The effects of venting and capsulotomy on traction force and hip distraction in hip arthroscopy

Association of Postless Distraction in Hip Arthroscopy With Decreased Postoperative Groin Numbness

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy performed with perineal post distraction may experience postoperative nerve and soft tissue complications related to the perineal post.

PURPOSE

To compare rates of postoperative numbness in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) with postless distraction and perineal post distraction methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS, with postless distraction and perineal post distraction methods. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, radiographic data, and operative data. Traction force data were collected on all patients prospectively using a previously validated method. Data on postoperative numbness (presence/absence and regionality) were collected prospectively at routine postoperative follow-ups (6-week and 3-month postoperative clinic visits).

RESULTS

Overall, 195 patients were included, with 94 patients (mean age, 30.4 years) in the postless distraction cohort and 101 patients (mean age, 31.9 years) in the post distraction cohort. The overall numbness rates were 29 of 94 (30.9%) in the postless distraction group and 45 of 101 (44.6%) in the post distraction group (P = .068). Rates of postoperative groin numbness were 1 of 94 (1.1%) in the postless distraction group and 19 of 101 (18.8%) in the post distraction group (P < .001). Multivariate analysis for postoperative groin numbness demonstrated post distraction (odds ratio [OR], 16.5; P = .022) and traction time (OR, 1.7; P = .020) to be statistically significant variables. In subgroup analysis of the post distraction group, traction time (P = .015), but not holding (P = .508) or maximum traction force (P = .665), reached statistical significance in patients who developed postoperative groin numbness.

CONCLUSION

Postless distraction hip arthroscopy demonstrated a statistically significantly lower rate of groin numbness rates in comparison with a traditional perineal post distraction method. In the post distraction group, traction time was significantly higher in patients who developed postoperative groin numbness than in those who did not.

Hip Joint Venting Decreases the Traction Force Required to Access the Central Compartment During Hip Arthroscopy

Purpose

To investigate the effect of hip joint venting on the magnitude of traction force required to arthroscopically access the central compartment of the hip.

Methods

Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome prospectively underwent an intraoperative traction protocol. Joint space was measured on fluoroscopic images obtained at 50 and 100 lbs of axial traction in the prevented and vented state, and joint space values were normalized to millimetric values using preoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. Venting was performed by inserting a large gauge spinal needle into the hip joint through the hip capsule and removing the stylet. Joint space differences were compared with paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and McNemar tests.

Results

Fifty hips in 46 patients were included. Mean joint space before venting was 7.4 ± 2.6 mm and 13.3 ± 2.8 mm at 50 and 100 lbs of traction, respectively. Mean joint space after venting was 13.9 ± 2.3 mm and 15.5 ± 2.4 mm at 50 and 100 lbs of traction, respectively. Mean differences in joint space at 50 and 100 lbs were 6.5 mm (P < .001) and 2.2 mm (P < .001), respectively. Mean joint space at 50 lbs in the vented state was significantly greater than in the pre-vented state at 100 lbs (13.9 mm vs. 13.3 mm; P = .002). The increase in joint space between 50 and 100 lbs of traction was significantly greater in the prevented state than in the vented state (5.9 mm vs 1.6 mm; P = .021).

Conclusions

Venting the hip reduces the traction force necessary to arthroscopically visualize and instrument the central compartment of the hip by at least 50%. Further, residual negative pressurization of the hip joint remains after breaking the labral suction seal and venting effectively eliminates this phenomenon to aid in hip joint distraction at lower traction force.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

Distraction Gap Needed for Safe Central Compartment Access in Hip Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Sufficient distraction of the hip is the key to a safe central compartment (CC) approach in hip arthroscopy. However, an adequate distraction gap has not been scientifically identified.

PURPOSE

To determine the sufficient amount of distraction that could predict a successful CC access as well as to identify the risk factors for a failed or difficult CC access.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All patients who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon between January 2018 and April 2019 were prospectively enrolled. We analyzed gaps of the hip on 4 C-arm fluoroscopic images: nondistraction, preoperative manual traction, preoperative maximal traction (without distension), and intraoperative maximal traction (at the end of CC procedures in a successful CC approach or after peripheral compartment procedures in a failed or difficult CC approach). A failed CC approach was defined as failure in introducing the anterolateral portal to the CC under arthroscopic control; a difficult CC approach was defined as the presence of an incomplete diagnostic round in the CC because of a small distraction. The amount of distraction was evaluated by the ratio of the distracted gap to the undistracted gap. Patients were classified into the successful CC access group (group 1) and the failed/difficult CC access group (group 2). The amount of distraction, demographic characteristics, and preoperative radiographic parameters were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 205 patients (113 males and 92 females; mean ± SD age, 34.5 ± 11.4 years), and group 2 consisted of 35 patients (27 males and 8 females; age, 32.5 ± 11.2 years). The preoperative joint space width was not significantly different between group 1 (mean ± SD, 3.89 ± 0.83 mm) and group 2 (3.68 ± 0.68 mm). The ratio of the amount of distraction at lateral gaps under all traction conditions was significantly greater in group 1 compared with group 2 (1.50 ± 0.54 vs 1.26 ± 0.35, respectively, under preoperative manual traction; 2.84 ± 0.76 vs 2.03 ± 0.63 under preoperative maximal traction; 3.36 ± 0.96 vs 2.50 ± 0.79 under intraoperative maximal traction). An increase of the lateral gap by >2.2 times (P < .001) under preoperative maximal traction and by >2.7 times (P < .001) under intraoperative maximal traction could predict successful CC access. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; P = .017) and increased lateral center-edge angle (OR, 1.08 for every 1° increase; P = .004) were significant risk factors for failed/difficult CC access.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase of the lateral gap by >2.2 times during an unsterile traction test without joint distension could predict successful CC access. Male sex and increased lateral center-edge angle were risk factors for a failed or difficult CC access.

Postless Hip Distraction Systems Decrease the Amount of Traction Force Needed to Obtain Adequate Hip Distraction Versus a Conventional Post Hip Distractor

PURPOSE

To directly compare hip distraction distance and traction force data for hip arthroscopy performed using a post-basedsystem versus a postless system.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement were prospectively enrolled. Before March 26, 2019, arthroscopy was performed using a post-based system. After this date, the senior author converted to using a postless system. Intraoperative traction force and fluoroscopic distraction distance were measured to calculate hip stiffness coefficients at holding traction (k-hold) and maximal traction (k-max). We used multivariable regression analysis to determine whether postless arthroscopy was predictive of lower stiffness coefficients when controlling for other relevant patient-specific factors.

RESULTS

Hip arthroscopy was performed with a post-based system in 105 patients and with a postless system in 51. Mean holding traction force (67.5 ± 14.0 kilograms-force [kgf] vs 55.8 ± 15.3 kgf) and mean maximum traction force (96.0 ± 16.6 kgf vs 69.9 ± 14.1 kgf) were significantly lower in the postless group. On multivariable analysis, postless traction was an independent predictor of decreased k-hold (β = -31.4; 95% confidence interval, -61.2 to -1.6) and decreased k-max (β = -90.4; 95% confidence interval, -127.8 to -53.1). Male sex, Beighton score of 0, and poor hamstring flexibility were also predictors of increased k-hold and k-max in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

Postless traction systems decrease the amount of traction force required for adequate hip distraction for both maximal and holding traction forces when compared with post-based systems. Postless traction systems may help further reduce distraction-type neurologic injuries and pain after hip arthroscopy by lowering the traction force required to safely distract the hip.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prospective cohort-historical control comparative study.

The diagnosis of hip microinstability is correlated with ease of intra-operative hip distraction

PURPOSE

Hip microinstability has emerged as a contributor to young adult, non-arthritic hip pain. There is a paucity of objective clinical data to identify patients with hip microinstability and guide surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify the degree of distractibility in patients with and without microinstability undergoing hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

A single-surgeon series of hip arthroscopies were retrospectively reviewed from 2014-2020. All procedures were performed with paralysis on a fracture table with a perineal post where 1 turn of fine traction equates to 4 mm of axial traction. Diagnosis was recorded as isolated instability, instability plus femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and isolated FAI. Operative reports were reviewed to collect patient demographic data, number of turns of traction required for adequate distraction of the femoral head relative to the acetabulum (10 mm), and the presence of residual subluxation after initial traction was released.

RESULTS

A total of 464 patients were identified, 26 (5.6%) with isolated microinstability, 183 (39.4%) with microinstability with FAI anatomy, and 255 (55.0%) with FAI. The concurrent diagnosis of microinstability was associated with decreased turns required to adequately distract the hip. Isolated microinstability patients required 6.9 turns (IQR 4.6-8.8) while those with instability plus FAI required 8.8 turns (IQR 6.5-11) and isolated FAI required 19.1 turns (IQR 15-22). Residual subluxation after removal of negative intra-articular pressure but before performing the hip arthroscopy was more commonly associated with instability, occurring in 84.6% of isolated instability and 86.9% of instability plus FAI as compared with 29.8% in the isolated FAI cohort.

CONCLUSION

A diagnosis of hip microinstability, with or without features of FAI, is associated with decreased axial traction required to distract the hip. These data support the use of intra-operative ease of distraction as a method of identifying patients with hip microinstability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The traction force of the pulled limb in hip arthroscopic surgery is determined by stiffness coefficient which is significantly related to muscle volume

PURPOSE

To verify the relationship between muscle volume, lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), alpha angle (AA), body mass index (BMI) and Beighton score with stiffness coefficient (SC). To analyse the difference of traction force at different physical states of hip joint capsule.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients who underwent hip arthroscopy operation were included. The volumes of some related muscles were measured in MRI images by 3D Slicer. We recorded and tested differences in traction force of five joint capsule physical states, including before (State 1) and after joint capsule puncture (State 2), after the establishment of anterolateral and mid-anterior approaches (State 3) and after incision of the joint capsule through these two approaches (States 4, 5). The correlation between muscle volume, BMI, LCEA, AA and SC was verified by Spearman test. Poisson regression was used to explain confounding variables.

RESULTS

The average force at State 1 was 531.8 N. There were significant differences in traction force between these five states (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between muscle volumes and SC (p < 0.001). BMI had no correlation with SC (n.s.). The preoperative LCEA of the affected side was correlated with SC (p = 0.043). AA and SC were not correlated (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The physical states of the hip joint capsule affected traction force. Muscle volume rather than BMI is an ideal index to estimate preoperative traction force. LCEA affected traction force, whilst AA and Beighton score did not. Measuring the muscle volume can help estimate the most suitable traction force for the patient.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Editorial Commentary: Hip Primary Labral Repair Versus Reconstruction: Equally Successful Outcomes Can Be Achieved Based on Proper Indications

One of the core principles of hip arthroscopy is preservation of the acetabular labrum. Compromise of the biomechanical function of the labrum underlies a significant symptom source in patients undergoing hip preservation surgery. As surgical techniques continue to improve and evolve beyond labral repair, increased use of advanced arthroscopic procedures like segmental and circumferential reconstruction shed further light on the optimal labral intervention. In the revision setting, labral deficiency warrants labral reconstruction or augmentation. Both segmental and circumferential techniques may significantly improve patient-reported outcomes. However, in the primary setting, controversy exists not necessarily in the surgical technique, but more in the indications to perform which specific labral intervention. Reasonable indications for primary labral reconstruction include a calcified or ossified labrum, irreparable labral tissue, and hypotrophy of the labrum (less than 2-3 mm) with a proven deficient suction seal without resistance to axial distraction. Short-term multicenter studies demonstrate similar success rates between primary labral reconstruction and repair using validated patient-report outcome scores. Mid- and long-term clinical and economic investigations comparing labral reconstruction and repair are needed to determine the role of primary reconstruction in modern arthroscopic hip preservation surgery.