1
|
Jungo KT, Deml MJ, Schalbetter F, Moor J, Feller M, Lüthold RV, Huibers CJA, Sallevelt BTGM, Meulendijk MC, Spruit M, Schwenkglenks M, Rodondi N, Streit S. A mixed methods analysis of the medication review intervention centered around the use of the 'Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing' Assistant (STRIPA) in Swiss primary care practices. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:350. [PMID: 38500163 PMCID: PMC10949561 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10773-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic clinical decision support systems (eCDSS), such as the 'Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing' Assistant (STRIPA), have become promising tools for assisting general practitioners (GPs) with conducting medication reviews in older adults. Little is known about how GPs perceive eCDSS-assisted recommendations for pharmacotherapy optimization. The aim of this study was to explore the implementation of a medication review intervention centered around STRIPA in the 'Optimising PharmacoTherapy In the multimorbid elderly in primary CAre' (OPTICA) trial. METHODS We used an explanatory mixed methods design combining quantitative and qualitative data. First, quantitative data about the acceptance and implementation of eCDSS-generated recommendations from GPs (n = 21) and their patients (n = 160) in the OPTICA intervention group were collected. Then, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs from the OPTICA intervention group (n = 8), and interview data were analyzed through thematic analysis. RESULTS In quantitative findings, GPs reported averages of 13 min spent per patient preparing the eCDSS, 10 min performing medication reviews, and 5 min discussing prescribing recommendations with patients. On average, out of the mean generated 3.7 recommendations (SD=1.8). One recommendation to stop or start a medication was reported to be implemented per patient in the intervention group (SD=1.2). Overall, GPs found the STRIPA useful and acceptable. They particularly appreciated its ability to generate recommendations based on large amounts of patient information. During qualitative interviews, GPs reported the main reasons for limited implementation of STRIPA were related to problems with data sourcing (e.g., incomplete data imports), preparation of the eCDSS (e.g., time expenditure for updating and adapting information), its functionality (e.g., technical problems downloading PDF recommendation reports), and appropriateness of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative findings help explain the relatively low implementation of recommendations demonstrated by quantitative findings, but also show GPs' overall acceptance of STRIPA. Our results provide crucial insights for adapting STRIPA to make it more suitable for regular use in future primary care settings (e.g., necessity to improve data imports). TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03724539, date of first registration: 29/10/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Tabea Jungo
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
| | - Michael J Deml
- Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Schalbetter
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jeanne Moor
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin Feller
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Renata Vidonscky Lüthold
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Corlina Johanna Alida Huibers
- Geriatrics, Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel C Meulendijk
- Public Health and Primary Care (PHEG), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marco Spruit
- Public Health and Primary Care (PHEG), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Matthias Schwenkglenks
- Health Economics Facility, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sven Streit
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ackerhans S, Huynh T, Kaiser C, Schultz C. Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review. Implement Sci 2024; 19:11. [PMID: 38347525 PMCID: PMC10860285 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to improve quality of care, patient safety, and efficiency because of their ability to perform medical tasks in a more data-driven, evidence-based, and semi-autonomous way. However, CDSSs may also affect the professional identity of health professionals. Some professionals might experience these systems as a threat to their professional identity, as CDSSs could partially substitute clinical competencies, autonomy, or control over the care process. Other professionals may experience an empowerment of the role in the medical system. The purpose of this study is to uncover the role of professional identity in CDSS implementation and to identify core human, technological, and organizational factors that may determine the effect of CDSSs on professional identity. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review and included peer-reviewed empirical studies from two electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science) that reported on key factors to CDSS implementation and were published between 2010 and 2023. Our explorative, inductive thematic analysis assessed the antecedents of professional identity-related mechanisms from the perspective of different health care professionals (i.e., physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, pharmacists). RESULTS One hundred thirty-one qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method studies from over 60 journals were included in this review. The thematic analysis found three dimensions of professional identity-related mechanisms that influence CDSS implementation success: perceived threat or enhancement of professional control and autonomy, perceived threat or enhancement of professional skills and expertise, and perceived loss or gain of control over patient relationships. At the technological level, the most common issues were the system's ability to fit into existing clinical workflows and organizational structures, and its ability to meet user needs. At the organizational level, time pressure and tension, as well as internal communication and involvement of end users were most frequently reported. At the human level, individual attitudes and emotional responses, as well as familiarity with the system, most often influenced the CDSS implementation. Our results show that professional identity-related mechanisms are driven by these factors and influence CDSS implementation success. The perception of the change of professional identity is influenced by the user's professional status and expertise and is improved over the course of implementation. CONCLUSION This review highlights the need for health care managers to evaluate perceived professional identity threats to health care professionals across all implementation phases when introducing a CDSS and to consider their varying manifestations among different health care professionals. Moreover, it highlights the importance of innovation and change management approaches, such as involving health professionals in the design and implementation process to mitigate threat perceptions. We provide future areas of research for the evaluation of the professional identity construct within health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Ackerhans
- Kiel Institute for Responsible Innovation, University of Kiel, Westring 425, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Thomas Huynh
- Kiel Institute for Responsible Innovation, University of Kiel, Westring 425, 24118, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carsten Kaiser
- Kiel Institute for Responsible Innovation, University of Kiel, Westring 425, 24118, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carsten Schultz
- Kiel Institute for Responsible Innovation, University of Kiel, Westring 425, 24118, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Söling S, Demirer I, Köberlein-Neu J, Hower KI, Müller BS, Pfaff H, Karbach U. Complex implementation mechanisms in primary care: do physicians' beliefs about the effectiveness of innovation play a mediating role? Applying a realist inquiry and structural equation modeling approach in a formative evaluation study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:131. [PMID: 37369994 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02081-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption of digital health technologies can improve the quality of care for polypharmacy patients, if the underlying complex implementation mechanisms are better understood. Context effects play a critical role in relation to implementation mechanisms. In primary care research, evidence on the effects of context in the adoption of digital innovation for polypharmacy management is lacking. STUDY AIM This study aims to identify contextual factors relevant to physician behavior and how they might mediate the adoption process. METHODS The physicians who participated in this formative evaluation study (n = 218) were part of the intervention group in a cluster-randomized controlled trial (AdAM). The intervention group implemented a digital innovation for clinical decision making in polypharmacy. A three-step methodological approach was used: (1) a realist inquiry approach, which involves the description of a context-mechanism-outcome configuration for the primary care setting; (2) a belief elicitation approach, which involves qualitative content analysis and the development of a quantitative latent contextualized scale; and (3) a mediation analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM) based on quantitative survey data from physicians to assess the mediating role of the contextualized scale (n = 179). RESULTS The key dimensions of a (1) context-mechanism-outcome model were mapped and refined. A (2) latent construct of the physicians' innovation beliefs related to the effectiveness of polypharmacy management practices was identified. Innovation beliefs play a (3) mediating role between the organizational readiness to implement change (p < 0.01) and the desired behavioral intent of physicians to adopt digital innovation (p < 0.01; R2 = 0.645). Our contextualized model estimated significant mediation, with a relative size of 38% for the mediation effect. Overall, the model demonstrated good fit indices (CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.034). CONCLUSION Physician adoption is directly affected by the readiness of primary care organizations for the implementation of change. In addition, the mediation analysis revealed that this relationship is indirectly influenced by primary care physicians' beliefs regarding the effectiveness of digital innovation. Both individual physician beliefs and practice organizational capacity could be equally prioritized in developing implementation strategies. The methodological approach used is suitable for the evaluation of complex implementation mechanisms. It has been proven to be an advantageous approach for formative evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03430336 . First registration: 12/02/2018. CLINICALTRIALS gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Söling
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
| | - Ibrahim Demirer
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juliane Köberlein-Neu
- Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Kira Isabel Hower
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Beate Sigrid Müller
- Institute for General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Pfaff
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ute Karbach
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences & Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel TK, Patel PB, Bhalla HL, Dwivedi P, Bajpai V, Kishore S. Impact of suspected adverse drug reactions on mortality and length of hospital stay in the hospitalised patients: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 79:99-116. [PMID: 36399205 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03419-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the risk of mortality and length of stay in hospitalised patients who have experienced suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as compared to patients who did not experience suspected ADRs. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted on databases for observational and randomised controlled studies conducted in any inpatient setting that reported deaths and/or length of hospital stay in patients who had suspected ADRs and did not have suspected ADRs during hospitalisation. PRISMA guidelines were strictly followed during the review. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using a tool designed by Smyth et al. for the studies of adverse drug reactions. The meta-analytic summary of all-cause mortality was estimated using odds ratio-OR (95% CI) and length of stay using mean difference-MD (95% CI). Both outcomes were pooled using a random effect model (DerSimonian and Laird method). Subgroup and meta-regression were performed based on study variables: study design, age group, study ward, study region, types of suspected ADRs (ADRAd-suspected ADRs that lead to hospitalisation and ADRIn-suspected ADRs that occur following hospitalisation), study duration, sample size and study period. The statistical analysis was conducted through the 'Review manager software version 5.4.1 and JASP (Version 0.14.1)'. RESULTS After screening 475 relevant articles, 55 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Patients having suspected ADRs had reported significantly higher odds of all-cause mortality [OR: 1.50 (95% CI: 1.21-1.86; I2 = 100%) than those patients who did not have suspected ADRs during hospitalisation. Study wards, types of suspected ADRs and sample size were observed as significant predictors of all-cause mortality (p < 0.05). Patients having suspected ADRs had reported significantly higher mean difference in hospital stay [MD: 3.98 (95% CI: 2.91, 5.05; I2 = 99%) than those patients who did not have suspected ADRs during hospitalisation. Types of suspected ADRs and study periods were observed as significant predictors of length of stay (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Suspected ADRs significantly increase the risk of mortality and length of stay in hospitalised patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION CRD42020176320.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejas K Patel
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, 273008, India.
| | - Parvati B Patel
- Department of Pharmacology, GMERS Medical College, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, 390021, India
| | - Hira Lal Bhalla
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, 273008, India
| | - Priyanka Dwivedi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, 273008, India
| | - Vijeta Bajpai
- Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, 273008, India
| | - Surekha Kishore
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, 273008, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meunier PY, Raynaud C, Guimaraes E, Gueyffier F, Letrilliart L. Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. Ann Fam Med 2023; 21:57-69. [PMID: 36690490 PMCID: PMC9870646 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify and quantify the barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) by primary care professionals (PCPs). METHODS A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted using a sequential synthesis design. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library were searched in July 2021. Studies that evaluated CDSSs providing recommendations to PCPs and intended for use during a consultation were included. We excluded CDSSs used only by patients, described as concepts or prototypes, used with simulated cases, and decision supports not considered as CDSSs. A framework synthesis was performed according to the HOT-fit framework (Human, Organizational, Technology, Net Benefits), then a quantitative synthesis evaluated the impact of the HOT-fit categories on CDSS use. RESULTS A total of 48 studies evaluating 45 CDSSs were included, and 186 main barriers or facilitators were identified. Qualitatively, barriers and facilitators were classified as human (eg, perceived usefulness), organizational (eg, disruption of usual workflow), and technological (eg, CDSS user-friendliness), with explanatory elements. The greatest barrier to using CDSSs was an increased workload. Quantitatively, the human and organizational factors had negative impacts on CDSS use, whereas the technological factor had a neutral impact and the net benefits dimension a positive impact. CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasize the need for CDSS developers to better address human and organizational issues, in addition to technological challenges. We inferred core CDSS features covering these 3 factors, expected to improve their usability in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Yves Meunier
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Camille Raynaud
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuelle Guimaraes
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - François Gueyffier
- Laboratoire de biométrie et biologie évolutive, département biostatistiques et modélisation pour la santé et l'environnement, CNRS UMR5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Fédération de Recherche Santé Lyon Est, PAM Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Letrilliart
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mecca MC, Zenoni M, Fried TR. Primary care clinicians' use of deprescribing recommendations: A mixed-methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2715-2720. [PMID: 35523638 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to explore the effects of a deprescribing intervention on primary care clinicians' medication-related communication. METHODS A clinical decision support tool provided clinicians in the intervention group with an individualized report regarding potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), deintensification of diabetes and/or hypertension treatment, and poor adherence/cognition. Participants included 113 Veterans aged ≥ 65 prescribed ≥ 7 medications and their primary care clinicians. Encounters were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Between 36% and 38% of intervention clinicians discussed PIMs and diabetes mellitus/hypertension deintensification and 94% discussed adherence. PIMs discussions referred to the report and prompted some medication changes. The diabetes mellitus/hypertension and adherence discussions were not prompted by the report but instead arose from enhanced medication reconciliation. Changes in diabetes mellitus/hypertension medications were not made out of overtreatment concerns. There was no deprescribing for nonadherence. Enhanced medication reconciliation also led to discussions about medications not in the report. CONCLUSION An individualized report regarding medication appropriateness prompted clinicians to perform a more thorough medication reconciliation and discuss PIMs. It did not prompt chronic care deintensification or deprescribing to enhance adherence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Feedback reports can promote robust medication reconciliation in primary care. Changing clinician practice to achieve deprescribing in chronic disease management will be more challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia C Mecca
- Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave., #240, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
| | - Maria Zenoni
- Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave., #240, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Program on Aging, Yale School of Medicine, 300 George St., New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Terri R Fried
- Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave., #240, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Program on Aging, Yale School of Medicine, 300 George St., New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kilgallon JL, Gannon M, Burns Z, McMahon G, Dykes P, Linder J, Bates DW, Waikar S, Lipsitz S, Baer HJ, Samal L. Multicomponent intervention to improve blood pressure management in chronic kidney disease: a protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054065. [PMID: 34937722 PMCID: PMC8705218 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to incorporate behavioural economic principles and user-centred design principles into a multicomponent intervention for the management of uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a multicentre, pragmatic, controlled trial cluster-randomised at the clinician level at The Brigham and Women's Practice -Based Research Network of 15 practices. Of 220 total clinicians, 184 were eligible to be enrolled, and the remainder were excluded (residents and clinicians who see urgent care or walk-in patients); no clinicians opted out. The intervention consists of a clinical decision support system based in behavioural economic and user-centred design principles that will: (1) synthesise existing laboratory tests, medication orders and vital sign data; (2) increase recognition of CKD, (3) increase recognition of uncontrolled HTN in CKD patients and (4) deliver evidence-based CKD and HTN management recommendations. The primary endpoint is the change in mean systolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 months compared across arms. We will use the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework. At the conclusion of this study, we will have: (1) validated an intervention that combines laboratory tests, medication records and clinical information collected by electronic health records to recognise uncontrolled HTN in CKD patients and recommend a course of care, (2) tested the effectiveness of said intervention and (3) collected information about the implementation of the intervention that will aid in dissemination of the intervention to other practice settings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board at Brigham and Women's Hospital provided an expedited review and approval for this study protocol, and a Data Safety Monitoring Board will ensure the ongoing safety of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03679247.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Kilgallon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Gannon
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zoe Burns
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gearoid McMahon
- Division of Nephrology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patricia Dykes
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey Linder
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Westfall Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sushrut Waikar
- Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stuart Lipsitz
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Heather J Baer
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lipika Samal
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nurse Practitioner's Geriatric Practice in Japanese Postacute Care Setting. J Nurse Pract 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
9
|
Samal L, Fu HN, Camara DS, Wang J, Bierman AS, Dorr DA. Health information technology to improve care for people with multiple chronic conditions. Health Serv Res 2021; 56 Suppl 1:1006-1036. [PMID: 34363220 PMCID: PMC8515226 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review evidence regarding the use of Health Information Technology (health IT) interventions aimed at improving care for people living with multiple chronic conditions (PLWMCC) in order to identify critical knowledge gaps. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Compendex, and IEEE Xplore databases for studies published in English between 2010 and 2020. STUDY DESIGN We identified studies of health IT interventions for PLWMCC across three domains as follows: self-management support, care coordination, and algorithms to support clinical decision making. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Structured search queries were created and validated. Abstracts were reviewed iteratively to refine inclusion and exclusion criteria. The search was supplemented by manually searching the bibliographic sections of the included studies. The search included a forward citation search of studies nested within a clinical trial to identify the clinical trial protocol and published clinical trial results. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The search yielded 1907 articles; 44 were included. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 35 other studies including quasi-experimental, usability, feasibility, qualitative studies, or development/validation studies of analytic models were included. Five RCTs had positive results, and the remaining four RCTs showed that the interventions had no effect. The studies address individual patient engagement and assess patient-centered outcomes such as quality of life. Few RCTs assess outcomes such as disability and none assess mortality. CONCLUSIONS Despite a growing body of literature on health IT interventions or multicomponent interventions including a health IT component for chronic disease management, current evidence for applying health IT solutions to improve care for PLWMCC is limited. The body of literature included in this review provides critical information on the state of the science as well as the many gaps that need to be filled for digital health to fulfill its promise in supporting care delivery that meets the needs of PLWMCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lipika Samal
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBostonMAUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Helen N. Fu
- Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public HealthIndianapolisINUSA
- Regenstrief InstituteCenter for Biomedical InformaticsIndianapolisINUSA
| | - Djibril S. Camara
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (CSELS) Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Public Health Informatics Fellowship ProgramAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
- Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityRockvilleMDUSA
| | - Jing Wang
- Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityRockvilleMDUSA
- Florida State University College of NursingTallahasseeFloridaUSA
- Health and Aging Policy Fellows Program at Columbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Arlene S. Bierman
- Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityRockvilleMDUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kouladjian O'Donnell L, Reeve E, Hilmer SN. Development, validation and evaluation of the Goal-directed Medication review Electronic Decision Support System (G-MEDSS)©. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 18:3174-3183. [PMID: 34583897 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 1) To understand and investigate the experiences of accredited clinical pharmacists (ACP) using computerised clinical decision support systems (CCDSS) during medication reviews for older people, including those living with dementia; 2) To design, develop, validate, and evaluate a CCDSS that incorporates pharmacological and other deprescribing tools to aid person-centred management of high-risk medications in older adults living with and without dementia. METHODS This study consisted of three phases and was designed on scenario-based methodology: a) the development phase, which included an exploratory survey and prototype building; b) the validation phase, which included qualitative data collection and usability testing with ACPs, general practitioners (GPs) and carers for people living with dementia; and c) the evaluation phase, using mixed-methods analyses. RESULTS The exploratory survey found that ACPs required a flexible, and reliable CCDSS to support them with clinical decisions regarding high-risk medication use in older adults. The Goal-directed Medication review Electronic Decision Support System (G-MEDSS)© was developed and validated using quantitative and qualitative feedback received from ACPs, GPs and carers for people with dementia. The mean (SD) System Usability Scale score was 69.0 (12.9), which indicated fair-good usability. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Involving end-users in the design process refined and improved the design of G-MEDSS, allowing for a person-centred and goal-directed delivery of pharmaceutical care. G-MEDSS allows healthcare practitioners conducting medication reviews for older adults living with and without dementia to tailor pharmaceutical care to meet their goals and preferences. Future studies may explore integration of G-MEDSS with prescribing or dispensing software.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Kouladjian O'Donnell
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Emily Reeve
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Geriatric Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine, and College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada; Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ie K, Aoshima S, Yabuki T, Albert SM. A narrative review of evidence to guide deprescribing among older adults. J Gen Fam Med 2021; 22:182-196. [PMID: 34221792 PMCID: PMC8245739 DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Potentially inappropriate prescription and polypharmacy are well‐known risk factors for morbidity and mortality among older adults. However, recent systematic reviews have failed to demonstrate the overall survival benefits of deprescribing. Thus, it is necessary to synthesize the current evidence to provide a practical direction for future research and clinical practice. This review summarizes the existing body of evidence regarding deprescribing to identify useful intervention elements. There is evidence that even simple interventions, such as direct deprescribing targeted at risky medications and explicit criteria‐based approaches, effectively reduce inappropriate prescribing. On the other hand, if the goal is to improve clinical outcomes such as hospitalization and emergency department visits, patient‐centered multimodal interventions such as a combination of medication review, multidisciplinary collaboration, and patient education are likely to be more effective. We also consider the opportunities and challenges for deprescribing within the Japanese healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenya Ie
- Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Internal Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.,Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Internal Medicine Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital Kawasaki Japan.,Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh PA USA
| | | | - Taku Yabuki
- Department of Internal Medicine Tochigi Medical Center Tochigi Japan
| | - Steven M Albert
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rantsi M, Hyttinen V, Jyrkkä J, Vartiainen AK, Kankaanpää E. Process evaluation of implementation strategies to reduce potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in older population: A scoping review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 18:2367-2391. [PMID: 33926827 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Several implementation strategies can reduce potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing. Although use of PIMs has declined in recent years, it remains prevalent. Various strategies exist to improve the appropriateness of medication use. However, little is known about the processes of these different implementation strategies. This scoping review aims to investigate how the process evaluation of implementation strategies for reducing PIM prescribing in the older population has been studied. METHODS We searched for process evaluations of implementation strategies for reducing PIM prescribing in PUBMED, SCOPUS and Web of Science published between January 2000 and November 2019 in English. We applied the following inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥65 years, validated PIM criteria, and implementation process evaluated. The review focuses on decision support for health care professionals. We described the findings of the process evaluations, and compared the authors' concepts of process evaluation of the included publications to those of Proctor et al.( 2010). RESULT Of 9131 publications screened, 29 met our inclusion criteria. Different process evaluation conceptualizations were identified. Most process evaluations took place in the initial stages of the process (acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and feasibility) and sustainability and implementation costs were seldom evaluated. None of the included publications evaluated fidelity. Multifaceted interventions were the most studied implementation strategies. Medication review was more common in acceptability evaluations, multidisciplinary interventions in adoption evaluations, and computerized systems and educational interventions in feasibility evaluations. Process evaluations were studied from the health care professionals' viewpoint in most of the included publications, but the management viewpoint was missing. DISCUSSION The conceptualization of process evaluation in the field of PIM prescribing is indeterminate. There is also a current gap in the knowledge of sustainability and implementation costs. Clarifying the conceptualization of implementation process evaluation is essential in order to effectively translate research knowledge into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mervi Rantsi
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Finland.
| | - Virva Hyttinen
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Finland
| | - Johanna Jyrkkä
- Assessment of Pharmacotherapies, Finnish Medicines Agency, Finland
| | | | - Eila Kankaanpää
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parkhurst E, Calonico E, Noh G. Medical Decision Support to Reduce Unwarranted Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) Genetic Testing. J Med Syst 2020; 44:152. [PMID: 32737598 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01615-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Most major national medical associations have advised against routine MTHFR testing since at least 2013. However, many providers continue to order this unwarranted genetic test. This study assessed the efficacy of an electronic best practice alert to aid ordering providers. We tracked the rate of MTHFR tests ordered per 1 million patients in the twelve months before and after the implementation of an alert that suggested an alternative test. Associated factors including the ordering department, diagnosis, patient sex, and patient age were also analyzed. Chi square analysis was used to compare the difference between pre- and post-alert test ordering rates. A total of 997 MTHFR analysis were ordered in Southern California Kaiser Permanente from January 2017 through December 2018. Overall, the average MTHFR monthly test ordering rates dropped significantly from 12.93 per million patients in 2017 to 7.08 per million patients in 2018 (p = 0.0056). However, testing rates in children were unchanged and, in some associated diagnoses, such as psychiatric illnesses and neurodevelopmental conditions, the testing rates increased. Recommending an alternate test in lieu of the unwarranted one significantly reduced the overall rate of MTHFR testing. The alert was most effective for specialties and diagnoses where MTHFR was historically medically indicated. This suggests such alerts are an effective intervention that health care systems can implement to serve as an educational update and to reduce unwarranted genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Parkhurst
- Genetics Department, Southern California Kaiser Permanente, 6041 Cadillac Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90034, USA.
| | - Elise Calonico
- Genetics Department, Southern California Kaiser Permanente, 6041 Cadillac Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90034, USA
| | - Grace Noh
- Genetics Department, Southern California Kaiser Permanente, 9985 Sierra Ave, MOB2, 2nd floor, Fontana, CA, 92335, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rieckert A, Reeves D, Altiner A, Drewelow E, Esmail A, Flamm M, Hann M, Johansson T, Klaassen-Mielke R, Kunnamo I, Löffler C, Piccoliori G, Sommerauer C, Trampisch US, Vögele A, Woodham A, Sönnichsen A. Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2020; 369:m1822. [PMID: 32554566 PMCID: PMC7301164 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review in elderly people with polypharmacy. DESIGN Pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING 359 general practices in Austria, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS 3904 adults aged 75 years and older using eight or more drugs on a regular basis, recruited by their general practitioner. INTERVENTION A newly developed electronic decision support tool comprising a comprehensive drug review to support general practitioners in deprescribing potentially inappropriate and non-evidence based drugs. Doctors were randomly allocated to either the electronic decision support tool or to provide treatment as usual. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. The key secondary outcome was reduction in the number of drugs. RESULTS 3904 adults were enrolled between January and October 2015. 181 practices and 1953 participants were assigned to electronic decision support (intervention group) and 178 practices and 1951 participants to treatment as usual (control group). The primary outcome (composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months) occurred in 871 (44.6%) participants in the intervention group and 944 (48.4%) in the control group. In an intention-to-treat analysis the odds ratio of the composite outcome was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.07; P=0.19, 997 of 1953 v 1055 of 1951). In an analysis restricted to participants attending practice according to protocol, a difference was found favouring the intervention (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.98; 774 of 1682 v 873 of 1712, P=0.03). By 24 months the number of prescribed drugs had decreased in the intervention group compared with control group (uncontrolled mean change -0.42 v 0.06: adjusted mean difference -0.45, 95% confidence interval -0.63 to -0.26; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In intention-to-treat analysis, a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review of elderly people with polypharmacy showed no conclusive effects on the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. Nonetheless, a reduction in drugs was achieved without detriment to patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10137559.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Rieckert
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - David Reeves
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Attila Altiner
- Institute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Eva Drewelow
- Institute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Aneez Esmail
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Flamm
- Institute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mark Hann
- Centre for Biostatistics, School for Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Tim Johansson
- Institute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Renate Klaassen-Mielke
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Christin Löffler
- Institute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Christina Sommerauer
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Ulrike S Trampisch
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Anna Vögele
- Institute for Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Adrine Woodham
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Andreas Sönnichsen
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center of Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|