Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations

The incidence of foodborne diseases has increased over the years and resulted in major public health problem globally. Foodborne pathogens can be found in various foods and it is important to detect foodborne pathogens to provide safe food supply and to prevent foodborne diseases. The conventional methods used to detect foodborne pathogen are time consuming and laborious. Hence, a variety of methods have been developed for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens as it is required in many food analyses. Rapid detection methods can be categorized into nucleic acid-based, biosensor-based and immunological-based methods. This review emphasizes on the principles and application of recent rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens. Detection methods included are simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR), multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and oligonucleotide DNA microarray which classified as nucleic acid-based methods; optical, electrochemical and mass-based biosensors which classified as biosensor-based methods; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunoassay which classified as immunological-based methods. In general, rapid detection methods are generally time-efficient, sensitive, specific and labor-saving. The developments of rapid detection methods are vital in prevention and treatment of foodborne diseases.

Comparative evaluation of new TaqMan real-time assays for the detection of hepatitis A virus

Three novel real-time TaqMan RT-PCR assays targeting the 5'-UTR, the viral protease and the viral polymerase regions of the hepatitis A virus (HAV) were developed, evaluated and compared against a new published 5'-UTR TaqMan assay (JN) and a widely used conventional RT-PCR assay (HAVc). All conventional RT-PCR (HAV, SH-Prot and SH-Poly systems) and TaqMan (SH-Prot, SH-Poly, JN and SH-5U systems) assays evaluated were consistent for the detection of the three different HAV strains (HM-175, HAS-15 and LSH/S) used and reproducible for both RNA duplicates with the exception of two reproducibility discrepancies observed with both 5'-UTR real-time systems (JN and SH-5U). Limits of detection for conventional HAV, SH-Prot and SH-Poly RT-PCR systems were found to be equivalent when tested with serially diluted suspensions of the HM-175 strain. Although the four real-time RT-PCR TaqMan assays evaluated herein produced similar and consistent quantification data down to the level of one genomic equivalent copy with their respectively cloned amplicons, significant and important differences were observed for the detection of HAV genomic RNA. Results showed that the new real-time TaqMan SH-Poly and SH-Prot primer and probe systems were more consistent and sensitive by 5 logs as compared to both 5'-UTR designs (JN and SH-5U) used for the detection of HAV genomic RNA as well as for the detection in cell culture by cytopathic effect. Considering their higher analytical sensitivity, the proposed SH-Poly and SH-Prot amplification systems could therefore represent valuable tools for the detection of HAV in clinical, environmental and food samples.

Comparative evaluation of RT-PCR, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) and real-time RT-PCR for detection of noroviruses in faecal material

Using different primer and probe sets, RT-PCR, NASBA and TaqMan RT-PCR molecular methods were compared to detect NoV GII in 13 clinical stool samples. The RT-PCR results observed by gel electrophoresis (Ando, Kageyama and Anderson amplification and probe systems), dot blot hybridization (Ando and Kageyama) and real-time TaqMan assay (Ando and Kageyama) were shown to be consistent and reproducible for the detection of NoV GII. Whereas, the NASBA assay using Ando primers showed some reproducibility discrepancies. Detection limits of the NoV GII/Kageyama system were found to be equal or significantly higher than the Ando system. Real-time TaqMan RT-PCR assay showed similar detection limits to that of NASBA with the Kageyama amplification and detection system, while it was 1log less sensitive than the Ando system. In a clinical context, RT-PCR, NASBA and real-time TaqMan RT-PCR methods using undiluted samples were all suitable for the detection of NoV GII, however the NASBA assay provided less consistent signals. The NoV GII Kageyama real-time TaqMan RT-PCR assay was reliable with a high analytical sensitivity and has shown the capability of detecting one genomic equivalent copy.