Characterization of version in the dysplastic hip and the need for subsequent femoral derotational osteotomy after periacetabular osteotomy

Retroverting Periacetabular Osteotomy for Symptomatic Acetabular Anteversion

BACKGROUND

Acetabular dysplasia has traditionally been defined using the lateral center edge angle and treated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). However, the recently described Ottawa classification further quantifies dysplasia in 3-dimensional terms, categorizing Ottawa A as dysplasia due to isolated, excessive acetabular anteversion or anterior acetabular under-coverage. We sought to determine if patients who have Ottawa A dysplasia can expect similar outcomes when undergoing a PAO compared to a traditional dysplasia cohort.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone PAO with Ottawa A hip dysplasia were selected and compared to a control group of patients who had lateral acetabular undercoverage. The modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool-33 were collected preoperatively and at various follow-up points for a final follow-up average of 2.3 years (range, 0.9 to 6.2).

RESULTS

The 17 patients (21 hips) who had Ottawa A dysplasia were compared to a control cohort of 69 patients (88 hips). Both groups saw significant improvements in modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool-33 at final follow-up, P < .001. There were no differences between groups in any of the outcome measures or rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or substantial clinical benefit. Rates of MCID ranged from 82.4 to 100%, and rates of achieving substantial clinical benefit ranged from 47.1 to 52.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing a PAO for Ottawa A hip dysplasia, a significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes can be expected with high rates of MCID achievement. This is not significantly different for patients undergoing PAO for more traditional dysplasia parameters.

Derotational femoral osteotomy locations and their influence on joint reaction forces in dysplastic hips

Femoral version (FV) deformities are common in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and may contribute to cartilage damage due to abnormal joint loading. Derotational femoral osteotomy (DFO) surgery corrects FV deformities. However there is little consensus about the femoral transection location for DFO, and its influence on joint loads is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two common DFO locations on muscle forces and hip joint reaction forces (JRFs) in patients with DDH. DFO was simulated in nine patients with DDH and abnormal FV using patient-specific musculoskeletal models. Femoral transection for DFO was separately simulated proximal and distal to the lesser trochanter and FV values were corrected to an idealized 15°. JRFs during early and late stance of gait were compared between the two simulated transection locations. Most changes to JRFs were similar between proximal and distal DFO, however, statistically significant differences were found for the medial JRF component during late stance among patients with femoral anteversion (p = 0.01). Force changes from five hip muscles were significantly different between DFO locations, however, changes were minimal. Most changes after DFO in patients with femoral retroversion were opposite of those with femoral anteversion, with anteroposterior and superior JRFs increasing after retroversion correction. After DFO correction, superior and medial JRFs in DDH patients remained elevated compared to controls. Understanding the influence of DFO location on muscle-generated hip forces can help surgeons justify decisions and potentially standardize surgical correction of FV deformities in patients with DDH.

[Preoperative MR imaging for hip dysplasia : Assessment of associated deformities and intraarticular pathologies]

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a known reason for hip pain for adolescents and young adults. Preoperative imaging is increasingly recognized as an important factor due to the recent advances in MR imaging.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to give an overview of preoperative imaging for DDH. The acetabular version and morphology, associated femoral deformities (cam deformity, valgus and femoral antetorsion) and intraarticular pathologies (labrum and cartilage damage) and cartilage mapping are described.

METHODS

After an initial evaluation with AP radiographs, CT or MRI represent the methods of choice for the preoperative evaluation of the acetabular morphology and cam deformity, and for the measurement of femoral torsion. Different measurement techniques and normal values should be considered, especially for patients with increased femoral antetorsion because this could lead to misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. MRI allows analysis of labrum hypertrophy and subtle signs for hip instability. 3D MRI for cartilage mapping allows quantification of biochemical cartilage degeneration and yields great potential for surgical decision-making. 3D-CT and, increasingly, 3D MRI of the hip to generate 3D pelvic bone models and subsequent 3D impingement simulation can help to detect posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral impingement.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Acetabular morphology can be divided in anterior, lateral and posterior hip dysplasia. Combined osseous deformities are common, such as hip dysplasia combined with cam deformity (86%). Valgus deformities were reported in 44%. Combined hip dysplasia and increased femoral antetorsion can occur in 52%. Posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral impingement between the lesser trochanter and the ischial tuberosity can occur in patients with increased femoral antetorsion. Typically, labrum damage and hypertrophy, cartilage damage, subchondral cysts can occur in hip dysplasia. Hypertrophy of the muscle iliocapsularis is a sign for hip instability. Acetabular morphology and femoral deformities (cam deformity and femoral anteversion) should be evaluated before surgical therapy for patients with hip dysplasia, considering the different measurement techniques and normal values of femoral antetorsion.

Patellofemoral joint load and knee abduction/adduction moment are sensitive to variations in femoral version and individual muscle forces

Torsional profiles of the lower limbs, such as femoral anteversion, can dictate gait and mobility, joint biomechanics and pain, and functional impairment. It currently remains unclear how the interactions between femoral anteversion, kinematics, and muscle activity patterns contribute to joint biomechanics and thus conditions such as knee pain. This study presents a computational modeling approach to investigating the interactions between femoral anteversion, muscle forces, and knee joint loads. We employed an optimal control approach to produce actuator and muscle-driven simulations of the stance phase of gait for femoral anteversion angles ranging from -8° (retroversion) to 52° (anteversion) with a typically developing baseline of 12° of anteversion and implemented a Monte Carlo analysis for variations in lower limb muscle forces. While total patellofemoral joint load decreased with increasing femoral anteversion, patellofemoral joint load alignment worsened, and knee abduction/adduction magnitude increased with both positive and negative changes in femoral anteversion (p < 0.001). The rectus femoris muscle was found to greatly influence patellofemoral joint loads across all femoral anteversion alignments (R > 0.8, p < 0.001), and the medial gastrocnemius was found to greatly influence knee abduction/adduction moments for the extreme version cases (R > 0.74, p < 0.001). Along with the vastus lateralis, which decreased with increasing femoral anteversion (R = 0.89, p < 0.001), these muscles are prime candidates for future experimental and clinical efforts to address joint pain in individuals with extreme femoral version. These findings, along with future modeling efforts, could help clinicians better design treatment strategies for knee joint pain in populations with extreme femoral anteversion or retroversion.

Combined femoral and acetabular version is sex-related and differs between patients with hip dysplasia and acetabular retroversion

AIMS

Frequency of abnormal femoral and acetabular version (AV) and combinations are unclear in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to investigate femoral version (FV), the proportion of increased FV and femoral retroversion, and combined-version (CV, FV+AV) in DDH patients and acetabular-retroversion (AR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective IRB-approved observational study was performed with 78 symptomatic DDH patients (90 hips) and 65 patients with femoroacetabular-impingement (FAI) due to AR (77 hips, diagnosis on AP radiographs). CT/MRI-based measurement of FV (Murphy method) and central AV were compared. Frequency of increased FV(FV > 25°), severely increased FV (FV > 35°) and excessive FV (FV > 45°) and of decreased FV (FV < 10°) and CV (McKibbin-index/COTAV-index) was analysed.

RESULTS

Mean FV and CV was significantly (p < 0.001) increased of DDH patients (mean ± SD of 25 ± 11° and 47 ± 18°) compared to AR (16 ± 11° and 28 ± 13°). Mean FV of female DDH patients (27 ± 16°) and AR (19 ± 12°) was significantly (p < 0.001) increased compared to male DDH patients (18 ± 13°) and AR (13 ± 8°). Frequency of increased FV (>25°) was 47% and of severely increased FV (>35°) was 23% for DDH patients. Proportion of femoral retroversion (FV < 10°) was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in patients AR (31%) compared to DDH patients (17%). 18% of DDH patients had AV > 25° combined with FV > 25°. Of patients with AR, 12% had FV < 10° combined with AV < 10°.

CONCLUSION

Patients with DDH and AR have remarkable sex-related differences of FV and CV. Frequency of severely increased FV > 35° (23%) is considerable for patients with DDH, but 17% exhibited decreased FV, that could influence management. The different combinations underline the importance of patient-specific evaluation before open hip preservation surgery (periacetabular osteotomy and femoral derotation osteotomy) and hip-arthroscopy.

Minimally Invasive Radiographic Evaluation of the Dysplastic Hip Joint Configuration in Terms of Surgical Treatment with Hip Preservation by PAO

Introduction

Residual developmental dysplasia of hip (RDDH) is a factor of early osteoarthritis of the hip. The main problems are pain and instability of the hip joint due to inadequate coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum. The purpose of this study was to radiologically evaluate RDDH after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and to compare RDDH to healthy hips.

Materials and Methods

The radiological parameters of RDDH treated by PAO were retrospectively evaluated. Digital AP pelvic radiographs were taken, including parameters of central edge angle and femoral head coverage, medialization, distalization, and ilio-ischial angle. Clinical assessment is based on the VAS scale. The study group consisted of patients with RDDH, and the control group consisted of patients without RDDH.

Results

After PAO radiological parameters decreased: medialization by 2.68 mm, distalization by 3.65 mm, and ilio-ischial angle by 2.62°. However, there was an increase in the parameters: CEA by 17.61° and FHC by 16.46%. There was a mean 3 point decrease in pain on the VAS scale. There was also a statistically significant radiological difference in the structure of dysplastic hip joints before surgery and healthy hip joints of the control group.

Conclusions

Radiological studies confirmed the effectiveness of the PAO method in the treatment of RDDH. Based on all radiological parameters, differences between healthy and dysplastic hip joints were demonstrated. We believe that a thorough understanding of the values of radiological parameters used to describe dysplastic hip joints will allow us to improve the imaging diagnosis of this condition.

Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint

Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for femoral version measurement. However, recent data have shown magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as another modality to measure femoral version. This study aimed to correlate MRI and CT femoral version measurements in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)-related complaint. Patients (18-35 years old) who presented to the hip preservation clinic and radiology department with a suspected FAI diagnosis from 26 December 2018 to 4 March 2020 were included. All patients had a CT and MRI of the hip, with images including both hips and knees, as per our institution's protocol for possible hip preservation surgery. Patients were excluded if they were missing views of the knees, or if they had a history or imaging appearance of any condition affecting femoral version at the femoral head (e.g. slipped capital femoral epiphysis). Femoral version was measured by three reviewers. Fifty-eight patients were included, and 36 (62%) were female. Femoral version averaged 6.1° ± 11.8° on CT and 6.5° ± 10.8° on MRI. A strong positive correlation was reported between the two imaging modalities (r: 0.81; P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability among the three reviewers was excellent and statistically significant for measurements on both MRI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.99; P < 0.001] and CT (ICC: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99; P < 0.001). Our finding suggests that MRI is a sufficient method for measuring femoral version to determine disease etiology and treatment progression. To avoid exposing patients to ionizing radiation, physicians should not obtain CT scans to evaluate femoral version.

Hip Morphology in Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) Patients Treated for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) as Infants Compared With Those Without Infant Treatment

BACKGROUND

A subset of patients successfully treated for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) as infants have symptomatic acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity leading to periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). The purpose of this study was to compare femoral and acetabular morphology in PAO patients with late acetabular dysplasia after previous treatment for DDH with PAO patients who do not have a history of DDH treatment.

METHODS

A single surgeon's patients who underwent PAO between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients previously treated for infantile DDH with a Pavlik harness, abduction brace, closed reduction and spica casting, or open reduction and spica casting were included. Patients with previous bony hip surgery were excluded. Preoperative radiographic measurements of each hip were recorded including lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, and Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof index. Computed tomography measurements included the coronal center edge angle, sagittal center edge angle, Tönnis angle, acetabular anteversion at 1, 2, and 3 o'clock, femoral neck-shaft angle, femoral version, and alpha angle. Control PAO cases without a history of DDH diagnosis or treatment were matched with the infantile DDH treatment group in a 2:1 ratio based on coronal center edge angle, age, and sex.

RESULTS

There were 21 hips in 18 patients previously treated for infantile DDH (13 patients Pavlik harness, 3 abduction brace, 1 closed reduction, and 1 open reduction). The control PAO cohort was 42 hips in 42 patients who did not have previous DDH treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the recorded measurements between patients previously treated for DDH and those without previous treatment including femoral version (P=0.494), anteversion at 1 o'clock (P=0.820), anteversion at 2 o'clock (P=0.584), anteversion at 3 o'clock (P=0.137), neck-shaft angle (P=0.612), lateral center edge angle (P=0.433), Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof index (P=0.144), and alpha angle (P=0.156).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral and acetabular morphology is similar between PAO patients with persistent symptomatic acetabular dysplasia following DDH treatment and patients presenting after skeletal maturity with acetabular dysplasia and no previous history of DDH treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-case-control, prognostic study.

Less in-toeing after femoral derotation osteotomy in adult patients with increased femoral version and posterior hip impingement compared to patients with femoral retroversion

In-toeing of the foot was associated with high femoral version (FV), while Out-toeing was associated with femoral-retroversion. Therefore, we report on (i) foot-progression-angle (FPA), (ii) prevalence of In-toeing and Out-toeing, and (iii) clinical outcome of patients treated with femoral-derotation-osteotomy (FDO). We performed a retrospective analysis involving 20 patients (20 hips) treated with unilateral FDO (2017–18). Of them, 14 patients had increased FV, 6 patients had femoral-retroversion. Follow-up time was mean 1 ± 1 years. All patients had minimal 1-year follow-up and the mean age was 29 ± 8 years. Patients with increased FV (FV > 35°) presented with positive posterior-impingement-test and mean FV was 49 ± 11° (Murphy method). Six patients with femoral-retroversion (FV < 10°) had positive anterior impingement test and mean FV of 5 ± 4°. Instrumented gait analysis was performed preoperatively and at follow-up using the Gaitrite system to measure FPA and was compared to a control group of 18 healthy asymptomatic volunteers (36 feet, mean age 29 ± 6 years). (i) Mean FPA increased significantly (P = 0.006) from preoperative 1.3 ± 7° to 4.5 ± 6° at follow-up for patients with increased FV and was not significantly different compared to the control group (4.0 ± 4.5°). (ii) In-toeing decreased from preoperatively (five patients) to follow-up (two patients) for patients with increased FV. Out-toeing decreased from preoperatively (two patients) to follow-up (no patient) for patients with femoral-retroversion. (iii) Subjective-hip-value of all patients increased significantly (P < 0.001) from preoperative 21 to 78 points at follow-up. WOMAC was 12 ± 8 points at follow-up. Patients with increased FV that underwent FDO walked with less In-toeing. FDO has the potential to reduce In-toeing and Out-toeing and to improve subjective satisfaction at follow-up.

[Effects of femoral offset and mechanical axis of the lower extremity on hip after osteotomy for adult developmental dysplasia of the hip]

Objective

To investigate the effects of femoral offset and mechanical axis of the lower extremity on hip after osteotomy for adult developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

A clinical data of 62 adult patients with DDH (62 hips), who underwent periacetabular osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy between January 2016 and May 2019 and met selective criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 6 males and 56 females. The age ranged from 18 to 38 years, with an average of 24.4 years. Body mass index ranged from 15.8 to 31.8 kg/m ², with an average of 21.8 kg/m ². There were 44 cases of Hartofilakidis typeⅠ and 18 cases of typeⅡ. According to the modified Tönnis osteoarthritis staging, 46 cases were stage 0 and 16 cases were stageⅠ. There were 13 cases with pelvic anteversion, 40 cases with normal pelvis, and 9 cases with pelvic retroversion. Intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complications were recorded. Postoperative hip function was evaluated by Harris score and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) score. The femoral offset, collo-diaphyseal angle, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), knee valus angle, CE (Wiberg central-edge angle), anterior CE angle, and acetabular index angle were measured and the osteotomy healing was observed on X-ray films. Patients were grouped according to postoperative femoral offset (≥48 mm or <48 mm) and HKA [varus group (HKA<177°), normal group (HKA 177°-183°), and valgus group (HKA>183°)]. Harris score and iHOT score were compared between groups.

Results

Intraoperative blood loss ranged from 200 to 1 550 mL, with an average of 476 mL. The length of hospital stay ranged from 8 to 21 days, with an average of 13.3 days. All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 2.0-4.5 years, with an average of 2.8 years. At 1 year after operation, the Harris score and iHOT score of the hip joint significantly increased when compared with those before operation ( P<0.05); there were significant differences in the femoral offset, collo-diaphyseal angle, HKA, knee valus angle, CE angle, anterior CE angle, and acetabular index angle between pre- and post-operation ( P>0.05). According to the modified Tönnis osteoarthritis staging, 38 cases were stage 0 and 24 cases were stageⅠ; and there was no significant difference between pre- and post-operation ( χ ²=2.362, P=0.124). There were 11 cases with pelvic anteversion, 38 cases with normal pelvis, and 13 cases with pelvic retroversion, showing no significant difference when compared with that before operation ( χ ²=0.954, P=0.623). The pubic branch osteotomy did not heal in 9 cases, proximal femur osteotomy did not heal in 2 cases, and inferior pubic ramus stress fracture occurred in 5 cases. There were significant differences ( P<0.05) in the Harris score and iHOT score between femoral offset≥48 mm group ( n=10) and femoral offset<48 mm group ( n=52). There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in Harris score and iHOT score between varus group ( n=13), normal group ( n=40), and valgus group ( n=9).

Conclusion

Periacetabular osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy can improve the femoral offset and mechanical axis of the lower extremity of patients with DDH, and improve the functional score of the hip. However, excessive increase of femoral offset during femoral osteotomy is not desirable, resulting in low postoperative functional score.

Rate of continued conservative management versus progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up in patients with pre-arthritic hip pain

INTRODUCTION

Extensive literature has described surgical outcomes for pre-arthritic hip pain, but the proportion of patients who progress to surgery remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of patients who present to a tertiary referral center for pre-arthritic hip pain and progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Thirteen to 40-year-olds who presented for initial evaluation to a conservative or surgical orthopedic specialist and were diagnosed with pre-arthritic hip pain (n=713 patients, 830 hips).

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of progression to surgery at minimum one year follow-up for the entire cohort. Predictors of progression to surgery were determined for the entire cohort and for radiographically defined subgroups using multiple logistic regression. Candidate predictors included baseline demographic, radiographic, clinical diagnosis, and patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

In a cohort with mean age 25.4 (SD 8.1) years, 72.7% female, and mean follow-up 2.6 (range 1.0-4.8) years, 429/830 hips (51.7% [95% CI 48.2%-55.1%]) progressed to surgery. Predictors of surgical progression in the entire cohort included younger age (OR 0.95/year [95% CI 0.93-0.98]), pain duration longer than six months (OR 1.87-2.03, p≤.027), worse physical function (OR 0.96/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) point [0.92-0.99]), and a clinical diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (OR 3.47 [2.05-5.89]), acetabular dysplasia (OR 2.75 [1.73-4.35]), and/or labral tear (OR 10.71 [6.98-16.47]). Radiographic dysplasia (lateral center edge angle<20⁰ ) increased the likelihood of surgery in all subgroups (OR 2.05-8.47, p≤.008). Increasing maximum α angle increased the likelihood of surgery in patients with severe cam FAI (α>63⁰ ) (OR 1.03/degree [1.00-1.06]).

CONCLUSION

Almost half of patients with pre-arthritic hip pain did not progress to surgery at minimum one year follow-up. A trial of conservative management is likely worthwhile in most patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

What is the pelvic tilt in acetabular dysplasia and does it change following peri-acetabular osteotomy?

To quantify the pelvic tilt (PT) in patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and determine if it represents a compensatory mechanism to improve femoral head coverage, we studied a cohort of 16 patients undergoing 32 bilateral staged PAOs for acetabular dysplasia and compared this to a matched cohort of 32 patients undergoing PAO for unilateral acetabular dysplasia all with >1 year follow-up. The change in PT was determined with two validated methods, namely, the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle and the pubic symphysis to sacroiliac index (PS-SI). Despite an improvement in the lateral centre-edge and Tönnis angles to within normal limits following PAO, patients with unilateral and bilateral acetabular dysplasia have similar PT pre-operatively (8° ± 5°) and post-operatively (9° ± 5°). A change of >5° was observed in only six patients (13%) using the SFP angle, and five patients (10%) using the PS-SI, all increased (posterior rotation of the pelvis). No patients were observed to have a change in PT >10°. The observed PT in our study group is equivalent to that found in the normal population and in patient with symptomatic acetabular retroversion. These findings all suggest that PT is morphological rather than a result of a compensatory mechanism, and even if it was compensatory, it does not appear to reverse significantly following PAO. The target for acetabular reorientation, therefore, remains constant.