Evaluation of analytical and clinical performance of the AFIAS Tn-I plus assay - a new point-of-care

BACKGROUND

The objective of this evaluation was to determine the analytical and clinical performance of the AFIAS point-of-care (POC) Tn-I Plus assay (Boditech Med Inc).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), repeatability, reproducibility, inter- and intra-individual CV were evaluated using the CLSI guidelines. The study was also designed to estimate the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) and to assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

The precision repeatability CVs were 6.7-8.5% and reproducibility was 7.5-7.6%. The LOD and LOQ were consistent with the manufacturer's specified values of 0.010 ng/mL and 0.030 ng/mL, respectively. The 99th percentile URLs for males (aged 18-75 years) and females (aged 17-65 years) in serum were 0.0300 ng/mL (7.8% CV) and 0.0239 ng/mL (9.4% CV) respectively. Overall 99th percentile URL was 0.0296 ng/mL (8.2% CV). For the overall apparently healthy population, the percentage of measurable cardiac troponin I (cTn-I) values below the 99th percentile (i.e. 0.0296 ng/mL) and above the assay's LOD (= 0.010 ng/mL) was 47,68% (391/820 samples). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 100% with 95% CI (97% - 100%) and 95.2% with 95% CI (93.6% - 96.5%), respectively. No significant differences were observed for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between AFIAS Tn-I plus and Abbott ARCHITECT High Sensitive Troponin-I.

CONCLUSION

The clinical performance of AFIAS Tn-I Plus assay for AMI is comparable to the established Abbott ALINITY STAT High Sensitive Troponin-I. This assay is suitable for routine use in clinical laboratories.

Variability of cardiac troponin levels in normal subjects and in patients with cardiovascular diseases: analytical considerations and clinical relevance

In accordance with all the most recent international guidelines, the variation of circulating levels of cardiac troponins I and T, measured with high-sensitivity methods (hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT), should be used for the detection of acute myocardial injury. Recent experimental and clinical evidences have demonstrated that the evaluation of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT variations is particularly relevant: a) for the differential diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED); b) for the evaluation of cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing major cardiac or non-cardiac surgery, and in asymptomatic subjects of the general population aged >55 years and with co-morbidities; c) for the evaluation of cardiotoxicity caused by administration of some chemotherapy drugs in patients with malignant tumors. The aim of this document is to discuss the fundamental statistical and biological considerations on the intraindividual variability of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT over time in the same individual. Firstly, it will be discussed in detail as the variations of circulating levels strictly depend not only on the analytical error of the method used but also on the intra-individual variability of the biomarker. Afterwards, the pathophysiological interpretation and the clinical relevance of the determination of the variability of the hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT values ​​ in patients with specific clinical conditions are discussed. Finally, the evaluation over time of the variation in circulating levels of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT is proposed for a more accurate estimation of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic subjects from the general population.

Cardiac troponins: Mechanisms of release and role in healthy and diseased subjects

The cardiac troponins (cTns), cardiac troponin C (cTnC), cTnT, and cTnI are key elements of myocardial apparatus, fixed as protein complex on the thin filament of sarcomere and are involved in the regulation of excitation-contraction coupling of cardiomyocytes in the presence of Ca²⁺ . Circulating cTnT and cTnI (cTns) increase following cardiac tissue necrosis, and they are consolidated biomarkers of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the use of high sensitivity (hs)-immunoassay tests for cTnT and cTnI has made it possible to identify a multitude of other clinical conditions associated with increased circulating levels of cTns. cTns can be measured also in the peripheral circulation of healthy subjects or athletes, suggesting that different mechanisms are involved in the release of cTns in the blood independently of cardiac cell necrosis. In this review, the molecular/cellular mechanisms involved in cTns release in blood and the exploitation of cTnI and cTnT as biomarkers of cardiac adverse events, in addition to cardiac necrosis, are discussed.

Evaluation of the cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: role of cardiac-specific biomarkers

Major adverse cardiovascular events are frequently observed in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery during the peri-operative period. At this time, the possibility to predict cardiovascular events remains limited, despite the introduction of several algorithms to calculate the risk of adverse events, mainly death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) based on the clinical history, risk factors (sex, age, lipid profile, serum creatinine) and non-invasive cardiac exams (electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, stress tests). The cardiac-specific biomarkers natriuretic peptides (NPs) and cardiac troponins (cTn) have been proposed as additional tools for risk prediction in the peri-operative period, particularly for the identification of myocardial injury in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. The prognostic information from the measurement of BNP/NT-proBNP and hs-cTn is independent and complementary to other important indicators of risk, also including ECG and imaging techniques. Elevated levels of cardiac-specific biomarkers before surgery are associated with a markedly higher risk of MACE during the peri-operative period. BNP/NT-proBNP and hs-cTn should be measured in all patients during the clinical evaluation before surgery, particularly during intermediate- or high-risk surgery, in patients aged >65 years and/or with comorbidities. Several questions remain to be assessed in dedicated clinical studies, such as how to optimize the management of patients with raised cardiac specific biomarkers before surgery, and whether a strategy based on biomarker measurement improves patient outcomes and is cost-effective.

Age partitioned and continuous upper reference limits for Ortho VITROS High Sensitivity Troponin I in a healthy paediatric cohort

OBJECTIVES

In adults, the elevation of cardiac troponin (cTn) above the 99th percentile upper reference limit defines myocardial injury. The use and interpretation of cTn in a paediatric population, however, is difficult given the 99th percentile for different assays is not well established. Using paediatric blood samples from healthy neonates, infants and children we derived continuous and partitioned 97.5th and 99th percentiles for the Ortho VITROS hs-TnI assay.

METHODS

A total of 328 samples for infants, children and adolescents aged 0-17.8 years were obtained. Age partitioned reference limits were derived in accordance with CLSI EP28-A3C. Continuous reference limits were established as described previously by the HAPPI Kids Study team.

RESULTS

hs-TnI as measured by the Ortho VITROS Assay is highly elevated above the adult 99th percentile at birth and declines to lower levels within the first 6 months of life. The 99th centile upper reference limit for ages 0-3 months was 72 ng/L (90% CI: 52-91) and 9 ng/L (90% CI: 5.2-17.4) for ages 3 months to 18 years. Continuous upper 99th centile reference limits were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Partitioned and continuous 99th percentiles for hs-TnI were derived for the new Ortho VITROS assay in healthy neonates and older children. This will assist clinicians to appropriately assess for the presence of myocardial injury in this population.

Use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in the emergency department for the early rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI) in Italy

Serial measurements of cardiac troponin are recommended by international guidelines to diagnose myocardial infarction (MI) since 2000. However, some relevant differences exist between the three different international guidelines published between 2020 and 2021 for the management of patients with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. In particular, there is no agreement on the cut-offs or absolute change values to diagnose non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI). Other controversial issues concern the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cut-off values for the most rapid algorithms (0 h/1 h or 0 h/2 h) to rule-in and rule-out NSTEMI. Finally, another important point is the possible differences between demographic and clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in multicenter trials compared to those routinely admitted to the Emergency Department in Italy. The Study Group of Cardiac Biomarkers, supported by the Italian Scientific Societies Società Italiana di Biochimica Clinica, Italian Society of the European Ligand Assay Society, and Società Italiana di Patolgia Clinica e Medicina di Laboratorio decided to revise the document previously published in 2013 about the management of patients with suspected NSTEMI, and to provide some suggestions for the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice, with a particular focus on the Italian setting.

Diagnostic algorithms for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: open issues

The use of serial measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) is recommended by international guidelines for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) since 2000. This article focuses on factors influencing temporal changes in high-sensitive cTn (hs)-cTn and the impact of these factors on the diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI). The recommendations proposed by three different international guidelines published in 2020-2021 for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTE) show some discrepancies. In particular, there is no agreement among these guidelines about cut-off or absolute change values to be used for the rule-in, especially regarding the use of sex-specific cut-off values. Furthermore, there are no sufficient evidences on the diagnostic accuracy and cost effectiveness related to cut-off values suggested for algorithms to be used by some hs-cTnI methods.