations, mainly its prolonged turnaround time. Molecular methods based on M. tuberculosis genomic DNA sequencing have been developed during the past two decades, to identify the most common mutations involved in drug resistance. The Xpert ® MTB/RIF is a real-time polymerase chain reaction that offers results in less than two hours and has an overall sensitivity for rifampin resistance of 96% and 98% specificity. Line probe assays (LPAs) are commercial DNA strip-based tests for detecting the most frequent mutations responsible for resistance to rifampin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, and second-line injectable drugs.

:

Discrepancies between phenotypic and genotyping methods are a problem that the clinician will face in everyday practice. However, any resistance result (with any type of test) in a person with risk factors for harboring resistant microorganisms should be considered appropriate while the results of complementary tests are available.