1
|
Dhami A, Rutland CD, Momeni A, Waheed U. Acellular Dermal Matrix: Imaging Features With Histopathology Correlation. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024:wbae054. [PMID: 39248808 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is an immunologically inert graft, typically from cadaveric skin, often used in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Created from decellularized dermal tissues that have been treated to remove DNA and antigenic donor cells (leaving extracellular matrix), ADM is often used as a structural scaffold or sling to reinforce and support the structure and position of a breast implant during postoperative integration in implant-based breast reconstruction; ADM can also be used to fill cosmetic defects. Advantages of ADM use include improved cosmesis and reduced capsular contracture rates. On US, ADM can be seen as a subtle band with variable echogenicity adjacent to the implant. When folded on itself or redundant, ADM may present as a palpable oval mass with indistinct or circumscribed margins and variable echogenicity. On mammography, ADM can be seen as a circumscribed oval equal density mass when redundant and folded on itself; a layered appearance may be evident on tomosynthesis. On MRI, presence and absence of enhancement have been documented. Imaging findings likely vary depending on the degree of host tissue remodeling and incorporation, and when biopsied, histopathologically, ADM may be difficult to distinguish from scarring. Successful imaging diagnosis of ADM is aided by clinical knowledge of the intraoperative use and configuration of ADM, which may help differentiate ADM from new or recurrent malignancy and avoid unnecessary biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alysha Dhami
- Breast Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cooper D Rutland
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Arash Momeni
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Uzma Waheed
- Breast Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pittman SM, Rosen EL, DeMartini WB, Nguyen DH, Poplack SP, Ikeda DM. The Postoperative Breast: Imaging Findings and Diagnostic Pitfalls After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Oncoplastic Breast Surgery. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:203-216. [PMID: 38262628 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Breast surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for early breast cancer. Historically, mastectomy and conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were the main surgical techniques for treatment. Now, oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS), introduced in the 1990s, allows for a combination of BCS and reconstructive surgery to excise the cancer while preserving or enhancing the contour of the breast, leading to improved aesthetic results. Although imaging after conventional lumpectomy demonstrates typical postsurgical changes with known evolution patterns over time, OBS procedures show postsurgical changes/fat necrosis in locations other than the lumpectomy site. The purpose of this article is to familiarize radiologists with various types of surgical techniques for removal of breast cancer and to distinguish benign postoperative imaging findings from suspicious findings that warrant further work-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Pittman
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eric L Rosen
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Wendy B DeMartini
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dung H Nguyen
- Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Steven P Poplack
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Debra M Ikeda
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rijkx MEP, Heuts EM, Houwers JB, Hommes JE, Piatkowski AA, van Nijnatten TJA. Imaging findings after a total reconstructed breast with autologous fat transfer: what the radiologist needs to know. BJR Open 2024; 6:tzae010. [PMID: 38798692 PMCID: PMC11128096 DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzae010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is an upcoming technique for total breast reconstruction. Consequently, radiological imaging of women with an AFT reconstructed breast will increase in the coming years, yet radiological experience and evidence after AFT is limited. The surgical procedure of AFT and follow-up with imaging modalities including mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and MRI in patients with a total breast reconstruction with AFT are summarized to illustrate the radiological normal and suspicious findings for malignancy. Imaging after a total breast reconstruction with AFT appears to be based mostly on benign imaging findings with an overall low biopsy rate. As higher volumes are injected in this technique, the risk for the onset of fat necrosis increases. Imaging findings most often are related to fat necrosis after AFT. On MG, fat necrosis can mostly be seen as oil cysts. The occurrence of a breast seroma after total breast reconstruction with AFT is an unfavourable outcome and may require special treatment. Fat deposition in the pectoral muscle is a previously unknown, but benign entity. Although fat necrosis is a benign entity, it can mimic breast cancer (recurrence). In symptomatic women after total breast reconstruction with AFT, MG and US can be considered as first diagnostic modalities. Breast MRI can be used as a problem-solving tool during later stage. Future studies should investigate the most optimal follow-up strategy, including different imaging modalities, in patients treated with AFT for total breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maud E P Rijkx
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M Heuts
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke B Houwers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Juliette E Hommes
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrzej A Piatkowski
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM School for Nutrition, and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiemo J A van Nijnatten
- GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harvey JA. Randomized Controlled Mammography Screening Trials Revisited. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:105-107. [PMID: 38422431 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Harvey
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Imaging Sciences, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|