1
|
Liu M, Gao M, Hu Y, Ren X, Li Y, Gao F, Dong J, Dong J, Wang Q. Comparison of the Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. J Pain Res 2024; 17:1651-1661. [PMID: 38736679 PMCID: PMC11086438 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s456880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery (AHS) require good analgesia and early rehabilitation after surgery, and there is no consensus on the optimal nerve block. We aimed to compare the efficacy of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block compared to fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in patients with AHS. Patients and Methods A total of 80 patients receiving AHS under general anesthesia were randomized to receive either FICB (group F) or PENG block in combination with LFCN block (group P). The primary outcomes were the rate of quadriceps weakness after block on the afflicted side, as well as muscle strength grading and pain score after block, and the quality of recovery on the second postoperative day. Results Compared with group F, group P had a lower incidence of quadriceps weakness 48 h after block (76.9% vs 28.2%, P < 0.001), and had less impact on muscle strength grade and lower static pain score at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h after block (P < 0.001), and a lower dynamic pain score at 6 and 12 h after block in group P (p < 0.05). The quality of recovery on the second postoperative day improved (p < 0.05). Conclusion In comparison to FICB, PENG block in combination with LFCN block can affect less quadriceps muscle strength and reduce the use of postoperative analgesics, which is beneficial for the postoperative recovery of AHS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menglin Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mingyang Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yufei Hu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoqin Ren
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fang Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianglong Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiangtao Dong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiujun Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keogh JAJ, Keng I, Ifabiyi M, Patel M, Duong A, Malviya A, Wuerz TH, Ayeni OR. Adhesions After Hip Arthroscopy Are Associated With Revision But Show Poorly Defined Criteria for Diagnosis and Operative Management: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2024:S0749-8063(24)00303-7. [PMID: 38697325 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the current body of evidence surrounding the diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes of adhesions that developed after hip arthroscopy (HA). METHODS A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases was designed and conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies included patients with confirmed adhesions after HA that reported one or more of the following: (1) diagnostic procedures and criteria used; (2) indications for and details surrounding surgical management; and (3) clinical outcomes after the operative management of adhesions (e.g., patient-reported outcome measures). RESULTS Nineteen studies involving a total of 4,145 patients (4,211 hips; 38% female sex) were included in this review. The quality of evidence was found to be fair for both comparative studies (mean, 17; range, 13-21) and noncomparative studies (mean, 10; range, 5-12) according to the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) instrument, with the level of evidence ranging from IIB to IV. Adhesions were often diagnosed intraoperatively at the time of revision surgery (10 of 19 studies, 53%), with only 3 studies specifying the criteria used to adjudicate adhesions. The most common indication for operative management (i.e., release or lysis of adhesions) was persistent pain (9 of 19, 47%), but this was often grossly stated for revision HA rather than being specific to adhesions. Patient-reported outcome measures were the most reported postoperative outcomes (9 of 19, 47%) and generally showed significant improvement from preoperative assessment across the short-term follow-up period (range, 24.5-38.1 months). There was a paucity of objective measures of clinical improvement (3 of 19, 16%) and of mid- and long-term follow-up (i.e., 5-7 years and ≥10 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Despite the growing body of evidence suggesting that adhesions are highly contributory to revision HA, there is ambiguity in the diagnostic approach and indications for operative management of adhesions. Additionally, although the operative management of adhesions after HA has shown satisfactory clinical outcomes in the short term, there is a paucity of research elucidating the mid- to long-term outcomes, as well as minimal use of objective assessment of clinical improvement (e.g., biomechanics). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A J Keogh
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Isabelle Keng
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Muyiwa Ifabiyi
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Mansi Patel
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Andrew Duong
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Ajay Malviya
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Ashington, England
| | - Thomas H Wuerz
- Boston Sports & Shoulder Center, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Olufemi R Ayeni
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Punnoose A, Claydon-Mueller L, Rushton A, Khanduja V. PREHAB FAI- Prehabilitation for patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome -Protocol for an assessor blinded randomised controlled feasibility study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0301194. [PMID: 38603694 PMCID: PMC11008823 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past decade has seen an exponential growth of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Procedures such as hip arthroscopy have rapidly grown and become the standard of care for patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS). Although, the results of such procedures are encouraging, a large proportion of patients do not achieve optimal outcomes due to chronicity and deconditioning as a result of delay in diagnosis and increased waiting times amongst other factors. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials, moderate certainty evidence supported prehabilitation over standard care in optimising several domains including muscle strength, pain and health related quality of life in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical interventions. However, the role of prehabilitation in patients with FAI syndrome undergoing hip arthroscopy has received little attention. AIM To evaluate the feasibility, suitability, acceptability and safety of a prehabilitation programme for FAI to inform a future definitive randomised control trial to assess effectiveness. METHODS A systematically developed prehabilitation intervention based on a literature review and international consensus will be utilised in this study. A mixed methodology encompassing a two-arm randomised parallel study alongside an embedded qualitative component will be used to answer the study objectives. Patients will be recruited from a tertiary referral NHS centre for young adult hip pathology in the UK. Patient reported outcomes such as iHOT-12, Brief Pain Inventory Scale (Short form), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Global Impression of Change score will be obtained alongside objective measurements such as Muscle Strength and Star Excursion Balance Test at various time points. Outcome measures will be obtained at baseline (prior to prehabilitation intervention), after prehabilitation before surgery, and at 6 weeks+/- 4 weeks and 6 months +/- 4 weeks (planned primary endpoint for definitive RCT) postoperatively when participants attend the research site for clinical care and remotely at 12 months +/- 4 weeks postoperatively. Mean change and 95% CI, and effect size of outcome measures will be used to determine the sample size for a future RCT. For the qualitative component, in depth face-to-face semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists and focus groups with participants will be conducted to assess the feasibility, suitability, and acceptability of the prehabilitation intervention using a predetermined success criteria. All qualitative data will be recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. DISCUSSION This study will be first of its kind to evaluate a systematically developed prehabilitation intervention for patients with FAIS undergoing hip arthroscopy. This study will provide important preliminary data to inform feasibility of a definitive RCT in the future to evaluate effectiveness of a prehabilitation intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 15371248, 09/03/2023. TRIAL PROTOCOL Version 2.3, 26th June 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj Punnoose
- Young Adult Hip Service & Physiotherapy Department, Addenbrooke’s- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- School of Allied Health, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alison Rushton
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Vikas Khanduja
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Young Adult Hip Service, Addenbrooke’s – Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Den Hartog TJ, Leary SM, Schaver AL, Parker EA, Westermann RW. The Incidence and Outcomes Following Treatment of Capsulolabral Adhesions in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. THE IOWA ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL 2023; 43:146-155. [PMID: 38213862 PMCID: PMC10777703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Background To perform a systematic review to evaluate the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions following hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI); including risk factors and post-treatment outcomes. Methods Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we queried PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English-language studies with minimum 6-month follow-up after primary or revision HA for FAI, which reported the incidence of capsulolabral adhesions. Potential adhesion risk factors, such as anchor type used and protocol for capsule closure, were assessed. Pre-operative and post-operative modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) values were compared in studies that reported them. Results Thirty-seven articles were included (24 primary HA; 13 revision HA). There were 6747 patients who underwent primary HA (6874 hips; 3005 female, 44%). The incidence of capsulolabral adhesions, confirmed surgically during revision HA, was low. Patients undergoing surgical treatment reported postoperative improvement per modified Harris Hip Scores. Data for 746 patients undergoing second revision HA (761 hips; 449 female, 60%), showed an incidence of adhesions greater than that of primary HA patients. Conclusion While the incidence of symptomatic capsulolabral adhesions after primary hip arthroscopy is low; revision hip arthroscopy is strongly associated with adhesion development. Lysis of adhesions in primary hip arthroscopy patients reliably improved patient-reported outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor J. Den Hartog
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Steven M. Leary
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Andrew L. Schaver
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Emily A. Parker
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Robert W. Westermann
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ruzbarsky JJ, Soares RW, Comfort SM, Arner JW, Philippon MJ. Adhesions in the setting of hip arthroscopy. EFORT Open Rev 2023; 8:792-797. [PMID: 37909708 PMCID: PMC10646518 DOI: 10.1530/eor-21-0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
With the growing number of primary arthroscopies performed, patients requiring revision hip arthroscopies for various issues is high including postoperative adhesion formation, a source of pain, mechanical symptoms, range of motion limitation, stiffness, and microinstability. Adhesions are a consequence of biological pathways that have been stimulated by injury or surgical interventions leading to an increased healing response. Preventative efforts have included surgical adjuncts during/after primary hip arthroscopy, biologic augmentation, and postoperative rehabilitation. Treatment options for adhesion formation includes surgical lysis of adhesions with or without placement of biologic membranes aimed at inhibiting adhesion reformation as well as systemic medications to further reduce the risk. Postoperative rehabilitation exercises have also been demonstrated to prevent adhesions as a result of hip arthroscopy. Ongoing clinical trials are further investigating pathways and prevention of adhesion formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Ruzbarsky
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA
- Steadman Clinic and United States Coalition for the Prevention of Illness and Injury in Sport, Vail, Colorado, USA
| | - Rui W Soares
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Justin W Arner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marc J Philippon
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA
- Steadman Clinic and United States Coalition for the Prevention of Illness and Injury in Sport, Vail, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ruzbarsky JJ, Comfort SM, Martin MD, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Outcomes for Treatment of Capsulolabral Adhesions With a Capsular Spacer During Revision Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:487-493. [PMID: 36661250 DOI: 10.1177/03635465221145704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of adhesions is a common source of pain and dysfunction after hip arthroscopic surgery and an indication for revision surgery. The placement of a capsular spacer in the capsulolabral recess after lysis of adhesions has been developed to treat and prevent the recurrence of adhesions. PURPOSE To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at a minimum of 2 years after revision hip arthroscopic surgery with capsular spacer placement for capsular adhesions. STUDY DESIGN Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS Between January 2013 and June 2018, a total of 95 patients (99 hips) aged ≥18 years underwent revision hip arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of capsular adhesions with the placement of a capsular spacer. Overall, 53 patients (56 hips) met the inclusion criteria and had a minimum 2-year follow-up, forming the cohort of this study. Exclusion criteria included confounding metabolic bone diseases (eg, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, Marfan syndrome), labral deficiency, or advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 2 or 3). Preoperative and postoperative outcome scores (modified Harris Hip Score [mHHS], Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living [HOS-ADL], Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale [HOS-SSS], 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) were collected and compared in addition to the revision rate, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 32 ± 11 years, with 32 female hips (57%) and a median number of previous hip arthroscopic procedures of 1 (range, 1-5). The arthroplasty- and revision-free survivorship rate at 2 years was 91%. Overall, 5 patients (6 hips; 11%) underwent revision surgery at a mean of 2.4 ± 1.4 years after capsular spacer placement, with symptomatic capsular defects being the most common finding. There were 4 patients (7%) who converted to total hip arthroplasty. For hips not requiring subsequent surgery (n = 46), there was a significant improvement in outcome scores except for the SF-12 Mental Component Summary, with rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference of 70%, 70%, and 65% for the mHHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SSS, respectively. CONCLUSION Capsular spacers, as part of a systematic approach including lysis of adhesions with early and consistent postoperative physical therapy including circumduction exercises, resulted in improved PROs as well as high arthroplasty- and revision-free survivorship (91%) at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Capsular spacers should be considered in revision hip arthroscopic procedures when an adequate labral volume remains but adhesions continue to be a concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Ruzbarsky
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.,The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | - Karen K Briggs
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA
| | - Marc J Philippon
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.,The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Curley AJ, Engler ID, Ruh ER, Mauro CS, McClincy MP. Periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy demonstrates improved outcomes in a heterogenous patient population: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 31:2090-2102. [PMID: 35974192 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07108-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the literature on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy (PAO-FHA) for (1) patient demographics and hip morphology, (2) changes in preoperative to postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and (3) PROs in comparison to primary periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) patients. METHODS A systematic literature search of Pubmed, CINAHL/Medline, and cochrane databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The search phrase was "(periacetabular osteotomy or PAO or rotational osteotomy) and (hip arthroscopy or arthroscopic)". The titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened for studies on PAO-FHA. Study quality was assessed, and relevant data were collected. A meta-analysis was not performed due to study heterogeneity. RESULTS The search identified 7 studies, including 151 hips (148 patients, 93.9% female) undergoing PAO-FHA, out of an initial 593 studies, with three Level IV and four Level III studies. Mean time from hip arthroscopy to PAO ranged from 17.0 to 29.6 months. Heterogenous hip morphologies and radiologic findings prior to PAO were observed, though patients most frequently demonstrated moderate-to-severe dysplasia (mean or median lateral center edge angle < 20°) and minimal osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 0 or 1). In all 5 studies that reported concomitant procedures with PAO, femoral and/or acetabular osteoplasty was performed via arthroscopy or arthrotomy. Following PAO-FHA, radiographic acetabular coverage and PROs improved in all 6 studies that reported postoperative outcomes. All four comparative studies of primary PAO vs. PAO-FHA included patients with mean or median LCEAs < 20°, reporting mixed outcomes for the optimal treatment approach. CONCLUSION PAO-FHA is reported in a heterogenous patient population that frequently includes hips with moderate-to-severe dysplasia and minimal osteoarthritis. Regardless of hip morphology or concomitant procedures, all studies that reported postoperative outcomes demonstrated improved PROs following PAO-FHA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Curley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. .,American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Ian D Engler
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Ethan R Ruh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Craig S Mauro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Michael P McClincy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Peripheral Nerve Block for Hip Arthroscopy Does Not Have any Clinical Advantage Compared With Local Anesthetic Regarding Pain Management: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy 2022; 38:2007-2017. [PMID: 34920002 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of peripheral nerve block on reduction in opioid consumption and pain control after hip arthroscopy. METHOD To identify studies evaluating the effects of peripheral nerve block on pain control and reduction in opioid consumption in hip arthroscopy, we searched all records in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until May 2021. Studies with the following characteristics were considered eligible: 1) patients who underwent a hip arthroscopy (population); 2) patients who received peripheral nerve block (intervention); 3) patients who did not receive peripheral nerve block (comparator); 4) record of total opioid consumption as a primary outcome and pain level at 1, 3 to 6, and 24 hours after surgery, patient satisfaction, and incidence of nausea and vomiting as secondary outcomes (outcomes); and 5) randomized controlled trial (study design). Data were independently extracted by two reviewers and synthesized using a random or fixed-effects model, according to the heterogeneity. RESULTS Eight RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hours (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.091, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.270, 0.089]) or in visual analog scale (VAS) score at 1 (SMD = 0.299, 95% CI [-0.758, 0.160]), 3 to 6 (SMD = -0.304, 95% CI [-0.655, 0.047]), and 24 (SMD = -0.230, 95% CI [-0.520, 0.060]) hours postoperatively between the peripheral nerve block and control groups. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in patient satisfaction (SMD < 0.001, 95% CI [-0.284, 0.284]) or the incidence of nausea and vomiting (SMD = 0.808, 95% CI [0.311, 2.104]) between the two groups. CONCLUSION Peripheral nerve block for hip arthroscopy has no clinical advantage regarding pain management after surgery when compared with the group that received the local infiltration of analgesics without peripheral nerve block. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, meta-analysis of level I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Collapse
|
9
|
Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Arthrography of Post-Arthroscopy Hip Instability Demonstrates Increased Effective Intracapsular Volume and Anterosuperior Capsular Changes. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e1999-e2006. [PMID: 34977659 PMCID: PMC8689270 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To quantify the magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) capsular morphologic findings associated with postarthroscopy hip instability. Methods Among patients with clinically significant iatrogenic hip instability at a single center, patients with preindex and postindex surgery MRAs were identified. These MRAs were compared regarding effective intracapsular volume calculated by semi-automated 3-dimensional pixel intensity region segmentation, 2-dimensional anterior proximal intracapsular area in the femoral neck axial plane reconstruction, maximal anterior fluid pocket depth, capsule retraction distance, and capsular instability grade. Morphological measurements were conducted using Horos image processing software. Paired t-test, paired Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the McNemar test were used for identifying statistical significance. Results In 42 patients, mean effective intracapsular volume was significantly greater in the postindex surgery MRAs (19.44 cm3 vs 17.26 cm3; P = .006). Proximal anterosuperior (12-3 o'clock) intracapsular area was also significantly greater after index surgery (2.84 cm2 vs 1.43 cm2; P < .001. Proximal anteroinferior (3-6 o'clock) intracapsular area (1.34 cm2 vs 0.97 cm2; P = .002), capsule deficiency grade (P < .001), anterior capsule retraction distance (4.83 mm vs 0.34 mm; P < .001), and maximum anterior fluid depth (8.33 mm vs 4.90 mm; P <.001) were also significantly increased after index surgery. Conclusion In comparison to the preoperative state, iatrogenic hip instability is associated with MRA findings that include increases in total effective intracapsular volume, proximal anterosuperior and anteroinferior intracapsular cross-sectional area, maximum proximal anterosuperior fluid depth, and capsule retraction distance. Level of Evidence Level IV, diagnostic case series.
Collapse
|
10
|
Feingold JD, Swartwout EL, Roberts SA, Nwachukwu BU, Ranawat AS. Failure to Achieve Threshold Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Within 1 Year Has a Predictive Risk of Subsequent Hip Surgery Within 5 Years of Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Case-Control Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211053012. [PMID: 34805421 PMCID: PMC8600560 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211053012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Research has identified factors that influence achievement rates of threshold
scores on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after hip arthroscopy.
However, little data exist on whether failure to achieve a threshold score
(minimal clinically important difference [MCID] or substantial clinical
benefit [SCB]) in the short term after hip arthroscopy predicts the risk of
future hip surgery. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine if failure to achieve the MCID or
SCB on PROMs within 1 year of hip arthroscopy can be considered a risk
factor for repeat surgery within 5 years of primary hip arthroscopy. It was
hypothesized that failure to achieve threshold scores would increase the
risk of subsequent hip surgery. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was completed. Four
PROMs were collected preoperatively and within 1 year of hip arthroscopy:
modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip
Outcome Score–Sports, and the 33-Item International Hip Outcome Tool. Results: Two cohorts were formed: (1) a study cohort (n = 88) composed of patients who
underwent repeat hip surgery within 5 years of hip arthroscopy and (2) a
control cohort (n = 288) composed of patients who did not require repeat hip
surgery. The study cohort had significantly (P < .001)
lower scores on all postoperative PROMs, and a significantly
(P < .001) smaller percentage of the study cohort
met the MCID and SCB. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that
not achieving the MCID or SCB on each of the PROMs is an independent risk
factor for repeat hip surgery. For every PROM in which a patient failed to
achieve the MCID, the odds of subsequent surgery increased by 1.68 (95% CI,
1.42-1.98; P < .001). For every PROM in which a patient
failed to achieve the SCB, the odds of subsequent surgery increased by 1.63
(95% CI, 1.35-1.97; P < .001). Conclusion: Failure to meet threshold scores on PROMs after hip arthroscopy was an
independent risk factor for subsequent hip surgery. This study establishes a
novel utility of PROMs and confirms the importance of these metrics in the
orthopaedic literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob D. Feingold
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Jacob D. Feingold, BS, Hospital for Special Surgery, 541 E 71st
Street, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10021, USA (
)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cooper JD, Dekker TJ, Ruzbarsky JJ, Pierpoint LA, Soares RW, Philippon MJ. Autograft Versus Allograft: The Evidence in Hip Labral Reconstruction and Augmentation. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:3575-3581. [PMID: 34665988 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211042633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Labral augmentation and labral reconstruction have emerged as essential procedures for restoring the anatomic and functional characteristics of the hip joint in patients with a deficient hip labrum or irreparable labral tear. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare allograft and autograft hip labral reconstruction and augmentation. We hypothesized that autografts would entail fewer revision arthroscopic procedures. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS Patients were identified who underwent labral reconstruction or labral augmentation using iliotibial band (ITB) allograft or ITB autograft performed by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2017. Patient-reported outcome measures collected before surgery and at minimum 2-year follow-up included the following: Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Hip Outcome Score Sports-Specific Subscale and, at follow-up, patient satisfaction (range, 1-10, with 10 being very satisfied). Patients followed a standardized rehabilitation protocol after surgery with relative individualization to address each patient's needs. For continuous variables, comparisons between allografts and autografts were made using Student t tests or Mann-Whitney tests. Categorical comparisons were assessed using chi-square or Fisher exact test. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine the influence of graft choice on risk of revision or THA. RESULTS A total of 205 hips met 2-year inclusion criteria. ITB allografts were used for 55 patients (37 augmentations, 18 reconstructions) and ITB autografts for 150 patients (34 augmentations, 116 reconstructions). Females represented a greater proportion of allograft versus autograft patients (71% vs 46%, respectively; P = .001). Overall, autograft patients had larger alpha angles (66.6° vs 59.1°; P = .001) and longer grafts (46 vs 41 mm; P = .03) compared with allograft patients. A total of 13 (23.6%) patients required revision surgery in the allograft group compared with 11 (7.3%) in the autograft group (P < .001). After controlling for sex, procedure (reconstruction vs augmentation), and previous surgery, the odds of revision were higher for allograft patients (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-11.6). No significant differences in conversion to THA were observed between groups (allograft = 9%; autograft = 6%; P = .50), even after adjustment for the above covariates (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.6-7.9). No differences in postoperative patient-reported outcome measures or patient satisfaction were observed between groups. CONCLUSION Labral augmentation or reconstruction with autograft has a significantly lower revision rate than labral augmentation or reconstruction with allograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Rui W Soares
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Field R. Editorial. J Hip Preserv Surg 2021; 8:213-214. [PMID: 35414947 PMCID: PMC8994102 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnac010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Field
- Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, St George's University of London
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beck EC, Nwachukwu BU, Chahla J, Clapp IM, Jan K, Nho SJ. Complete Capsular Closure Provides Higher Rates of Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement and Higher Survivorship Versus Partial Closure After Hip Arthroscopy at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:1833-1842. [PMID: 33529782 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (1) compare the rates of reaching threshold hip-specific outcome scores for achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients who underwent partial versus complete T-capsulotomy repair and (2) identify the failure rates in each group 5 years after undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). METHODS Data from consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS performed by a single fellowship-trained surgeon from January 2011 to March 2013 were collected and analyzed. Baseline data, hip-specific outcomes, and clinical failure rates were recorded at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Patients with partial T-capsulotomy repair were matched 1:3 by age, body mass index, and sex to patients with complete T-capsulotomy repair. Threshold scores for achieving the MCID and PASS were calculated and compared between the 2 groups. Additionally, rates of revision and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were compared between the groups. RESULTS A total of 379 patients were available for analysis (39 partial and 340 complete repairs), with 100 patients included in the matching process (25 in the partial-repair group and 75 in the complete-repair group). Comparison of radiographic parameters, including the Tönnis grade, alpha angle, and lateral center-edge angle, between the 2 groups showed no statistically significant difference (P > .05 for all). Comparison of postoperative score averages between the partial- and complete-closure groups showed a significant difference in the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living Subscale (85.4 ± 17.7 vs 94.6 ± 7.8, P < .001), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (76.6 ± 26.2 vs 89.3 ± 16.8, P = .034), modified Harris Hip Score (83.2 ± 19.7 vs 90.5 ± 11.2, P = .035), and visual analog scale pain score (24.5 ± 30.8 vs 13.4 ± 15.8, P = .035). A total of 65 complete-repair patients (95.6%) achieved the MCID for at least 1 outcome measure versus 18 patients with partial repair (78.3%) (P = .04). A total of 69 complete-repair patients (92%) achieved the PASS for at least 1 outcome measure versus 18 partial-repair patients (72%) (P = .017). Of the 39 partial-repair patients, 35.9% (n = 14) underwent revision or conversion to THA, as compared with 2.9% (n = 10) in the overall cohort. CONCLUSIONS At a minimum 5-year follow-up, patients with complete capsular closure after hip arthroscopy for FAIS show superior long-term outcomes and achieve higher rates of meaningful clinical success when compared with patients with partial capsular closure. Furthermore, patients with partial capsular repair undergo revision or conversion to THA at high rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Beck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A..
| | - Benedict U Nwachukwu
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Jorge Chahla
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Ian M Clapp
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Kyleen Jan
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Shane J Nho
- Division of Sports Medicine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kaplan DJ, Samim M, Burke CJ, Baron SL, Meislin RJ, Youm T. Decreased Hip Labral Width Measured via Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Inferior Outcomes for Arthroscopic Labral Repair for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:98-107. [PMID: 32828937 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the association between labral width as measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and hip-specific validated patient self-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. METHODS We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively gathered hip arthroscopy patients from 2010 to 2017. The inclusion criteria were defined as patients aged 18 to 65 years with radiographic evidence of femoroacetabular impingement who underwent a primary labral repair and had a minimum of 2 years' clinical follow-up. The exclusion criteria were defined as inadequate preoperative imaging, prior hip surgery, Tönnis grade 1 or higher, or lateral center-edge angle lower than 25°. An a priori power analysis was performed. MRI measurements of labral width were conducted by 2 blinded, musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologists at standardized "clock-face" locations using a previously validated technique. Outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). For the mHHS, scores of 8 and 74 were used to define the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state, respectively. Patients were divided into groups by a labral width less than 1 SD below the mean (hypoplastic) or widths above 1 SD below the mean. Statistical analysis was performed using linear and polynomial regression; the Mann-Whitney U, χ2, and Fisher exact tests; and intraclass correlation coefficient testing. RESULTS A total of 103 patients (107 hips) met the inclusion criteria (mean age, 39.4 ± 17 years; body mass index, 25.0 ± 4; 51% right sided; 68% female patients; mean follow-up, 76.5 ± 19.1 months [range, 30.0-113.0 months]). Mean labral width at the 11:30 clock-face position (indirect rectus), 3-o'clock position (psoas U), and 1:30 clock-face position (point halfway between the 2 aforementioned positions) was 7.1 ± 2.2 mm, 7.0 ± 2.0 mm, and 5.5 ± 1.9 mm, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient agreements were good to excellent between readers at all positions (0.83-0.91, P < .001). The preoperative HHS, mHHS, and NAHS were not statistically significantly different (P > .05) between the 2 groups. Sex, laterality, and body mass index were not predictive of outcomes (P > .05). The postoperative HHS, mHHS, and NAHS were found to be significantly lower in the hypoplastic group at each location tested (P < .01), including the mHHS at the 11:30 clock-face position (69 vs 87), 3-o'clock position (70 vs 87), and 1:30 clock-face position (71 vs 87). The proportion of patients with hypoplastic labra who reached the minimal clinically important difference was significantly lower (P < .001) at the 11:30 clock-face position (50% vs 91%), 3-o'clock position (56% vs 90%), and 1:30 clock-face position (58% vs 91%) in comparison to the non-hypoplastic labrum group. The proportion of patients with hypoplastic labra above the patient acceptable symptomatic state was significantly lower (P < .001) at the 11:30 clock-face position (44% vs 83%), 3-o'clock position (37.5% vs 84%), and 1:30 clock-face position (42% vs 85%) in comparison to the non-hypoplastic labrum group. Linear regression modeling was not significant at any position (P > .05). Polynomial regression was significant at the 11:30 clock-face position (R2 = 0.23, P < .001), 3-o'clock position (R2 = 0.17, P < .001), and 1:30 clock-face position (R2 = 0.26, P < .004). CONCLUSIONS Hip labral width less than 1 SD below the mean measured via preoperative MRI was associated with significantly worse functional outcomes after arthroscopic labral repair and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. The negative relation between labral width and outcomes may be nonlinear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, case series with subgroup analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Kaplan
- Orthopaedic Department, Division of Sports Medicine, New York Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A.
| | - Mohammad Samim
- Radiology Department, Musculoskeletal Division, New York Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Christopher J Burke
- Radiology Department, Musculoskeletal Division, New York Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Samuel L Baron
- Orthopaedic Department, Division of Sports Medicine, New York Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Robert J Meislin
- Orthopaedic Department, Division of Sports Medicine, New York Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Thomas Youm
- Orthopaedic Department, Division of Sports Medicine, New York Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dwyer T, Whelan D, Shah PS, Ajrawat P, Hoit G, Chahal J. Author reply to "Regarding 'Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Meta-analysis of Short-Term Outcomes'". Arthroscopy 2020; 36:2786-2787. [PMID: 32442712 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Dwyer
- Young Adult Hip Innovation Program, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Whelan
- Young Adult Hip Innovation Program, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Prakesh S Shah
- Department of Paediatrics and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Mount Sinai Hospital (New York) and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Graeme Hoit
- Young Adult Hip Innovation Program, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaskarndip Chahal
- Young Adult Hip Innovation Program, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dumont GD, Land J, Battle NC, Glenn RL, Menge TJ, Thier ZT. Factors associated with high pain catastrophizing in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020; 7:483-486. [PMID: 33948203 PMCID: PMC8081422 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if physical, mental health and patient-specific factors are associated with increased Pain Catastrophizing in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were included if they completed a standard pre-operative questionnaire which included the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), VAS and 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical and Mental Composite Scores. Patient-specific variables including age, gender, BMI, tobacco use, number of allergies, pre-operative opioid use and diagnosis of depression or anxiety were recorded. Multiple linear regression was performed to assess for a relationship between physical and mental health scores, patient-specific variables, and a 'High Catastrophizing' PCS score. One-hundred and sixty-eight patients were included in this study. Patients with a PCS score of 22 or above were categorized as 'High Catastrophizing'. The variables included in the multiple linear regression model statistically significantly predicted high pain catastrophizing, F(10,149) = 4.75, P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.4. SF-12 Physical and Mental Composite Scores and a mental health illness diagnosis added statistically significantly to the prediction, P < 0.005. Pre-operative hip arthroscopy patients with better general physical and mental health, as measured by the SF-12, and those without mental health illness are less likely to having higher pain catastrophizing scores. Age, gender, BMI, visual analog pain scale (VAS), tobacco use, number of allergies and pre-operative opioid use were not independently associated with elevated pain catastrophizing scores. These findings may be helpful when interpreting PCS scores and counseling patients prior to arthroscopic hip surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume D Dumont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 14 Medical Park, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29206, USA
| | - Joel Land
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 14 Medical Park, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29206, USA
| | - Nicole C Battle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 14 Medical Park, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29206, USA
| | - Rachel L Glenn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 14 Medical Park, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29206, USA
| | - Travis J Menge
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spectrum Health/Michigan State University, 4100 Lake Dr SE Suite 300, Grand Rapids, MI 49546, USA
| | - Zachary T Thier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, 14 Medical Park, Suite 200, Columbia, SC 29206, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dick AG, Smith C, Bankes MJK, George M. The impact of mental health disorders on outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020; 7:195-204. [PMID: 33163204 PMCID: PMC7605775 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) has been shown to be beneficial in the short- to medium-term though outcomes vary between individuals. Multiple factors have been suggested to affect outcomes including pre-operative mental health disorders. We undertook a systematic review to assess the evidence relating to the effect of pre-existing mental health disorders on the outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAI. Following PRISMA guidelines, a multi-database search was undertaken using three key concepts: 'mental health', 'FAI' and 'hip arthroscopy'. Results were screened and data extracted from relevant studies. A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria including 2248 hips, all published between 2017 and 2019. All studies were of evidence level III or IV with reasonable methodological quality. One study demonstrated pre-operative depression to be related to altered pain reduction in the short-term following surgery. Three studies reported inferior outcomes in the medium-term (1-2 years) in those with worse mental health. One study demonstrated an increased risk of persistent pain 2 years following surgery and one a reduced chance of returning to active military service following surgery in those with worse mental health. Despite inferior outcomes individuals with mental health disorders did still benefit from surgery in general. In conclusion, the presence of pre-existing poor mental health is associated with inferior outcomes in the medium-term following arthroscopic surgery for FAI. Surgeons should consider screening patients for mental health disorders before surgery and counselling them appropriately as to the potential for less satisfactory surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair G Dick
- Department of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Smith
- Department of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Marcus J K Bankes
- Department of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Marc George
- Department of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weber AE, Nakata H, Mayer EN, Bolia IK, Philippon MJ, Snibbe J, Romano R, Tibone JE, Gamradt SC. Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in NCAA Division I Athletes: Experience at a Single Institution. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8:2325967120918383. [PMID: 32548179 PMCID: PMC7249579 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120918383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The rate of return to sport after surgical treatment of femoroacetabular
impingement (FAI) syndrome (FAIS) has been studied in high-level athletes.
However, few studies examining this rate have focused exclusively on
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes. Purpose: To evaluate the return-to-sport rate after hip arthroscopy for FAIS and to
examine the influence of sport type on the clinical presentation of FAIS in
collegiate athletes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Included in this study were NCAA Division I student-athletes who underwent
hip arthroscopy for FAIS at our institution between 2010 and 2017. Exclusion
criteria were history of previous hip pathology, pediatric hip disease,
radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade >0), prior lower
extremity procedure, history of chronic pain, osteoporosis, or history of
systemic inflammatory disease. Athletes were categorized into 6 subgroups
based on the type of sport (cutting, contact, endurance, impingement,
asymmetric/overhead, and flexibility) by using a previously reported
classification system. Patient characteristics and preoperative,
intraoperative, and return-to-sport variables were compared among sport
types. Results: A total of 49 hip arthroscopies for FAIS were performed in 39 collegiate
athletes (10 females, 29 males; mean age, 19.5 ± 1.3 years). A total of 1
(2.6%) cutting athlete, 15 (38.5%) contact athletes, 8 (20.5%) impingement
athletes, 6 (15.4%) asymmetric/overhead athletes, and 9 (23.1%) endurance
athletes were included in the study. There were no differences among sports
groups with respect to the FAI type. Endurance athletes had lower rates of
femoral osteochondroplasty (45.5%) and labral debridement (0.0%)
(P < .0001). Contact sport athletes had higher rates
of labral debridement (50.0%; P < .0001). Patients were
evaluated for return to sport at an average of 1.96 ± 0.94 years. Overall,
the return-to-sport rate was 89.7%. There were no differences in
return-to-sport rates based on the sport type except for endurance athletes,
who returned at a lower rate (66.6%; P < .001). No
differences in return-to-sport rate (P = .411), duration
after return (P = .265), or highest attempted level of
sport resumed (P = .625) were found between patients who
underwent labral repair versus debridement. Conclusion: Collegiate-level athletes who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS returned to
sport at high and predictable rates, with endurance athletes possibly
returning to sport at lower rates than all other sport types. Surgical
procedures may be influenced by sport type, but the rate of return to sport
between athletes who underwent labral debridement versus labral repair was
similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E Weber
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Haley Nakata
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eric N Mayer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ioanna K Bolia
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marc J Philippon
- The Steadman Clinic and Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA
| | - Jason Snibbe
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Russ Romano
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - James E Tibone
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Seth C Gamradt
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arriaza CR, Sampson TG, Olivos Meza A, Mendez-Vides AC. Findings on repaired full-thickness acetabular articular cartilage defects during revision hip arthroscopy allowing a second look. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020; 7:122-129. [PMID: 32382439 PMCID: PMC7195933 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnz065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Full-thickness acetabular articular cartilage defects (FAACD) are found on most hips with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with a wave sign in the acetabulum. When not repaired it can produce pain and catching sensation. Multiple arthroscopic techniques for repairing this chondral lesion exist, but only few show the quality of the repair on a second look. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of the repaired cartilage during revision hip arthroscopy (RHA) allowing a second look in patients treated of FAACD. A total of 13 hips with FAACD repaired in the past underwent RHA for ongoing pain. Signs of persistent chondral defects or the ability to elevate the articular cartilage from subchondral bone were evaluated by zones. Those with persistent defects were re-repaired. All patients had FAACD lesions in zones I, II and III diagnosed in the index hip arthroscopy. The most common finding at the RHA was the presence of bone growth or residual impingement. Before FAACD repair, 11 (85%) hips had the wave sign, while 2 (15%) hips had it in RHA. Five (38%) hips had residual delamination in the second look, these patients had residual FAI, were ≥58 years or waited >6 months to be revised. The wave sign was not observed in 85% of the revised hips, indicating the technique was successful in most cases and was not the principal cause of their ongoing pain. This technique achieved the stated goal of stabilizing the articular cartilage seen in the wave sign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos R Arriaza
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Herrera Llerandi, Guatemala City, Guatemala.,Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitaciœn LGII, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Thomas G Sampson
- Hip Arthroscopy Post Street Surgery Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anell Olivos Meza
- Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitaciœn LGII, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular Incompetency. Arthroscopy 2020; 36:127-136. [PMID: 31864565 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy for failure to improve with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative evidence of a capsular incompetency as compared with (1) patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy without evidence of a capsular incompetency and (2) patients undergoing primary surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at a minimum follow up of 2 years. METHODS Data from consecutive patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with MRI/arthrogram-confirmed capsular incompetency between January 2012 and June 2016 were analyzed. All revision patients with capsular incompetency was matched 1:1 by age and body mass index to FAIS revision patients without capsular incompetency and primary FAIS patients. Outcomes included the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living (ADL), HOS-Sports Subscale (SS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), pain, and satisfaction. The minimal clinically important difference was calculated for HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and mHHS. RESULTS In total, 49 patients (54.4%) of 90 undergoing revision hip arthroscopy had MRI evidence of a capsular incompetency. Most patients were female (79.6%), with a mean age of 30 ± 10.5 years and body mass index of 25.7 ± 5.5. The difference among pre- and postoperative HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS, and visual analog scale score for pain were all statistically significant (P < .05). Analysis of reported outcomes among matched groups demonstrated statistically significant differences, with the group undergoing primary surgery having the greatest 2-year outcomes. Only 66.7% of patients undergoing revision surgery with capsular incompetency achieved a minimal clinically important difference; however, there was no significant difference when compared with revision patients without capsular incompetency. When compared with patients undergoing primary surgery, the difference in frequency was statistically significant (66.7% vs 91.3%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS More than one half of patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy had MRI and intraoperative evidence of capsular incompetency. Revision arthroscopy for capsular incompetency results in significantly improved 2-year outcomes. However, patients undergoing revision for capsular incompetency and intact capsule revision patients reported significantly lower outcomes compared with primary patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.
Collapse
|
21
|
Heterotopic ossification: radiological and pathological review. Radiol Oncol 2019; 53:275-284. [PMID: 31553710 PMCID: PMC6765162 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2019-0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Heterotopic Ossification (HO) is a common condition referring to ectopic bone formation in soft tissues. It has two major etiologies, acquired (more common) and genetic. The acquired form is closely related to tissue trauma. The exact pathogenesis of this disease remains unclear; however, there is ongoing research in prophylactic and therapeutic treatments that is promising. Conclusions Due to HO potential to cause disability, it is so important to differentiate it from other causes in order to establish the best possible management.
Collapse
|
22
|
Nho SJ, Beck EC, Kunze KN, Okoroha K, Suppauksorn S. Contemporary Management of the Hip Capsule During Arthroscopic Hip Preservation Surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019; 12:260-270. [PMID: 31278565 PMCID: PMC6684827 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-019-09564-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The importance of the hip capsule and its effect on hip biomechanics, functional outcomes, and hip arthroscopy success rates has been demonstrated in recent studies. These results have led to a shift in management of the hip capsule, where an increasing number of surgeons routinely perform complete capsular closure. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent studies evaluating the hip capsule and describe contemporary capsular management and repair. RECENT FINDINGS Biomechanical studies using cadaveric models have demonstrated that complete capsular closure restores hip distraction, rotation, and extension forces back to the native, intact state. Additionally, capsular closure by plication results in quantifiable intraarticular volume reduction, which increases hip stability, particularly in cases of patulous capsule and hypermobility. Clinical studies have demonstrated superior patient-reported functional outcomes and decreased failure rates when undergoing hip arthroscopy with comprehensive capsular management for femoroacetabular impingement surgery. Complete capsular management, including appropriate capsulotomy and subsequent closure, is critical for restoring biomechanical properties of the hip, ensuring high survivorship and improving functional outcomes. This review provides an update on the effects of contemporary capsular management as well as a detailed description of efficient T-capsulotomy and comprehensive capsule closure via plication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane J. Nho
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - Edward C. Beck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC USA
| | - Kyle N. Kunze
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - Kelechi Okoroha
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - Sunikom Suppauksorn
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Webb MSL, Devitt BM, O'Donnell JM. Preserving the chondrolabral junction reduces the rate of capsular adhesions. J Hip Preserv Surg 2019; 6:50-54. [PMID: 31069095 PMCID: PMC6501442 DOI: 10.1093/jhps/hnz005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The operative treatment of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has become an increasingly more common procedure. Classically, the labrum is incised at the chondrolabral junction (CLJ), or a concurrent tear is extended to allow access to the acetabular rim facilitating acetabuloplasty. The labrum is subsequently repaired using suture anchors. More recently, acetabuloplasty has been performed without incising the labrum and negating the need to use suture anchors. The aim of this study is to determine whether preserving the CLJ reduces the incidence of revision hip arthroscopy for the treatment of capsulolabral adhesions. This retrospective study compared two cohorts of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for pincer-type FAI from August 2002 to April 2015. The groups analysed were patients undergoing acetabuloplasty with labral repair (LR) and those with no labral repair (NLR). The revision rates and causes for revision were compared using the χ2 analysis. There were 1010 cases in total. Acetabuloplasty with LR was performed in 546 hips (519 patients), while acetabuloplasty with NLR was performed in 464 hips (431 patients). In the LR group, there were 54 (9.9%) revisions, 25 (46%) of which were due to capsulolabral adhesions. The NLR group had 36 (7.8%) revisions with six (17%) due to capsulolabral adhesions. Preserving the CLJ, thereby avoiding the need for drilling and the insertion of suture anchors, when performing an acetabuloplasty for pincer-type FAI, significantly reduces the rate of symptomatic adhesions requiring revision arthroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S L Webb
- Hip Arthroscopy Australia, 21 Erin Street, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.,Trauma & Orthopaedic Department, St. George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London, UK
| | - Brian M Devitt
- OrthoSport Victoria, Level 5, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - John M O'Donnell
- Hip Arthroscopy Australia, 21 Erin Street, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Leong NL, Clapp IM, Neal WH, Beck E, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ. The Influence of Pain in Other Major Joints and the Spine on 2-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2018; 34:3196-3201. [PMID: 30396799 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether patients who have pain in other major joints or the spine have poorer postsurgical outcomes than patients without comorbid orthopaedic pain. METHODS We performed a review of a prospectively maintained institutional surgical registry of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between January 1, 2012, and July 16, 2015, by a single surgeon, with a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. A musculoskeletal morbidity (MSM) score was assigned to each patient preoperatively based on the presence of pain in other joints and the spine (grade 1, hip only; grade 2, hip and other major joints without spine; grade 3, hip with spine; and grade 4, hip and other major joints with spine). Preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively, functional outcomes were measured using the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and the percentages of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) were calculated. RESULTS In total, 821 patients were identified, of whom 700 (85.3%) completed 2-year follow-up. Preoperatively, MSM grade 1 patients had a higher HOS-ADL than grade 2 patients (P = .02), but there was no difference between grade 1 and grade 3 patients (P = .63) or between grade 1 and grade 4 patients (P = .14). Likewise, there was no difference in the preoperative HOS-ADL among grades 2, 3, and 4. Patients with MSM grades 1 and 2 were younger than those with grades 3 and 4. At 2 years postoperatively, MSM grade 1 patients had higher HOS-ADL values than grade 3 (P = .01) and grade 4 (P = .02) but not grade 2 (P = .07) patients. Overall, 84% of patients showed an MCID and 72% of patients achieved a PASS with regard to the HOS-ADL. There were no statistically significant differences among MSM grades in terms of the MCID or PASS. CONCLUSIONS Overall, 84% of patients improved with hip arthroscopy by MCID criteria for the HOS-ADL. Patients with no pain in other joints (MSM grade 1) had better 2-year postoperative HOS-ADL values after hip arthroscopy than patients with spine pain (grades 3 and 4). However, there were no significant differences in the MCID or PASS among patients with regard to MSM grade. A total of 40.5% of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy had pain in another joint. A limitation, however, is that there is potential for a type II error, in that there may not have been a sufficient number of patients studied to detect a significant difference in outcome among patients with different grades of musculoskeletal comorbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie L Leong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
| | - Ian M Clapp
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - William H Neal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Edward Beck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Charles A Bush-Joseph
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| | - Shane J Nho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
de Sa D, Lian J, Sheean AJ, Inman K, Drain N, Ayeni O, Mauro C. A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6:2325967118796222. [PMID: 30320142 PMCID: PMC6154262 DOI: 10.1177/2325967118796222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a rapidly growing body of literature on the topic of hip arthroscopic surgery. PURPOSE To provide an overall summary of systematic reviews published on the indications, complications, techniques, outcomes, and information related to hip arthroscopic surgery. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A systematic review of all hip arthroscopic surgery-related systematic reviews published between January 2000 and May 2018 was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. Narrative reviews and non-English articles were excluded. RESULTS A total of 837 articles were found, of which 85 met the inclusion criteria. Included articles were summarized and divided into 6 major categories based on the subject of the review: femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), non-FAI indications, surgical technique, outcomes, complications, and miscellaneous. CONCLUSION A summary of systematic reviews on hip arthroscopic surgery can provide surgeons with a single source for the most current synopsis of the available literature. As the prevalence of orthopaedic surgeons performing hip arthroscopic surgery increases, updated evidence-based guidelines must likewise be advanced and understood to ensure optimal patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren de Sa
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jayson Lian
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew J Sheean
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathleen Inman
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicholas Drain
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olufemi Ayeni
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Craig Mauro
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|