Orbital Compartment Syndrome Following Major Burn Resuscitation: A Case Series and Survey of Practice Patterns

Diagnosis and Management of Orbital Compartment Syndrome in Burn Patients - a Systematic Review

Orbital compartment syndrome is a poorly understood complication of acute burns. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the literature describing orbital compartment syndrome in burn patients to provide greater detail on risk factors and guide management of this morbid condition. A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in June 2023 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Study quality was assessed using two validated scoring systems. After removing duplicates, 303 unique articles were reviewed and 8 met inclusion criteria. All publications were retrospective. Most studies considered intraocular pressure >30-40mmHg as diagnostic for orbital compartment syndrome. Sixty unique cases of orbital compartment syndrome were reported. Orbital compartment syndrome occurred most frequently within 24 hours post-burn. The mean total body surface area of burn was 58.7%; the mean 24-hour resuscitation volume was 6.01 cc/kg/%total burn surface area; and 86.5% of cases had periorbital burns. Surgical decompression always started with lateral canthotomy. When pressures were not immediately reduced, cantholysis was performed. Study quality per Median Newcastle Ottawa Scores ranged from 38.9% to 94.4% (median 66.7%). A precise threshold for surgical decompression of OCS remains conflicted; however, IOP>30-40mmHg warrants intervention. Burn surgeons/intensivists should be aware of the risk factors for this vision-threatening complication and act appropriately.

American Burn Association Clinical Practice Guidelines on Burn Shock Resuscitation

This Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) addresses the topic of acute fluid resuscitation during the first 48 hours following a burn injury for adults with burns ≥20% of the total body surface area (%TBSA). The listed authors formed an investigation panel and developed clinically relevant PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions. A systematic literature search returned 5978 titles related to this topic and after 3 levels of screening, 24 studies met criteria to address the PICO questions and were critically reviewed. We recommend that clinicians consider the use of human albumin solution, especially in patients with larger burns, to lower resuscitation volumes and improve urine output. We recommend initiating resuscitation based on providing 2 mL/kg/% TBSA burn in order to reduce resuscitation fluid volumes. We recommend selective monitoring of intra-abdominal and intraocular pressure during burn shock resuscitation. We make a weak recommendation for clinicians to consider the use of computer decision support software to guide fluid titration and lower resuscitation fluid volumes. We do not recommend the use of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived variables to guide burn shock resuscitation. We are unable to make any recommendations on the use of high-dose vitamin C (ascorbic acid), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), early continuous renal replacement therapy, or vasopressors as adjuncts during acute burn shock resuscitation. Mortality is an important outcome in burn shock resuscitation, but it was not formally included as a PICO outcome because the available scientific literature is missing studies of sufficient population size and quality to allow us to confidently make recommendations related to the outcome of survival at this time.

Orbital Compartment Syndrome in Severe Burns: Predictive Factors, Timing, and Complications of Intervention

PURPOSE

Severe burn patients require high-volume fluid resuscitation, which increases risk for orbital compartment syndrome (OCS). We aimed to understand surgeons' practice patterns and to examine risk factors for OCS, timing of lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC), and complications of intervention.

METHODS

A survey of American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and North American Society of Academic Orbital Surgeons' practice patterns in burn patients was undertaken. In addition, a retrospective analysis was conducted of 107 patients with burns greater than 20% total body surface area at 1 institution from January 1, 2009, to June 1, 2018. Patients with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, frostbite, or no ophthalmologic consultation were excluded. Risk factors for OCS, timing of LCC, and complications of the intervention were examined.

RESULTS

In the survey, 37 of 54 respondents had treated burn patients, of which 29 followed no protocol. Threshold intraocular pressure for intervention varied widely, and nearly all reported having seen complications from LCC in burn patients. For the retrospective analysis, 107 patients met criteria, of which 22 (20.6%) required LCC. Renal failure, inhalation injury, eyelid burns, higher total body surface area, elevated lactate, increased number of escharotomies, and greater total fluid required were significantly associated with the clinical decision that the patient was at risk for OCS requiring LCC. Fluid resuscitation in excess of the Ivy Index (250 ml/kg) increased odds of LCC 8.6 times. Average time of LCC was 15.8 hours after burn. LCC patients experienced higher rates of complications including eyelid retraction, exposure keratopathy, and corneal ulceration.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe burn patients should be monitored closely by an ophthalmologist during the first 48 hours for signs of OCS. Further studies should aim to recommend protocols guiding evaluation and intervention.

The First 24 Hours: Burn Shock Resuscitation and Early Complications

Resuscitation is required for the management of patients with severe thermal injury. Some of the initial pathophysiologic events following burn injury include an exaggerated inflammatory state, injury to the endothelium, and increased capillary permeability, which all culminate in shock. Understanding these processes is critical to the effective management of patients with burn injuries. Formulas predicting fluid requirements during burn resuscitation have evolved over the past century in response to clinical experience and research efforts. Modern resuscitation features individualized fluid titration and monitoring along with colloid-based adjuncts. Despite these developments, complications from over-resuscitation still occur.