Clinical Evaluation of Assays for Plasma Renin Activity and Aldosterone Measurement by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

The interpretation of immunometric, chromatographic and mass spectrometric data for steroids in diagnosis of endocrine disorders

The analysis of steroids for endocrine disorders is in transition from immunoassay of individual steroids to more specific chromatographic and mass spectrometric methods with simultaneous determination of several steroids. Gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) offer unrivalled analytical capability for steroid analysis. These specialist techniques were often judged to be valuable only in a research laboratory but this is no longer the case. In a urinary steroid profile up to 30 steroids are identified with concentrations and excretion rates reported in a number of ways. The assays must accommodate the wide range in steroid concentrations in biological fluids from micromolar for dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) to picomolar for oestradiol and aldosterone. For plasma concentrations, panels of 5-20 steroids are reported. The profile results are complex and interpretation is a real challenge in order to inform clinicians of likely implications. Although artificial intelligence and machine learning will in time generate reports from the analysis this is a way off being adopted into clinical practice. This review offers guidance on current interpretation of the data from steroid determinations in clinical practice. Using this approach more laboratories can use the techniques to answer clinical questions and offer broader interpretation of the results so that the clinician can understand the conclusion for the steroid defect, and can be advised to program further tests if necessary and instigate treatment. The biochemistry is part of the patient workup and a clinician led multidisciplinary team discussion of the results will be required for challenging patients. The laboratory will have to consider cost implications, bearing in mind that staff costs are the highest component. GC-MS and LC-MS/MS analysis of steroids are the choices. Steroid profiling has enormous potential to improve diagnosis of adrenal disorders and should be adopted in more laboratories in favour of the cheap, non-specific immunological methods.

Screening and diagnosis of primary aldosteronism. Consensus document of all the Spanish Societies involved in the management of primary aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent cause of secondary hypertension (HT), and is associated with a higher cardiometabolic risk than essential HT. However, PA remains underdiagnosed, probably due to several difficulties clinicians usually find in performing its diagnosis and subtype classification. The aim of this consensus is to provide practical recommendations focused on the prevalence and the diagnosis of PA and the clinical implications of aldosterone excess, from a multidisciplinary perspective, in a nominal group consensus approach by experts from the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN), Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI), Spanish Radiology Society (SERAM), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI), Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC(ML)), Spanish Society of Anatomic-Pathology, Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC).

The Clinical Impact of Sample Storage at -20 °C on Renin Reference Intervals and Aldosterone-Renin Ratio Calculations

Cryoactivation is known to occur in whole blood and plasma samples when kept between +4 and -5 °C, leading to falsely high renin concentrations. In 2022 it has been clearly shown that cryoactivation can also occur in samples stored at -20 °C. Based on these new findings, here we discuss how this can influence the clinical diagnosis of patients. First, we show that storage of renin plasma samples can affect the renin measurements and thereby the aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) calculation, which might explain the high intraindividual variability in ARR also recently demonstrated. Second, we discuss the existing studies on the establishment of renin reference intervals and note the lack of attention given to this recently revealed preanalytical condition. Our literature review of the reference intervals for renin suggest that cryoactivation might have influenced the published data.

Poor comparability of plasma renin activity measurement in determining patient samples: the status quo and recommendations for harmonization

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate and update the consistency and comparability of plasma renin activity (PRA) assays in measuring clinical samples. The contributions of recalibration, blank subtraction, and incubation strategies to interchangeability were also explored.

METHODS

Five different laboratories were evaluated using forty-six individual plasma samples, including four liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC‒MS/MS) assays and one chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Spearman correlation coefficient (R), Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland‒Altman plot analyses were used to evaluate the consistency among assays. Consistency before and after recalibration, blank subtraction, and incubation strategy unification was compared.

RESULTS

A good correlation was observed among all assays (R>0.93). None of the samples measured by all assays showed coefficient variation (CV) <10 %, and 37 % of samples showed overall CVs >20 %. The 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for slopes did not contain 1 for most assay pairs. Large relative biases (-85.1-104.2 %) were found, and 76 % (52-93 %) of samples had unacceptable biases. Recalibration reduced the calibration bias. Ignoring blank subtraction improved the comparability across all assays while unifying incubation did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The interchangeability of PRA measurement was unsatisfying. Harmonization on calibrator and ignoring blank were recommended. Unifying incubation strategy was unnecessary.

Chinese normotensive and essential hypertensive reference intervals for plasma aldosterone and renin activity by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

OBJECTIVES

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) regulates blood pressure. Plasma renin activities (PRA) and plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) are biomarkers related to RAAS. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based measurements for PRA and PAC have become popular. Method-specific reference intervals (RIs) are required.

METHODS

Routine PRA and PAC services in a Hong Kong teaching hospital were based on LC-MS/MS methods. PRA and PAC RIs were developed for normotensive subjects and essential hypertensive (EH) patients. Healthy volunteers were recruited to establish normotensive RIs. PRA and PAC results of hypertensive patients with urine aldosterone tests for primary aldosteronism (PA) screening were retrieved from the laboratory information system. Patients without PA were included. Patients with secondary hypertension and patients on medications affecting the RAAS were excluded. The central 95% RIs were established based on the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline C28-A3.

RESULTS

PRA and PAC of 170 normotensive volunteers and 362 EH patients were analysed. There was no sex-specific difference in PRA and PAC for normotensive and EH reference subjects. Differences for PRA and PAC were noted between normotensive subjects aged below 45 and their older counterparts. However, such a difference was only identified for PRA but not PAC in EH patients. Age-specific RIs were established accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presented age-specific LC-MS/MS RIs of PRA and PAC for both normotensive and EH populations for local Chinese in Hong Kong.