The Biologically Relevant Coordination Chemistry of Iron and Nitric Oxide: Electronic Structure and Reactivity

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important signaling molecule that is involved in a wide range of physiological and pathological events in biology. Metal coordination chemistry, especially with iron, is at the heart of many biological transformations involving NO. A series of heme proteins, nitric oxide synthases (NOS), soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), and nitrophorins, are responsible for the biosynthesis, sensing, and transport of NO. Alternatively, NO can be generated from nitrite by heme- and copper-containing nitrite reductases (NIRs). The NO-bearing small molecules such as nitrosothiols and dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNICs) can serve as an alternative vehicle for NO storage and transport. Once NO is formed, the rich reaction chemistry of NO leads to a wide variety of biological activities including reduction of NO by heme or non-heme iron-containing NO reductases and protein post-translational modifications by DNICs. Much of our understanding of the reactivity of metal sites in biology with NO and the mechanisms of these transformations has come from the elucidation of the geometric and electronic structures and chemical reactivity of synthetic model systems, in synergy with biochemical and biophysical studies on the relevant proteins themselves. This review focuses on recent advancements from studies on proteins and model complexes that not only have improved our understanding of the biological roles of NO but also have provided foundations for biomedical research and for bio-inspired catalyst design in energy science.

Dinitrosyl Iron Complexes (DNICs). From Spontaneous Assembly to Biological Roles

Dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNICs) are spontaneously and rapidly generated in cells. Their assembly requires nitric oxide (NO), biothiols, and nonheme iron, either labile iron or iron-sulfur clusters. Despite ubiquitous detection by electron paramagnetic resonance in NO-producing cells, the DNIC's chemical biology remains only partially understood. In this Forum Article, we address the reaction mechanisms for endogenous DNIC formation, with a focus on a labile iron pool as the iron source. The capability of DNICs to promote S-nitrosation is discussed in terms of S-nitrosothiol generation associated with the formation and chemical reactivity of DNICs. We also highlight how elucidation of the chemical reactivity and the dynamics of DNICs combined with the development of detection/quantification methods can provide further information regarding their participation in physiological and pathological processes.

What is the Mechanism of Nitric Oxide Conversion into Nitrosonium Ions Ensuring S-Nitrosating Processes in Living Organisms

Here, I present the data testifying that the conversion of free radical NO molecules to nitrosonium ions (NO⁺), which are necessary for the realization of one of NO biological effects (S-nitrosation), may occur in living organisms after binding NO molecules to loosely bound iron (Fe²⁺ ions) with the subsequent mutual one-electron oxidation-reduction of NO molecules (their disproportionation). Inclusion of thiol-containing substances as iron ligands into this process prevents hydrolysis of NO⁺ ions bound to iron thus providing the formation of stable dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNIC) with thiol ligands. Such complexes act in living organisms as donors of NO and NO⁺, providing stabilization and transfer of these agents via the autocrine and paracrine pathways. Without loosely bound iron (labile iron pool) and thiols participating in the DNIC formation, NO functioning as one of universal regulators of diverse metabolic processes would be impossible.

Redox-Sensing Iron-Sulfur Cluster Regulators

SIGNIFICANCE

Iron-sulfur cluster proteins carry out multiple functions, including as regulators of gene transcription/translation in response to environmental stimuli. In all known cases, the cluster acts as the sensory module, where the inherent reactivity/fragility of iron-sulfur clusters with small/redox-active molecules is exploited to effect conformational changes that modulate binding to DNA regulatory sequences. This promotes an often substantial reprogramming of the cellular proteome that enables the organism or cell to adapt to, or counteract, its changing circumstances. Recent Advances: Significant progress has been made recently in the structural and mechanistic characterization of iron-sulfur cluster regulators and, in particular, the O₂ and NO sensor FNR, the NO sensor NsrR, and WhiB-like proteins of Actinobacteria. These are the main focus of this review.

CRITICAL ISSUES

Striking examples of how the local environment controls the cluster sensitivity and reactivity are now emerging, but the basis for this is not yet fully understood for any regulatory family.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Characterization of iron-sulfur cluster regulators has long been hampered by a lack of high-resolution structural data. Although this still presents a major future challenge, recent advances now provide a firm foundation for detailed understanding of how a signal is transduced to effect gene regulation. This requires the identification of often unstable intermediate species, which are difficult to detect and may be hard to distinguish using traditional techniques. Novel approaches will be required to solve these problems.

Redox-sensing iron-sulfur cluster regulators

SIGNIFICANCE

Iron-sulfur cluster proteins carry out a wide range of functions, including as regulators of gene transcription/translation in response to environmental stimuli. In all known cases, the cluster acts as the sensory module, where the inherent reactivity/fragility of iron-sulfur clusters towards small/redox active molecules is exploited to effect conformational changes that modulate binding to DNA regulatory sequences. This promotes an often substantial re-programming of the cellular proteome that enables the organism or cell to adapt to, or counteract, its changing circumstances. Recent Advances. Significant progress has been made recently in the structural and mechanistic characterization of iron-sulfur cluster regulators and, in particular, the O2 and NO sensor FNR, the NO sensor NsrR, and WhiB-like proteins of Actinobacteria. These are the main focus of this review.

CRITICAL ISSUES

Striking examples of how the local environment controls the cluster sensitivity and reactivity are now emerging, but the basis for this is not yet fully understood for any regulatory family.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Characterization of iron-sulfur cluster regulators has long been hampered by a lack of high resolution structural data. Though this still presents a major future challenge, recent advances now provide a firm foundation for detailed understanding of how a signal is transduced to effect gene regulation. This requires the identification of often unstable intermediate species, which are difficult to detect and may be hard to distinguish using traditional techniques. Novel approaches will be required to solve these problems.

Sensing Mechanisms in the Redox-Regulated, [2Fe-2S] Cluster-Containing, Bacterial Transcriptional Factor SoxR

Bacteria possess molecular biosensors that enable responses to a variety of stressful conditions, including oxidative stress, toxic compounds, and interactions with other organisms, through elaborately coordinated regulation of gene expression. In Escherichia coli and related bacteria, the transcription factor SoxR functions as a sensor of oxidative stress and nitric oxide (NO). SoxR protein contains a [2Fe-2S] cluster essential for its transcription-enhancing activity, which is regulated by redox changes in the [2Fe-2S] cluster. We have explored the mechanistic and structural basis of SoxR proteins function and determined how the chemistry at the [2Fe-2S] cluster causes the subsequent regulatory response. In this Account, I describe our recent achievements in three different areas using physicochemical techniques, primarily pulse radiolysis. First, redox-dependent conformational changes in SoxR-bound DNA were studied by site-specifically replacing selected bases with the fluorescent probes 2-aminopurine and pyrrolocytosine. X-ray analyses of the DNA-SoxR complex in the oxidized state revealed that the DNA structure is distorted in the center regions, resulting in local untwisting of base pairs. However, the inactive, reduced state had remained uncharacterized. We found that reduction of the [2Fe-2S] cluster in the SoxR-DNA complex weakens the fluorescence intensity within a region confined to the central base pairs in the promoter region. Second, the reactions of NO with [2Fe-2S] clusters of E. coli SoxR were analyzed using pulse radiolysis. The transcriptional activation of SoxR in E. coli occurs through direct modification of [2Fe-2S] by NO to form a dinitrosyl iron complex (DNIC). The reaction of NO with [2Fe-2S] cluster of SoxR proceeded nearly quantitatively with concomitant reductive elimination of two equivalents S⁰ atoms. Intermediate nitrosylation products, however, were too unstable to observe. We found that the conversion proceeds through at least two steps, with the faster phase being the first reaction of the NO molecule with the [2Fe-2S] cluster. The slower reaction with the second equivalent NO molecule, however, was important for the formation of DNIC. Third, to elucidate the differences between the distinct responses of SoxR proteins from two different species, we studied the interaction of E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa SoxR with superoxide anion using a mutagenic approach. Despite the homology between E. coli SoxR and P. aeruginosa SoxR, the function of P. aeruginosa SoxR differs from that of E. coli. The substitution of E. coli SoxR lysine residues, located close to [2Fe-2S] clusters, into P. aeruginosa SoxR dramatically affected the reaction with superoxide anion.

Transcription Factors That Defend Bacteria Against Reactive Oxygen Species

Bacteria live in a toxic world in which their competitors excrete hydrogen peroxide or superoxide-generating redox-cycling compounds. They protect themselves by activating regulons controlled by the OxyR, PerR, and SoxR transcription factors. OxyR and PerR sense peroxide when it oxidizes key thiolate or iron moieties, respectively; they then induce overlapping sets of proteins that defend their vulnerable metalloenzymes. An additional role for OxyR in detecting electrophilic compounds is possible. In some nonenteric bacteria, SoxR appears to control the synthesis and export of redox-cycling compounds, whereas in the enteric bacteria it defends the cell against the same agents. When these compounds oxidize its iron-sulfur cluster, SoxR induces proteins that exclude, excrete, or modify them. It also induces enzymes that defend the cell against the superoxide that such compounds make. Recent work has brought new insight into the biochemistry and physiology of these responses, and comparative studies have clarified their evolutionary histories.

Redox-dependent DNA distortion in a SoxR protein-promoter complex studied using fluorescent probes

The [2Fe-2S] transcriptional factor SoxR, a member of the MerR family, is regulated by the reversible oxidation and reduction of [2Fe-2S] clusters and functions as a sensor of oxidative stress in Escherichia coli. In the oxidized state, distortion of the target DNA promoter region initiates transcription by RNA polymerase, thereby activating transcription. The inactive reduced state of the protein has remained uncharacterized. Here, we directly observed redox-dependent conformational changes in the promoter DNA by site-specifically replacing selected adenine (A) and cytosine (C) bases in the promoter oligonucleotide with the fluorescent probes 2-aminopurine (2Ap) and pyrrolocytosine (pyrrolo-dC), respectively. Reduction of the [2Fe-2S] cluster in the SoxR-DNA complex dramatically weakened the fluorescence intensity of the 2Ap moieties incorporated into the central part of the DNA. In contrast, the fluorescence of 2Ap moieties incorporated at A in other regions and the fluorescence of pyrrolo-dC moieties in the central region of the DNA (C3 and C3') were only slightly decreased by the reduction. These results strongly suggest that the redox change causes a large conformational change within a region confined to the central A-T base pairs in the promoter region of the DNA.