Domains two and three of Escherichia coli ribosomal S1 protein confers 30S subunits a high affinity for downstream A/U-rich mRNAs

Directed evolution of the rRNA methylating enzyme Cfr reveals molecular basis of antibiotic resistance

Alteration of antibiotic binding sites through modification of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is a common form of resistance to ribosome-targeting antibiotics. The rRNA-modifying enzyme Cfr methylates an adenosine nucleotide within the peptidyl transferase center, resulting in the C-8 methylation of A2503 (m8A2503). Acquisition of cfr results in resistance to eight classes of ribosome-targeting antibiotics. Despite the prevalence of this resistance mechanism, it is poorly understood whether and how bacteria modulate Cfr methylation to adapt to antibiotic pressure. Moreover, direct evidence for how m8A2503 alters antibiotic binding sites within the ribosome is lacking. In this study, we performed directed evolution of Cfr under antibiotic selection to generate Cfr variants that confer increased resistance by enhancing methylation of A2503 in cells. Increased rRNA methylation is achieved by improved expression and stability of Cfr through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms, which may be exploited by pathogens under antibiotic stress as suggested by natural isolates. Using a variant that achieves near-stoichiometric methylation of rRNA, we determined a 2.2 Å cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Cfr-modified ribosome. Our structure reveals the molecular basis for broad resistance to antibiotics and will inform the design of new antibiotics that overcome resistance mediated by Cfr.

Translational Control by Ribosome Pausing in Bacteria: How a Non-uniform Pace of Translation Affects Protein Production and Folding

Protein homeostasis of bacterial cells is maintained by coordinated processes of protein production, folding, and degradation. Translational efficiency of a given mRNA depends on how often the ribosomes initiate synthesis of a new polypeptide and how quickly they read the coding sequence to produce a full-length protein. The pace of ribosomes along the mRNA is not uniform: periods of rapid synthesis are separated by pauses. Here, we summarize recent evidence on how ribosome pausing affects translational efficiency and protein folding. We discuss the factors that slow down translation elongation and affect the quality of the newly synthesized protein. Ribosome pausing emerges as important factor contributing to the regulatory programs that ensure the quality of the proteome and integrate the cellular and environmental cues into regulatory circuits of the cell.

An RNA pseudoknot is essential for standby-mediated translation of the tisB toxin mRNA in Escherichia coli

In response to DNA damage, Escherichia coli cells activate the expression of the toxin gene tisB of the toxin-antitoxin system tisB-istR1. Of three isoforms, only the processed, highly structured +42 tisB mRNA is active. Translation requires a standby site, composed of two essential elements: a single-stranded region located 100 nucleotides upstream of the sequestered RBS, and a structure near the 5'-end of the active mRNA. Here, we propose that this 5'-structure is an RNA pseudoknot which is required for 30S and protein S1-alone binding to the mRNA. Point mutations that prevent formation of this pseudoknot inhibit formation of translation initiation complexes, impair S1 and 30S binding to the mRNA, and render the tisB mRNA non-toxic in vivo. A set of mutations created in either the left or right arm of stem 2 of the pseudoknot entailed loss of toxicity upon overexpression of the corresponding mRNA variants. Combining the matching right-left arm mutations entirely restored toxicity levels to that of the wild-type, active mRNA. Finally, since many pseudoknots have high affinity for S1, we predicted similar pseudoknots in non-homologous type I toxin-antitoxin systems that exhibit features similar to that of tisB-IstR1, suggesting a shared requirement for standby acting at great distances.

Regulation outside the box: New mechanisms for small RNAs

Regulation at the post‐transcriptional level is an important mode of gene expression control in bacteria. Small RNA regulators (sRNAs) that act via intramolecular base‐pairing with target mRNAs are key players in this process and most often sequester the target's ribosome binding site (RBS) to down‐regulate translation initiation. Over the past few years, several exceptions from this mechanism have been reported, revealing that sRNAs are able to influence translation initiation from a distance. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Azam and Vanderpool show that repression of the manY mRNA by the sRNA SgrS relies on an unconventional mechanism involving a translational enhancer element and ribosomal protein S1. Binding of S1 to an AU‐rich sequence within the 5ʹ untranslated region of the manY transcript promotes translation of the mRNA, and base‐pairing of SgrS to the same site can interfere with this process. Therefore, instead of blocking translation initiation by occluding the manY RBS, SgrS reduces ManY synthesis by inhibiting S1‐dependent translation activation. These findings increase the base‐pairing window for sRNA‐mediated gene expression control in bacteria and highlight the role of ribosomal protein S1 for translation initiation.

Translation inhibition from a distance: The small RNA SgrS silences a ribosomal protein S1-dependent enhancer

Many bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs) efficiently inhibit translation of target mRNAs by forming a duplex that sequesters the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence or start codon and prevents formation of the translation initiation complex. There are a growing number of examples of sRNA-mRNA binding interactions distant from the SD region, but how these mediate translational regulation remains unclear. Our previous work in Escherichia coli and Salmonella identified a mechanism of translational repression of manY mRNA by the sRNA SgrS through a binding interaction upstream of the manY SD. Here, we report that SgrS forms a duplex with a uridine-rich translation-enhancing element in the manY 5' untranslated region. Notably, we show that the enhancer is ribosome-dependent and that the small ribosomal subunit protein S1 interacts with the enhancer to promote translation of manY. In collaboration with the chaperone protein Hfq, SgrS interferes with the interaction between the translation enhancer and ribosomal protein S1 to repress translation of manY mRNA. Since bacterial translation is often modulated by enhancer-like elements upstream of the SD, sRNA-mediated enhancer silencing could be a common mode of gene regulation.