Pelvic osteotomies for acetabular dysplasia: Are there outcomes, survivorship and complication differences between different osteotomy techniques?

Shelf acetabuloplasty may inhibit range of motion: A computer simulation analysis

Shelf acetabuloplasty has been performed in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH); however, the appropriate position of the shelf has not been determined, particularly with respect to avoiding range of motion (ROM) loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of ROM inhibition and the influence of 3D position of the shelf following actual shelf acetabuloplasty and virtual surgery using computer simulation analysis. Computed tomography data from 15 patients with DDH who underwent shelf acetabuloplasty were collected between August 2019 and February 2022. The three-dimensional models of a hip joint were constructed using Zed Hip®. Maximal internal rotation (MIR) at 45° and 90° flexion was measured in each patient. The frequency and position of ROM inhibition was determined in a real postoperative model virtually. In addition, a second analysis using virtual acetabuloplasty was performed. Upon placing the shelf, three patterns were provided for the following four parameters: height, coronal inclination, center-edge angle (CEA), and anteroposterior position. The predictors for ROM inhibition were analyzed using a logistic regression model. In the actual postoperative model, a limitation of MIR at 90° and 45° of flexion occurred in 60% and 66.7% of patients, respectively. A higher CEA and anterior position are major factors limiting MIR. The analysis of the virtual shelf acetabuloplasty model revealed that anterior position and CEA were significant factors causing ROM inhibition. As for clinical significance, the results of the current study indicated the optimal location of the shelf to avoid iatrogenic impingement after shelf acetabuloplasty.

Treatment of Severe Hip Dysplasia with Leg Length Discrepancy Using Spherical Periacetabular Osteotomy

Case. A 20-year-old woman with severe subluxation of the hip displayed a leg length discrepancy of approximately 20 mm. The proposed treatment was a spherical periacetabular osteotomy (SPO) for joint preservation and postoperative leg length maintenance. SPO is a novel periacetabular osteotomy procedure. At her 3-year follow-up, the patient had functional, pain-free motion and high satisfaction. In this case, the SPO technique was able to achieve satisfactory clinical results without further exacerbating the leg length discrepancy after surgery.

Total hip arthroplasty after rotational acetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a retrospective observational study

Background

Total hip arthroplasty after osteotomy is more technically challenging than primary total hip arthroplasty, especially concerning cup placement. This is attributed to bone morphological abnormalities caused by acetabular bone loss and osteophyte formation. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after rotational acetabular osteotomy compared with those of primary total hip arthroplasty, focusing mainly on acetabular deformity and cup position.

Methods

The study included 22 hips that had undergone rotational acetabular osteotomy and 22 hips in an age- and sex-matched control group of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasties between 2005 and 2020. We analyzed cup abduction and anteversion; lateral, anterior, and posterior cup center–edge angle; hip joint center position; femoral anteversion angle; and presence of acetabular defect using postoperative radiography and computed tomography. Operative results and clinical evaluations were also analyzed.

Results

The clinical evaluation showed that the postoperative flexion range of motion was lower in total hip arthroplasty after rotational acetabular osteotomy than in primary total hip arthroplasty, although no significant difference was noted in the postoperative total Japanese Orthopedic Association hip score. The operative time was significantly longer in the rotational acetabular osteotomy group than in the control group, but there was no significant difference in blood loss. The lateral cup center–edge angle was significantly higher and the posterior cup center–edge angle was significantly lower in the total hip arthroplasty after rotational acetabular osteotomy, suggesting a posterior bone defect existed in the acetabulum. In total hip arthroplasty after rotational acetabular osteotomy, the hip joint center was located significantly superior and lateral to the primary total hip arthroplasty.

Conclusions

In total hip arthroplasty after rotational acetabular osteotomy, the cup tended to be placed in the superior and lateral positions, where there was more bone volume. The deformity of the acetabulum and the high hip center should be considered for treatment success because they may cause cup instability, limited range of motion, and impingement.

Is combined surgical dislocation and proximal femoral osteotomy a safe procedure for correction of complex hip deformities?

Complex deformities of the hip requiring intra-articular and proximal femoral correction are challenging with regard to surgical access and complication risk. Combined surgical dislocation and proximal femoral osteotomy (SD/PFO) is a surgical strategy that provides unrestricted access to the joint with the capability for adjunctive PFO. Although providing excellent surgical access, concerns over a potentially high risk of postoperative complications remain, and published information on the safety of this technique remain scarce. In this study, we defined the early complication profile of combined surgery across 48 hips with a variety of complex deformities using a standardized, validated complication grading scheme for hip preservation surgery. Patients were mean age 19.1 years 13–33 years and 60% had previous surgery. At the early mean follow-up of 2.9 years, considerable improvement was seen across all outcome scores. Major complications (Grade III or higher) occurred at a rate of 4.2% (n = 2). Both were osteotomy non-unions, and both were treated successfully with revision PFO and bone grafting at mean 1.1 years. To our knowledge, the current series of combined SD-PFO surgeries represents the largest to date for which detailed complication data have been reported. Given the complexity of these disorders, a major complication rate of 4.2% is acceptable. Our complication rates were comparable to those reported for isolated SD and PFO procedures. These rates did not vary significantly across morphologic variants or patient-specific characteristics. Additionally, our complication risk profile is consistent with previous, smaller reports, which supports the generalizability of these results among appropriately experienced surgeons.

Rates of readmission and reoperation following pelvic osteotomy in adolescent patients: a database study evaluating the pediatric health information system

Rates and reasons for readmission and reoperation following adolescent pelvic osteotomy are not well-defined. This study aimed to (1) determine 30-day and 90-day readmission rates and the 2-year reoperation rate after pelvic osteotomy in adolescents and (2) identify reasons for readmission and reoperation. The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried between 10 January 2015 and 1 January 2020 for patients meeting selected International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) procedure and diagnosis codes relating to pelvic osteotomies. Readmission rates were calculated within 30 and 90 days from index osteotomy. The ipsilateral reoperation rate was calculated within 2 years from index osteotomy. Reasons for these outcomes were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to identify readmission risks. Of 1475 patients, 5.4% and 9.2% were readmitted within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Reasons for readmission were consistent across both time points and included infection, hip-related orthopedic conditions and neurologic conditions. Younger age (OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.89; P < 0.0001) and male sex (OR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.23–2.54; P = 0.002) were predictive of readmission within 90 days. The 2-year reoperation rate was 32.1%, of which 79.8% underwent reoperation for hardware removal, 17.7% for revision and 1.3% for hip replacement. 30-day readmission, 90-day readmission and 2-year reoperation rates after adolescent pelvic osteotomy were 5.4%, 9.2% and 32.1%, respectively. Younger age and male sex were predictive of 90-day readmission. Most ipsilateral reoperations were for hardware removal. Understanding readmission and reoperation risks following pelvic osteotomy can benefit patient counseling and improve expectations of post-surgical outcomes.

Level of Evidence:

IV, case series.

Short-term patient-reported outcomes following concomitant hip arthroscopy and the endoscopic modified shelf procedure for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia and intra-articular pathology

The shelf procedure is a treatment of acetabular dysplasia, with the aim of increasing weight-bearing acetabular coverage. Although several shelf techniques have been described, the endoscopic procedure with concomitant hip arthroscopy is a new, less invasive alternative. Outcomes following this procedure are scarce. The purpose of this study was to report short-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following concomitant hip arthroscopy and endoscopic modified shelf procedure in the setting of acetabular dysplasia and labral tears. Patients that met extraordinarily selective surgical indications and underwent the abovementioned surgery between February 2016 and October 2019 and had minimum 1-year follow-up were included. There were five females with a mean age of 40.18 ± 5.05 years and follow-up of 21.55 ± 8.68 months. The lateral center-edge angle increased from 15.80° to 23.20° (P = 0.003), and vertical center-edge angle increased from 16.60° to 23.60° (P < 0.001). The Tönnis angle decreased from 15.40° to 3.74° (P < 0.001). The alpha angle decreased from 58.46° to 40.70° (P < 0.001). PROs demonstrated significant improvement at latest follow-up (modified Harris Hip Score, P = 0.042; Non-Arthritic Hip Score, P < 0.001; Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Subscale, P = 0.035; Visual Analog Scale, P < 0.001; International Hip Outcome Tool-12, P = 0.043), and satisfaction was 8.60 ± 0.89. No secondary surgeries were reported. Concomitant hip arthroscopy and endoscopic modified shelf procedure appears to be a safe and effective procedure for patients with acetabular dysplasia and labral tears yielding favorable outcomes and satisfaction at short-term follow-up.