1
|
Lee CS, Lewin A, Reig B, Heacock L, Gao Y, Heller S, Moy L. Women 75 Years Old or Older: To Screen or Not to Screen? Radiographics 2023; 43:e220166. [PMID: 37053102 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, with the incidence rising substantially with age. Older women are a vulnerable population at increased risk of developing and dying from breast cancer. However, women aged 75 years and older were excluded from all randomized controlled screening trials, so the best available data regarding screening benefits and risks in this age group are from observational studies and modeling predictions. Benefits of screening in older women are the same as those in younger women: early detection of smaller lower-stage cancers, resulting in less invasive treatment and lower morbidity and mortality. Mammography performs significantly better in older women with higher sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate, and positive predictive values, accompanied by lower recall rates and false positives. The overdiagnosis rate is low, with benefits outweighing risks until age 90 years. Although there are conflicting national and international guidelines about whether to continue screening mammography in women beyond age 74 years, clinicians can use shared decision making to help women make decisions about screening and fully engage them in the screening process. For women aged 75 years and older in good health, continuing annual screening mammography will save the most lives. An informed discussion of the benefits and risks of screening mammography in older women needs to include each woman's individual values, overall health status, and comorbidities. This article will review the benefits, risks, and controversies surrounding screening mammography in women 75 years old and older and compare the current recommendations for screening this population from national and international professional organizations. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy S Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (C.S.L., A.L., B.R., L.H., Y.G., S.H., L.M.); and Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY (L.M.)
| | - Alana Lewin
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (C.S.L., A.L., B.R., L.H., Y.G., S.H., L.M.); and Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY (L.M.)
| | - Beatriu Reig
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (C.S.L., A.L., B.R., L.H., Y.G., S.H., L.M.); and Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY (L.M.)
| | - Laura Heacock
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (C.S.L., A.L., B.R., L.H., Y.G., S.H., L.M.); and Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY (L.M.)
| | - Yiming Gao
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (C.S.L., A.L., B.R., L.H., Y.G., S.H., L.M.); and Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY (L.M.)
| | - Samantha Heller
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (C.S.L., A.L., B.R., L.H., Y.G., S.H., L.M.); and Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY (L.M.)
| | - Linda Moy
- From the Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (C.S.L., A.L., B.R., L.H., Y.G., S.H., L.M.); and Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Vilcek Institute of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, New York, NY (L.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phillips J, U Achibiri J, Kim G, Quintana LM, J Mehta R, S Mehta T. Characterization of True and False Positive Findings on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Acad Radiol 2022; 29:1672-1681. [PMID: 35190261 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this paper is to characterize true and false positive findings on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and correlate enhancement pattern and method of detection with pathology outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an IRB-approved retrospective review of diagnostic CEM performed from December 2015 through December 2019 for which biopsy was recommended. Background parenchymal enhancement, tissue density, finding features, pathologic/clinical outcomes, and method of detection were captured. CEM includes low-energy images (LE), similar to standard 2D mammography, and recombined images (RI) that show enhancement. 'MG-detected' findings were identified on mammography or LE. 'RI-detected' findings were identified due to enhancement on RI. The positive predictive value (PPV2) was calculated on a per-case and a per-finding level. Comparisons were performed using Pearson chi-square and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS One hundred sixty CEM cases with 220 findings were evaluated with a case PPV2 of 58.1%. 32.3% (71/220) of lesions were RI-detected. The PPV2 of RI-detected enhancement was 40.8% with subanalysis revealing PPV2 of 22.2%, 32%, and 51.4% for foci, NME, and masses, respectively. The PPV2 of MG-detected enhancement was 73.5% with subanalysis revealing PPV2 of 50%, 54.1%, and 83.8% for foci, NME, and masses, respectively. There were 100 false positives findings, 42 of which were RI-detected. CONCLUSION PPV2 of diagnostic CEM is within the range of other diagnostic breast imaging exams. However false positives remain a challenge, especially for RI-detected findings. Additional efforts to improve specificity of RI-detected findings are worthwhile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordana Phillips
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - radiology dept., Pathology, Boston MA.
| | - Janeiro U Achibiri
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - radiology dept., Pathology, Boston MA.
| | - Geunwon Kim
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - radiology dept., Pathology, Boston MA
| | - Liza M Quintana
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - radiology dept., Pathology, Boston MA.
| | - Rashmi J Mehta
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - radiology dept., Pathology, Boston MA
| | - Tejas S Mehta
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - radiology dept., Pathology, Boston MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rahman WT, Helvie MA. Breast cancer screening in average and high-risk women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 83:3-14. [PMID: 34903436 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females worldwide with rising incidence. In the United States, screening mammography and advances in therapy have lowered mortality by 41% since 1990. Screening mammography is supported by randomized control trials (RCT), observational studies, and computer model data. Digital breast tomosynthesis is a new technology that addresses limitations in mammography resulting from overlapping breast tissue, improving its sensitivity and specificity. Patients at high risk for breast cancer include those with a ≥20% lifetime risk, high-risk germline mutation, or history of thoracic radiation treatment between 10-30 years of age. Such patients are recommended to undergo annual screening mammography and adjunctive annual screening breast MRI. Patients unable to undergo MRI may undergo whole breast ultrasound or contrast-enhanced mammography. Pregnant and lactating patients at average risk for breast cancer are recommended to undergo age-appropriate screening mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Tania Rahman
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Mark A Helvie
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|