Topical Hemostatic Agents in Burn Surgery: A Systematic Review

Acute burn surgery has long been associated with significant intra-operative bleeding. Several techniques were introduced to limit hemorrhage, including tourniquets, tumescent infiltration, and topical agents. To date, no study has comprehensively investigated the available data regarding topical hemostatic agents in burn surgery. A systematic review was performed by two independent reviewers using electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) from first available to September 10, 2021. Articles were included if they were published in English and described or evaluated topical hemostatic agents used in burn excision and/or grafting. Data were extracted on the agent(s) used, their dosage, mode of delivery, hemostasis outcomes, and complications. The search identified 1982 nonduplicate citations, of which 134 underwent full-text review, and 49 met inclusion criteria. In total, 32 studies incorporated a vasoconstrictor agent, and 28 studies incorporated a procoagulant agent. Four studies incorporated other agents (hydrogen peroxide, tranexamic acid, collagen sheets, and TT-173). The most common vasoconstrictor used was epinephrine, with doses ranging from 1:1000 to 1:1,000,000. The most common procoagulant used was thrombin, with doses ranging from 10 to 1000 IU/ml. Among the comparative studies, outcomes of blood loss were not reported in a consistent manner, therefore meta-analysis could not be performed. The majority of studies (94%) were level of evidence III-V. Determining the optimal topical hemostatic agent is limited by low-quality data and challenges with consistent reporting of intra-operative blood loss. Given the routine use of topical hemostatic agents in burn surgery, high-quality research is essential to determine the optimal agent, dosage, and mode of delivery.

A review of the most impactful published pharmacotherapy-pertinent literature of 2019 and 2020 for clinicians caring for patients with thermal or inhalation injury

Keeping abreast with current literature can be challenging, especially for practitioners caring for patients sustaining thermal or inhalation injury. Practitioners caring for patients with thermal injuries publish in a wide variety of journals, which further increases the complexity for those with resource limitations. Pharmacotherapy research continues to be a minority focus in primary literature. This review is a renewal of previous years' work to facilitate extraction and review of the most recent pharmacotherapy-centric studies in patients with thermal and inhalation injury. Sixteen geographically dispersed, board-certified pharmacists participated in the review. A MeSH-based, filtered search returned 1,536 manuscripts over the previous 2-year period. After manual review and exclusions, only 98 (6.4%) manuscripts were determined to have a potential impact on current pharmacotherapy practices and included in the review. A summary of the 10 articles that scored highest are included in the review. Nearly half of the reviewed manuscripts were assessed to lack a significant impact on current practice. Despite an increase in published literature over the previous 2-year review, the focus and quality remain unchanged. There remains a need for investment in well-designed, high impact, pharmacotherapy-pertinent research for patients sustaining thermal or inhalation injuries.

The Pediatric Burn: Current Trends and Future Directions

Management of the pediatric burn patient presents a variety of clinical challenges for the pediatric anesthesiologist. Despite the high incidence of burn injuries, standard management strategies are far from universal. The complex physiologic changes presented by burn injuries present airway management and resuscitation challenges and mandate careful consideration of adequate nutritional support. Long hospital stays with frequent operations and dressing changes necessitate creative approaches to anxiolysis and pain control. Underutilized modalities warranting further research include regional anesthesia and nonpharmacologic approaches, such as virtual reality. Further research and collaboration between burn centers are needed to standardize care for this population.

Pediatric burn resuscitation, management, and recovery for the pediatric anesthesiologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to summarize literature in pediatric burn resuscitation and management that is relevant to the pediatric anesthesiologist. The scope of the literature is expanding as long-term survival in even the most critically ill, burn-injured children has increased.

RECENT FINDINGS

Longstanding variations in the care of burn-injured children exist despite decades of experience in burn care management. There seems to be a discomfort outside major burn centers in the triage, evaluation, and assessment of burned children. This is evidenced by the prevalence of 'unnecessary intubations', continued overestimation of total body surface area injured, and subsequent fluid administration disproportionate to injury leading to over-resuscitation. Techniques, such as virtual reality and regional anesthesia are increasingly available and serve adjuncts to pharmacologic therapies for anxiolysis and analgesia. Such techniques reduce opioid utilization while maintaining patient comfort and satisfaction particularly during wound dressing changes. Questions about transfusion threshold and ratio of blood products remain topics of ongoing research.

SUMMARY

Literature review continues to reveal underpowered or retrospective analyses of these very important questions. Public health burden caused by burns warrants rigorous, prospective studies to take the best care of these patients and portend the best long-term outcomes. Collaboration amongst pediatric anesthesiologists who care for these children is necessary to develop and execute powered studies to answer important questions.