Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle

Genomic prediction of service sire effect on female reproductive performance in Holstein cattle: A comparison between different methods, validation population and marker densities

Reproductive traits of dairy cattle are bound to the actual efficiency of farm operation, which therefore show great economic importance. Among them, some traits were deemed to be simultaneously affected by service sire and mating cow. Service sires are proved to play an important role in reproduction process of cows. However, limited study explored the genetic effect of service sire (GESS), let alone the genomic prediction of this effect. In the present study, 2244 genotyped bulls together with phenotypic records were used to predict the GESS on conception rate, 56-day non-return rate, calving ease, stillbirth and gestation length. The feasibilities of multi-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (msGBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (ssGBLUP) were investigated under different scenarios, that is, different marker densities and validation population. The predictive accuracies and unbiasedness for GESS ranged from 0.159 to 0.647 and from 0.202 to 2.018, respectively, when validated on young bulls, while the accuracies and unbiasedness ranged from 0.409 to 0.802 and 0.333 to 1.146 when validated on random split data sets. It is feasible to predict GESS on reproductive traits by using a linear mixed model and genomic data, and high-density marker panel had limited contribution to the prediction. This research investigated the potential factors that influence the genomic prediction of GESS on reproductive traits and indicated the possibility of genomic selection on GESS, both in ideal and practical circumstances.

Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Prediction for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Hanwoo Cattle

There is a growing interest worldwide in genetically selecting high-value cut carcass weights, which allows for increased profitability in the beef cattle industry. Primal cut yields have been proposed as a potential indicator of cutability and overall carcass merit, and it is worthwhile to assess the prediction accuracies of genomic selection for these traits. This study was performed to compare the prediction accuracy obtained from a conventional pedigree-based BLUP (PBLUP) and a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) method for 10 primal cut traits-bottom round, brisket, chuck, flank, rib, shank, sirloin, striploin, tenderloin, and top round-in Hanwoo cattle with the estimators of the linear regression method. The dataset comprised 3467 phenotypic observations for the studied traits and 3745 genotyped individuals with 43,987 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. In the partial dataset, the accuracies ranged from 0.22 to 0.30 and from 0.37 to 0.54 as evaluated using the PBLUP and ssGBLUP models, respectively. The accuracies of PBLUP and ssGBLUP with the whole dataset varied from 0.45 to 0.75 (average 0.62) and from 0.52 to 0.83 (average 0.71), respectively. The results demonstrate that ssGBLUP performed better than PBLUP averaged over the 10 traits, in terms of prediction accuracy, regardless of considering a partial or whole dataset. Moreover, ssGBLUP generally showed less biased prediction and a value of dispersion closer to 1 than PBLUP across the studied traits. Thus, the ssGBLUP seems to be more suitable for improving the accuracy of predictions for primal cut yields, which can be considered a starting point in future genomic evaluation for these traits in Hanwoo breeding practice.

Genetic analysis of growth, visual scores, height, and carcass traits in Nelore cattle

Covariance components were estimated for growth traits (BW, birth weight; WW, weaning weight; YW, yearling weight), visual scores (BQ, breed quality; CS, conformation; MS, muscling; NS, navel; PS, finishing precocity), hip height (HH), and carcass traits (BF, backfat thickness; LMA, longissimus muscle area) measured at yearling. Genetic gains were obtained and validation models on direct and maternal effects for BW and WW were fitted. Genetic correlations of growth traits with CS, PS, MS, and HH ranged from 0.20 ± 0.01 to 0.94 ± 0.01 and were positive and low with NS (0.11 ± 0.01 to 0.20 ± 0.01) and favorable with BQ (0.14 ± 0.02 to 0.37 ± 0.02). Null to moderate genetic correlations were obtained between growth and carcass traits. Genetic gains were positive and significant, except for BW. An increase of 0.76 and 0.72 kg is expected for BW and WW, respectively, per unit increase in estimated breeding value (EBV) for direct effect and an additional 0.74 and 1.43, respectively, kg per unit increase in EBV for the maternal effect. Monitoring genetic gains for HH and NS is relevant to maintain an adequate body size and a navel morphological correction, if necessary. Simultaneous selection for growth, morphological, and carcass traits in line with improve maternal performance is a feasible strategy to increase herd productivity.

Genomic selection in Gir cattle using female reference population

When a sizeable reference population of proven bulls is not available for implementing Genomic selection for a particular trait, and when a recording of certain traits on large scale is difficult, the use of a female reference population is recommended. Gir, one of the important milk purpose cattle breeds of India falls under this category. There is no large scale Progeny Testing (PT) programme in Gir, so proven bulls based on daughter performance in large numbers are not available. Considering the constraints, a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) model was implemented based on recorded cow reference population in Gir breed. Cows (3491) and 23 bulls were genotyped using INDUSCHIP for this purpose. Due to non-availability of pedigreed data, conventional breeding values (BV) of bulls and their reliabilities were not known. For comparison, assumed theoretical reliability of BV of a bull selected based on its dam's yield was compared with reliability obtained for genomic breeding value (GBV) using a GBLUP model. The reliability estimates for GBVs were 4 times higher than that for BVs. The predictive ability of the model was demonstrated by measuring the correlation between corrected phenotypes and GBVs for animals whose records were masked in a five-fold cross-validation study. The correlation was around 0.45 showing reasonable predictability of the GBLUP model. The GBVs were not biased. The regression coefficient between the corrected phenotype and GBV was 1.045. The present study demonstrates that it is feasible to implement genomic selection in Gir cattle in Indian conditions using a female reference population. It is expected that the bulls can be selected with around 4 fold more accuracy than the current method of selecting based on their dams' yield accelerating expected genetic growth in Gir cattle.

The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1

The largest gains in accuracy in a genomic selection program come from genotyping young selection candidates who have not yet produced progeny and who might, or might not, have a phenotypic record recorded. To reduce genotyping costs and to allow for an increased amount of genomic data to be available in a population, young selection candidates may be genotyped with low-density (LD) panels and imputed to a higher density. However, to ensure that a reasonable imputation accuracy persists overtime, some parent animals originally genotyped at LD must be re-genotyped at a higher density. This study investigated the long-term impact of selectively re-genotyping parents with a medium-density (MD) SNP panel on the accuracy of imputation and on the genetic predictions using ssGBLUP in a simulated beef cattle population. Assuming a moderately heritable trait (0.25) and a population undergoing selection, the simulation generated sequence data for a founder population (100 male and 500 female individuals) and 9,000 neutral markers, considered as the MD panel. All selection candidates from generation 8 to 15 were genotyped with LD panels corresponding to a density of 0.5% (LD_0.5), 2% (LD_2), and 5% (LD_5) of the MD. Re-genotyping scenarios chose parents at random or based on EBV and ranged from 10% of male parents to re-genotyping all male and female parents with MD. Ranges in average imputation accuracy at generation 15 were 0.567 to 0.936, 0.795 to 0.985, and 0.931 to 0.995 for the LD_0.5, LD_2, and LD_5, respectively, and the average EBV accuracies ranged from 0.453 to 0.735, 0.631 to 0.784, and 0.748 to 0.807 for LD_0.5, LD_2, and LD_5, respectively. Re-genotyping parents based on their EBV resulted in higher imputation and EBV accuracies compared to selecting parents at random and these values increased with the size of LD panels. Differences between re-genotyping scenarios decreased when the density of the LD panel increased, suggesting fewer animals needed to be re-genotyped to achieve higher accuracies. In general, imputation and EBV accuracies were greater when more parents were re-genotyped, independent of the proportion of males and females. In practice, the relationship between the density of the LD panel used and the target panel must be considered to determine the number (proportion) of animals that would need to be re-genotyped to enable sufficient imputation accuracy.