Subtrochanteric osteotomy for femoral mal-torsion through a surgical dislocation approach

Anterior knee pain patients without structural knee abnormalities and normal lower limb skeletal alignment have a higher prevalence of cam-femoroacetabular impingement syndrome than the general population

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of cam femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (cam-FAIS) in anterior knee pain (AKP) patients devoid of both structural patellofemoral joint abnormalities and lower limb skeletal malalignment. A secondary objective was to examine pain and disability differences between AKP patients with and without cam-FAIS.

METHODS

A total of 209 AKP patients were screened for eligibility. Inclusion criteria were normal imaging studies and normal lower limb alignment, and exclusion criteria were previous knee surgery and knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. Of those, 49 (23.4%) were eligible and this number matched a previous power analysis to detect statistically significant differences in prevalence of cam-FAIS in a population of AKP patients. The first step in the study sequence was to ask the patient whether they had groin pain. If so, the impingement test was done. Then, the femoral cam morphology defined by an alpha angle greater than or equal to 55° in a 45° Dunn axial view of the hip was ruled out. Additionally, patients completed Kujala and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) functional knee scores for disability assessment. General population control group was obtained from literature.

RESULTS

The study included 9 males and 40 females, with an average age of 36 (20-50, ±SD 8.03) years. Groin pain and positive impingement test were found in 26/49 patients (53%). An alpha angle ≥55° was observed in 35/49 patients (71%). A combination of groin pain, positive impingement test and an alpha angle ≥55° was seen in 18/49 patients (37%). The AKP patients with groin pain, a positive impingement test and an alpha angle ≥55° exhibited statistically similar pain and disability levels as AKP patients without cam-FAIS.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that AKP patients without structural abnormalities in the patellofemoral joint and without lower limbs malalignment have a statistically significantly higher prevalence of cam-FAIS than the general population. Moreover, AKP patients with cam-FAIS have a statistically similar degree of pain and disability than AKP patients without it.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Beyond the patella: Treatment of cam femoroacetabular impingement syndrome improves anterior knee pain

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate if there is a relationship between cam femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (cam-FAIS) and chronic anterior knee pain (AKP).

METHODS

This is a pilot retrospective review of 12 AKP patients with no structural anomalies in the patellofemoral joint and no skeletal malalignment in the lower limbs. All the patients were resistant to proper conservative treatment for AKP (AKP-R). Subsequently, these patients developed pain in the ipsilateral hip several months later, and upon evaluation, were diagnosed with cam-FAIS. Arthroscopic femoral osteoplasty and labral repair were performed and clinical follow-up of hip and knee pain and function (Kujala Score and Non-arthritic Hip Score -NAHS-) was carried out.

RESULTS

All the patients showed improvement in the knee and hip pain scores with a statistically significant clinical difference in all of them at 69 months follow up (range: 18 to 115) except one patient without improvement in the groin VAS score post-operatively. Visual analogical scale (VAS) of knee pain improved from 6.3 (range: 5 to 8) to a postoperative 0.5 (range: 0 to 3.5), (p ​< ​0.001). The VAS of groin pain improved from 4.4 (range: 2 to 8) to a postoperative 0.9 (range: 0 to 3), (p ​< ​0.001). NAHS improved from a preoperative 67.9 (range: 28.7 to 100) to a postoperative 88 (range: 70 to 100), (p ​< ​0.015) and knee Kujala's score improved from a preoperative 48.7 (range: 22 to 71) to a postoperative 96 (range: 91 to 100), (p ​< ​0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study's principal finding suggests an association between cam-FAIS and AKP-R in young patients who exhibit normal knee imaging and lower limbs skeletal alignment. Addressing cam-FAIS in these cases leads to resolution of both groin and knee pain, resulting in improved functional outcomes for both joints.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort series with a single contemporaneous long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Rotational femoral osteotomies and cam resection improve hip function and internal rotation for patients with anterior hip impingement and decreased femoral version

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients with reduced femoral version (FV) are poorly understood. The aim of this study is to assess (i) hip pain and range of motion, (ii) subjective satisfaction and (iii) subsequent surgeries of symptomatic patients who underwent rotational femoral osteotomies. A retrospective case series involving 18 patients (23 hips, 2014-2018) with anterior hip pain that underwent rotational femoral osteotomies for treatment of decreased FV was performed. The mean preoperative age was 25 ± 6 years (57% male), and all patients had decreased FV < 10° and minimum 1-year follow-up (mean follow-up 2 ± 1 years). Surgical indication was the positive anterior impingement test, limited internal rotation (IR) in 90° of flexion (mean 10 ± 8°) and IR in extension (mean 24 ± 11°), anterosuperior chondrolabral damage in Magnet resonance (MR) arthrography, CT-based measurement of decreased FV (mean 5 ± 3°, Murphy method) and no osteoarthritis (Tönnis Grade 0). Most patients had intra- and extra-articular subspine FAI (patient-specific 3D impingement simulation). Subtrochanteric rotational femoral osteotomies to increase FV (correction 20 ± 4°) were combined with cam resection (78%) and surgical hip dislocation (91%). (i) The positive anterior impingement test decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from pre- to postoperatively (100% to 9%). IR in 90° of flexion increased significantly (P < 0.001, 10 ± 8° to 31 ± 10°). (ii) Subjective satisfaction increased significantly (P < 0.001) from pre- to postoperatively (33% 77%). The mean Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score increased significantly (P < 0.001) from 14 ± 2 (8-15) points to 17 ± 1 (13-18, P < 0.001) points. Most patients (85%) reported at follow-up that they would undergo surgery again. (iii) At follow-up, all 23 hips were preserved (no conversion to total hip arthroplasty). One hip (4%) underwent revision osteosynthesis. Proximal rotational femoral osteotomies combined with cam resection improve hip pain and IR in most FAI patients with decreased FV at short-term follow-up. Rotational femoral osteotomies to increase FV are safe and effective.

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy corrects excessive femoral anteversion in patients with patellofemoral instability: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Patellofemoral instability (PFI) is a common condition that can be caused from multiple factors, including lower limb rotational malalignments. Determining precise criteria for performing corrective torsional osteotomy can be a daunting task due to the lack of consensus on normal and excessive values and the limited evidence-based data in the postoperative results. The purpose was to assess the clinical, functional and imaging outcomes following derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) in patients with PFI and/or anterior knee pain (AKP) associated with lower limb rotational malalignments.

METHODS

Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases up to October 2023. Studies reporting outcomes after DDFO in patients with PFI and/or AKP were eligible for the systematic review. The primary outcome was imaging metrics, especially femoral anteversion. Secondary outcomes included the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (clinical and functional). Quantitative synthesis involved the use of weighted averages to calculate pre- to postoperative mean differences (MD) and compare them against the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

Ten studies (309 knees) were included with a mean follow-up of 36.1 ± 11.7 months. Imaging outcomes consistently indicated the correction of femoral anteversion (MD = -19.4 degrees, 95% confidence interval: -20.1 to -18.7) following DDFO. PROMs showed significant improvements in most studies, exceeding the MCID. Patient satisfaction with the DDFO was high (93.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The DDFO was an effective treatment option for correcting excessive femoral anteversion in patients with PFI associated with clinically relevant functional and clinical improvement and a high satisfaction rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level II-IV studies.

Proximal femoral derotation osteotomy for management of femoral malversion: a systematic review

Femoral malversion is an under-recognized contributor to hip pain in younger adults. Under treatment is often a contributor to poor outcomes in hip preservation surgery. We reviewed the literature to analyse the outcomes of proximal femoral derotation osteotomy as a treatment for femoral malversion as well as propose our own management algorithm for treating such patients. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines searching four databases (PubMed, CINALH, MEDLINE and EMBASE) for studies investigating the outcomes of derotation osteotomy in treating malversion. Nine studies were found encompassing 229 hips. At a mean follow-up of 39.9 months across the studies, there were only two conversions (1%) to total hip arthroplasty and four revision cases in total. Seven of the nine studies reported improved functional outcomes in their cohorts, with the mean Harris hip score improved from 63.7 to 87.3 where reported. There is a paucity of literature around the outcomes of proximal femoral derotation osteotomy. However, both the evidence available and the authors' experience suggest that consideration of femoral malversion is an essential component of hip preservation surgery, improving functional outcomes in cases of excessive femoral anteversion and femoral retroversion.

Combined Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia and Increased Femoral Anteversion Is Associated With Worse Outcomes in Female Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship of increased femoral anteversion and borderline acetabular dysplasia on the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in a female cohort of patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of female patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. All patients had preoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans from which lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and femoral anteversion were measured. Patient outcome was quantified by preoperative and postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool 12-item instrument (iHOT-12). All patients had follow-up at 2 to 4 years postoperatively. Published values for minimum clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit (SCB), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and a normal or abnormal hip were used to determine outcome as well as the final score and delta of the iHOT-12.

RESULTS

There were 243 female patients included in the cohort (83% follow-up) who had iHOT-12 scores at 2- to 4-year follow-up (mean 36.9 months). Female patients with combined LCEA ≤25° and femoral anteversion >20° had lower final IHOT-12 scores (P = .001) and delta iHOT-12 (P = .010) and were less likely to achieve a normal hip (P = .013), minimum clinically important difference (P = .018), SCB (P < .001), or PASS (P < .001) and more likely to have an abnormal hip (P = .002). In addition, patients with an LCEA ≤25° and normal femoral version were less likely to achieve a normal hip (P = .013), SCB (P < .001), and PASS (P < .001) compared with those with normal acetabular coverage (all P < .05). There was no difference in these outcome measures between the groups with an LCEA >25° with or without increased femoral version.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients with femoral anteversion >20° and borderline acetabular dysplasia did poorly after hip arthroscopy. However, those with increased femoral anteversion and normal acetabular coverage had outcomes similar to control hips.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

No relevant mechanical leg axis deviation in the frontal and sagittal planes is to be expected after subtrochanteric or supracondylar femoral rotational or derotational osteotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate if one level of corrective femoral osteotomy (subtrochanteric or supracondylar) bears an increased risk of unintentional implications on frontal and sagittal plane alignment in a simulated clinical setting.

METHODS

Out of 100 cadaveric femora, 23 three-dimensional (3-D) surface models with femoral antetorsion (femAT) deformities (> 22° or < 2°) were investigated, and femAT normalized to 12° with single plane rotational osteotomies, perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. Change of the frontal and sagittal plane alignment was expressed by the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), respectively. The influence of morphologic factors of the femur [centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle and antecurvatum radius (ACR)] were assessed. Furthermore, position changes of the lesser (LT) and greater trochanters (GT) in the frontal and sagittal plane compared to the hip centre were investigated.

RESULTS

Mean femoral derotation of the high-antetorsion group (n = 6) was 12.3° (range 10-17°). In the frontal plane, mLDFA changed a mean of 0.1° (- 0.06 to 0.3°) (n.s.) and - 0.3° (- 0.5 to - 0.1) (p = 0.03) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. In the sagittal plane, PDFA changed a mean of 1° (0.7 to 1.1) (p = 0.03) and 0.3° (0.1 to 0.7) (p = 0.03), respectively. The low-antetorsion group (n = 17) was rotated by a mean of 13.8° (10°-23°). mLDFA changed a mean of - 0.2° (- 0.5° to 0.2°) (p < 0.006) and 0.2° (0-0.5°) (p < 0.001) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. PDFA changed a mean of 1° (- 2.3 to 1.3) (p < 0.01) and 0.5° (- 1.9 to 0.3) (p < 0.01), respectively. The amount of femAT correction was associated with increased postoperative deviation of the mechanical leg axis (p < 0.01). Using multiple regression analysis, no other morphological factors were found to influence mLDFA or PDFA. Internal rotational osteotomies decreased the ischial-lesser trochanteric space by < 5 mm in both the frontal and sagittal plane (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In case of femAT correction of ≤ 20°, neither subtrochanteric nor supracondylar femoral derotational or rotational osteotomies have a clinically relevant impact on frontal or sagittal leg alignment. A relevant deviation in the sagittal (but not frontal plane) might occur in case of a > 25° subtrochanteric femAT correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Femoral de-rotation osteotomy versus hip arthroscopy for management of femoroacetabular impingement in adult patients with decreased femoral anteversion: a matched retrospective cohort study

Femoral de-rotation osteotomy (FDO) and hip arthroscopy are both recognized surgical options for the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in the setting of decreased femoral anteversion (<5°). Minimal comparative data exist regarding the difference in outcomes between these two techniques, and we believe this is the first study to provide that comparison. This retrospective cohort study included a total of 20 patients with such pathology, matched for age, gender and body mass index. A total of 10 patients were included in the FDO group [median anteversion −0.5° (true retroversion); average follow-up 17.9 months]. In total, 10 patients were included in the hip arthroscopy group [median anteversion −0.5° (true retroversion); average follow-up 28.5 months]. Both groups demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in the post-operative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) scores [median improvement: FDO group, 37.7 points (r 14–58.8; P < 0.041); hip arthroscopy group, 35.9 points (r 11.1–81; P < 0.05)], noting that the minimal clinically important difference for the iHOT-33 is 6.1 points. However, the study was not adequately powered to delineate a difference in improvement between the two groups. The findings suggest significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, and clinical findings can be achieved with either FDO or hip arthroscopy for FAI in the setting of decreased femoral anteversion. However, selection of the most suitable surgical procedure using a patient-specific approach may optimize outcomes in this challenging population.

Rotation osteotomy of the distal femur influences coronal femoral alignment and the ischiofemoral space

INTRODUCTION

Despite the fact that osteotomies around the knee represent well-established treatment options for the redistribution of loads and forces within and around the knee joint, unforeseen effects of these osteotomies on the remaining planes and adjacent joints are still to be defined. It was, therefore, the aim of this study to determine the influence of a distal femoral rotation osteotomy on the coronal limb alignment and on the ischiofemoral space of the hip joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Long-leg standing radiographs and CT-based torsional measurements of 27 patients undergoing supracondylar rotational osteotomies of the femur between 2012 and 2019 were obtained and utilized for the purpose of this study. Postoperative radiographs were obtained after union at the osteotomy site. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), and the ischiofemoral space were measured. Comparison between means was performed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients underwent isolated supracondylar external rotation osteotomy to reduce the overall antetorsion of the femur. The osteotomy resulted in a 2.4° ± 1.4° mean increase in HKA and 2.4 mm ± 1.7 mm increase in the ischiofemoral space (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Supracondylar external rotation osteotomy of the femur leads to valgisation of the coronal limb alignment and increases the ischiofemoral space. This is resultant to the reorientation of the femoral antecurvature and the femoral neck. When planning a rotational osteotomy of the lower limb, this should be appreciated and may also aid in the decision regarding osteotomy site.

Less in-toeing after femoral derotation osteotomy in adult patients with increased femoral version and posterior hip impingement compared to patients with femoral retroversion

In-toeing of the foot was associated with high femoral version (FV), while Out-toeing was associated with femoral-retroversion. Therefore, we report on (i) foot-progression-angle (FPA), (ii) prevalence of In-toeing and Out-toeing, and (iii) clinical outcome of patients treated with femoral-derotation-osteotomy (FDO). We performed a retrospective analysis involving 20 patients (20 hips) treated with unilateral FDO (2017–18). Of them, 14 patients had increased FV, 6 patients had femoral-retroversion. Follow-up time was mean 1 ± 1 years. All patients had minimal 1-year follow-up and the mean age was 29 ± 8 years. Patients with increased FV (FV > 35°) presented with positive posterior-impingement-test and mean FV was 49 ± 11° (Murphy method). Six patients with femoral-retroversion (FV < 10°) had positive anterior impingement test and mean FV of 5 ± 4°. Instrumented gait analysis was performed preoperatively and at follow-up using the Gaitrite system to measure FPA and was compared to a control group of 18 healthy asymptomatic volunteers (36 feet, mean age 29 ± 6 years). (i) Mean FPA increased significantly (P = 0.006) from preoperative 1.3 ± 7° to 4.5 ± 6° at follow-up for patients with increased FV and was not significantly different compared to the control group (4.0 ± 4.5°). (ii) In-toeing decreased from preoperatively (five patients) to follow-up (two patients) for patients with increased FV. Out-toeing decreased from preoperatively (two patients) to follow-up (no patient) for patients with femoral-retroversion. (iii) Subjective-hip-value of all patients increased significantly (P < 0.001) from preoperative 21 to 78 points at follow-up. WOMAC was 12 ± 8 points at follow-up. Patients with increased FV that underwent FDO walked with less In-toeing. FDO has the potential to reduce In-toeing and Out-toeing and to improve subjective satisfaction at follow-up.

Most of patients with femoral derotation osteotomy for posterior extraarticular hip impingement and high femoral version would do surgery again

AIMS

To assess (1) hip pain and function and ROM; (2) subsequent surgeries, complications; and (3) subjective satisfaction and PROMs in patients undergoing femoral derotation osteotomies.

METHODS

Femoral derotation subtrochanteric osteotomies to treat symptomatic posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral hip impingement were performed in 23 patients (25 hips) between 2013 and 2017. The mean age was 26 ± 8 years (96% female) with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean follow-up of 4 ± 1 years). Surgical indication was a positive posterior impingement test and limited external rotation (mean 16° ± 8°) in extension in patients with abnormal high femoral version (mean 46° ± 9, measured on CT scans with the Murphy method) and high McKibbin instability index (mean 67°). Femoral osteotomies were combined with a surgical hip dislocation in 96% for cam resection and labrum or cartilage treatment. Preoperative MRI and 3D-CT with dynamic impingement simulation were evaluated.

RESULTS

(1) The posterior impingement test decreased significantly from preoperatively 100% to 4% (p < 0.001). External rotation in extension increased significantly (p < 0.001) from preoperative 16° ± 8 to 44° ± 16°. The MdA score increased significantly from 14 ± 1 to 16 ± 2 (p < 0.001) points.(2) At follow-up, all 25 hips were preserved. No conversion to THA and no revision osteosynthesis was performed. 64% underwent complete hardware removal.(3) 80% of the patients reported at follow-up that they would undergo surgery again. Subjective satisfaction (SHV) increased significantly (p < 0.001) from preoperatively 24% to 84% postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral derotation subtrochanteric osteotomies for the treatment of posterior extraarticular ischiofemoral hip impingement are safe and improve posterior hip pain and function and external rotation in mostly female patients with high femoral version and a high McKibbin instability index.

Subtrochanteric osteotomy in the management of femoral maltorsion results in anteroposterior malcorrection of the greater trochanter: computed simulations of 3D surface models of 100 cadavers

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the greater trochanter's (GT) behaviour in simulated subtrochanteric osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Measurement of functional and anatomical femoral torsion, and position of the GT and lesser trochanter was performed using 3-dimensional (3D) surface models of 100 cadaveric femora. Femoral torsion between 2° and 22° was defined as normal, femora with <2° and >22° of femoral torsion were assigned to the low- and high-torsion group. Subtrochanteric osteotomy was simulated to normalise torsional deformities to 12°.

RESULTS

With subtrochanteric osteotomy, functional torsion was simultaneously corrected while adjusting anatomical torsion (R² = 0.866, p < 0.001). Compared to the normal-torsion group, an anteroposterior (AP) overcorrection of ±0.5 centimetres (range 0.02-1.1 cm) of the GT resulted in the high- and low-torsion group, respectively (p < 0.001): Mean AP GT distance to a standardised coronal plane was 2.1 ± 0.3 cm (range 12-30 cm) in the normal-torsion group compared to 1.61 ± 0.1 cm (range 1.4-1.71 cm) and 2.6 ± 0.6 cm (range 1.8-3.6 cm) for the corrected high and low-torsion groups, respectively. The extent of the GT shift in AP direction correlated strongly with the extent to which anatomical femoral torsion was corrected (R² = 0.946; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subtrochanteric osteotomy for femoral maltorsion reliably adjusts anatomical and functional torsion, but also results in a ±1 cm AP shift of the GT per 10° of torsional correction. However, this effect of the procedure is most likely not clinically relevant in relation to hip abductor performance.

Short-term Outcomes of Concomitant Femoral Derotation Osteotomy and Hip Arthroscopy

The goal of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of concomitant hip arthroscopy and femoral derotational osteotomy (FRO) to treat femoral malrotation and intra-articular pathology. Data were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing concomitant hip arthroscopy and FRO between March 2013 and January 2017. Patients were included if they had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up for modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) score, 12-item Short Form Health Survey Physical component and Mental component (SF-12 P and SF-12 M, respectively) scores, Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey Physical and Mental (VR-12 P and VR-12 M, respectively) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, and patient satisfaction ratings. Rates for meeting the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also recorded. Nine hips were included, and mean follow-up was 36.9 months. Mean preoperative femoral version was 33.0°. Patients underwent 1 or more concomitant procedures, such as labral treatment, capsular plication, acetabuloplasty, or femoroplasty. At latest follow-up, significant improvement was seen for mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, and VAS score. Additionally, rates of meeting the PASS for mHHS, iHOT-12 score, and HOS-SSS were 100%, 88.9%, and 55.6%, respectively. Rates of achieving MCID for mHHS and HOS-SSS were 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively. One hip required revision derotational osteotomy to treat overcorrection, and 3 hips underwent secondary surgery for hardware removal. Concomitant hip arthroscopy and FRO may yield improved outcomes for patients with concurrent intra-articular pathology and excessive femoral anteversion. Considering that no major complications were diagnosed, this procedure is also relatively safe. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):e739-e746.].

Subtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for young adults with hip pain due to femoral maltorsion

INTRODUCTION

Femoral rotational osteotomies can be a treatment option for symptomatic femoral maltorsion. This study investigated the clinical and radiological results of subtrochanteric rotational osteotomy and its potential adverse effects, particularly on patellofemoral stability and geometry.

METHODS

Retrospective consecutive series of patients undergoing subtrochanteric rotational osteotomy with hip arthroscopy. 25 hips, 18 with decreased (⩽4°), 7 with increased (⩾28°) femoral torsion (FT), were analysed. Mean follow-up was 37 months. Subjective Hip value (SHV), WOMAC and Harris Hip Score (HHS), hip range of motion, asymmetries in foot position during gait as well as patellofemoral instability were the outcome measures. Femoral and tibial torsion as well as morphological signs of patella maltracking (TTTG, patellar tilt and lateralisation) were measured on MRI.

RESULTS

SHV improved from 52% to 72% (p = 0.002), WOMAC from 3 to 1 (p < 0.001) and HHS from 68 to 86 (p < 0.001). Hips treated for reduced FT showed better internal rotation and hips treated for excessive FT less internal rotation compared to the opposite side. 1 patient demonstrated asymptomatic minor in-toeing. Objective patellofemoral instability was not found except for in 1 patient with bilateral patellofemoral apprehension. FT was normalised (mean 16° ± 9°). Tibial torsion showed normal values. Compared to the opposite side TTTG (p > 0.08), patellar tilt (p > 0.09) and lateralisation (p > 0.26) did not differ. No complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtrochanteric rotational osteotomy with hip arthroscopy improves the hip subjectively without leading to objective patellofemoral instability nor changes in the patellofemoral geometry compared to contralateral side. The technique of subtrochanteric rotational osteotomy is safe and reliable.

Asymmetrically increased femoral version with high prevalence of moderate and severe femoral anteversion in unilateral Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

PURPOSE

To determine and stratify femoral version in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD), and to compare the femoral version between the LCPD hip and the contralateral unaffected hip.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 45 patients with unilateral LCPD who had available CT scan through the hips and knees between January 2000 and June 2017. There were 34 (76%) male cases with a mean age of 14 years (sd 4.69). Two independent readers measured femoral version on the affected and the unaffected contralateral femur. Femoral version was classified as follows: severely decreased version (< 10°); moderately decreased (10° to 14°); normal femoral version range (15° to 20°); moderately increased (21° to 25°); and severely increased version (> 25°).

RESULTS

LCPD hips had predominantly increased femoral version (38% severely increased anteversion, 24% moderately increased anteversion), while 51% of the contralateral unaffected hips had normal femoral version (p < 0.001). LCPD hips had higher mean femoral version than the contralateral, unaffected side (mean difference = 13o; 95% confidence iterval 10o to 16o; p < 0.001). As the version of the affected hip increased, so did the discrepancy between sides. No effect of sex on the LCPD femoral version was detected (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

This study included a selected group of patients with unilateral LCPD and available CT scans obtained for surgical planning. The femoral version was asymmetric, with a high proportion of excessive anteversion observed at later stages of disease in the affected hips. Future studies will be necessary to determine the pathogenesis of increased femoral version associated with LCPD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective study.

Complications of hip preserving surgery

Preoperative evaluation of the pathomorphology is crucial for surgical planning, including radiographs as the basic modality and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and case-based additional imaging (e.g. 3D-CT, abduction views).

Hip arthroscopy (HAS) has undergone tremendous technical advances, an immense increase in use and the indications are getting wider. The most common indications for revision arthroscopy are labral tears and residual femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Treatment of borderline developmental dysplastic hip is currently a subject of controversy. It is paramount to understand the underlining problem of the individual hip and distinguish instability (dysplasia) from FAI, as the appropriate treatment for unstable hips is periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and for FAI arthroscopic impingement surgery.

PAO with a concomitant cam resection is associated with a higher survival rate compared to PAO alone for the treatment of hip dysplasia. Further, the challenge for the surgeon is the balance between over- and undercorrection.

Femoral torsion abnormalities should be evaluated and evaluation of femoral rotational osteotomy for these patients should be incorporated to the treatment plan.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:472-486. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210019

Posterior Extra-articular Ischiofemoral Impingement Can Be Caused by the Lesser and Greater Trochanter in Patients With Increased Femoral Version: Dynamic 3D CT-Based Hip Impingement Simulation of a Modified FABER Test

Background:

Posterior extra-articular hip impingement has been described for valgus hips with increased femoral version (FV). These patients can present clinically with lack of external rotation (ER) and extension and with a positive posterior impingement test. But we do not know the effect of the combination of deformities, and the impingement location in early flexion is unknown.

Purpose:

To evaluate patient-specific 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scans of hips with increased FV and control hips for differences in range of motion, location and prevalence of osseous posterior intra- and extra-articular hip impingement.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Osseous 3D models based on segmentation of 3D CT scans were analyzed for 52 hips (38 symptomatic patients) with positive posterior impingement test and increased FV (>35°). There were 26 hips with an increased McKibbin instability index >70 (unstable hips). Patients were mainly female (96%), with an age range of 18 to 45 years. Of them, 21 hips had isolated increased FV (>35°); 22 hips had increased FV and increased acetabular version (AV; >25°); and 9 valgus hips (caput-collum-diaphyseal angle >139°) had increased FV and increased AV. The control group consisted of 20 hips with normal FV, normal AV, and no valgus (caput-collum-diaphyseal angle <139°). Validated 3D CT–based collision detection software for impingement simulation was used to calculate impingement-free range of motion and location of hip impingement. Surgical treatment was performed after the 3D CT–based impingement simulation in 27 hips (52%).

Results:

Hips with increased FV had significantly (P < .001) decreased extension and ER at 90° of flexion as compared with the control group. Posterior impingement was extra-articular (92%) in hips with increased FV. Valgus hips with increased FV and AV had combined intra- and extra-articular impingement. Posterior hip impingement occurred between the ischium and the lesser trochanter at 20° of extension and 20° of ER. Impingement was located between the ischium and the greater trochanter or intertrochanteric area at 20° of flexion and 40° of ER, with a modification of the flexion-abduction-ER (FABER) test.

Conclusion:

Posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral hip impingement can be caused by the lesser and greater trochanter or the intertrochanteric region. We recommend performing the modified FABER test during clinical examination in addition to the posterior impingement test for female patients with high FV. In addition, 3D CT can help for surgical planning, such as femoral derotation osteotomy and/or hip arthroscopy or resection of the lesser trochanter.

Supracondylar rotation osteotomy of the femur influences the coronal alignment of the ankle

Purpose

Osteotomies represent well-established treatment-options for the redistribution of loads and forces within and around the knee-joint. Effects of these osteotomies on the remaining planes and adjacent joints are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of a distal-femoral-rotation-osteotomy on the coronal alignment of the ankle. It was hypothesized that supracondylar-external-rotation-osteotomy of the distal femur leads to a change in the coronal orientation of the ankle joint.

Methods

Long-leg standing radiographs and CT-based torsional measurements of 27 patients undergoing supracondylar-rotational-osteotomy of the femur between 2012 and 2019 were obtained and utilized for the purpose of this study. Postoperative radiographs were obtained after union at the osteotomy-site. The hip-knee-ankle-angle (HKA), the mechanical-lateral-distal-femur-angle (mLDFA), and Tibia-Plafond-Horizontal-Orientation-Angle (TPHA) around the ankle were measured. Comparison between means was performed using the Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test.

Results

Twenty-seven patients with high femoral antetorsion (31.3° ± 4.0°) underwent supracondylar-external-rotation-osteotomy. The osteotomy led to a reduced antetorsion (17.4 ± 5.1; p < 0.001) and to a valgisation of the overall limb-alignment. The HKA decreased by 2.4° ± 1.4° (p < 0.001). The TPHA decreased by 2.6° (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Supracondylar external rotation osteotomy of the femur leads to lateralization of the weight bearing line at the knee and ankle due to valgisation of the coronal limb alignment. The mobile subtalar joint has to compensate (inversion) for the resulting valgus orientation of the ankle to ensure contact between the foot and the floor. When planning a rotational osteotomy of the lower limb, this should be appreciated – especially in patients with a preexisting valgus alignment of the lower extremities or restricted mobility in the subtalar joint.

Outcomes of femoral de-rotation osteotomy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in adults with decreased femoral anteversion

Decreased femoral anteversion is an often overlooked factor in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), with potential to exacerbate both cam and pincer type impingement, or itself be the primary cause. Femoral de-rotation osteotomy (FDO) is a surgical option for symptomatic patients with such underlying bony deformity. This study aimed to investigate outcomes of FDO for management of symptomatic FAI in the presence of decreased (<5°) femoral anteversion. Secondary aims were to describe the surgical technique and assess complications. This study included 33 cases (29 patients) with average pre-operative anteversion measuring –3.1° (true retroversion). At an average follow-up of 1.5 years (19.8 months), 97% reported significant improvement. The overall average post-operative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) score of 70.6 points (r: 23–98) compared to the average pre-operative score of 42.8 points (r: 0–56) for the 11 patients with available pre-operative scores suggests an overall improvement. The minimal clinically important difference for the iHOT-33 is 6.1 points. Patients with both pre- and post-operative iHOT-33 scores available demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement of 37.7 (r: 13–70) points. There were three cases (9%) of delayed union and two cases (6%) of non-union early in the series which prompted evolution of the technique. Locking screw removal was performed in 33% of patients for a resultant overall re-operation rate of 45%. The findings suggest improvement in patient-reported outcomes can be achieved with FDO for symptomatic FAI in the setting of decreased femoral anteversion (<5°).

Tibial torsion analysis in computed tomography: development and validation of a real 3D measurement technique

PURPOSE

Pathological tibial torsion is known to negatively influence the functionality of the lower extremity, and therefore, its assessment might play an important role. While 3D imaging is used for many examinations of the musculoskeletal system, for the determination of tibial torsion no 3D measurement technique has been available so far. We developed a 3D measurement method and assess its interobserver reliability as well as its correlation with standard 2D measurement methods.

METHODS

CT scans of 82 tibiae in 79 patients with a mean age of 41 years were included. A novel 3D measurement technique was developed and applied. Measurements were compared with two frequently used 2D measurement methods. ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient) for the new technique was determined and compared to the 2D measurement method. Furthermore, differences between left and right legs as well as between males and females were assessed.

RESULTS

The ICC for the 2D methods was 0.917 and 0.938, respectively. For the 3D measurements, ICCs were calculated to be 0.954 and 0.950. Agreement between 2 and 3D methods was moderate to good with ICCs between 0.715 and 0.795. Torsion values for left and right legs did not differ significantly in 2D and in 3D (26.2 vs 28.5° and 27.2 vs. 25.9°). The same is true for the differences between male and female in 2D and 3D (26.2 vs. 29.6° and 25.0 vs. 31.2°).

CONCLUSION

The newly developed 3D measurement technique shows a high intraclass agreement and offers an applicable opportunity to assess the tibial torsion three-dimensionally.

The ischiofemoral space of the hip is influenced by the frontal knee alignment

PURPOSE

The ischiofemoral distance (IFD), defined as the distance between the ischial tuberosity and the lesser trochanter of the femur, is gaining recognition as an extra-articular cause of hip pain. It is unknown whether the IFD is influenced by the frontal knee alignment. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of realignment surgery around the knee on the IFD. It was hypothesized that valgisation osteotomy around the knee is associated with reduction of the IFD.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 154 patients undergoing frontal realignment procedures around the knee in 2017 were included in this study. Long-leg standing radiographs were obtained before surgery and postoperatively. The IFD was measured between the ischium and the lesser trochanter at three different levels (proximal, middle and distal margins of the lesser trochanter parallel to the horizontal orientation of the pelvis) on standardized long-leg radiographs with the patient in upright standing position. The knee alignment was determined by measuring the hip knee ankle angle, mechanical lateral distal femur angle and the medial mechanical proximal tibia angle. Linear regression was performed to determine the influence of the change of frontal knee alignment on the IFD.

RESULTS

Linear regression showed a direct influence of the overall change in frontal knee alignment on the IFD of the hip, regardless of the site of the osteotomy (β-0.4, confidence-interval - 0.5 to - 0.3, p < 0.001). Valgisation osteotomy around the knee induced a significant reduction of the ipsilateral IFD (p < 0.001), while varisation osteotomy induced a significant increase (p < 0.001). The amount of ISD change was 0.4 mm per corresponding degree of change in frontal knee alignment.

CONCLUSION

These findings are relevant to both the hip and knee surgeons when planning an osteotomy or arthroplasty procedure. Correction of a malalignment of the knee may resolve an ischiofemoral conflict in the hip. The concept deserves inclusion in the diagnostic workup of both the hip and knee joints.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Prevalence of combined abnormalities of tibial and femoral torsion in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement

AIMS

The prevalence of combined abnormalities of femoral torsion (FT) and tibial torsion (TT) is unknown in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of combined abnormalities of FT and TT, and which subgroups are associated with combined abnormalities of FT and TT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated symptomatic patients with FAI or hip dysplasia with CT scans performed between September 2011 and September 2016. A total of 261 hips (174 patients) had a measurement of FT and TT. Their mean age was 31 years (SD 9), and 63% were female (165 hips). Patients were compared to an asymptomatic control group (48 hips, 27 patients) who had CT scans including femur and tibia available for analysis, which had been acquired for nonorthopaedic reasons. Comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

In the overall study group, abnormal FT was present in 62% (163 hips). Abnormal TT was present in 42% (109 hips). Normal FT combined with normal TT was present in 21% (55 hips). The most frequent abnormal combination was increased FT combined with normal TT of 32% (84 hips). In the hip dysplasia group, 21% (11 hips) had increased FT combined with increased TT. The prevalence of abnormal FT varied significantly among the subgroups (p < 0.001). We found a significantly higher mean FT for hip dysplasia (31°; SD 15)° and valgus hips (42° (SD 12°)) compared with the control group (22° (SD 8°)). We found a significantly higher mean TT for hips with cam-type-FAI (34° (SD 6°)) and hip dysplasia (35° (SD 9°)) compared with the control group (28° (SD 8°)) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with FAI had a high prevalence of combined abnormalities of FT and TT. For hip dysplasia, we found a significantly higher mean FT and TT, while 21% of patients (11 hips) had combined increased TT and increased FT (combined torsional malalignment). This is important when planning hip preserving surgery such as periacetabular osteomy and femoral derotation osteotomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1636-1645.

Hip preservation

Classical indications for hip preserving surgery are: femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) (intra- and extra-articular), hip dysplasia, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, residual deformities after Perthes disease, avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Pre-operative evaluation of the pathomorphology is crucial for surgical planning including radiographs as the basic modality and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) to evaluate further intra-articular lesions and osseous deformities.

Two main mechanisms of intra-articular impingement have been described:

(1) Inclusion type FAI (‘cam type’).

(2) Impaction type FAI (‘pincer type’).

Either arthroscopic or open treatment can be performed depending on the severity of deformity.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis often results in a cam-like deformity of the hip. In acute cases a subcapital re-alignment (modified Dunn procedure) of the femoral epiphysis is an effective therapy.

Perthes disease can lead to complex femoro-acetabular deformity which predisposes to impingement with/without joint incongruency and requires a comprehensive diagnostic workup for surgical planning.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip results in a static overload of the acetabular rim and early osteoarthritis. Surgical correction by means of periacetabular osteotomy offers good long-term results.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:630-640. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190074

Subtrochanteric Osteotomy in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Subtrochanteric osteotomy of the femur (STO) is a valuable corrective procedure in hip surgeries. However, STO in traditional posterolateral approach usually encounters complications such as postoperative dislocation, bone non-union, and prosthesis failure. Some relevant pathologies and mechanisms have been identified, but there is sparse evidence for verification. The aim of this video in orthopaedic technique is to test our hypothesis of STO in direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty in a complicated hip surgery, and to further illustrate the rationality, reproducibility, and superiority of STO in this minimally invasive and enhanced-recovery approach by presenting a standardized and systemic protocol, as well as operational pearls and pitfalls.

Mal-angulation of femoral rotational osteotomies causes more postoperative sagittal mechanical leg axis deviation in supracondylar than in subtrochanteric procedures

PURPOSE

Alteration of the postoperative frontal mechanical leg axis is a known problem in femoral rotational osteotomies. However, the maintenance of the sagittal mechanical leg axis seems also important. Goal of this study was to investigate the impact of femoral rotational osteotomies on the sagittal mechanical leg axis and to identify the degree of mal-angulation of the osteotomy planes that alter the postoperative sagittal alignment relevantly.

METHODS

Using 3D bone models of two patients with a pathologic femoral torsion (42° antetorsion and 6° retrotorsion), subtrochanteric and supracondylar rotational osteotomies were simulated first with an osteotomy plane perpendicular to the mechanical femoral axis (baseline osteotomy plane), second with predefined mal-angulated osteotomy planes. Subsequently, five different degrees of rotation were applied and the postoperative deviations of the sagittal mechanical leg axes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Using the baseline osteotomy plane, the sagittal mechanical leg axis changed by 0.4° ± 0.5° over both models. Using the mal-angulated osteotomy planes, maximum deviation of the sagittal mechanical leg axis of 4.0° ± 1.2° and 11.0° ± 2.0° was observed for subtrochanteric and for supracondylar procedures, respectively. Relevant changes of more than 2° were already observed with mal-angulation of 10° in the frontal plane and 15° of rotation in supracondylar procedures.

CONCLUSION

Relevant changes of the postoperative sagittal mechanical leg axis could be observed with just slight mal-angulation of the osteotomy planes, in particular in supracondylar procedures and in cases with higher degrees of rotation. However, osteotomies perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis showed no relevant alterations.

[Torsional deformities of the femur in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : Dynamic 3D impingement simulation can be helpful for the planning of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy]

BACKGROUND

Torsional deformities of the femur include femoral retrotorsion and increased femoral torsion, which are possible causes for hip pain and osteoarthritis. For patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), torsional deformities of the femur represent an additional cause of FAI in addition to cam and pincer-type FAI.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of measurement techniques and normal values of femoral torsion. The clinical presentation, possible combinations and surgical therapy of patients with torsional deformities of the femur will be discussed.

METHODS

For measurement of femoral torsion, CT or MRI represent the method of choice. The various definitions should be taken into account, because they can lead to differing values and misdiagnosis. This is the case especially for patients with high femoral torsion. Dynamic 3D impingement simulation using 3D-CT can help to differentiate between intra und extra-articular FAI.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Femoral retrotorsion (< 5°) can lead to anterior intra- and extraarticular (subspine) FAI, between the anterior iliac inferior spine (AIIS) and the proximal femur. Increased femoral torsion (> 35°) can lead to posterior intra- and extra-articular ischiofemoral FAI, between the lesser/greater trochanter and the ischial tuberosity. During clinical examination, a patient with femoral retrotorsion exhibits loss of internal rotation and a positive anterior impingement test. Hips with increased femoral torsion show high internal rotation if examined in prone position and have a positive FABER and posterior impingement test. During surgical therapy for patients with torsional deformities, intra and extra-articular causes for FAI in addition to cam and pincer-deformities should be considered. In addition to hip arthroscopy and surgical hip dislocation, also femoral rotational or derotational osteotomies should be evaluated during surgical planning of these patients.

The Effect of Modality and Landmark Selection on MRI and CT Femoral Torsion Angles

Background Assessment of femoral torsion at preoperative hip imaging is commonly recommended. However, it is unclear whether MRI is as accurate as CT and how different methods affect femoral torsion measurements. Purpose To compare MRI- and CT-based assessment of femoral torsion by using four commonly used measurement methods in terms of agreement, reproducibility, and reliability and to compare femoral torsion angles between the four different measurement methods. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated patients with hip pain who underwent CT and 3-T MRI of the hip including sequences of the pelvis and distal condyles between May 2017 and June 2018. The four measurement methods differed regarding the landmark levels for the proximal femoral reference axis and included measurements at the level of the greater trochanter, femoral neck, base of the femoral neck, and level of the lesser trochanter. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated, and Bland-Altman analysis was performed. Results Forty-five patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 19 years ± 5; 27 female) and 57 hips were evaluated. Inter- and intrarater reliability were excellent for each of the four CT- and MRI-based measurement methods (ICC range, 0.97-0.99). Mean difference between CT- and MRI-based measurement ranged from 0.3° ± 3.4 (P = .58) to 2.1° ± 4.1 (P < .001). Differences between CT and MRI were within the corresponding ICC variation for all four measurement methods. Mean torsion angles were greater by 17.6° for CT and 18.7° for MRI (all P < .001) between the most proximal to the most distal measurement methods. Conclusion MRI- and CT-based femoral torsion measurements showed high agreement and comparable reliability and reproducibility but were dependent on the level of selected landmarks used to define the proximal reference axis. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Zoga in this issue.

Surgical hip dislocation and varus derotation osteotomy for extra-articular cause of femoroacetabular impingement: a single case report

Femoral retroversion is an extra-articular cause of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) via early engagement with anterior rim. Valgus hip also causes extra-articular FAI by decreasing the range of motion. We present a case of valgus hip accompanied by femoral retroversion, which was refractory to prior arthroscopic femoroplasty. As a reasonable strategy, we have performed extra-articular correction via femoral subtrochanteric varus derotation osteotomy as well as intra-articular decompression by surgical hip dislocation. Femoral varus derotation osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation is a rational and appropriate solution in patients with extra-articular FAI, which is refractory to arthroscopic FAI surgery. Extra-articular causes of FAI should be suspected in every refractory case.

A Novel Approach to Lower-limb Axial Alignment Analysis: A CT Study

To analyze the torsion of the lower extremities in a healthy cohort and to determine the contribution of different segments of the femur and tibia to the torsion of both bones.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 32 patients with nonjoint or bone-related symptoms were analyzed by CT angiography. Lower-limb torsion, femoral torsion, proximal femoral torsion, femoral shaft torsion, distal femoral torsion, tibial torsion, proximal tibial torsion, and distal tibial torsion were measured.

RESULTS

The median total limb torsion was 25° external torsion, with the median femoral torsion being -9° and the median tibial torsion 30°. Both femoral metaphyses had internal torsion, with the internal torsion of the proximal metaphysis being approximately three times greater than that of the distal femoral metaphysis. The shaft was found to compensate with an external torsion of approximately two-thirds of the internal torsion of both femoral metaphyses. The proximal metaphysis of the tibia accounted for approximately one-third of the external torsion, with the segment from the distal to the tibial tubercle accounting for the remaining two-thirds of the tibial torsion.

CONCLUSIONS

The diaphysis and distal metaphysis are the major contributors to external torsion of the tibia, whereas the proximal metaphysis is the major contributor to the internal torsion of the femur.

Retrograde Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Derotational Femoral Osteotomy for Recurrent Femoropatellar Instability

Axial alignment of the femur and tibia is often misdiagnosed in patients with patellofemoral stability problems. Femoral torsion is critical for patellofemoral biomechanics, so it must be evaluated in every patient before the plan of surgery is decided. This case describes a femoral derotational osteotomy due to excessive internal torsion of the femur fixed with a retrograde femoral nail. This type of fixation provides a biomechanical advantage compared to plates. At the two-year follow-up, the patient achieved excellent results, reaching a functional score of 91 points on the Lysholm scale. Derotational femoral osteotomy should be considered in patellofemoral pathology, and a retrograde femoral nail is a valid fixation method for this surgery.

Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion

BACKGROUND

Correct quantification of femoral torsion is crucial to diagnose torsional deformities, make an indication for surgical treatment, or plan the amount of correction. However, no clear evaluation of different femoral torsion measurement methods for hips with excessive torsion has been performed to date.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How does CT-based measurement of femoral torsion differ among five commonly used measurement methods? (2) Do differences in femoral torsion among measurement methods increase in hips with excessive femoral torsion? (3) What is the reliability and reproducibility of each of the five torsion measurement methods?

METHODS

Between March and August 2016, we saw 86 new patients (95 hips) with hip pain and physical findings suggestive for femoroacetabular impingement at our outpatient tertiary clinic. Of those, 56 patients (62 hips) had a pelvic CT scan including the distal femur for measurement of femoral torsion. We excluded seven patients (seven hips) with previous hip surgery, two patients (two hips) with sequelae of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, and one patient (one hip) with a posttraumatic deformity. This resulted in 46 patients (52 hips) in the final study group with a mean age of 28 ± 9 years (range, 17-51 years) and 27 female patients (59%). Torsion was compared among five commonly used assessment measures, those of Lee et al., Reikerås et al., Jarrett et al., Tomczak et al., and Murphy et al. They differed regarding the level of the anatomic landmark for the proximal femoral neck axis; the method of Lee had the most proximal definition followed by the methods of Reikerås, Jarrett, and Tomczak at the base of the femoral neck and the method of Murphy with the most distal definition at the level of the lesser trochanter. The definition of the femoral head center and of the distal reference was consistent for all five measurement methods. We used the method described by Murphy et al. as our baseline measurement method for femoral torsion because it reportedly most closely reflects true anatomic femoral torsion. With this method we found a mean femoral torsion of 28 ± 13°. Mean values of femoral torsion were compared among the five methods using multivariate analysis of variance. All differences between two of the measurement methods were plotted over the entire range of femoral torsion to evaluate a possible increase in hips with excessive femoral torsion. All measurements were performed by two blinded orthopaedic residents (FS, TDL) at two different occasions to measure intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

We found increasing values for femoral torsion using measurement methods with a more distal definition of the proximal femoral neck axis: Lee et al. (most proximal definition: 11° ± 11°), Reikerås et al. (15° ± 11°), Jarrett et al. (19° ± 11°), Tomczak et al. (25° ± 12°), and Murphy et al. (most distal definition: 28° ± 13°). The most pronounced difference was found for the comparison between the methods of Lee et al. and Murphy et al. with a mean difference of 17° ± 5° (95% confidence interval, 16°-19°; p < 0.001). For six of 10 possible pairwise comparisons, the difference between two methods increased with increasing femoral torsion and decreased with decreasing femoral torsion. We observed a fair-to-strong linear correlation (R range, 0.306-0.622; all p values < 0.05) for any method compared with the Murphy method and for the Reikerås and Jarrett methods when compared with the Tomczak method. For example, a hip with 10° of femoral antetorsion according Murphy had a torsion of 1° according to Reikerås, which corresponds to a difference of 9°. This difference increased to 20° in hips with excessive torsion; for example, a hip with 60° of torsion according to Murphy had 40° of torsion according to Reikerås. All five methods for measuring femoral torsion showed excellent agreement for both intraobserver reproducibility (ICC, 0.905-0.973) and interobserver reliability (ICC, 0.938-0.969).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the quantification of femoral torsion in hips with excessive femoral torsion differs considerably among measurement methods, it is crucial to state the applied methods when reporting femoral torsion and to be consistent regarding the used measurement method. These differences have to be considered for surgical decision-making and planning the degree of correction. Neglecting the differences among measurement methods to quantify femoral torsion can potentially lead to misdiagnosis and surgical planning errors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, diagnostic study.

Femoral Derotation Osteotomy in Adults for Version Abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Version abnormalities of the femur can cause pain and hip joint damage due to impingement or instability. A retrospective clinical review was conducted on patients undergoing a subtrochanteric derotation osteotomy for either excessive anteversion or retroversion of the femur.

METHODS

A total of 55 derotation osteotomies were performed in 43 patients: 36 females and 7 males. The average age was 29 years (range, 14 to 59 years). The osteotomies were performed closed with an intramedullary saw. Fixation was performed with a variety of intramedullary nails. Twenty-nine percent of patients had a retroversion deformity (average, -9° of retroversion; range, +2° to -23°) and 71% had excessive anteversion of the femur (average, +37° of anteversion; range, +22° to +53°). The etiology was posttraumatic in 5 patients (12%), diplegic cerebral palsy in 2 patients (5%), Prader-Willi syndrome in 1 patient (2%), and idiopathic in 35 patients (81%). Forty-nine percent underwent concomitant surgery with the index femoral derotation osteotomy, including hip arthroscopy in 40%, tibial derotation osteotomy in 13%, and a periacetabular osteotomy in 5%. Tibial osteotomies were performed to correct a compensatory excessive external tibial torsion that would be exacerbated in the correction of excessive femoral anteversion.

RESULTS

No patient was lost to follow-up. Failures occurred in three hips in three patients (5%): two hip arthroplasties and one nonunion that healed after rerodding. There was one late infection treated successfully with implant removal and antibiotics with an excellent final clinical outcome. At an average follow-up of 6.5 years (range, 2 to 19.7 years), the modified Harris Hip Score improved by 29 points in the remaining 52 cases (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The results were rated as excellent in 75%, good in 23%, and fair in 2%. Subsequent surgery was required in 78% of hips, 91% of which were implant removals.

CONCLUSIONS

A closed, subtrochanteric derotation osteotomy of the femur is a safe and effective procedure to treat either femoral retroversion or excessive anteversion. Excellent or good results were obtained in 93%, despite the need for subsequent implant removal in more than two-thirds of the patients.

Femoral Derotational Osteotomies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Femoral derotational osteotomies are performed to correct residual symptomatic increased femoral torsion in adolescents and adults. Typical indications are anterior knee pain caused by patellar maltracking and patellofemoral instability. There is still no consensus as to what the correct indication is and which surgical techniques lead to the best outcomes in performing a femoral derotational osteotomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Good early clinical outcomes have been reported. However, long-term studies and data on return to play are lacking. Surgery often is performed according to the surgeon's experience. There is no evidence to support decisions regarding surgical technique or level of osteotomy. Femoral derotational osteotomy is the treatment of choice in patients with symptomatic excessive anteversion and torsional malalignment of the femur. Multiple techniques have shown good clinical results with high patient satisfaction. Future studies however must focus on radiographic and clinical assessment to understand different subtypes of torsional deformity and its implication on operative therapy.

Abnormal femoral antetorsion-a subtrochanteric deformity

Femoral rotational malalignment is associated with pain and functional disability and may be a contributing factor to hip impingement as well as to instability. In general, the deformity can be addressed surgically by rotational osteotomy. However, the anatomic location of the deformity is debated. The goal of the present study was to narrow down the anatomic site of deformity using the lesser trochanter (LT) as an additional landmark. One hundred and eight patients underwent computer tomography (CT)-based rotational analysis of their lower extremities. Femoral torsion (FT) and LT torsion (LTT) were measured. The combined angle (CoA) between FT and LTT was calculated. Statistical evaluation was done by multiple regression analysis. Ninety-seven extremities were examined for FT and LTT. Average age was 41 years (SD = 16.9) with a range of 18–85 years. Mean values were 20° for FT (SD = 12.2) and −16° for LTT (SD = 11.3). Mean CoA was 37.2 (SD = 8.7). Statistical analysis reveals a strong linear relationship between FT and LTT (y=31+0.74x) and a weaker relationship between FT and CoA (y=31+0.24x). This study identifies the LT as a reliable landmark and shows a strong linear relationship between the orientation of the LT and the overall torsion of the femur below and above the LT with about two-thirds of torsional changes occurring distal to it. These results provide a considerable indication for a subtrochanteric osteotomy to address correction of femoral rotational deformity at its anatomical origin.

Level of Evidence: Level III, observational study.

Instability of the hip after anatomical re-alignment in patients with a slipped capital femoral epiphysis

AIMS

Several studies have reported the safety and efficacy of subcapital re-alignment for patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) using surgical dislocation of the hip and an extended retinacular flap. Instability of the hip and dislocation as a consequence of this surgery has only recently gained attention. We discuss this problem with some illustrative cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We explored the literature on the possible pathophysiological causes and surgical steps associated with the risk of post-operative instability and articular damage. In addition, we describe supplementary steps that could be used to avoid these problems.

RESULTS

The causes of instability may be divided into three main groups: the first includes causes directly related to SCFE (acetabular labral damage, severe abrasion of the acetabular cartilage, flattening of the acetabular roof and a bell-shaped deformity of the epiphysis); the second, causes not related to the SCFE (acetabular orientation and poor quality of the soft tissues); the third, causes directly related to the surgery (capsulotomy, division of the ligamentum teres, shortening of the femoral neck, pelvi-trochanteric impingement, previous proximal femoral osteotomy and post-operative positioning of the leg).

CONCLUSION

We present examples drawn from our clinical practice, as well as possible ways of reducing the risks of these complications, and of correcting them if they happen. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:16-21.

Hip contact stress and femoral neck retroversion: a biomechanical study to evaluate implication of femoroacetabular impingement

The current literature on femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is focused on acetabular orientation and femoral head asphericity, with little emphasis on the effect of version of the femoral neck. A biomechanical model was developed to determine the causative effect, if any, of femoral retroversion on hip contact stress and, if present, delineate the type of FAI with femoral neck retroversion. Five pairs of cadaveric hips (n = 10) were tested by loading the hip in 90° of flexion and measured the peak joint pressure and the location of the peak joint pressure. The experiment was repeated after performing a subtrochanteric osteotomy and retroverting the proximal femur by 10°. Ten hips were successfully tested, with one hip excluded due to an outlier value for peak joint pressure. Retroversion of the proximal femur significantly increased the magnitude of mean peak joint pressure. With retroversion, the location of the peak joint pressure was shifted posteroinferiorly in all cases. In conclusion, femoral neck retroversion increases peak joint pressure in the flexed position and may act as a cause of femoroacetabular impingement. The location of peak joint pressure suggests a pincer-type impingement with retroversion. The version of femoral neck should be assessed as a possible causative factor in patients with FAI, especially those with pincer-type impingement.