Abnormally High Blood Acetaldehyde Concentrations Suggest Potential Postmortem Ethanol Generation

Ethanol is one of the most commonly used and abused substances worldwide. Identifying whether the source of ethanol detected in corpses is antemortem ingestion or postmortem generation is especially important for determining the cause of death, which remains a vibrant field of research. During the synthesis of ethanol in the putrefaction process of corpses, other small molecules such as acetaldehyde and n-propanol could also be produced. According to our prospective statistical analysis based on authentic samples from forensic cases, it is rational to suspect ethanol generation after death when the concentration of acetaldehyde detected in blood exceeds 0.014 g/dL. Through in vitro simulation experiments, in addition to confirming that ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate are the reliable biomarkers of antemortem ingestion of ethanol, we propose that acetaldehyde is far more sensitive than n-propanol as a potential marker in the blood of corpses for postmortem ethanol formation.

The use of multiple keratinous matrices (head hair, axillary hair, and toenail clippings) can help narrowing a period of drug exposure: experience with a criminal case involving 25I-NBOMe and 4-MMC

The objective of this publication is to present the interest of collecting several keratinous specimens in order to document possible drug impairment at the time of the assault, when knowledge solely occurred 7 months after. A subject committed a murder and within minutes after the crime self-inflicted serious wounds. He was charged to the hospital where he slowly recovered. After several weeks, he was sent to prison. During this period, intelligence indicated possible drug impairment at the time of the assault after using 25I-NBOMe and 4-MMC. Head hair (4 cm), axillary hair, and toenails were collected 7 months after the crime. New psychoactive substances were tested in each specimen using LC-MS/MS, which revealed the presence of 25I-NBOMe and 4-MMC in axillary hair (2 and 6 pg/mg) and toenails (1 and 5 pg/mg). However, the perpetrator claimed that the positive findings were due to contamination in prison. Therefore, the head hair was also tested and results returned negative (LOQ at 1 pg/mg), demonstrating absence of contamination during the last 4 months before collection. Combining the window of drug detection in axillary hair (about 4 to 8 months) and the one of toenail clippings (up to 8 months), and excluding drug exposure during the previous 4 months as well as external contamination as the head hair results were negative, allowed us to conclude that the positive findings in axillary hair and toenails are more likely than not consistent with consumption of both 25I-NBOMe and 4-MMC at the time of the crime.

Testing venous carbohydrate-deficient transferrin or capillary phosphatidylethanol with concurrent ethyl glucuronide and ethyl palmitate hair tests to assess historical and recent alcohol use

Hair biomarkers, ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl palmitate (EtPa), together with blood biomarker tests, carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) or phosphatidylethanol (PEth), are commonly used in identifying patterns of alcohol consumption as they possess different windows of detection. The detection of EtG in hair samples is mainly used in combination with EtPa when hair cosmetic treatments such as hair colouring and bleaching affect EtG levels. The main purpose of our study was to investigate the differences in frequency distribution of positive CDT and PEth results indicating alcohol had been used, when EtG and EtPa were not detected, where evidence of abstinence is paramount. Of the total 602 cases, for 179 (29.7%), neither EtG nor EtPa markers were detected. Of these, 0.5% of the cases produced positive CDT. However, 18.6% produced positive PEth, a significantly higher proportion. A similar pattern emerges when results are evaluated according to whether hair had been either cosmetically treated or untreated. When hair was untreated, one case produced positive CDT, and 19.3% were positive for PEth (median of 51 ng/ml). No cases of positive CDT results, but 20.8% of PEth were positive (median of 106.5 ng/ml) when hair samples had been cosmetically treated. Whether EtG or EtPa markers were detected or not, significantly higher proportions of PEth than CDT were seen. The results of this study substantiate the case for using hair EtG in conjunction with a PEth test, rather than CDT test, for efficient monitoring of recent and historical alcohol consumption.

Negative hair test result after long-term drug use. About a case involving morphine and literature review

Although it has been accepted by most scientists that drugs circulating in blood are eligible to hair incorporation, this cannot be considered as a general statement. A 42-year old man was found dead in his swimming pool. He was living alone, and seen alive 2 days before by a neighbour. Femoral blood, cardiac blood and hair were collected during body examination. Free morphine was identified in femoral blood at 28 ng/mL, corresponding to his treatment for chronic pain (3 × 5 mg daily for 4 months). However, with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) at 10 pg/mg, segmental hair testing (3 × 1 cm) for morphine was negative. In this paper, the author has reviewed the different factors which can be responsible of this discrepancy. Several variables can influence the detection of a drug in hair and the author has listed reasons that can account for the absence of analytical response in hair after drug administration. The drug may not be incorporated in hair. That is the case for large bio-molecules, such as hormones, which cannot be transferred from the blood capillaries to growing cells of hair. Cosmetic treatments (perming, colouring, bleaching) or environmental aggressions (ultraviolet radiation, thermal application) will always reduce the concentrations. In this case, the lack of morphine detection was attributed to the effects of chlorinated water from the swimming pool. A negative hair result is also a result. However, this can be interpreted in three different ways: 1. the owner of the hair did not take or was not exposed to the specific drug, 2. the procedure is not sensitive enough to detect the drug, or 3. something happened after drug incorporation (cosmetic treatment, environmental influence).