Quantification of 54 Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs, Including 20 Designer Ones, in Plasma

Probe Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Detection and Quantification of Benzodiazepines

BACKGROUND

Legally prescribed benzodiazepines (BZDs) and designer BZDs are widely misused and must be determined in multiple contexts (eg, overdose, drug-facilitated sexual assaults, or driving under the influence of drugs). This study aimed to develop a method for measuring serum BZD levels using probe electrospray ionization (PESI) mass spectrometry and an isotope dilution approach.

METHODS

A tandem mass spectrometer equipped with a probe electrospray ionization source in multiple reaction monitoring mode was used. Isotope dilution was applied for quantification using a deuterated internal standard at a fixed concentration for alprazolam, bromazepam, diazepam, nordiazepam, oxazepam, temazepam, zolpidem, and zopiclone. This method included designer BZDs: clonazolam, deschloroetizolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, flubromazepam, flubromazolam, meclonazepam, nifoxipam, and pyrazolam. Sample preparation was done by mixing 10 µL of serum with 500 µL of an ethanol/ammonium formate 0.01 mol/L buffer. Complete validation was performed, and the method was compared with liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and immunoassays (IC) by analyzing 40 real samples.

RESULTS

The analysis time for identification and quantification of the 18 molecules was 2.5 minutes. This method was fully validated, and the limits of quantification varied from 5 to 50 mcg/L depending on the molecule. In the 40 real samples, 100% of molecules (n = 89) were detected by both LC-MS/MS and PESI-MS/MS, and regression analysis showed excellent agreement between the 2 methods (r 2 = 0.98). On IC, bromazepam and zolpidem were not detected in 2 and 1 cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PESI-MS/MS allows serum BZD detection and measurement. Given the isotope dilution approach, a calibration curve was not required, and its performance was similar to that of LC-MS/MS, and its specificity was higher than that of IC.

Urine Drug Screening in the Era of Designer Benzodiazepines: Comparison of Three Immunoassay Platforms, LC-QTOF-MS, and LC-MS/MS

This study investigated the presence of designer benzodiazepines in 35 urine specimens obtained from emergency department patients undergoing urine drug screening. All specimens showed apparent false-positive benzodiazepine screening results (i.e., confirmatory testing using a 19-component LC-MS/MS panel showed no prescribed benzodiazepines at detectable levels). The primary aims were to identify the possible presence of designer benzodiazepines, characterize the reactivity of commercially available screening immunoassays with designer benzodiazepines, and evaluate the risk of inappropriately ruling out designer benzodiazepine use when utilizing common urine drug screening and confirmatory tests. Specimens were obtained from emergency departments of a single US Health system. Following clinically ordered drug screening using Abbott ARCHITECT c assays and lab-developed LC-MS/MS confirmatory testing, additional characterization was performed for investigative purposes. Specifically, urine specimens were screened using two additional assays (Roche cobas c502, Siemens Dimension Vista) and LC-QTOF-MS to identify presumptively positive species, including benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines. Finally, targeted, qualitative LC-MS/MS was performed to confirm the presence of 12 designer benzodiazepines. Following benzodiazepine detection using the Abbott ARCHITECT, benzodiazepines were subsequently detected in 28/35 and 35/35 urine specimens, respectively, using Siemens and Roche assays. LC-QTOF-MS showed the presumptive presence of at least one non-FDA approved benzodiazepine in 30/35 specimens: flubromazolam (12/35), flualprazolam (11/35), flubromazepam (2/35), clonazolam (4/35), etizolam (9/35), metizolam (5/35), nitrazepam (1/35), and pyrazolam (1/35). Two or three designer benzodiazepines were detected concurrently in 13/35 specimens. Qualitative LC-MS/MS confirmed the presence of at least one designer benzodiazepine or metabolite in 23/35 specimens, with 3 specimens unavailable for confirmatory testing. Urine benzodiazepine screening assays from three manufacturers were cross-reactive with multiple non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines. Clinical and forensic toxicology laboratories using traditionally designed LC-MS/MS panels may fail to confirm the presence of non-US FDA-approved benzodiazepines detected by screening assays, risking inappropriate interpretation of screening results as false-positives.

Multi-analyte LC-MS/MS quantification of 38 antipsychotics and metabolites in plasma: Method validation & application to routine analyses

The past decades have seen a rise in the prescription of antipsychotic drugs in the European population, despite the risk of extra-pyramidal, metabolic and cardiac side effects. A multi-analyte liquid chromatography - triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method was developed for the quantification of 38 antipsychotic drugs in plasma. Samples were extracted by a straightforward liquid-liquid extraction with methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether and the compounds of interest were chromatographically separated within 6 min. Calibration curves covered the recommended therapeutic range for all compounds, in addition to sub- and supratherapeutic concentrations for most. The method was successfully validated according to the European Medicines Agency guidelines on bioanalytical method validation. Analysis of medico-legal samples confirmed the relatively common use of the second generation antipsychotics quetiapine and olanzapine, as well as the continued presence of the first generation antipsychotic haloperidol.