Abbreviated Screening Breast MRI in Women at Higher-than-Average Risk for Breast Cancer with Prior Normal Full Protocol MRI

Hereditary Breast Cancer: BRCA Mutations and Beyond

Hereditary breast cancers are manifested by pathogenic and likely pathogenic genetic mutations. Penetrance expresses the breast cancer risk associated with these genetic mutations. Although BRCA1/2 are the most widely known genetic mutations associated with breast cancer, numerous additional genes demonstrate high and moderate penetrance for breast cancer. This review describes current genetic testing, details the specific high and moderate penetrance genes for breast cancer and reviews the current approach to screening for breast cancer in patients with these genetic mutations.

The value, diagnostic efficacy and clinical significance of functional magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is a common malignant tumor in female. In recent years, with the change of fertility pattern and lifestyle, the incidence of breast cancer is increasing year by year, seriously endangering the health and life of women. MRI is suitable for follow-up evaluation of the course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LABC, but there are few related studies and reports. Based on the above background, it is necessary to further evaluate the value of functional magnetic resonance imaging in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer, so as to lay a theoretical foundation for the popularization and application of this detection method. Based on this, this study was to explore the value, diagnostic efficacy and clinical importance of functional magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 62 patients with triple-negative breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our hospital from September 2017 to September 2022 were selected. To compare the differences of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) between effective and ineffective patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the related data were statistically analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference between the mode of tumor withdrawal and the pathological complete remission of tumor tissue (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in anti-Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) data before and after chemotherapy between over-expressed patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) and non-over-expressed patients with HER-2 (P>0.05). The levels of ADC and Δ ADC in pathological complete remission patients after chemotherapy were significantly higher than those in non-pathological complete remission patients (P<0.05). Using the ΔADC value as the evaluation parameter, the pathological response of tumor tissue was classified as the "gold standard" to draw the ROC curve, the area under curve (AUC) was 0.673, the cut-off of ΔADC to evaluate the significant response of tumor tissue after chemotherapy was 1.418, the sensitivity of evaluating the efficacy was 71.9%, and the specificity was 55.0%.

Conclusion

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has diagnostic value for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer. According to the change of ADC value, the curative effect can be predicted early and the treatment strategy can be adjusted in time.

Evaluating the effectiveness of abbreviated breast MRI (abMRI) interpretation training for mammogram readers: a multi-centre study assessing diagnostic performance, using an enriched dataset

Background

Abbreviated breast MRI (abMRI) is being introduced in breast screening trials and clinical practice, particularly for women with dense breasts. Upscaling abMRI provision requires the workforce of mammogram readers to learn to effectively interpret abMRI.

The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of mammogram readers to interpret abMRI after a single day of standardised small-group training and to compare diagnostic performance of mammogram readers experienced in full-protocol breast MRI (fpMRI) interpretation (Group 1) with that of those without fpMRI interpretation experience (Group 2).

Methods

Mammogram readers were recruited from six NHS Breast Screening Programme sites. Small-group hands-on workstation training was provided, with subsequent prospective, independent, blinded interpretation of an enriched dataset with known outcome. A simplified form of abMRI (first post-contrast subtracted images (FAST MRI), displayed as maximum-intensity projection (MIP) and subtracted slice stack) was used. Per-breast and per-lesion diagnostic accuracy analysis was undertaken, with comparison across groups, and double-reading simulation of a consecutive screening subset.

Results

37 readers (Group 1: 17, Group 2: 20) completed the reading task of 125 scans (250 breasts) (total = 9250 reads). Overall sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84–87%; 1776/2072) and specificity 86% (95%CI 85–86%; 6140/7178). Group 1 showed significantly higher sensitivity (843/952; 89%; 95%CI 86–91%) and higher specificity (2957/3298; 90%; 95%CI 89–91%) than Group 2 (sensitivity = 83%; 95%CI 81–85% (933/1120) p < 0.0001; specificity = 82%; 95%CI 81–83% (3183/3880) p < 0.0001). Inter-reader agreement was higher for Group 1 (kappa = 0.73; 95%CI 0.68–0.79) than for Group 2 (kappa = 0.51; 95%CI 0.45–0.56). Specificity improved for Group 2, from the first 55 cases (81%) to the remaining 70 (83%) (p = 0.02) but not for Group 1 (90–89% p = 0.44), whereas sensitivity remained consistent for both Group 1 (88–89%) and Group 2 (83–84%).

Conclusions

Single-day abMRI interpretation training for mammogram readers achieved an overall diagnostic performance within benchmarks published for fpMRI but was insufficient for diagnostic accuracy of mammogram readers new to breast MRI to match that of experienced fpMRI readers. Novice MRI reader performance improved during the reading task, suggesting that additional training could further narrow this performance gap.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-022-01549-5.