Lateral acetabular coverage as a predictor of femoroacetabular cartilage thickness

The Principles of Hip Joint Preservation

The three primary factors involved in preservation of the hip joint include femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), hip dysplasia/instability, and femoral torsion abnormalities. Each of these factors affects the health of the acetabular labrum and femoroacetabular cartilage. The appropriate surgical treatments for each of these factors include arthroscopic or open femoroplasty/acetabuloplasty for FAI, periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia/instability, and derotational femoral osteotomy for femoral torsion abnormalities. When evaluating patients with prearthritic hip conditions, orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the various factors involved in hip joint preservation and, if surgery is indicated, the surgeon should be sure to address all factors that need surgical treatment rather than focusing on the commonly diagnosed issue or visible injury, for example, a labral tear. If any of these factors is ignored, the hip joint may not thrive. The purpose of this review was to explain the importance of the most common factors involved in hip joint preservation and the appropriate surgical treatments for pathology in these factors.

Editorial Commentary: Most Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Do Well After Hip Arthroscopy: Could Instability Be the Problem for Those Who Do Poorly?

Borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) is often defined based on the lateral center edge angle. While patients with frank hip dysplasia often require bony realignment with periacetabular osteotomy and/or derotational femoral osteotomy, patients with BHD represent an "in-between" group of patients. While many, perhaps even most, patients with BHD will have successful outcomes after hip arthroscopy alone, some will be unresponsive to an arthroscopic-only approach and require the same surgical treatments as those with frank dysplasia. A variety of radiographic and arthroscopic parameters can be used to assess the degree of instability in patients with BHD. It may be that patients with "borderline" hip dysplasia combined with hip instability are more likely to fail an arthroscopic-only approach but to date we still do not have a great algorithm for determining which patients with BHD should undergo bony treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. It is important for future studies to continue to seek out characteristics of BHD patients that predict failure of an arthroscopic-only approach. This will not only allow for optimal initial surgical treatment in "at-risk" patients with BHD but will also improve success rates in BHD patients selected for hip arthroscopy as initial surgical treatment.

Radiographic Parameters of Adult Hip Dysplasia

As knowledge about the origin and morphologic characteristics of hip pain in the young adult has evolved, so too has the clinician's ability to assess for various pathologies of the hip on radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), and computed tomography (CT). Because there is no algorithm at this time directly indicating what to do in more subtle hip morphologies, such as microinstability and borderline hip dysplasia (BHD), a skilled hip preservation specialist must use multiple imaging sources and know how to interpret them correctly. Imaging parameters used in the workup for hip dysplasia and BHD include the lateral center-edge angle, Tönnis angle, iliofemoral line, and presence of an upsloping lateral sourcil or everted labrum, among many others. The purpose of this narrative review was to detail various established criteria and parameters on anteroposterior pelvis plain radiographs, MRI/MRA, and CT that assist in defining the nature and severity of instability present in a dysplastic hip, thereby aiding in the development of patient-specific surgical treatment plans.

Lateral to Medial Joint Space Ratio is Predictive of Survivorship After Primary Hip Arthroscopy

PURPOSE

To assess whether preoperative joint space measures would be predictive of survivorship in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

METHODS

Data on consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. To be eligible for final analysis, patients were required to have preoperative radiographs for joint space measurements and data indicating conversion to a total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip resurfacing, or neither; at a minimum of 2 years after primary hip arthroscopy. Survivorship following HA was defined as remaining conversion free and served as the primary outcome. A multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operator curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the correlation between joint space measurements and survivorship following HA.

RESULTS

A total of 1,885 primary arthroscopy cases were included in this study. The multivariate regression analysis found preoperative lateral-to-medial joint space ratio (L/M ratio) to be the strongest predictive factor of survivorship after primary hip arthroscopy (OR = 2.084, CI_95% = 1.239-3.503; P = .006). The ROC curve for the model demonstrated acceptable discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792. Patients with an L/M ratio ≥0.75 had a survivorship rate of 91.7% compared to a rate of 75% for patients with an L/M ratio <0.75 (OR: 3.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that, of the factors evaluated in this study, the most significant factor in predicting survivorship at 2 years after undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was a larger lateral-to-medial joint space ratio. This may suggest an initiation of primary arthritis at the edge-loading area of the lateral acetabulum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative observation study.

It's not arthritis! Resolution of the illusion of joint space narrowing with acetabuloplasty and labral reconstruction for the calcified labrum

Labral calcification may be part of the natural history of untreated femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in certain patients, making it a potential target for intervention with the goal of preserving the hip joint. The purpose of this study was to investigate if calcified labra create the appearance of lateral joint space narrowing and report minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after treating patients with arthroscopic acetabuloplasty and labral reconstruction. Prospectively collected data on patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS and labral tearing from February 2015 to April 2021 were reviewed. Patients treated with primary labral reconstruction for an intraoperatively confirmed diagnosis of labral calcification were included. A sub-analysis was performed for patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative PROMs for the modified Harris hip score, nonarthritic hip score, the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 and visual analog scale for pain were recorded. Forty-six hips (46 patients) were included, with 19 hips in the sub-analysis. There was a significant increase in apparent lateral joint space width (JSW) measured on supine anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs with no significant changes in medial and central JSW and significant decreases in the lateral and anterior center-edge angles and alpha angle. Patients experienced significant increases in PROMs and high rates of achieving psychometric thresholds. Patients presenting with FAIS and calcified labra may have apparent lateral joint space narrowing on pre-operative supine AP pelvis radiographs. These patients have low rates of full-thickness femoral head and acetabular cartilage pathology, this apparent narrowing can be corrected and excellent outcomes and survivorship can be achieved, with primary labral reconstruction.

Acetabular coverage analysis of the proximal femoral head accurately characterizes dysplastic acetabular morphology

This study aimed to (1) measure acetabular sector angle (ASA) from proximal to distal positions along the axial femoral head axis, (2) identify acetabular deficiency patterns, and (3) correlate ASA at different axial positions with other radiological measurements in acetabular dysplasia. We identified 30 hips with dysplasia (lateral center edge angle [LCEA] <20°) and 30 hips without dysplasia (LCEA >25°) from a retrospective cohort. Anterior and posterior ASA (AASA, PASA) were measured in the axial computed tomography plane through the femoral head center (equatorial) and two axial positions above the equatorial line (intermediate and proximal). Deficiency patterns were identified using ASA cut-off values determined from receiver operating characteristic curves. Pearson's coefficients were used for correlations. Compared to non-dysplastic hips, AASA in dysplastic hips was significantly smaller in all levels: equatorial (46.1 ± 7.3 vs. 54.9 ± 8.5,° p < 0.001), intermediate (62.1 ± 11.2 vs. 69.0 ± 10.6,° p = 0.02), and proximal (102.9 ± 14.2 vs. 128.3 ± 23.0,° p < 0.001). According to proximal ASA (Pro-ASA) cut-off values in dysplastic hips, global deficiency was most prevalent (19/30, 63.3%), followed by anterior (6/30, 20%) and posterior (3/30, 10%) deficiency. There were strong correlations between acetabular anteversion and Eq-AASA (r = -0.74, p < 0.001) and LCEA and pro-PASA (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). Clinical significance: Acetabular sector angle provides insight into acetabular morphology and patterns of deficiency, providing essential information for precise acetabular reorientation.

Correlation of Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) Value With Hip Arthroscopy Intraoperative Findings and Midterm Periacetabular Osteotomy Outcomes

Background:

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is an advanced imaging technique that is purported to quantify cartilage damage in acute and chronic joint disease and predict periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) outcomes. There is a paucity of literature relating dGEMRIC values to arthroscopic findings before PAO and postoperative outcomes after PAO.

Purpose:

To assess the utility and validity of dGEMRIC as a preoperative and prognostic assessment tool of cartilage status and integrity as it relates to intraoperative findings and midterm postoperative outcomes after PAO.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We analyzed a cohort of 58 patients (70 hips) with a median age of 30.1 years (range, 15-50) with hip dysplasia who underwent hip arthroscopy, followed by a PAO with preoperative dGEMRIC. The primary outcome measures were intraoperative assessment and correlation with cartilage damage (presence of cartilage flap, Outerbridge grade of the acetabulum and femoral head). Secondary outcome measures were postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, including the International Hip Outcome Tool and Non-arthritic Hip Score. Correlation analyses were performed to determine the relationship between dGEMRIC values and (1) PROs and (2) intraoperative assessment of cartilage damage.

Results:

There were significant negative linear relationships between dGEMRIC values and the primary outcome measures: presence of a cartilage flap (coronal, P = .004; sagittal, P < .001), Outerbridge grade of acetabular articular cartilage lesion (coronal, P = .002; sagittal, P = .003), and Outerbridge grade of femoral head articular cartilage lesion (coronal, P = .001; sagittal, P < .001). Despite significant overall improvement in all patients, there was no significant correlation between preoperative dGEMRIC values and improvement in PROs from presurgery to latest postoperative follow-up (median, 2.2 years; range, 1.0-5.0 years).

Conclusion:

Although dGEMRIC values (sagittal and coronal) were significant predictors of the intraoperative presence of cartilage flaps and overall cartilage integrity, they were not associated with midterm outcomes after PAO.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Mild/Borderline Hip Dysplasia with Concomitant Femoroacetabular Impingement-Literature Review

Purpose of Review

This literature review aims to survey the current knowledge about the management FAI in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia.

Recent Findings

With better understanding, hip arthroscopy has recently been advocated for treating mild or borderline hip dysplasia (BDH) with concomitant femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) despite early studies that condemned its use. Recent outcome data have demonstrated that hip arthroscopy is a viable option in BDH, with and without FAI, and has been gaining wider acceptance. Hip arthroscopy can address the concomitant soft tissue and bony intra-articular pathologies and obviate the necessity for other surgeries. Moreover, hip arthroscopy may be used as an adjuvant treatment to other procedures such as a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO).

Summary

Hip arthroscopy for BDH is an evolving procedure with promising short- and mid-term outcomes. The combination of BDH and FAI is becoming recognized as a problem in its own right, requiring dedicated treatment.

Acetabular Cartilage Thickness Differs Among Cam, Pincer, or Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Descriptive Study Using In Vivo Ultrasonic Measurements During Surgical Hip Dislocation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate acetabular cartilage thickness among (1) 8 measurement locations on the lunate surface and (2) different types of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

DESIGN

Prospective descriptive study comparing in vivo measured acetabular cartilage thickness using a validated ultrasonic device during surgical hip dislocation in 50 hips. Measurement locations included the anterior/posterior horn and 3 locations on each peripheral and central aspect of the acetabulum. The clock system was used for orientation. Thickness was compared among cam (11 hips), pincer (8 hips), and mixed-type (31 hips) of FAI. Mean age was 31 ± 8 (range, 18-49) years. Hips with no degenerative changes were included (Tönnis stage = 0).

RESULTS

Acetabular cartilage thickness ranged from 1.7 mm to 2.7 mm and differed among the 8 locations (P < 0.001). Thicker cartilage was found on the peripheral aspect at 11 and 1 o'clock positions (mean of 2.4 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively). At 5 out of 8 locations of measurement (anterior and posterior horn, 1 o'clock peripheral, 12 and 2 o'clock central), cartilage thickness was thinner in hips with pincer impingement compared to cam and/or mixed-type of FAI (P ranging from <0.001 to 0.031). No difference in thickness existed between cam and mixed-type of impingement (P = 0.751).

CONCLUSION

Acetabular cartilage thickness varied topographically and among FAI types. This study provides first baseline information about topographical cartilage thickness in FAI measured in vivo. Thinner cartilage thickness in pincer deformities could be misinterpreted as joint degeneration and could therefore have an impact on indication for hip preserving surgery.

Hip Dysplasia

Acetabular dysplasia represents a structural pathomorphology associated with hip pain, instability, and osteoarthritis. The wide spectrum of dysplasia anatomically refers to a 3-dimensional volumetric- and surface area-based insufficiency in coverage and is classified based on the magnitude and location of undercoverage. Borderline dysplasia has been variably defined and leads to management challenges. In symptomatic dysplasia, treatment addresses coverage with periacetabular osteotomy. Concomitant simultaneous or staged hip arthroscopy has significant advantages to address intra-articular pathology. In nonarthritic individuals, there is evidence PAO alters the natural history of dysplasia and decreases the risk of hip arthritis and total hip arthroplasty.

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopy for Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Selection Determines the Outcomes

Although the literature has presented results that favored arthroscopic procedures in treating borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH), it remains controversial whether arthroscopic surgery would be better than periacetabular osteotomy for BDDH. Instead of a debate on the application of arthroscopy, the issue worthy of discussion should be distinguishing suitable BDDH candidates for hip arthroscopy. First, identification of patients with real BDDH is critical for making management choices. Second, it should be distinguished whether the major symptoms result from mechanical lesions or functional hip instability. Third, once hip arthroscopy is suggested for BDDH patients, relative contraindications such as advanced age and osteoarthritis should be taken into consideration, in addition to labral repair and capsular closure or plication intraoperatively. In conclusion, more long-term and high-grade evidence is still demanded to end the debate, but we believe that an individualized management strategy based on an accurate diagnosis and comprehensive assessment will bring optimal outcomes for BDDH patients.

Hip Arthroscopy and Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To provide an up-to-date evidence-based review of hip arthroscopy for patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH).

METHODS

Literature describing hip arthroscopy in patients with BDDH was systematically identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. All studies that involved BDDH and not just those reporting their clinical outcomes were included. Methodological Index for Non Randomized Studies criteria and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the quality of studies. The definition of BDDH, operative technique, correlation with labrum and/or cartilage lesions, outcome, and factors associated with poor outcome were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Assessment of the articles yielded 28 studies involving 1502 hips that were included for final analysis. There were no studies with a high risk of bias. BDDH was defined as lateral center-edge angle of 20° to 25° in most studies. Hip arthroscopy for BDDH showed an improvement in the weighted mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Score, from 60.2 to 81.7, a relatively high rate of acquisition of minimal clinically important difference of 79.5% to 87%, and had 1.0% rate of complications. Eleven studies reported on all the patients undergoing a capsular plication. Four studies reported that BDDH was associated with cartilage damage on the femoral head. Age older than 35 or 42 years and ≥20° of femoral anteversion were reported as risk factors for poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip arthroscopy for BDDH with capsular plication provides improvement in patient-reported outcome measures and a relatively high rate of acquisition of minimal clinically important difference with a low rate of complications in the shorter term. BDDH may be associated with cartilage damage on the femoral head. Female sex is a factor related to good outcomes, whereas older age, excessive femoral anteversion, and anterior undercoverage of acetabulum are risk factors related to poorer outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III to IV studies.

A Contemporary Look at the Evaluation and Treatment of Adult Borderline and Frank Hip Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Adult hip dysplasia is often diagnosed according to the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA). Patients with frank hip dysplasia (LCEA <20°) traditionally require treatment with bony realignment through a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and/or derotational femoral osteotomy, while patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) present a challenging treatment dilemma, as it remains unknown when they should be treated with hip arthroscopy and/or a PAO.

PURPOSE

To perform a narrative review to report the differences in hip morphology and clinical outcomes between adult patients with frank hip dysplasia and BHD.

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted through the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the search phrase borderline hip dysplasia.

RESULTS

The search identified 305 articles, of which 48 were considered relevant to this study after screening of titles and abstracts. Four articles discussed new radiographic means of evaluating adult hip dysplasia, 16 articles analyzed morphology of dysplastic hips, and 28 articles described the clinical outcomes of patients with frank hip dysplasia or BHD treated with hip arthroscopy and/or PAO. Because the level of evidence obtained from this search was not adequate for systematic review or meta-analysis, a current concepts review on the diagnosis, hip morphology, and clinical outcomes of patients with frank hip dysplasia or BHD is presented.

CONCLUSION

Adult hip dysplasia is most commonly diagnosed based on the LCEA; however, the LCEA is an unreliable sole marker for dysplasia, and additional radiographic parameters should be utilized. Furthermore, specific pathology identified on imaging and/or during hip arthroscopy can provide clues to a surgeon when the diagnosis is inconclusive according to history and physical examination alone. While the data support that patients with frank dysplasia are best treated with PAO, there is no such preferred treatment for patients with BHD, who have a wide spectrum of instability. Selective use of arthroscopic labral and capsular treatment alone may provide good results in carefully chosen patients with BHD, while some may end up requiring a bony realignment procedure.

Can Radiographic Joint Space Accurately Predict Chondral Damage During Hip Arthroscopy? A Cross-Sectional Analysis

PURPOSE

To examine how preoperative radiographic joint space correlated with intraoperative chondral damage as diagnosed during hip arthroscopy, in patients without radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis or joint space <2 mm.

METHODS

Patients younger than the age of 50 years without previous hip conditions who underwent hip primary arthroscopy had their joint space and intraoperative chondral damage compared. A narrow joint space group was defined as those in the lowest decile of the average joint space. The demographics and presence of intra-articular findings of chondral damage were compared. In addition, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess joint space as a predictor of intraarticular damage.

RESULTS

There were 1892 in this analysis. The incidence of severe cartilage damage (Outerbridge III and IV) was not significantly different between the narrow and non-narrow groups. The ROC analysis for joint space at detecting chondral damage was poor. The ROC area under the curve for joint space detecting any chondral defect (acetabular or femoral head) was 0.536 (confidence interval 0.506-0.565), with low sensitivity (0.492), specificity (0.582), negative predictive value (0.720), and positive predictive value (0.340). Spearman correlation could not demonstrate a correlation between joint space and cartilage damage (⍴_Acetabular = 0.10, ⍴_{Femoral Head} = 0.04). Interestingly, a gradual widening was observed between the medial and lateral joint spaces, with more pronounced findings in hips without damage.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that in patients with Tönnis 0 and 1, narrower joint space may be an anatomic variant and cannot predict actual intraoperative cartilage damage. However, if the lateral joint space has relative narrowing compared with the medial joint space, this may indicate acetabular cartilage damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective diagnostic comparative study.

Is acetabular morphology related to trochlear dysplasia?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the correlation between trochlear dysplasia and acetabular coverage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

109 retrospective CT studies referred from the young adult knee clinic were independently reviewed by two observers. Anterior acetabular (AASA) and posterior acetabular (PASA) sector angles were calculated bilaterally on axial CT. Trochlear dysplasia was graded using the Dejour classification (A-D). ANOVA test was used.

RESULTS

Dejour types A, B and D trochlear dysplasia were associated with a significantly increased AASA (P value = 0.0011).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate a significant relationship between trochlear dysplasia and anterior acetabular coverage, as measured by AASA.

Acetabular Morphologic Characteristics Predict Early Conversion to Arthroplasty After Isolated Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy in the setting of dysplasia and borderline dysplasia is controversial. Dysplasia severity is most often defined by the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) but can also be evaluated radiographically by the acetabular inclination (AI).

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to determine the effect of AI on outcomes after isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We hypothesized that patients with dysplasia would have higher rates of arthroplasty as well as inferior clinical and functional outcomes compared with patients who did not have dysplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A hip arthroscopy registry was reviewed for participants undergoing arthroscopic correction of FAI from February 28, 2008, to June 10, 2013. Participants required a clinical diagnosis and isolated arthroscopic correction of FAI with preoperative imaging and intraoperative cartilage status recorded. AI dysplasia was defined as an AI greater than 10°, LCEA dysplasia as LCEA less than 18°, and borderline LCEA dysplasia as LCEA 18° to 25°. Patients without an acetabular deformity (LCEA 25°-40°; AI <10°) served as a control population. Postoperative variables included patient-reported outcome surveys with conversion to arthroplasty as the primary endpoint. Minimum 5-year outcome scores were obtained for 337 of 419 patients (80.4%) with an average follow-up of 75.2 ± 12.7 months.

RESULTS

This study included 419 patients: 9 (2%) with LCEA dysplasia, 42 (10%) with AI dysplasia, and 51 (12%) with borderline dysplasia. The AI but not LCEA was significantly correlated with lower outcome scores on the modified Harris Hip Score (r = 0.13; P = .01), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (r = 0.10; P = .04), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (r = 0.11; P = .04). A total of 58 patients (14%) underwent arthroplasty at 31 ± 20 months postoperatively. Patients with LCEA dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 56% (odds ratio, 8.4), whereas patients with AI dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 31% (odds ratio, 3.3), which was significantly greater than the rate for the nondysplastic cohort (13.5%; P < .0001). Patients with borderline LCEA dysplasia did not have increased rates of arthroplasty. A multivariate analysis found increasing age, increasing AI, Tönnis grade higher than 1, and femoral Outerbridge grade higher than 2 to be most predictive of conversion to arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

We found that an elevated AI, along with increasing age, Tönnis grade, and femoral Outerbridge grade significantly predict early conversion to arthroplasty after isolated hip arthroscopy. We recommend using the AI, in addition to the LCEA, in evaluating hip dysplasia before hip arthroscopy.

The "Outside-In" Lesion of Hip Impingement and the "Inside-Out" Lesion of Hip Dysplasia: Two Distinct Patterns of Acetabular Chondral Injury

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular dysplasia lead to acetabular cartilage damage that commonly results in the chondral flaps seen during hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE

To compare the acetabular chondral flap morphology seen during hip arthroscopy ("outside-in" vs "inside-out") with clinical and radiographic parameters underlying FAI and hip dysplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy by the senior author between 2013 and 2017 with a finding of Outerbridge grade IV acetabular chondral flap were included. Each procedure was retrospectively reviewed on video and chondral flaps were categorized as inside-out or outside-in. An inside-out designation was made for flaps exhibiting an intact chondrolabral junction with a detached sleeve of chondrolabral tissue from the central acetabulum, and an outside-in designation was made for centrally anchored flaps exhibiting a break in the chondrolabral junction. Radiographic markers of hip impingement/dysplasia were noted for each patient during assignment into 1 of 2 radiographic groups: group 1, lateral center edge angle (LCEA) >20 with FAI, and group 2, LCEA ≤20 with or without cam FAI. Associations between chondral flap morphology and clinical diagnosis were tested using a chi-square test.

RESULTS

Overall, 95 patients (103 hips) were included (group 1, 78 hips; group 2, 25 hips). Among hips in group 2, 24 had concurrent cam FAI. There was a significant relationship between chondral flap type and radiographic diagnosis (P < .001). Among group 1 hips, 78% exhibited outside-in type chondral flaps, 12% exhibited combined outside-in and inside-out flaps, and 10% exhibited inside-out flaps. Group 2 hips showed 72% inside-out type chondral flaps, 16% combined, and 12% outside-in. Hips exhibiting outside-in type flaps were significantly more likely to be in group 1 (positive predictive value [PPV], 91%; negative predictive value [NPV], 69%). Similarly, hips exhibiting inside-out type flaps were significantly more likely to be in group 2 (PPV, 56%; NPV, 95%). Altogether, 90% of group 1 hips exhibited an outside-in lesion and 88% of group 2 hips exhibited an inside-out lesion.

CONCLUSION

Acetabular chondral flap type visualized during hip arthroscopy correlates with radiographic markers of hip impingement and hip instability. Outside-in flaps are highly predictive of FAI, whereas inside-out flaps are highly predictive of acetabular dysplasia.

Automatic MRI-based Three-dimensional Models of Hip Cartilage Provide Improved Morphologic and Biochemical Analysis

BACKGROUND

The time-consuming and user-dependent postprocessing of biochemical cartilage MRI has limited the use of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC). An automated analysis of biochemical three-dimensional (3-D) images could deliver a more time-efficient and objective evaluation of cartilage composition, and provide comprehensive information about cartilage thickness, surface area, and volume compared with manual two-dimensional (2-D) analysis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How does the 3-D analysis of cartilage thickness and dGEMRIC index using both a manual and a new automated method compare with the manual 2-D analysis (gold standard)? (2) How does the manual 3-D analysis of regional patterns of dGEMRIC index, cartilage thickness, surface area and volume compare with a new automatic method? (3) What is the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of software-assisted manual 3-D and automated 3-D analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface, and volume for two readers on two time points?

METHODS

In this IRB-approved, retrospective, diagnostic study, we identified the first 25 symptomatic hips (23 patients) who underwent a contrast-enhanced MRI at 3T including a 3-D dGEMRIC sequence for intraarticular pathology assessment due to structural hip deformities. Of the 23 patients, 10 (43%) were male, 16 (64%) hips had a cam deformity and 16 (64%) hips had either a pincer deformity or acetabular dysplasia. The development of an automated deep-learning-based approach for 3-D segmentation of hip cartilage models was based on two steps: First, one reader (FS) provided a manual 3-D segmentation of hip cartilage, which served as training data for the neural network and was used as input data for the manual 3-D analysis. Next, we developed the deep convolutional neural network to obtain an automated 3-D cartilage segmentation that we used as input data for the automated 3-D analysis. For actual analysis of the manually and automatically generated 3-D cartilage models, a dedicated software was developed. Manual 2-D analysis of dGEMRIC indices and cartilage thickness was performed at each "full-hour" position on radial images and served as the gold standard for comparison with the corresponding measurements of the manual and the automated 3-D analysis. We measured dGEMRIC index, cartilage thickness, surface area, and volume for each of the four joint quadrants and compared the manual and the automated 3-D analyses using mean differences. Agreement between the techniques was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The overlap between 3-D cartilage volumes was assessed using dice coefficients and means of all distances between surface points of the models were calculated as average surface distance. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the software-assisted manual 3-D and the automated 3-D analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface and volume was assessed for two readers on two different time points using ICCs.

RESULTS

Comparable mean overall difference and almost-perfect agreement in dGEMRIC indices was found between the manual 3-D analysis (8 ± 44 ms, p = 0.005; ICC = 0.980), the automated 3-D analysis (7 ± 43 ms, p = 0.015; ICC = 0.982), and the manual 2-D analysis.Agreement for measuring overall cartilage thickness was almost perfect for both 3-D methods (ICC = 0.855 and 0.881) versus the manual 2-D analysis. A mean difference of -0.2 ± 0.5 mm (p < 0.001) was observed for overall cartilage thickness between the automated 3-D analysis and the manual 2-D analysis; no such difference was observed between the manual 3-D and the manual 2-D analysis.Regional patterns were comparable for both 3-D methods. The highest dGEMRIC indices were found posterosuperiorly (manual: 602 ± 158 ms; p = 0.013, automated: 602 ± 158 ms; p = 0.012). The thickest cartilage was found anteroinferiorly (manual: 5.3 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.001; automated: 4.3 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.001). The smallest surface area was found anteroinferiorly (manual: 134 ± 60 mm; p < 0.001, automated: 155 ± 60 mm; p < 0.001). The largest volume was found anterosuperiorly (manual: 2343 ± 492 mm; p < 0.001, automated: 2294 ± 467 mm; p < 0.001). Mean average surface distance was 0.26 ± 0.13 mm and mean Dice coefficient was 86% ± 3%. Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability was near perfect for overall analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface area, and volume (ICC range, 0.962-1).

CONCLUSIONS

The presented deep learning approach for a fully automatic segmentation of hip cartilage enables an accurate, reliable and reproducible analysis of dGEMRIC indices, thickness, surface area, and volume. This time-efficient and objective analysis of biochemical cartilage composition and morphology yields the potential to improve patient selection in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery and to aid surgeons with planning of acetabuloplasty and periacetabular osteotomies in pincer FAI and hip dysplasia. In addition, this validation paves way to the large-scale use of this method for prospective trials which longitudinally monitor the effect of reconstructive hip surgery and the natural course of osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Standardizing the Prearthritic Hip Joint Space Width: An Analysis of 994 Hips

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were (1) to define a normal prearthritic hip joint space width (JSW) in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with various degrees of acetabular coverage based on the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and (2) to determine predictors of JSW using patient-specific variables.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of patients presenting to a hip preservation clinic between July 2012 and April 2016, a standard weight-bearing anteroposterior pelvic view was obtained. JSW was defined as the distance between the bony contour of the acetabular rim and femoral head in 2 locations (lateral and medial weight-bearing zone). Hips with severe anatomic deformity, a Tönnis grade >0, or a lateral or medial JSW <2.5 mm were excluded. A linear mixed model analysis was performed in order to determine which variables (age, sex, side, height, weight, symptomatic/asymptomatic, LCEA, and clinical diagnosis) were significantly related to JSW.

RESULTS

A total of 994 hips were included. LCEA was found to be a significant predictor of both the lateral and medial JSW, with a decreased JSW associated with increasing degrees of acetabular bony coverage (P < .02). A mean 0.9 mm (20%) difference in medial JSW was found between patients with frank dysplasia (LCEA <20°) compared with those with pincer-type FAI (LCEA ≥40°). There was no difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips, either for lateral (asymptomatic: 4.51 ± 0.83 mm; symptomatic: 4.52 ± 0.85 mm; P = .58) or medial JSW (asymptomatic: 4.02 ± 0.96 mm; symptomatic: 3.97 ± 0.84 mm; P = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

The LCEA is a significant predictor of hip JSW, with the mean JSW decreasing with increasing degrees of acetabular bony coverage. Joint space is not a major factor in symptomatology in adults with prearthritic hip pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The Iliofemoral Line: A Radiographic Sign of Acetabular Dysplasia in the Adult Hip

BACKGROUND

Several radiographic parameters utilized for the diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia in adults suffer from poor reproducibility and reliability.

PURPOSE

To define and validate a novel radiographic parameter (the iliofemoral line [IFL]) for the detection of frank and borderline hip dysplasia and to compare the sensitivity and specificity of this radiographic marker to those of previously validated qualitative parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 222 adult patients (436 hips) undergoing hip preservation surgery was included. The IFL, which extends from the lateral femoral neck through the inner cortical lip of the iliac crest, intersects the femoral head in cases of dysplasia. Percent medialization of the IFL was defined as the horizontal distance of the exposed femoral head lateral to the IFL, relative to the horizontal femoral head width at the center of the femoral head.

RESULTS

Percent medialization of the IFL was strongly correlated to the lateral center edge angle ( P < .0001). Values of percent medialization ranging from 15% to 22% predicted the presence of borderline hip dysplasia with a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 89%, while values exceeding 22% predicted the presence of frank acetabular dysplasia with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 94%. By comparison, abnormality of the Shenton line demonstrated a sensitivity of 3.7% and specificity of 97% for the detection of borderline dysplasia and a sensitivity of 16% and specificity of 99% for the detection of frank acetabular dysplasia. Compared with the Shenton line, percent medialization of the IFL was significantly more sensitive for the detection of both borderline and frank acetabular dysplasia (both P < .0001). The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the horizontal difference outside the IFL were 0.99 and 0.96, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percent medialization of the IFL is a reliable and accurate radiographic marker of frank acetabular dysplasia and, to a lesser extent, borderline dysplasia. The use of this radiographic parameter as an additional tool may enable the earlier detection of borderline and frank hip dysplasia in young adults presenting with hip pain.